Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constraints on Lorentz-invariance violation in the neutrino sector from the ultrahigh-energy event KM3-230213A

Yu-Ming Yang1,2,*, Xing-Jian Lv1,2,†, Xiao-Jun Bi1,2,‡, and Peng-Fei Yin1,§

  • *Contact author: yangyuming@ihep.ac.cn
  • †Contact author: lvxj@ihep.ac.cn
  • ‡Contact author: bixj@ihep.ac.cn
  • §Contact author: yinpf@ihep.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 111, 123037 – Published 24 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6zzg-tv4s

Abstract

Many quantum gravity theories predict deviations from Lorentz invariance, a foundational principle of modern physics, at energy scales exceeding the Planck scale. The presence of Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) would modify the dispersion relations of particles in vacuum and render certain decay channels kinematically permissible. In this study, we derive stringent constraints on the energy scale of LIV in the neutrino sector by investigating the impact of neutrino decay channels on the neutrino spectrum in the presence of LIV. Utilizing the spectra derived from the joint fit of KM3NeT, IceCube, and Auger data as a benchmark, we demonstrate that to be compatible with the highest-energy neutrino event ever detected, known as event KM3-230213A, the second-order LIV energy scale must satisfy Λ2>5.0×1019  GeV at 90% confidence level. Furthermore, our analyses indicate that the current data do not impose a stringent constraint on the energy scale associated with the first-order LIV.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011).
  2. V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989).
  3. G. Amelino-Camelia, J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Distance measurement and wave dispersion in a Liouville string approach to quantum gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 607 (1997).
  4. J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Search for quantum gravity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 31, 1257 (1999).
  5. G. Amelino-Camelia, Doubly special relativity, Nature (London) 418, 34 (2002).
  6. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 190403 (2002).
  7. J. Alfaro, H. A. Morales-Tecotl, and L. F. Urrutia, Loop quantum gravity and light propagation, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103509 (2002).
  8. T. Li, N. E. Mavromatos, D. V. Nanopoulos, and D. Xie, Time delays of strings in D-particle backgrounds and vacuum refractive indices, Phys. Lett. B 679, 407 (2009).
  9. G. Amelino-Camelia, Quantum-spacetime phenomenology, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 5 (2013).
  10. J. D. Tasson, What do we know about Lorentz invariance?, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 062901 (2014).
  11. D. Mattingly, Modern tests of Lorentz invariance, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 5 (2005).
  12. J.-J. Wei and X.-F. Wu, Testing fundamental physics with astrophysical transients, Front. Phys. 16, 44300 (2021).
  13. P. He and B.-Q. Ma, Lorentz symmetry violation of cosmic photons, Universe 8, 323 (2022).
  14. A. Addazi et al., Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103948 (2022).
  15. Y.-M. Yang, X.-J. Bi, and P.-F. Yin, Constraints on Lorentz invariance violation from the LHAASO observation of GRB 221009A, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2024) 060.
  16. R. Alves Batista et al., White paper and roadmap for quantum gravity phenomenology in the multi-messenger era, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 032001 (2025).
  17. E. Borriello, S. Chakraborty, A. Mirizzi, and P. D. Serpico, Stringent constraint on neutrino Lorentz-invariance violation from the two IceCube PeV neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 87, 116009 (2013).
  18. F. W. Stecker, S. T. Scully, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, Searching for traces of Planck-scale physics with high energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 91, 045009 (2015).
  19. U. D. Jentschura, Squeezing the parameter space for Lorentz violation in the neutrino sector with additional decay channels, Particles 3, 630 (2020).
  20. J. M. Carmona, J. L. Cortés, J. J. Relancio, and M. A. Reyes, Decay of superluminal neutrinos in the collinear approximation, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043001 (2023).
  21. A. G. Cohen and S. L. Glashow, Pair creation constrains superluminal neutrino propagation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181803 (2011).
  22. Y. Huo, T. Li, Y. Liao, D. V. Nanopoulos, and Y. Qi, Constraints on neutrino velocities revisited, Phys. Rev. D 85, 034022 (2012).
  23. S. Adrian-Martinez et al. (KM3Net Collaboration), Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G 43, 084001 (2016).
  24. S. Aiello et al. (KM3NeT Collaboration), Observation of an ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrino with KM3NeT, Nature (London) 638, 376 (2025).
  25. P. Satunin, Ultra-high-energy event KM3-230213A constraints on Lorentz invariance violation in neutrino sector, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 545 (2025).
  26. O. Adriani et al. (KM3NeT Collaboration), KM3NeT constraint on Lorentz-violating superluminal neutrino velocity, arXiv:2502.12070.
  27. O. Adriani et al. (KM3NeT Collaboration), The ultra-high-energy event km3-230213a within the global neutrino landscape, .
  28. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Differential limit on the extremely-high-energy cosmic neutrino flux in the presence of astrophysical background from nine years of IceCube data, Phys. Rev. D 98, 062003 (2018).
  29. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), The IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data, Phys. Rev. D 104, 022002 (2021).
  30. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Characterization of the astrophysical diffuse neutrino flux using starting track events in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 110, 022001 (2024).
  31. R. Abbasi et al., Improved characterization of the astrophysical muon–neutrino flux with 9.5 years of IceCube data, Astrophys. J. 928, 50 (2022).
  32. A. Abdul Halim et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Latest results from the searches for ultra-high-energy photons and neutrinos at the Pierre Auger Observatory, Proc. Sci. ICRC2023 (2023) 1488.
  33. F. W. Stecker and S. T. Scully, Propagation of superluminal PeV IceCube neutrinos: A high energy spectral cutoff or new constraints on Lorentz invariance violation, Phys. Rev. D 90, 043012 (2014).
  34. P. S. Behroozi, R. H. Wechsler, and C. Conroy, The average star formation histories of galaxies in dark matter halos from z=0–8, Astrophys. J. 770, 57 (2013).
  35. Reprint of: P. C. Mahalanobis (1936) on the generalised distance in statistics, Sankhya A 80, 1 (2018).
  36. R. De Maesschalck, D. Jouan-Rimbaud, and D. Massart, The Mahalanobis distance, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 50, 1 (2000).
  37. A. G. Cohen and S. L. Glashow, Pair creation constrains superluminal neutrino propagation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181803 (2011).
  38. L. Stodolsky, The speed of light and the speed of neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 201, 353 (1988).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation