Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Jet charge with global event shapes: Probing quark flavor dynamics

Yang-Ting Chien1 and Sonny Mantry2

Phys. Rev. D 113, 114004 – Published 3 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/668t-9jv3

Abstract

We propose measuring the jet electric charge of jet regions, defined within the framework of global event shapes, as a probe of quark flavor dynamics within the nucleon and the hadronization process. In particular, we consider a measurement of the jet region charge while simultaneously keeping track of the energy flow throughout the event, as characterized by the global event shape. As a concrete example, we focus on the measurement of the 1-Jettiness jet charge (Q), the jet charge of the jet region (J) defined within the framework of the 1-Jettiness global event shape (τ1) for the deep inelastic scattering (DIS) process, e−+p→e−+J+X, with unpolarized or longitudinally polarized protons. The 1-Jettiness distribution, binned according to jet charge, allows for enhanced quark flavor separation of the initial-state unpolarized or polarized PDFs. On the other hand, the jet charge distribution binned by 1-Jettiness can serve as a probe of quark flavor dynamics in the final-state hadronization process. We derive a factorization theorem for simultaneous measurements of τ1 and Q in the resummation region, τ1≪PJT, where PJT denotes the transverse momentum of the jet region. The correlation between the jet region charge and the charge of the struck quark is expected to be the strongest in the resummation region. The factorization theorem contains a new universal charged jet function, generalizing the standard jet function to include a jet charge measurement. Therefore these universal functions can be extracted from a global analysis of N-jettiness and thrust at eb+e−¯ colliders. We provide simulation studies to demonstrate the sensitivity of the 1-Jettiness jet charge observable to quark flavor dynamics in nucleon structure and explore the possibility of probing the final-state hadronization process. This observable is well-suited for applications with existing HERA data and the future Electron-Ion Collider (EIC).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (112)

  1. E. Farhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1587 (1977).
  2. M. Dasgupta and G. P. Salam, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2002) 032.
  3. L. Clavelli, Phys. Lett. B85, 111 (1979).
  4. G. Parisi, Phys. Lett. 74B, 65 (1978).
  5. H. Georgi and M. Machacek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1237 (1977).
  6. I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 092002 (2010).
  7. Z.-B. Kang, S. Mantry, and J.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114011 (2012).
  8. Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu, S. Mantry, and J.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074020 (2013).
  9. D. Kang, C. Lee, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054004 (2013).
  10. Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu, and S. Mantry, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014041 (2014).
  11. D. Kang, C. Lee, and I. W. Stewart, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 132.
  12. Z. Chu, Y. Wang, J.-H. Ee, J. Chen, and D. Kang, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 111.
  13. H. Cao, Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu, and S. Mantry, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014045 (2024).
  14. J.-H. Ee, D. Kang, C. Lee, and I. W. Stewart, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 240.
  15. T. Becher and M. D. Schwartz, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2008) 034.
  16. R. Abbate, M. Fickinger, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011).
  17. R. Abbate, M. Fickinger, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 86, 094002 (2012).
  18. G. Bell, C. Lee, Y. Makris, J. Talbert, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094008 (2024).
  19. M. A. Benitez, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, I. W. Stewart, and G. Vita, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 249.
  20. M. A. Benitez et al., arXiv:2502.12253.
  21. S. Fleming, A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 77, 074010 (2008).
  22. S. Fleming, A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, and I. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114003 (2008).
  23. A. H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074021 (2019).
  24. B. Bachu, A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, A. Pathak, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014026 (2021).
  25. B. Dehnadi, A. H. Hoang, O. L. Jin, and V. Mateu, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 065.
  26. Y.-T. Chien and M. D. Schwartz, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 058.
  27. A. H. Hoang, V. Mateu, M. D. Schwartz, and I. W. Stewart, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 092.
  28. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Lett. 85B, 297 (1979).
  29. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2018 (1979).
  30. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1585 (1978).
  31. C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2298 (1978).
  32. D. Neill, G. Vita, I. Vitev, and H. X. Zhu, in Snowmass 2021, arXiv:2203.07113.
  33. I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, arXiv:2506.09119.
  34. P. F. Monni, G. Vita, Z. Xu, and H. X. Zhu, arXiv:2508.00977.
  35. K. Lee and I. Moult, arXiv:2308.00746.
  36. E.-C. Aschenauer et al., arXiv:1602.03922.
  37. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 032004 (2018).
  38. D. Boer and C. Pisano, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074024 (2015).
  39. X. Liu, F. Ringer, W. Vogelsang, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 192003 (2019).
  40. M. Arratia, Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, and F. Ringer, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074015 (2020).
  41. X. Liu, F. Ringer, W. Vogelsang, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094022 (2020).
  42. E.-C. Aschenauer, K. Lee, B. Page, and F. Ringer, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054028 (2020).
  43. M. Arratia, Y. Song, F. Ringer, and B. Jacak, Phys. Rev. C 101, 065204 (2020).
  44. M. Arratia, Y. Makris, D. Neill, F. Ringer, and N. Sato, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034005 (2021).
  45. Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, and F. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135756 (2020).
  46. E. Aschenauer et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 024301 (2019).
  47. L. Zheng, E. Aschenauer, J. Lee, B.-W. Xiao, and Z.-B. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034011 (2018).
  48. R. Field and R. Feynman, Nucl. Phys. B136, 1 (1978).
  49. D. Krohn, M. D. Schwartz, T. Lin, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 212001 (2013).
  50. W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. D 86, 094030 (2012).
  51. J. Berge et al. (Fermilab-Serpukhov-Moscow-Michigan Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 91B, 311 (1980).
  52. J. Berge et al., Nucl. Phys. B184, 13 (1981).
  53. P. Allen et al. (Aachen-Bonn-CERN-Munich-Oxford Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B 194, 373 (1982), p. 307.
  54. J. Albanese et al. (European Muon Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 144B, 302 (1984).
  55. S. Barlag et al. (Amsterdam-Bologna-Padua-Pisa-Saclay-Turin Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 11, 283 (1982); 14, 281(E) (1982).
  56. R. Erickson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 822 (1979); 42, 1246(E) (1979).
  57. AMY, D. Stuart et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 983 (1990).
  58. D. Decamp et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 259, 377 (1991).
  59. W. Braunschweig et al. (TASSO Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 48, 433 (1990).
  60. V. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 041801 (2007).
  61. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 032003 (2013).
  62. ATLAS, G. Aad et al., J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 031.
  63. CMS, V. Khachatryan et al., J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 017.
  64. Y.-C. J. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, G. Cottin, and D. Shih, Phys. Rev. D 101, 053001 (2020).
  65. H. T. Li, B. Yan, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137300 (2022).
  66. X.-R. Wang and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 108, 056010 (2023).
  67. H. T. Li, B. Yan, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041802 (2023).
  68. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 052003 (2016).
  69. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 131.
  70. K. Fraser and M. D. Schwartz, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 093.
  71. Z.-B. Kang, A. J. Larkoski, and J. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 151901 (2023).
  72. M. Gyulassy and X.-n. Wang, Nucl. Phys. B420, 583 (1994).
  73. X.-N. Wang, M. Gyulassy, and M. Plumer, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3436 (1995).
  74. Y.-T. Chien and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 112301 (2017).
  75. M. Connors, C. Nattrass, R. Reed, and S. Salur, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025005 (2018).
  76. H. T. Li and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076020 (2020).
  77. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 115.
  78. Y.-L. Du, D. Pablos, and K. Tywoniuk, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 206.
  79. Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu, S. Mantry, and D. Y. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242003 (2020).
  80. Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, D. Y. Shao, and J. Terry, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 066.
  81. J. Gallicchio and M. D. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 172001 (2011).
  82. A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and B. Nachman, Phys. Rep. 841, 1 (2020).
  83. J. Brewer, J. Thaler, and A. P. Turner, Phys. Rev. C 103, 021901 (2021).
  84. Y.-T. Chien and R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, arXiv:1803.03589.
  85. A. Buckley, G. Callea, A. J. Larkoski, and S. Marzani, SciPost Phys. 9, 026 (2020).
  86. Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu, S. Mantry, M. Spraker, and T. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074028 (2021).
  87. The ATLAS Collaboration, CERN Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2013086, 2013, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1572980.
  88. Y.-T. Chien, A. Deshpande, M. M. Mondal, and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 105, L051502 (2022).
  89. I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. D 81, 094035 (2010).
  90. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke, Phys. Rev. D 63, 014006 (2000).
  91. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  92. C. W. Bauer and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Lett. B 516, 134 (2001).
  93. C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054022 (2002).
  94. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014017 (2002).
  95. M. Beneke, A. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, and T. Feldmann, Nucl. Phys. B643, 431 (2002).
  96. A. Idilbi, X. Ji, and F. Yuan, Nucl. Phys. B753, 42 (2006).
  97. T. Becher, M. Neubert, and B. D. Pecjak, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 076.
  98. T. T. Jouttenus, I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114030 (2011).
  99. R. Boughezal, X. Liu, and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094035 (2015).
  100. T. Becher and M. Neubert, Phys. Lett. B 637, 251 (2006).
  101. I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, and W. J. Waalewijn, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 005.
  102. J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, and F. Tackmann, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 113.
  103. R. Brüser, Z. L. Liu, and M. Stahlhofen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 072003 (2018).
  104. T. Sjöstrand et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  105. C. Bierlich et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  106. R. Boughezal, F. Petriello, U. Schubert, and H. Xing, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034001 (2017).
  107. G. P. Korchemsky, arXiv:hep-ph/9806537.
  108. G. P. Korchemsky and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B555, 335 (1999).
  109. C. W. Bauer, C. Lee, A. V. Manohar, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 70, 034014 (2004).
  110. C. Lee and G. F. Sterman, eConf C0601121, A001 (2006).
  111. C. Lee and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 75, 014022 (2007).
  112. C. W. Bauer and A. V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D 70, 034024 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation