Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

First determination of fragmentation functions in an exotic-hadron candidate

S. Kumano

Phys. Rev. D 114, L071501 – Published 5 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6241-7111

Abstract

In recent years, there are experimental reports on exotic-hadron candidates, which have different quark configurations from ordinary qq¯ and qqq constituents. However, it is not easy to confirm their exotic nature from global observables such as masses, spins, parities, and decay widths. At high energies, internal quark and gluon configurations could become more apparent because hadrons should be described by fundamental degrees of freedom of quarks and gluons in quantum chromodynamics. One of such possibilities is to use the fragmentation functions (FFs). In this work, accurate FFs of an exotic-hadron candidate f0(980) are determined for the first time by a global analysis of experimental data on e++e−→f0(980)+X with recent precise measurements of the Belle Collaboration. From the global analysis, we found that their second moments have a relation Mu=Md≪Ms∼Mg for up-quark, down-quark, strange-quark, and gluon FFs. Furthermore, the function Dsf0(z) is distributed in the larger-z region in comparison with the functions Duf0(z), Ddf0(z), and Dgf0(z). These facts support that the f0(980) has the ss¯ configuration at high energies. This is a new finding that f0(980) should be considered mainly as the ss¯ state, which is different from our usual understanding as a tetraquark (or KK¯) hadron from low-energy studies. Our results could indicate the transition of the internal configuration picture that f0(980) looks like a qq¯ state at high energies, although it is described by tetraquark or KK¯ molecule state at low energies. It sheds light on a new direction in exotic-hadron physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (17)

  1. For a recent review on f0(980), see S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024), especially Sec. 64, Scalar Mesons below 1 GeV, for finding the current situation of possible f0(980) configurations.
  2. F. E. Close, N. Isgur, S. Kumano, Nucl. Phys. B389, 513 (1993).
  3. T. Sekihara and S. Kumano, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034010 (2015).
  4. M. Hirai, S. Kumano, M. Oka, and K. Sudoh, Phys. Rev. D 77, 017504 (2008).
  5. H. Kawamura, S. Kumano, and T. Sekihara, Phys. Rev. D 88, 034010 (2013).
  6. W.-C. Chang, S. Kumano, and T. Sekihara, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034006 (2016).
  7. H. Kawamura and S. Kumano, Phys. Rev. D 89, 054007 (2014).
  8. M. Hirai, S. Kumano, T.-H. Nagai, and K. Sudoh, Phys. Rev. D 75, 094009 (2007); M. Hirai, H. Kawamura, S. Kumano, and K. Saito, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 113B04 (2016).
  9. There are many global analyses for light hadrons. For example, see the recent works V. Bertone, N. P. Hartland, E. R. Nocera, J. Rojo, and L. Rottoli, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 651 (2018); R. A. Khalek, V. Bertone, and E. R. Nocera, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034007 (2021); E. Moffat, W. Melnitchouk, T. C. Rogers, and N. Sato, 104, 016015 (2021); I. Borsa, D. de Florian, R. Sassot, and M. Stratmann, 105, 031502 (2022); J. Gao, C. Y. Liu, X. M. Shen, H. Xing, and Y. Zhao, 110, 114019 (2024); J. Gao, C. Y. Liu, X. Shen, H. Xing, and Y. ZhaoPhys. Rev. Lett. 132, 261903 (2024); J. Gao, X. M. Shen, H. Xing, Y. Zhao, and B. Zhao 135, 041902 (2025).; For a complete list of FFs analyses, see J. Gao, C. Y. Liu, M. Li, X. M. Shen, H. Xing, Y. Zhao, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054045 (2025).
  10. R. Seidl et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 111, 052003 (2025).
  11. R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, and B. R. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
  12. M. Hirai and S. Kumano, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1002 (2012).
  13. S. Abachi et al. (HRS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1990 (1986).
  14. P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 65, 587 (1995); Phys. Lett. B 449, 364 (1999).
  15. K. Ackerstaff et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 19 (1998).
  16. http://www.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/cernlib/asdoc/minuit/node33.html.
  17. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Nat. Commun. 16, 7990 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation