Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Chiral enhancement in soft-photon bremsstrahlung and charge asymmetry in low-energy lepton-proton scattering

Bhoomika Das1,*, Rakshanda Goswami1,†, Pulak Talukdar2,‡, Udit Raha1,§, and Fred Myhrer3,∥

  • *Contact author: bhoomika.das@iitg.ac.in
  • †Contact author: r.goswami@iitg.ac.in
  • ‡Contact author: pulaktalukdar45@gmail.com
  • §Contact author: udit.raha@iitg.ac.in
  • ∥Contact author: myhrer@mailbox.sc.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 033007 – Published 24 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6396-twj8

Abstract

We perform a Lorentz gauge evaluation of the single soft-photon bremsstrahlung radiative corrections to the unpolarized elastic lepton-proton scattering cross section at low energies, using the framework of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory (HBχPT). We systematically incorporate all next-to-leading-order [i.e., O(α3/M)] contributions to the cross section arising from radiative and proton’s low-energy recoil effects. An important component of the soft-photon bremsstrahlung corrections arises from the interference between lepton and proton bremsstrahlung processes, which are characterized as charge-odd. We identify a class of Feynman diagrams involving the final-state radiating proton that induces a chiral enhancement, thereby modifying the naive amplitude hierarchy based on the standard chiral power-counting scheme. The recently derived HBχPT result for the analytically computed exact two-photon exchange counterpart at next-to-leading order is combined with our charge-odd soft-photon bremsstrahlung contribution to yield the complete charge-odd radiative correction. By incorporating the leading hadronic correction to the one-photon exchange process within the charge-even radiative correction, we obtain a prediction for the charge asymmetry observable, which can be compared with forthcoming MUon Scattering Experiment data on elastic lepton-antilepton scattering off the proton. In all our calculations, we use finite lepton masses.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (58)

  1. N. Kivel and M. Vanderhaeghen, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 029.
  2. I. T. Lorenz, U.-G. Meissner, H. W. Hammer, and Y. B. Dong, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014023 (2015).
  3. O. Tomalak and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 90, 013006 (2014).
  4. O. Tomalak and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 24 (2015).
  5. O. Tomalak and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 93, 013023 (2016).
  6. O. Tomalak and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 125 (2016).
  7. O. Tomalak, B. Pasquini, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 95, 096001 (2017).
  8. O. Tomalak, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 858 (2017).
  9. O. Koshchii and A. Afanasev, Phys. Rev. D 96, 016005 (2017).
  10. O. Tomalak and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 514 (2018).
  11. R. D. Bucoveanu and H. Spiesberger, Eur. Phys. J. C 55, 57 (2019).
  12. P. Talukdar, V. C. Shastry, U. Raha, and F. Myhrer, Phys. Rev. D 101, 013008 (2020).
  13. C. Peset, A. Pineda, and O. Tomalak, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 121, 103901 (2021).
  14. P. Talukdar, V. C. Shastry, U. Raha, and F. Myhrer, Phys. Rev. D 104, 053001 (2021).
  15. N. Kaiser, Y.-H. Lin, and U.-G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. D 105, 076006 (2022).
  16. Q. Q. Guo and H. Q. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 106, 015203 (2022).
  17. T. Engel, F. Hagelstein, M. Rocco, V. Sharkovska, A. Signer, and Y. Ulrich, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 253 (2023).
  18. X. H. Cao, Q. Z. Li, and H. Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094008 (2022).
  19. P. Choudhary, U. Raha, F. Myhrer, and D. Chakrabarti, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 69 (2024); an erratum has been accepted for publication by EPJA.
  20. R. Goswami, P. Talukdar, B. Das, U. Raha, and F. Myhrer, Phys. Rev. D 111, 113009 (2025).
  21. A. Afanasev, P. G. Blunden, D. Hasell, and B. A. Raue, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 95, 245 (2017).
  22. F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck, Phys. Rev. 52, 54 (1937).
  23. D. R. Yennie, S. C. Frautschi, and H. Suura, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 13, 379 (1961).
  24. T. Kinoshita, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 650 (1962).
  25. T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. 133, B1549 (1964).
  26. A. Afanasev and A. Ilyichev, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 156 (2022).
  27. R. Gilman et al., arXiv:1709.09753.
  28. E. Cline, J. Bernauer, E. J. Downie, and R. Gilman, SciPost Phys. Proc. 5, 023 (2021).
  29. S. Strauch, Proc. Sci., CD2021 (2024) 070.
  30. R. Pohl et al. (CREMA Collaboration), Nature (London) 466, 213 (2010).
  31. R. Pohl, R. Gilman, G. A. Miller, and K. Pachucki, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 175 (2013).
  32. A. Antognini et al., Science 339, 417 (2013).
  33. J. C. Bernauer and R. Pohl, Sci. Am. 310, 32 (2014).
  34. C. E. Carlson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82, 59 (2015).
  35. J. C. Bernauer, EPJ Web Conf. 234, 01001 (2020).
  36. H. Gao and M. Vanderhaeghen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015002 (2022).
  37. A. Afanasev and A. Ilyichev, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 280 (2021).
  38. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar, Phys. Lett. B 255, 558 (1991).
  39. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. B388, 315 (1992).
  40. G. Ecker, Phys. Lett. B 336, 508 (1994).
  41. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and Ulf.-G. Meißner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 04, 193 (1995).
  42. N. Fettes, U. G. Meißner, M. Mojžiš, and S. Steininger, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 283, 273 (2000).
  43. N. Fettes, Ph.D. dissertation, Pion nucleon physics in chiral perturbation theory, FZ-Juelich, 2000.
  44. S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), Vol. 830.
  45. L. C. Maximon and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054320 (2000).
  46. M. Vanderhaeghen, J. M. Friedrich, D. Lhuillier, D. Marchand, L. Van Hoorebeke, and J. Van de Wiele, Phys. Rev. C 62, 025501 (2000).
  47. Y.-S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. 122, 1898 (1961).
  48. L. W. Mo and Y.-S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 205 (1969).
  49. L. C. Maximon, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 193 (1969).
  50. S. Scherer, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27, 277 (2003).
  51. V. Bernard, H. W. Fearing, T. R. Hemmert, and U. G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A635, 121 (1998).
  52. C. Hanhart and A. Wirzba, Phys. Lett. B 650, 354 (2007).
  53. F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. 110, 974 (1958).
  54. W. A. McKinley and H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 74, 1759 (1948).
  55. V. V. Bytev and E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, Phys. Rev. C 99, 025205 (2019); 106, 029902(E) (2022).
  56. A. Antognini et al. (CREMA Collaboration), Science 339, 417 (2013).
  57. R. Pohl, R. Gilman, G. A. Miller, and K. Pachucki, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 175 (2013).
  58. M. Mihovilovič et al. (A1 Collboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 107 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation