Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Matter flavor conversion mediated by pseudosterile states as the possible origin of neutrino oscillation anomalies

Sabya Sachi Chatterjee1,* and Antonio Palazzo2,3,†

  • *Contact author: sabya.chatterjee@kit.edu
  • †Contact author: palazzo@ba.infn.it

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075008 – Published 7 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6ft1-rk5b

Abstract

Neutrino oscillation experiments present anomalous results across a vast range of baselines and energies. Here we show that a 3+1 scenario in which sterile neutrinos feel a novel matter potential Vs proportional to background density of ordinary or (asymmetric) dark matter is able to explain several anomalies. In the limit of low-energies E≲1  TeV the model gives rise to effective nonstandard interactions (NSI)-like couplings among active flavors arranged in a distinctive nongeneric rank-1 Hamiltonian. Remarkably, unlike the ordinary NSI, the induced NSI-like couplings, being generated via mixing with a gauge-singlet state, are immune to the stringent constraints from SU(2) gauge invariance involving the charged leptons. The NSI-like couplings eliminate the tension between the two long-baseline (LBL) experiments NOvA and T2K provided that the potential is negative and the two sterile mixing angles θ14 and θ24 are nonzero. Solar neutrino data further constrain the strength of the potential and impose the bound |Ue4|2≃sin2θ14≲0.04, while LBL and low-energy atmospheric data establish the hierarchical pattern |Uμ4|2≪|Ue4|2 and |Uτ4|2≪|Ue4|2. A further indication in favor of a nonzero negative potential comes from the anomalous excess of νe-like events observed in Super-Kamiokande multi-GeV atmospheric neutrinos, which, in the new scenario can be explained by a modification of the 3-flavor resonance at energies of a few GeV. In the high-energy regime (E≳1  TeV) the new framework reveals its genuine 4-flavor nature and can produce a resonant behavior at E≃10  TeV as hinted at by IceCube which, for the preferred negative values of the potential, occurs in the neutrino channel. The resonance presents unconventional features, reflecting the complex structure of the amplification phenomenon. Specifically, we identify an irreducible three-level dynamics generating a new resonance in the (νe,νμ) sector intertwined with two conventional resonances in the (νe,νs) and (νμ,νs) subsystems. The novel amplification mechanism manifests with the emergence of effective mixing angles in matter (θ12m or θ13m) involving active neutrinos unrelated to their vacuum counterparts and can be operative even in the absence of conventional resonances. In order to have maximal phenomenological relevance the scenario requires values of f=Vs/|VNC|∼−20, Δm412∼60  eV2 (both roughly uncertain by a factor of two), |Ue4|2≃sin2θ14≃0.01–0.03 and |Uμ4|2≃sin2θ24≃10−4–10−3. Such a very small size of |Uμ4|2 eliminates the tension between IceCube and the other (all negative) νμ disappearance searches. The third mixing angle can have a sizable impact even for tiny values as small as |Uτ4|2≃sin2θ34∼3×10−4. Concerning the nature (Dirac vs Majorana) of the pseudosterile neutrino, the null results from 0ν2β decay strongly favor the Dirac case. However, this conclusion can be evaded in 3+2 and 3+3 frameworks if an underlying symmetry forces the effective Majorana mass close to zero. The model can play a substantial role in the Reactor anomaly and can partially explain the Gallium one. More crucially, it can be directly probed by KATRIN, which is very sensitive to the electron-sterile neutrino admixture in the region of high Δm412.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (185)

  1. A. Aguilar et al. (LSND Collaboration), Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of ν¯e appearance in a ν¯μ beam, Phys. Rev. D 64, 112007 (2001).
  2. G. Mention, M. Fechner, T. Lasserre, T. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Cribier, and A. Letourneau, The reactor antineutrino anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 83, 073006 (2011).
  3. P. Anselmann et al. (GALLEX Collaboration), First results from the Cr-51 neutrino source experiment with the GALLEX detector, Phys. Lett. B 342, 440 (1995).
  4. W. Hampel et al. (GALLEX Collaboration), Final results of the Cr-51 neutrino source experiments in GALLEX, Phys. Lett. B 420, 114 (1998).
  5. F. Kaether, W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, and T. Kirsten, Reanalysis of the GALLEX solar neutrino flux and source experiments, Phys. Lett. B 685, 47 (2010).
  6. D. N. Abdurashitov et al., The Russian-American gallium experiment (SAGE) Cr neutrino source measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4708 (1996).
  7. J. N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE Collaboration), Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Results for the 2002–2007 data-taking period, Phys. Rev. C 80, 015807 (2009).
  8. V. V. Barinov et al., Results from the Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 232501 (2022).
  9. V. V. Barinov et al., Search for electron-neutrino transitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment, Phys. Rev. C 105, 065502 (2022).
  10. A. P. Serebrov et al. (NEUTRINO-4 Collaboration), First observation of the oscillation effect in the Neutrino-4 experiment on the search for the sterile neutrino, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 109, 209 (2019).
  11. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Updated MiniBooNE neutrino oscillation results with increased data and new background studies, Phys. Rev. D 103, 052002 (2021).
  12. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for an anomalous production of charged-current νe interactions without visible pions across multiple kinematic observables in MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081802 (2025).
  13. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Search for an eV-scale sterile neutrino using improved high-energy νμ event reconstruction in IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 201804 (2024).
  14. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Exploration of mass splitting and muon/tau mixing parameters for an eV-scale sterile neutrino with IceCube, Phys. Lett. B 858, 139077 (2024).
  15. J. Wolcott, New Neutrino Oscillations Results from NOνA with 10 years of Data, Talk Presented at Neutrino 2024, 2024 (2024), https://indico.fnal.gov/event/43209/timetable/#20200622.detailed.
  16. C. Giganti, T2K experiments status and plan, Talk Presented at Neutrino 2024 (2024), https://agenda.infn.it/event/37867/contributions/233954/attachments/121809/177671/Neutrino2024_T2K_Claudio.pdf.
  17. P. B. Denton, J. Gehrlein, and R. Pestes, CP -violating neutrino nonstandard interactions in long-baseline-accelerator data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 051801 (2021).
  18. S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo, Nonstandard neutrino interactions as a solution to the NOνA and T2K discrepancy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 051802 (2021).
  19. S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo, Status of tension between NOvA and T2K after neutrino 2024 and possible role of nonstandard neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 113002 (2024).
  20. T. Wester et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with neutron tagging and an expanded fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I–V, Phys. Rev. D 109, 072014 (2024).
  21. B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp, Sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rep. 928, 1 (2021).
  22. M. A. Acero et al., White paper on light sterile neutrino searches and related phenomenology, J. Phys. G 51, 120501 (2024).
  23. S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, M. Laveder, Y. F. Li, and E. M. Zavanin, Light sterile neutrinos, J. Phys. G 43, 033001 (2016).
  24. M. Dentler, Á. Hernández-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, and T. Schwetz, Updated global analysis of neutrino oscillations in the presence of eV-Scale sterile neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 010.
  25. A. Diaz, C. A. Argüelles, G. H. Collin, J. M. Conrad, and M. H. Shaevitz, Where are we with light sterile neutrinos?, Phys. Rep. 884, 1 (2020).
  26. J. Villarreal, J. Woodward, J. Hardin, and J. Conrad, A frequentist simulation-based inference treatment of sterile neutrino global fits, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 6, 035053 (2025).
  27. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for light sterile neutrinos with two neutrino beams at MicroBooNE, Nature (London) 648, 64 (2025).
  28. J. M. Berryman, Constraining sterile neutrino cosmology with terrestrial oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 100, 023540 (2019).
  29. S. Hagstotz, P. F. de Salas, S. Gariazzo, M. Gerbino, M. Lattanzi, S. Vagnozzi, K. Freese, and S. Pastor, Bounds on light sterile neutrino mass and mixing from cosmology and laboratory searches, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123524 (2021).
  30. M. Archidiacono and S. Gariazzo, Two sides of the same coin: Sterile neutrinos and dark radiation, status and perspectives, Universe 8, 175 (2022).
  31. H. Minakata, eV-scale sterile neutrino: A window open to non-unitarity?, arXiv:2503.09280.
  32. M. H. Moulai, C. A. Argüelles, G. H. Collin, J. M. Conrad, A. Diaz, and M. H. Shaevitz, Combining sterile neutrino fits to short baseline data with IceCube data, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055020 (2020).
  33. J. M. Hardin, I. Martinez-Soler, A. Diaz, M. Jin, N. W. Kamp, C. A. Argüelles, J. M. Conrad, and M. H. Shaevitz, New clues about light sterile neutrinos: Preference for models with damping effects in global fits, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 058.
  34. S. Palomares-Ruiz, S. Pascoli, and T. Schwetz, Explaining LSND by a decaying sterile neutrino, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2005) 048.
  35. Y. Bai, R. Lu, S. Lu, J. Salvado, and B. A. Stefanek, Three twin neutrinos: Evidence from LSND and MiniBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 93, 073004 (2016).
  36. M. Dentler, I. Esteban, J. Kopp, and P. Machado, Decaying sterile neutrinos and the short baseline oscillation anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 101, 115013 (2020).
  37. A. de Gouvêa, O. L. G. Peres, S. Prakash, and G. V. Stenico, On the decaying-sterile neutrino solution to the electron (anti)neutrino appearance anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 141.
  38. M. Hostert, K. J. Kelly, and T. Zhou, Decaying sterile neutrinos at short baselines, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075002 (2024).
  39. S. Hannestad, R. S. Hansen, and T. Tram, How self-interactions can reconcile sterile neutrinos with cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 031802 (2014).
  40. B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp, Cosmologically safe eV-Scale sterile neutrinos and improved dark matter structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 031803 (2014).
  41. M. Archidiacono, S. Hannestad, R. S. Hansen, and T. Tram, Cosmology with self-interacting sterile neutrinos and dark matter—A pseudoscalar model, Phys. Rev. D 91, 065021 (2015).
  42. N. Saviano, O. Pisanti, G. Mangano, and A. Mirizzi, Unveiling secret interactions among sterile neutrinos with big-bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 90, 113009 (2014).
  43. A. Mirizzi, G. Mangano, O. Pisanti, and N. Saviano, Collisional production of sterile neutrinos via secret interactions and cosmological implications, Phys. Rev. D 91, 025019 (2015).
  44. X. Chu, B. Dasgupta, and J. Kopp, Sterile neutrinos with secret interactions—lasting friendship with cosmology, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2015) 011.
  45. J. F. Cherry, A. Friedland, and I. M. Shoemaker, Short-baseline neutrino oscillations, Planck, and IceCube, arXiv:1605.06506.
  46. M. Archidiacono, S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, S. Hannestad, R. Hansen, M. Laveder, and T. Tram, Pseudoscalar—sterile neutrino interactions: Reconciling the cosmos with neutrino oscillations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2016) 067.
  47. X. Chu, B. Dasgupta, M. Dentler, J. Kopp, and N. Saviano, Sterile neutrinos with secret interactions—cosmological discord?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2018) 049.
  48. Y. Farzan, Ultra-light scalar saving the 3+1 neutrino scheme from the cosmological bounds, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134911 (2019).
  49. J. M. Cline, Viable secret neutrino interactions with ultralight dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135182 (2020).
  50. M. Archidiacono, S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, S. Hannestad, and T. Tram, Sterile neutrino self-interactions: H0 tension and short-baseline anomalies, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 029.
  51. K. M. Belotsky, A. L. Sudarikov, and M. Y. Khlopov, Constraint on anomalous 4nu interaction, Phys. At. Nucl. 64, 1637 (2001).
  52. A. E. Nelson and J. Walsh, Short baseline neutrino oscillations and a new light gauge boson, Phys. Rev. D 77, 033001 (2008).
  53. N. Engelhardt, A. E. Nelson, and J. R. Walsh, Apparent CPT violation in neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 81, 113001 (2010).
  54. M. Pospelov, Neutrino physics with dark matter experiments and the signature of new baryonic neutral currents, Phys. Rev. D 84, 085008 (2011).
  55. G. Karagiorgi, M. H. Shaevitz, and J. M. Conrad, Confronting the short-baseline oscillation anomalies with a single sterile neutrino and non-standard matter effects, arXiv:1202.1024.
  56. J. Kopp and J. Welter, The not-so-sterile 4th neutrino: Constraints on new gauge interactions from neutrino oscillation experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 104.
  57. J. M. Berryman, V. Brdar, and P. Huber, Particle physics origin of the 5 MeV bump in the reactor antineutrino spectrum?, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055045 (2019).
  58. J. Liao, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, MiniBooNE, MINOS+and IceCube data imply a baroque neutrino sector, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015016 (2019).
  59. A. Esmaili and H. Nunokawa, On the robustness of IceCube’s bound on sterile neutrinos in the presence of non-standard interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 70 (2019).
  60. P. B. Denton, Y. Farzan, and I. M. Shoemaker, Activating the fourth neutrino of the 3+1 scheme, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035003 (2019).
  61. D. S. M. Alves, W. C. Louis, and P. G. deNiverville, Quasi-sterile neutrinos from dark sectors. Part I. BSM matter effects in neutrino oscillations and the short-baseline anomalies., J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 034.
  62. C. Sponsler, M. Hostert, I. Martinez-Soler, and C. A. Argüelles, Resonant neutrino flavor conversion in the atmosphere, arXiv:2405.12140.
  63. V. Brdar and D. S. Chattopadhyay, Does the 220 PeV event at KM3NeT point to new physics?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 081001 (2026).
  64. T.-K. Kuo and J. T. Pantaleone, Three neutrino oscillations and the solar neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3432 (1987).
  65. P. Adamson et al. (MINOS+ Collaboration), Search for sterile neutrinos in MINOS and MINOS+using a two-detector fit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 091803 (2019).
  66. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Dual-baseline search for active-to-sterile neutrino oscillations in NOvA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081804 (2025).
  67. N. Klop and A. Palazzo, Imprints of CP violation induced by sterile neutrinos in T2K data, Phys. Rev. D 91, 073017 (2015).
  68. S. Parveen, K. Sharma, S. Patra, and P. Mehta, Signals of eV-scale sterile neutrino at long baseline neutrino experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 181 (2025).
  69. S. K. Agarwalla, S. S. Chatterjee, and A. Palazzo, Physics reach of DUNE with a light sterile neutrino, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2016) 016.
  70. S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo, Interpretation of NOνA and T2K data in the presence of a light sterile neutrino, arXiv:2005.10338.
  71. G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, and A. Palazzo, Evidence for Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effects in solar neutrino flavor transitions, Phys. Lett. B 583, 149 (2004).
  72. F. Capozzi, E. Lisi, F. Marcone, A. Marrone, and A. Palazzo, Updated bounds on the (1, 2) neutrino oscillation parameters after first JUNO results, Phys. Rev. D 114, 016026 (2026).
  73. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, Lessons from the first JUNO results, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2026) 089.
  74. F. Capozzi, W. Giarè, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision, Phys. Rev. D 111, 093006 (2025).
  75. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  76. P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Martínez-Miravé, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle, 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 071.
  77. P. Huber, M. Lindner, and W. Winter, Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator), Comput. Phys. Commun. 167, 195 (2005).
  78. P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, and W. Winter, New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: General long baseline experiment simulator, Comput. Phys. Commun. 177, 432 (2007).
  79. J. Kopp Sterile neutrinos and non-standard neutrino interactions in GLoBES (2019), https://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/personalhomes/globes/tools/snu-1.0.pdf.
  80. O. G. Miranda, M. A. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, Are solar neutrino oscillations robust?, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2006) 008.
  81. P. Coloma and T. Schwetz, Generalized mass ordering degeneracy in neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 94, 055005 (2016).
  82. A. Albert et al. (ANTARES Collaboration), Search for non-standard neutrino interactions with 10 years of ANTARES data, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 048.
  83. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), All-flavor constraints on nonstandard neutrino interactions and generalized matter potential with three years of IceCube DeepCore data, Phys. Rev. D 104, 072006 (2021).
  84. S. Aiello et al. (KM3NeT Collaboration), Search for non-standard neutrino interactions with the first six detection units of KM3NeT/ORCA, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 073.
  85. G. Mitsuka et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Study of non-standard neutrino interactions with atmospheric neutrino data in Super-Kamiokande I and II, Phys. Rev. D 84, 113008 (2011).
  86. L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2369 (1978).
  87. A. Palazzo, Testing the very-short-baseline neutrino anomalies at the solar sector, Phys. Rev. D 83, 113013 (2011).
  88. C. Giunti and Y. F. Li, Matter effects in active-sterile solar neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 80, 113007 (2009).
  89. F. Capozzi, I. M. Shoemaker, and L. Vecchi, Solar neutrinos as a probe of dark matter-neutrino interactions, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2017) 021.
  90. T.-K. Kuo and J. T. Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 937 (1989).
  91. A. Palazzo, An estimate of θ14 independent of the reactor antineutrino flux determinations, Phys. Rev. D 85, 077301 (2012).
  92. K. Goldhagen, M. Maltoni, S. E. Reichard, and T. Schwetz, Testing sterile neutrino mixing with present and future solar neutrino data, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 116 (2022).
  93. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and J. P. Pinheiro, Solar model independent constraints on the sterile neutrino interpretation of the gallium anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 862, 139297 (2025).
  94. B. T. Cleveland, T. Daily, R. Davis, Jr., J. R. Distel, K. Lande, C. K. Lee, P. S. Wildenhain, and J. Ullman, Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the homestake chlorine detector, Astrophys. J. 496, 505 (1998).
  95. B. Aharmim et al. (SNO Collaboration), Combined analysis of all three phases of solar neutrino data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. C 88, 025501 (2013).
  96. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Solar neutrino measurements using the full data period of Super-Kamiokande-IV, Phys. Rev. D 109, 092001 (2024).
  97. G. Bellini et al., Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 141302 (2011).
  98. G. Bellini et al. (BOREXINO Collaboration), Neutrinos from the primary proton–proton fusion process in the Sun, Nature (London) 512, 383 (2014).
  99. M. Agostini et al. (Borexino Collaboration), First simultaneous precision spectroscopy of pp, Be7, and pep solar neutrinos with Borexino Phase-II, Phys. Rev. D 100, 082004 (2019).
  100. Y. Herrera and A. Serenelli, Standard solar models B23/SF-III, 10.5281/zenodo.10174170.
  101. A. Abusleme et al. (JUNO Collaboration), First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO, Nature (London) 654, 343 (2026).
  102. P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. a. P. Pinheiro, and S. Urrea, Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 032.
  103. H. Acharya et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Sterile-neutrino search based on 259 days of KATRIN data, Nature (London) 648, 70 (2025).
  104. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Strong constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions from TeV-Scale νu disappearance at IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 011804 (2022).
  105. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), ∥, IceCube Collaboration, Measurement of atmospheric neutrino oscillation parameters using convolutional neural networks with 9.3 years of data in IceCube DeepCore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 091801 (2025).
  106. M. P. Rodriguez, Measurement of the neutrino mass ordering with 9.28 years of IceCube DeepCore data. Ph.D. thesis, Wisconsins-Madison U., 2024, https://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/24CPK3B2BJYH586.
  107. E. K. Akhmedov, M. Maltoni, and A. Y. Smirnov, 1-3 leptonic mixing and the neutrino oscillograms of the earth, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2007) 077.
  108. G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, and A. Palazzo, Quasi energy independent solar neutrino transitions, Phys. Rev. D 65, 073019 (2002).
  109. S. Mikheev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonance amplification of oscillations in matter and spectroscopy of solar neutrinos, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 913 (1985); Yad. Fiz. 42, 1441 (1985);
  110. S. Mikheev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonant amplification of neutrino oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy, Nuovo Cimento C 9, 17 (1986).
  111. O. Yasuda, Neutrino oscillations with four generations, in Joint U.S. / Japan Workshop on New Initiatives in Muon Lepton Flavor Violation and Neutrino Oscillation with High Intense Muon and Neutrino Sources (2000), pp. 151–163, arXiv:hep-ph/0102166.
  112. H. Nunokawa, O. L. G. Peres, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Probing the LSND mass scale and four neutrino scenarios with a neutrino telescope, Phys. Lett. B 562, 279 (2003).
  113. S. Choubey, Signature of sterile species in atmospheric neutrino data at neutrino telescopes, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 014.
  114. S. Razzaque and A. Y. Smirnov, Searching for sterile neutrinos in ice, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 084.
  115. V. Barger, Y. Gao, and D. Marfatia, Is there evidence for sterile neutrinos in IceCube data?, Phys. Rev. D 85, 011302 (2012).
  116. S. Razzaque and A. Y. Smirnov, Searches for sterile neutrinos with IceCube DeepCore, Phys. Rev. D 85, 093010 (2012).
  117. A. Esmaili, F. Halzen, and O. L. G. Peres, Constraining sterile neutrinos with AMANDA and IceCube atmospheric neutrino data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2012) 041.
  118. S. K. Agarwalla, T. Li, O. Mena, and S. Palomares-Ruiz, Exploring the earth matter effect with atmospheric neutrinos in ice, arXiv:1212.2238.
  119. A. Esmaili and A. Y. Smirnov, Restricting the LSND and MiniBooNE sterile neutrinos with the IceCube atmospheric neutrino data, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 014.
  120. M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, Sterile neutrinos in the light of IceCube, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 124.
  121. S. T. Petcov, On the IceCube result on ν¯μ→ν¯s oscillations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1750018 (2017).
  122. L. S. Miranda and S. Razzaque, Revisiting constraints on 3+1 active-sterile neutrino mixing using IceCube data, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 203.
  123. E. Cabrera, A. Esmaili, and A. A. Quiroga, Limits on the parameter space of (3+2) sterile neutrino scenario by IceCube data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2024) 059.
  124. M. Brettell, I. Martinez-Soler, and H. Minakata, Sterile-active resonance: A global qualitative picture, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 011.
  125. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Searching for eV-scale sterile neutrinos with eight years of atmospheric neutrinos at the IceCube neutrino telescope, Phys. Rev. D 102, 052009 (2020).
  126. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Methods and stability tests associated with the sterile neutrino search using improved high-energy νμ event reconstruction in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 110, 092009 (2024).
  127. F. Hund, Zur deutung der molekelspektren I, Z. Phys. 40, 742 (1927).
  128. J. von Neumann and E. Wigner, Uber das Verhalten von Eigenwerten bei adiabatischen Prozessen, Phys. Z. 30, 465 (1929); Über merkwürdige diskrete Eigenwerte, 30, 467 (1929).
  129. Z.-z. Xing, S. Zhou, and Y.-L. Zhou, Renormalization-Group equations of neutrino masses and flavor mixing parameters in matter, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 015.
  130. S. Zeng and F. Xu, Matter effects of sterile neutrino in light of renormalization-group equations, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 029.
  131. P. B. Denton, S. J. Parke, and X. Zhang, Neutrino oscillations in matter via eigenvalues, Phys. Rev. D 101, 093001 (2020).
  132. X. Zhao, L.-M. Kuang, and J.-Q. Liao, General dark-state theory for arbitrary multilevel quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 113, 013723 (2026).
  133. B. R. Smithers, B. J. P. Jones, C. A. Argüelles, J. M. Conrad, and A. Diaz, Cascade appearance signatures of sterile neutrinos at 1–100 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 105, 052001 (2022).
  134. A. Esmaili, F. Halzen, and O. L. G. Peres, Exploring ντ−νs mixing with cascade events in DeepCore, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 048.
  135. C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, and R. P. Zhang, Revival of the reactor antineutrino anomaly, arXiv:2605.10353.
  136. H. Feshbach, Unifying theory of nuclear reactions, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 5, 357 (1958).
  137. P. O. Löwdin, A note on the quantum-mechanical perturbation theory, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 969 (1962).
  138. I. Lindgren and J. Morrison, Atomic Many-Body Theory (Springer, New York, 1986).
  139. I. Hubac and S. Wilson, Brillouin-Wigner Methods for Many-Body Systems (Springer, New York, 2010).
  140. C. Kraus, A. Singer, K. Valerius, and C. Weinheimer, Limit on sterile neutrino contribution from the mainz neutrino mass experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2323 (2013).
  141. A. I. Belesev, A. I. Berlev, E. V. Geraskin, A. A. Golubev, N. A. Likhovid, A. A. Nozik, V. S. Pantuev, V. I. Parfenov, and A. K. Skasyrskaya, An upper limit on additional neutrino mass eigenstate in 2 to 100 eV region from ‘Troitsk nu-mass’ data, JETP Lett. 97, 67 (2013).
  142. A. I. Belesev, A. I. Berlev, E. V. Geraskin, A. A. Golubev, N. A. Likhovid, A. A. Nozik, V. S. Pantuev, V. I. Parfenov, and A. K. Skasyrskaya, The search for an additional neutrino mass eigenstate in the 2–100 eV region from ‘Troitsk nu-mass’ data: A detailed analysis, J. Phys. G 41, 015001 (2014).
  143. C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, and Y. Y. Zhang, KATRIN bound on 3+1 active-sterile neutrino mixing and the reactor antineutrino anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 061.
  144. K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric dark matter: Theories, signatures, and constraints, Phys. Rep. 537, 91 (2014).
  145. R. Horvat, Resonant conversions of extremely high-energy neutrinos in dark matter halos, Phys. Rev. D 59, 123003 (1999).
  146. P. F. de Salas, R. A. Lineros, and M. Tórtola, Neutrino propagation in the galactic dark matter halo, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123001 (2016).
  147. K.-Y. Choi, E. J. Chun, and J. Kim, Neutrino oscillations in dark matter, Phys. Dark Universe 30, 100606 (2020).
  148. A. V. Penacchioni, O. Civitarese, and C. R. Argüelles, Testing dark matter distributions by neutrino–dark matter interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 183 (2020).
  149. A. Y. Smirnov and V. B. Valera, Resonance refraction and neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 177.
  150. G.-y. Huang and W. Rodejohann, Tritium beta decay with modified neutrino dispersion relations: KATRIN in the dark sea, Nucl. Phys. B993, 116262 (2023).
  151. G. M. Salla, Characterising dark matter-induced neutrino potentials, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 204 (2023).
  152. H.-X. Lin, J. Tang, and S. Vihonen, Ultralight dark matter in neutrino oscillations to accommodate T2K and NOνA tension, Phys. Rev. D 114, 012009 (2026).
  153. T. Gherghetta and A. Shkerin, Probing a local dark matter halo with neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095009 (2023).
  154. G. Chauhan, R. A. Gustafson, G. Herrera, T. Johnson, and I. M. Shoemaker, The dark matter diffused supernova neutrino background, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2025) 020.
  155. O. G. Miranda, C. A. Moura, and A. Parada, Sterile neutrinos, dark matter, and resonant effects in ultra high energy regimes, Phys. Lett. B 744, 55 (2015).
  156. I. Lopes, The sun: Light dark matter and sterile neutrinos, Astrophys. J. 905, 22 (2020).
  157. S. Chattopadhyay and A. Dighe, Refractive neutrino masses in the solar DM halo: Can the dark-LMA solution be revived?, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 053.
  158. A. Gould, WIMP distribution in and evaporation from the Sun, Astrophys. J. 321, 560 (1987).
  159. S. K. Lee, M. Lisanti, A. H. G. Peter, and B. R. Safdi, Effect of gravitational focusing on annual modulation in dark-matter direct-detection experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011301 (2014).
  160. H. Kim and A. Lenoci, Gravitational focusing of wave dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063032 (2022).
  161. S. Goswami and W. Rodejohann, Constraining mass spectra with sterile neutrinos from neutrinoless double beta decay, tritium beta decay and cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 73, 113003 (2006).
  162. S. Goswami and W. Rodejohann, MiniBooNE results and neutrino schemes with 2 sterile neutrinos: Possible mass orderings and observables related to neutrino masses, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2007) 073.
  163. J. Barry, W. Rodejohann, and H. Zhang, Light sterile neutrinos: Models and phenomenology, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 091.
  164. Y. F. Li and S.-s. Liu, Vanishing effective mass of the neutrinoless double beta decay including light sterile neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 706, 406 (2012).
  165. W. Rodejohann, Neutrinoless double beta decay and neutrino physics, J. Phys. G 39, 124008 (2012).
  166. I. Girardi, A. Meroni, and S. T. Petcov, Neutrinoless double beta decay in the presence of light sterile neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 146.
  167. C. Giunti and E. M. Zavanin, Predictions for neutrinoless double-beta decay in the 3+1 sterile neutrino scenario, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 171.
  168. J.-H. Liu and S. Zhou, Another look at the impact of an eV-mass sterile neutrino on the effective neutrino mass of neutrinoless double-beta decays, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850014 (2018).
  169. K. N. Deepthi, S. Goswami, V. K. N., and T. K. Poddar, Implications of the dark large mixing angle solution and a fourth sterile neutrino for neutrinoless double beta decay, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015020 (2020).
  170. S. Jana, L. Puetter, and A. Y. Smirnov, Restricting sterile neutrinos by neutrinoless double beta decay, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015011 (2025).
  171. K. N. Vishnudath, S. Choubey, and S. Goswami, New sensitivity goal for neutrinoless double beta decay experiments, Phys. Rev. D 99, 095038 (2019).
  172. S.-F. Ge and J.-y. Zhu, Phenomenological advantages of the normal neutrino mass ordering, Chin. Phys. C 44, 083103 (2020).
  173. B. Dutta, A. Karthikeyan, D. Kim, A. Thompson, and R. G. Van de Water, Photon excess from dark matter and neutrino scattering at MiniBooNE and MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 113, 015029 (2026).
  174. P. S. B. Dev, S. Jana, and Y. Porto, Matter effects on flavor composition of astrophysical neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 112, 093003 (2025).
  175. A. Omeliukh et al. (IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration), Optimization of the optical array geometry for IceCube-Gen2, Proc. Sci. ICRC2021 (2021) 1184. [arXiv:2107.08527].
  176. K. Valerius, Latest results from KATRIN: Neutrino mass and beyond, Talk Presented at CERN EP Seminar, 2025 (2025), https://indico.cern.ch/event/1500288/attachments/3061689/5414279/CERN-EP_KATRIN_2025-05-06.pdf.
  177. F. Acerbi et al., nuSCOPE: A short-baseline neutrino beam at CERN for high-precision cross-section measurements, arXiv:2503.21589.
  178. A. Blanchet et al., nuSCOPE sensitivity studies for sterile neutrino mixing with beam neutrinos, Talk Presented at EP-nu Group Meeting, 25 Sep 2025 (2025). https://indico.cern.ch/event/1592586/contributions/6711151/attachments/3142944/5578746/20250925_EPNU_nuSCOPE.pdf.
  179. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), Hyper-Kamiokande design report, arXiv:1805.04163.
  180. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual Design Report, Volume 2: The Physics Program for DUNE at LBNF, arXiv:1512.06148.
  181. A. Alekou et al. (ESSnuSB Collaboration), Updated physics performance of the ESSnuSB experiment: ESSnuSB Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1130 (2021).
  182. S. Adrian-Martinez et al. (KM3Net Collaboration), Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G 43, 084001 (2016).
  183. N. W. Kamp and G. Putnam, The neutrino kaleidoscope: Searches for non-standard neutrino oscillations at neutrino telescopes with a TeV muon accelerator source, Phys. Rev. D 114, 033007 (2026).
  184. L. Bojorquez-Lopez, M. Hostert, C. A. Argüelles, and Z. Liu, Muon colliders and the neutrino slice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 091803 (2025).
  185. C. Accettura et al. (International Muon Collider Collaboration), The Muon collider, arXiv:2504.21417.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation