- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Consistent canonical quantization of gravity: Recovery of classical GR from BRST-invariant coherent states

Lasha Berezhiani1,2, Gia Dvali1,2, and Otari Sakhelashvili3

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 125032 – Published 26 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/652w-ym62

Abstract

We perform canonical quantization of general relativity, as an effective quantum field theory below the Planck scale, within the Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST)-invariant framework. We show that the promotion of constraints to dynamical equations of motion for auxiliary fields leads to the healthy Hamiltonian flow. In particular, we show that the classical properties of Einstein’s gravity, such as vanishing Hamiltonian modulo boundary contribution, are realized merely as an expectation value in appropriate physical states. Most importantly, the physicality is shown not to entail trivial time evolution for correlation functions. In the present approach, we quantize the theory once and for all around the Minkowski vacuum and treat other would-be classical backgrounds as BRST-invariant coherent states. This is especially important for cosmological spacetimes as it uncovers features that are not visible in ordinary semiclassical treatment. The Poincaré invariance of the vacuum, essential for our quantization, provides strong motivation for spontaneously broken supersymmetry.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (58)

  1. G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black hole’s quantum N-portrait, Fortschr. Phys. 61, 742 (2013).
  2. G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black holes as critical point of quantum phase transition, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2752 (2014).
  3. G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Quantum compositeness of gravity: Black holes, AdS and inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2014) 023.
  4. G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Quantum exclusion of positive cosmological constant?, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 528, 68 (2016).
  5. L. Berezhiani, On corpuscular theory of inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 106 (2017).
  6. G. Dvali, C. Gomez, and S. Zell, Quantum break-time of de Sitter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2017) 028.
  7. L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali, and O. Sakhelashvili, de Sitter space as a BRST-invariant coherent state of gravitons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 025022 (2022).
  8. G. Dvali and S. Zell, Classicality and quantum break-time for cosmic axions, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2018) 064.
  9. G. Dvali, D. Flassig, C. Gomez, A. Pritzel, and N. Wintergerst, Scrambling in the black hole portrait, Phys. Rev. D 88, 124041 (2013).
  10. L. Berezhiani and M. Zantedeschi, Evolution of coherent states as quantum counterpart of classical dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 104, 085007 (2021).
  11. L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia, and M. Zantedeschi, Background-field method and initial-time singularity for coherent states, Phys. Rev. D 105, 045003 (2022).
  12. G. Dvali and L. Eisemann, Perturbative understanding of nonperturbative processes and quantumization versus classicalization, Phys. Rev. D 106, 125019 (2022).
  13. L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia, and M. Zantedeschi, Perturbative construction of coherent states, Phys. Rev. D 109, 085018 (2024).
  14. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat].1017/CBO9780511622632.
  15. G. Dvali, L. Eisemann, M. Michel, and S. Zell, Universe’s primordial quantum memories, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 010.
  16. G. Dvali, A microscopic model of holography: Survival by the burden of memory, arXiv:1810.02336.
  17. G. Dvali, L. Eisemann, M. Michel, and S. Zell, Black hole metamorphosis and stabilization by memory burden, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103523 (2020).
  18. G. Dvali, J. S. Valbuena-Bermúdez, and M. Zantedeschi, Memory burden effect in black holes and solitons: Implications for PBH, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056029 (2024).
  19. A. Alexandre, G. Dvali, and E. Koutsangelas, New mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter from the memory burden effect, Phys. Rev. D 110, 036004 (2024).
  20. V. Thoss, A. Burkert, and K. Kohri, Breakdown of Hawking evaporation opens new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter candidate, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 532, 451 (2024).
  21. S. Balaji, G. Domènech, G. Franciolini, A. Ganz, and J. Tränkle, Probing modified Hawking evaporation with gravitational waves from the primordial black hole dominated universe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2024) 026.
  22. M. R. Haque, S. Maity, D. Maity, and Y. Mambrini, Quantum effects on the evaporation of PBHs: Contributions to dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 002.
  23. L. Berezhiani and M. Trodden, How likely are constituent quanta to initiate inflation?, Phys. Lett. B 749, 425 (2015).
  24. L. Berezhiani and M. Trodden, A relativistic gas of inflatons as an initial state for inflation, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137852 (2023).
  25. J. Garriga and T. Tanaka, Can infrared gravitons screen Λ?, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024021 (2008).
  26. N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Quantum gravity slows inflation, Nucl. Phys. B474, 235 (1996).
  27. N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, The quantum gravitational back reaction on inflation, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 253, 1 (1997).
  28. R. P. Woodard, de Sitter breaking in field theory, arXiv:gr-qc/0408002.
  29. N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Comment on ‘Can infrared gravitons screen Lambda?’, Phys. Rev. D 78, 028501 (2008).
  30. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 2: Modern Applications (University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
  31. G. Dvali, S-matrix and anomaly of de Sitter, Symmetry 13, 3 (2020).
  32. G. Dvali, A. Kobakhidze, and O. Sakhelashvili, Hint to supersymmetry from GR vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 110, 086008 (2024).
  33. M. J. G. Veltman, Quantum theory of gravitation, Conf. Proc. C 7507281, 265 (1975), https://inspirehep.net/literature/105735.
  34. T. Kugo and I. Ojima, Subsidiary conditions and physical S matrix unitarity in indefinite metric quantum gravitational theory, Nucl. Phys. B144, 234 (1978).
  35. G. Dvali, Black Holes from Particle Physics Perspective, 2014, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1970923.
  36. C. Deffayet, G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and A. I. Vainshtein, Nonperturbative continuity in graviton mass versus perturbative discontinuity, Phys. Rev. D 65, 044026 (2002).
  37. J. W. Van Holten, Aspects of BRST quantization, Lect. Notes Phys. 659, 99 (2005).
  38. E. Witten, A note on the canonical formalism for gravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27, 311 (2023).
  39. T. Kugo and I. Ojima, Local covariant operator formalism of non-Abelian gauge theories and quark confinement problem, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66, 1 (1979).
  40. R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Dynamical structure and definition of energy in GR, Phys. Rev. 116, 1322 (1959).
  41. E. Witten, A simple proof of the positive energy theorem, Commun. Math. Phys. 80, 381 (1981).
  42. B. S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. 1. The canonical theory, Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967).
  43. L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali, and O. Sakhelashvili, On time evolution in quantum gravity, arXiv:2510.16543.
  44. L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali, and O. Sakhelashvili, Coherent states in gauge theories: Topological defects and other classical configurations, Phys. Rev. D 111, 065018 (2025).
  45. G. Dvali, Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem, Fortschr. Phys. 58, 528 (2010).
  46. G. Dvali and M. Redi, Black hole bound on the number of species and quantum gravity at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 77, 045027 (2008).
  47. G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Quantum information and gravity cutoff in theories with species, Phys. Lett. B 674, 303 (2009).
  48. G. Dvali and D. Lust, Evaporation of microscopic black holes in string theory and the bound on species, Fortschr. Phys. 58, 505 (2010).
  49. G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Species and strings, arXiv:1004.3744.
  50. G. Dvali, Safety of Minkowski vacuum, arXiv:1107.0956.
  51. Y. B. Zeldovich, Spontaneous processing in vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 52, 341 (1974).
  52. S. R. Coleman and F. De Luccia, Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3305 (1980).
  53. T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson, Asymptotically flat self-dual solutions to euclidean gravity, Phys. Lett. B 74, 249 (1978).
  54. T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson, Selfdual solutions to Euclidean gravity, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 120, 82 (1979).
  55. G. Dvali, Quantum gravity in species regime, arXiv:2103.15668.
  56. G. R. Dvali and S. H. H. Tye, Brane inflation, Phys. Lett. B 450, 72 (1999).
  57. G. R. Dvali, Q. Shafi, and S. Solganik, D-brane inflation, arXiv:hep-th/0105203.
  58. J. Polchinski, Dirichlet branes and Ramond-Ramond charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4724 (1995).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 125032– Published 26 June, 2026
  • Received 5 October 2024
  • Accepted 8 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation