Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Production of K+K− pairs through the decay of ϕ mesons

Xin-Nan Zhu1,2,3,*, Xin-Li Sheng4,†, and Defu Hou1,‡

  • 1Institute of Particle Physics and Key Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics (MOS), Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • 2Institut für Theoretische Physik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe–Universität, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, D–60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 3Helmholtz Research Academy Hesse for FAIR, Campus Riedberg, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 12, D–60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 4Università degli studi di Firenze and INFN Sezione di Firenze, Via Giovanni Sansone 1, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Florence), Italy

  • *Contact author: zxn19980402@mails.ccnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: sheng@fi.infn.it
  • ‡Contact author: houdf@ccnu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 056011 – Published 11 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7s6h-r457

Abstract

We develop a theoretical framework for the production of K+K− pairs through the decay of ϕ mesons produced from a thermal background, based on the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model. The differential production rate of K+K− is related to the self-energy of the ϕ meson, incorporating the contributions of the quark loop at leading order and the kaon loop at next-to-leading order in the 1/Nc expansion. We numerically evaluate the invariant mass spectrum of the K+K− pair both in vacuum and at finite temperature. The inclusion of the kaon loop results in a finite width of the spectrum, improving agreement with experimental data. We also investigate the spin alignment of the ϕ meson induced by its motion relative to the thermal background. In the NJL model with only chiral condensates, we find that deviations from the unpolarized limit of 1/3 are negligible.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (61)

  1. Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102301 (2005); 96, 039901(E) (2006).
  2. Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 629, 20 (2005).
  3. W. Florkowski, A. Kumar, and R. Ryblewski, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 108, 103709 (2019).
  4. J.-H. Gao, Z.-T. Liang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Lect. Notes Phys. 987, 195 (2021).
  5. F. Becattini and M. A. Lisa, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 395 (2020).
  6. F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, T. Niida, S. Pu, A.-H. Tang, and Q. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430006 (2024).
  7. T. Niida and S. A. Voloshin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430010 (2024).
  8. J.-H. Chen, Z.-T. Liang, Y.-G. Ma, X.-L. Sheng, and Q. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 211001 (2025).
  9. STAR Collaboration, Nature (London) 548, 62 (2017).
  10. J. Adam et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 98, 014910 (2018).
  11. F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal, and S. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 95, 054902 (2017).
  12. Y.-G. Yang, R.-H. Fang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034917 (2018).
  13. M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR Collaboration), Nature (London) 614, 244 (2023).
  14. X.-L. Sheng, L. Oliva, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 096005 (2020); 105, 099903(E) (2022).
  15. X.-L. Xia, H. Li, X.-G. Huang, and H. Zhong Huang, Phys. Lett. B 817, 136325 (2021).
  16. X.-L. Sheng, S.-Y. Yang, Y.-L. Zou, and D. Hou, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 299 (2024).
  17. M. Wei and M. Huang, Chin. Phys. C 47, 104105 (2023).
  18. A. Kumar, D.-L. Yang, and P. Gubler, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054038 (2024).
  19. P. H. De Moura, K. J. Goncalves, and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034032 (2023).
  20. F. Sun, J. Shao, R. Wen, K. Xu, and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116017 (2024).
  21. H.-L. Chen, W.-j. Fu, X.-G. Huang, and G.-L. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 032302 (2025).
  22. Z.-H. Zhang, X.-G. Huang, F. Becattini, and X.-L. Sheng, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 224.
  23. S.-Z. Yang, X.-Q. Xie, S. Pu, J.-H. Gao, and Q. Wang, arXiv:2412.19400.
  24. Y. Liang and S. Lin, Chin. Phys. C 49, 084105 (2025).
  25. X.-L. Sheng, L. Oliva, Z.-T. Liang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 042304 (2023).
  26. X.-L. Sheng, L. Oliva, Z.-T. Liang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036004 (2024).
  27. X.-L. Sheng, S. Pu, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 108, 054902 (2023).
  28. A. Kumar, B. Müller, and D.-L. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 076025 (2023).
  29. A. Kumar, B. Müller, and D.-L. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 016020 (2023).
  30. D.-L. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 056005 (2025).
  31. X.-L. Sheng, Y.-Q. Zhao, S.-W. Li, F. Becattini, and D. Hou, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056047 (2024).
  32. Y.-Q. Zhao, X.-L. Sheng, S.-W. Li, and D. Hou, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 070.
  33. E. Grossi, A. Palermo, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. C 111, 014914 (2025).
  34. K. Schilling, P. Seyboth, and G. E. Wolf, Nucl. Phys. B15, 397 (1970); B18, 332(E) (1970).
  35. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  36. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961).
  37. U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27, 195 (1991).
  38. S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
  39. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
  40. M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
  41. M. K. Volkov and A. E. Radzhabov, Phys. Usp. 49, 551 (2006).
  42. M. F. M. Lutz, S. Klimt, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A542, 521 (1992).
  43. P. Rehberg, S. P. Klevansky, and J. Hufner, Phys. Rev. C 53, 410 (1996).
  44. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  45. V. Dmitrasinovic, H. J. Schulze, R. Tegen, and R. H. Lemmer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 238, 332 (1995).
  46. R. H. Lemmer, Nucl. Phys. A593, 315 (1995).
  47. M. Oertel, M. Buballa, and J. Wambach, Nucl. Phys. A676, 247 (2000).
  48. M. Oertel, M. Buballa, and J. Wambach, Phys. At. Nucl. 64, 698 (2001).
  49. M. Oertel, M. Buballa, and J. Wambach, Phys. Lett. B 477, 77 (2000).
  50. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
  51. E. L. Feinberg, Nuovo Cimento A 34, 391 (1976).
  52. L. D. McLerran and T. Toimela, Phys. Rev. D 31, 545 (1985).
  53. C. Gale and J. I. Kapusta, Nucl. Phys. B357, 65 (1991).
  54. P. Faccioli, C. Lourenco, J. Seixas, and H. K. Wohri, Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 657 (2010).
  55. V. Bernard, R. L. Jaffe, and U. G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. B308, 753 (1988).
  56. S. Klimt, M. F. M. Lutz, U. Vogl, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A516, 429 (1990).
  57. Y. B. He, J. Hufner, S. P. Klevansky, and P. Rehberg, Nucl. Phys. A630, 719 (1998).
  58. H. Kim and P. Gubler, Phys. Lett. B 805, 135412 (2020).
  59. F. Li and S. Y. F. Liu, arXiv:2206.11890.
  60. W.-B. Dong, Y.-L. Yin, X.-L. Sheng, S.-Z. Yang, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 056025 (2024).
  61. X.-N. Zhu and X.-L. Sheng, Dataset for K+K− production in NJL model in arXiv: 2503.23919 [Data set], Zenodo, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17049556.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation