Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Normalized Wigner negativity rate as a second-moment probe of infall in AdS3

Ritam Basu*

  • *Contact author: ritam.basu@theory.tifr.res.in

Phys. Rev. D 114, 086025 – Published 30 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6pn8-sd9f

Abstract

In spread complexity, the growth rate of the average position of a time-evolved state along its Krylov chain recovers the proper radial momentum of an infalling particle in anti–de Sitter space. It is, however, a measure of the first moment only, irrespective of the spread of the wave packet away from its classical trajectory. The rate of a “normalized” Krylov-Wigner negativity can be proposed as a diagnostic of the second moment of the boundary state that captures this spreading. Starting with the “seed-normalized” Krylov-Wigner distribution—that is, the Wigner transform of the descendant cloud, with the decaying return amplitude divided out—we obtain an analytic Bessel form in the macroscopic limit and compute its total negativity explicitly. Retaining the Bessel variable all the way through, we find that the negativity goes as sinh4Δ(πt/β). But the raw normalized-state negativity saturates to an O(1) constant, well below the O(D) bound. Using the exact negative binomial statistics of the Krylov chain, the normalized negativity is at late times a fixed power of the second moment of the Krylov wave packet, N(t)∝[Var(N^Krylov)]Δ, for every Δ>1/2. The relation linearizes precisely at Δ=1. In this regime via the momentum dictionary of Caputa et al. [Phys. Rev. D 113, L041901 (2026)], the rate becomes the product of the proper radial position and momentum, R∝CPρ, which we interpret as the rate of the tidal stretch of nearby geodesics falling into the horizon. We also comment briefly on a speculative direction for future research, in particular, the interpretation of the transverse string size operator in terms of the Krylov number operator through the common SU(1,1) discrete series.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  2. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  3. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  4. L. Susskind, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 24 (2016).
  5. D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014).
  6. A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 191301 (2016).
  7. A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 93, 086006 (2016).
  8. L. Susskind, arXiv:1802.01198.
  9. V. Balasubramanian, J. M. Magan, P. Nandi, and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 113, 046004 (2026).
  10. M. A. Nielsen, Quantum Inf. Comput. 6, 213 (2006).
  11. R. A. Jefferson and R. C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 107.
  12. P. Caputa, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi, and K. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 097.
  13. P. Caputa and J. M. Magan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 231302 (2019).
  14. D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041017 (2019).
  15. J. L. F. Barbón, E. Rabinovici, R. Shir, and R. Sinha, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 264.
  16. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 062.
  17. V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046007 (2022).
  18. V. Balasubramanian, M. DeCross, A. Kar, and O. Parrikar, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 134.
  19. P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and D. Patramanis, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013041 (2022).
  20. A. Bhattacharya, R. N. Das, B. Dey, and J. Erdmenger, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 179.
  21. P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Martínez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Phys. Rep. 1125–1128, 1 (2025).
  22. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 151.
  23. R. L. Hudson, Rep. Math. Phys. 6, 249 (1974).
  24. F. Soto and P. Claverie, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 24, 97 (1983).
  25. F. Soto-Eguibar and P. Claverie, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 24, 1104 (1983).
  26. R. Basu, P. Chowdhury, A. Ganguly, S. Nath, O. Parrikar, and S. Paul, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 106.
  27. R. Basu, A. Ganguly, S. Nath, and O. Parrikar, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 264.
  28. K. Pal, K. Pal, and K.-Y. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2026) 187.
  29. H. A. Camargo, Y. Fu, K.-Y. Kim, and Y. H. Park, arXiv:2603.19359.
  30. N. De Ro, A. Sánchez-Garrido, and J. Sonner, arXiv:2607.12585.
  31. W. K. Wootters, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 176, 1 (1987).
  32. S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
  33. V. Veitch, C. Ferrie, D. Gross, and J. Emerson, New J. Phys. 14, 113011 (2012).
  34. D. Gross, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 47, 122107 (2006).
  35. S. Banerjee, J. Erdmenger, and D. Sarkar, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 001.
  36. P. Caputa, B. Chen, R. W. McDonald, J. Simón, and B. Strittmatter, Phys. Rev. D 113, L041901 (2026).
  37. Y. Fu, K.-Y. Kim, K. Pal, and K. Pal, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 139.
  38. H. A. Camargo, Y. Fu, V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim, and K. Pal, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 182.
  39. V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, O. Parrikar, and V. Singh, arXiv:2607.01351.
  40. M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 111602 (2014).
  41. P. Caputa, J. Simón, A. Štikonas, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2015) 102.
  42. P. Caputa and S. Datta, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 188; 09 (2022) 113(E).
  43. A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications, Texts and Monographs in Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986).
  44. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992).
  45. G. T. Horowitz and N. Itzhaki, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (1999) 010.
  46. G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2000) 027.
  47. H. Nastase, C. Nunez, and D. Roychowdhury, Phys. Rev. D 114, 086001 (2026).
  48. L. G. Yaffe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 407 (1982).
  49. P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 144, 249 (1982).
  50. J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 2929 (2001).
  51. J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and J. Son, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 2961 (2001).
  52. V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus, A. E. Lawrence, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 59, 104021 (1999).
  53. L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6606 (1994).
  54. R. Basu, O. Parrikar, S. Paul, and H. Rajgadia, Phys. Rev. D 114, 046016 (2026).
  55. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743 (1993).
  56. G. Penington, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 002.
  57. R. N. Das and T. Mori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 030201 (2026).
  58. H. W. Lin, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 060.
  59. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 213.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation