Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Postinflationary quenched production of axion SU(2) dark matter

Imtiaz Khan1,2,3,*, Pirzada4,5, and G. Mustafa1,†

  • *Contact author: ikhanphys1993@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: gmustafa3828@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 043546 – Published 25 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6pqv-jwr6

Abstract

The relic abundance of vector dark matter originating from an inherited axion-SU(2) condensate is typically determined by implementing an adiabatic matching procedure across the symmetry-breaking transition. We demonstrate that this outcome does not arise in the generic case. The postinflationary crossover can be formulated as a dynamical quantum quench problem, in which the residual coherent component of the field is characterized by a survival factor that induces an order-unity renormalization of the standard abundance relation. Expressed in conformal time, the spatially homogeneous condensate dynamics reduce to those of a canonical oscillator with quartic and quadratic self-interactions. This representation enables an analytic determination of the matching conditions across the symmetry-breaking transition, the derivation of the corresponding quench work and excess energy relations, and a quantitative validation of the coherent sector description via numerical simulations in both Minkowski and Friedmann-Robertson-Walker backgrounds. We also formulate the homogeneous fluctuation theory via the diagonal-SO(3) 1⊕3⊕5 decomposition and isolate a soft traceless-symmetric quintet with a k=0 vacuum obstruction, a regulated ultraviolet adiabatic bound, and a positive quartic stabilization term. Collectively, these results refine the theoretical description of inherited non-Abelian dark matter production and establish the necessary infrared framework for subsequent investigations of finite-k gauge-Higgs transfer dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103520 (2016).
  2. Y. Ema, K. Nakayama, and Y. Tang, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 060.
  3. A. Ahmed, B. Grzadkowski, and A. Socha, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 059.
  4. T. Sato, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 022.
  5. J. A. Dror, K. Harigaya, and V. Narayan, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035036 (2019).
  6. K. Nakayama and W. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 026.
  7. B. Salehian, M. A. Gorji, H. Firouzjahi, and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063526 (2021).
  8. Pirzada, I. Khan, M. Khan, T. Li, and A. Muhammad, arXiv:2603.00818.
  9. K. Kaneta, H.-S. Lee, J. Lee, and J. Yi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2023) 017.
  10. A. E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Phys. Rev. D 84, 103501 (2011).
  11. P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2012) 013.
  12. K. Nakayama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2019) 019.
  13. K. Nakayama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2020) 033.
  14. P. Adshead and M. Wyman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 261302 (2012).
  15. E. Dimastrogiovanni and M. Peloso, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103501 (2013).
  16. P. Adshead, E. Martinec, and M. Wyman, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 087.
  17. P. Adshead, E. Martinec, E. I. Sfakianakis, and M. Wyman, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 137.
  18. M. Barbon, N. Ijaz, and M. Peloso, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2026) 013.
  19. I. Wolfson, A. Maleknejad, and E. Komatsu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2020) 047.
  20. I. Wolfson, A. Maleknejad, T. Murata, E. Komatsu, and T. Kobayashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2021) 031.
  21. K. Ishiwata, E. Komatsu, and I. Obata, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2022) 010.
  22. Pirzada, Y. Gao, and Q. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 879, 140680 (2026).
  23. T. Fujita, K. Imagawa, and K. Murai, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2022) 046.
  24. I. Khan, A. Muhammad, T. Li, S. Raza, Pirzada, and M. Khan, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 115.
  25. E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, and A. Papageorgiou, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103542 (2024).
  26. N. Ijaz and M. U. Rehman, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139229 (2025).
  27. N. Ijaz, M. Mehmood, and M. U. Rehman, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1394 (2025).
  28. A. Muhammad, I. Khan, T. Li, S. Raza, M. Khan, and Pirzada, arXiv:2603.24152.
  29. S. Bhattacharya, M. Fasiello, A. Papageorgiou, and E. Dimastrogiovanni, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2025) 080.
  30. A. Sarkar, S. Das, and S. K. Sethi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2015) 004.
  31. P. S. Corasaniti, S. Agarwal, D. J. E. Marsh, and S. Das, Phys. Rev. D 95, 083512 (2017).
  32. S. Das and E. O. Nadler, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043517 (2021).
  33. T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  34. W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  35. L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3195 (1994).
  36. P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6175 (1997).
  37. T. Fujita, K. Murai, K. Nakayama, and W. Yin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2024) 007.
  38. P. B. Arnold, D. T. Son, and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 59, 105020 (1999).
  39. P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2003) 030.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation