Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Localization-delocalization transition at weak coupling in two-color matrix QCD

Nirmalendu Acharyya1,*, Prasanjit Aich2,†, Arkajyoti Bandyopadhyay1,‡, and Sachindeo Vaidya2,§

  • *Contact author: nirmalendu@iitbbs.ac.in
  • †Contact author: prasanjita@iisc.ac.in
  • ‡Contact author: s22ph09003@iitbbs.ac.in
  • §Contact author: vaidya@iisc.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 113, 094001 – Published 1 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7dc6-nz7v

Abstract

We numerically investigate the matrix model of two-color one-flavor adjoint QCD (matrix-QCD2,1adj) in the weak coupling regime (small g) and in the chiral limit. The Yang-Mills potential has two distinct gauge invariant minima: one at Ai=0 and the other at Ai=σi2g. We show that when the chiral chemical potential c≤32 there is a quantum phase transition (QPT) at g0*≃0.143: for g<g0*, the ground-state wave function is localized near Ai=0, while for g>g0*, the ground state is delocalized over the gauge configuration space. The transition between these two phases is singular, with the ground state at g0* being distinctly different from that of g0*±|ε|. At g0*, we show that the square of the chromoelectric field vanishes, strongly suggesting that the system is in a “dual superconductor” phase. Numerical evidence shows that the localization-delocalization phenomenon holds for the first and second excited states as well, leading us to conjecture that there are an infinite number of isolated singular points g0*>g1*>g2*>⋯ accumulating to g=0. For c=1, the model formally possesses N=1 supersymmetry. We show that in the localized phase (i.e., for g<g0*) the supermultiplet structure is disrupted and supersymmetry is spontaneously broken.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. A. P. Balachandran, S. Vaidya, and A. R. de Queiroz, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550080 (2015).
  2. A. P. Balachandran, A. de Queiroz, and S. Vaidya, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550064 (2015).
  3. I. M. Singer, Commun. Math. Phys. 60, 7 (1978).
  4. M. S. Narasimhan and T. R. Ramadas, Commun. Math. Phys. 67, 121 (1979).
  5. N. Acharyya, M. Pandey, and S. Vaidya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 092002 (2021).
  6. N. Acharyya, A. P. Balachandran, M. Pandey, S. Sanyal, and S. Vaidya, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850073 (2018).
  7. M. Pandey and S. Vaidya, Phys. Rev. D 101, 114020 (2020).
  8. M. Pandey and S. Vaidya, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 58, 022103 (2017).
  9. N. Acharyya and A. P. Balachandran, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074024 (2017).
  10. N. Acharyya, P. Aich, A. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Vaidya, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054016 (2024).
  11. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B188, 513 (1981).
  12. M. Claudson and M. B. Halpern, Nucl. Phys. B250, 689 (1985).
  13. F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rep. 251, 267 (1995).
  14. M. B. Halpern and C. Schwartz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13, 4367 (1998).
  15. U. H. Danielsson, G. Ferretti, and B. Sundborg, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11, 5463 (1996).
  16. N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, Nucl. Phys. B498, 467 (1997).
  17. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112 (1997).
  18. N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3577 (1997).
  19. H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, A. Tsuchiya, and T. Tada, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 134, 47 (1999).
  20. D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena, and H. S. Nastase, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2002) 013.
  21. H. Nicolai and R. Helling, arXiv:hep-th/9809103.
  22. K. Dasgupta, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and M. Van Raamsdonk, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2002) 056.
  23. M. Unsal, Phys. Rev. D 80, 065001 (2009).
  24. C. Córdova and T. T. Dumitrescu, SciPost Phys. 16, 139 (2024).
  25. S. Chen, K. Fukushima, H. Nishimura, and Y. Tanizaki, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034020 (2020).
  26. S. Chen, E. Ievlev, and M. Shifman, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114005 (2025).
  27. N. Astrakhantsev, V. V. Braguta, E. M. Ilgenfritz, A. Y. Kotov, and A. A. Nikolaev, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074507 (2020).
  28. A. Begun, V. G. Bornyakov, V. A. Goy, A. Nakamura, and R. N. Rogalyov, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114505 (2022).
  29. V. V. Braguta, Symmetry 15, 1466 (2023).
  30. K. Iida, E. Itou, K. Murakami, and D. Suenaga, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 022.
  31. D. Das, L. Ebner, S. V. Kadam, I. Raychowdhury, A. Schäfer, and X. Yao, arXiv:2509.18269.
  32. J. Wosiek, Nucl. Phys. B644, 85 (2002).
  33. M. Campostrini and J. Wosiek, Nucl. Phys. B703, 454 (2004).
  34. T. Anous and C. Cogburn, Phys. Rev. D 100, 066023 (2019).
  35. C. T. Asplund, F. Denef, and E. Dzienkowski, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 055.
  36. V. G. Filev and D. O’Connor, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 167.
  37. Y. Asano, V. G. Filev, S. Kováčik, and D. O’Connor, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 152.
  38. X. Han and S. A. Hartnoll, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011069 (2020).
  39. A. M. Garcia-Garcia and J. C. Osborn, Nucl. Phys. A770, 141 (2006).
  40. A. M. Garcia-Garcia and J. C. Osborn, Phys. Rev. D 75, 034503 (2007).
  41. Myung-Joong Hwang, Ricardo Puebla, and Martin B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015).
  42. J. Larson and E. K. Irish, J. Phys. A 50, 174002 (2017).
  43. R. Beaume, J. Manuceau, A. Pellet, and M. Sirugue, Commun. Math. Phys. 38, 29 (1974).
  44. F. Acerbi, G. Morchio, and F. Strocchi, Lett. Math. Phys. 26, 13 (1992); J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 34, 899 (1993); Lett. Math. Phys. 27, 1 (1993).
  45. M. Asorey and F. Falceto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3074 (1996).
  46. T. Iwai, J. Phys. A 43, 415203 (2010).
  47. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B202, 253 (1982).
  48. J. G. Esteve, Phys. Rev. D 34, 674 (1986).
  49. A. P. Balachandran and A. R. de Queiroz, Phys. Rev. D 85, 025017 (2012).
  50. J. P. Neirotti, P. Serra, and S. Kais, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5293 (1998).
  51. V. Errasti Díez, M. Pandey, and S. Vaidya, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074024 (2020).
  52. V. V. Braguta, E. M. Ilgenfritz, A. Y. Kotov, B. Petersson, and S. A. Skinderev, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034509 (2016).
  53. V. V. Braguta and A. Y. Kotov, Phys. Rev. D 93, 105025 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation