Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Polyakov loop model with exact static quark determinant in the ’t Hooft-Veneziano limit: U(N) case

S. Voloshyn*

  • *Contact author: billy.sunburn@gmail.com, s.voloshyn@bitp.kyiv.ua

Phys. Rev. D 113, 074526 – Published 30 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5mdx-j8qy

Abstract

I investigate a d-dimensional U(N) Polyakov loop model that includes the exact static determinant with Nf degenerate quark flavor and depends explicitly on the quark mass and chemical potential. In the large N,Nf limit mean field gives the exact solution, and the core of the Polyakov loop model is reduced to a deformed unitary matrix model, which I solve exactly. I compute the free energy, the expectation value of the Polyakov loop, and the quark condensate. The phase diagram of the model and the type of phase transition is investigated and shows it depends on the ratio κ=Nf/N.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (21)

  1. O. Philipsen, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2019 (2019) 273 [arXiv:1912.04827].
  2. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, and S. Voloshyn, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 11021 (2018).
  3. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, and S. Voloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014502 (2020).
  4. G. t’ Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974).
  5. G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B117, 519 (1976).
  6. P. H. Damgaard and A. Patkós, Phys. Lett. B 172, 369 (1986).
  7. C. H. Christensen, Phys. Lett. B 714, 306 (2012).
  8. D. J. Gross and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 21, 446 (1980).
  9. S. R. Wadia, Phys. Lett. 93B, 403 (1980).
  10. H. Nishimura, R. D. Pisarski, and V. V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036014 (2018).
  11. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, and S. Voloshyn, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2021) 453 [arXiv:2111.07103].
  12. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, and S. Voloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014501 (2022).
  13. Jorge G. Russo, Phys. Rev. D 102, 105019 (2020).
  14. Jorge G. Russo and Miguel Tierz, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 081.
  15. L. Santilli and M. Tierz, J. Stat. Mech. (2020) 083107.
  16. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, S. Voloshyn, and P. Yefanov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 008.
  17. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, E. Mendicelli, and A. Papa, Nucl. Phys. B965, 115332 (2021).
  18. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, S. Voloshyn, and P. Yefanov, Phys. Lett. B 827, 137000 (2022).
  19. O. Borisenko, S. Voloshyn, and V. Chelnokov, Rep. Math. Phys. 85, 129 (2020).
  20. Y. Y. Goldschmidt, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 21, 1842 (1980).
  21. O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, and S. Voloshyn, Nucl. Phys. B960, 115177 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation