Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Three-family supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes on rigid cycles

Adeel Mansha1, Mudassar Sabir2,*, Tianjun Li3,4,5,†, and Luyang Wang1,‡

  • *Contact author: mudassar.sabir@uestc.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: tli@itp.ac.cn
  • ‡Contact author: wangly@szu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 055006 – Published 4 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5m95-q581

Abstract

Intersecting D6-brane models without discrete torsion typically suffer from unstabilized open-string moduli arising from D-brane positions and Wilson lines. These moduli generate additional massless adjoint fields, obstructing the realization of negative β functions necessary for asymptotic freedom unless they are decoupled around the string scale. A viable solution involves utilizing rigid cycles, which eliminate these unwanted adjoint fields. In this work, we for the first time present a class of consistent three-family supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from rigid intersecting D6-branes on the factorizable T6/(Z2×Z2′) orientifold with discrete torsion. These models satisfy all the known consistency conditions, including N=1 supersymmetry, K-theory constraints, tadpole cancellation, and recent swampland bounds on the maximal gauge group rank. We provide detailed particle spectra, analyze their phenomenological implications, and discuss the decoupling of exotic states through strong dynamics in the hidden sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (54)

  1. M. Cvetic, G. Shiu, and A. M. Uranga, Three family supersymmetric standard-like models from intersecting brane worlds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 201801 (2001).
  2. M. Cvetic, G. Shiu, and A. M. Uranga, Chiral four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric type IIA orientifolds from intersecting D6 branes, Nucl. Phys. B615, 3 (2001).
  3. M. Cvetic, I. Papadimitriou, and G. Shiu, Supersymmetric three family SU(5) grand unified models from type IIA orientifolds with intersecting D6-branes, Nucl. Phys. B659, 193 (2003); B696, 298(E) (2004).
  4. M. Cvetic, T. Li, and T. Liu, Supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes: A road to the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B698, 163 (2004).
  5. R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, P. Langacker, and G. Shiu, Toward realistic intersecting D-brane models, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 71 (2005).
  6. C.-M. Chen, T. Li, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Standard-like Model building on type II orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B732, 224 (2006).
  7. C.-M. Chen, T. Li, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Type IIA Pati-Salam flux vacua, Nucl. Phys. B740, 79 (2006).
  8. C.-M. Chen, T. Li, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Flipped and unflipped SU(5) as type IIA flux vacua, Nucl. Phys. B751, 260 (2006).
  9. C.-M. Chen, T. Li, V. E. Mayes, and D. V. Nanopoulos, A realistic world from intersecting D6-branes, Phys. Lett. B 665, 267 (2008).
  10. C.-M. Chen, T. Li, V. E. Mayes, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Towards realistic supersymmetric spectra and Yukawa textures from intersecting branes, Phys. Rev. D 77, 125023 (2008).
  11. W. He, T. Li, R. Sun, and L. Wu, The final model building for the supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 710 (2022).
  12. W. He, T. Li, and R. Sun, The complete search for the supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 044.
  13. T. Li, R. Sun, and L. Wu, String-scale gauge coupling relations in the supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 210.
  14. M. Sabir, T. Li, A. Mansha, and X.-C. Wang, The supersymmetry breaking soft terms, and fermion masses and mixings in the supersymmetric Pati-Salam model from intersecting D6-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 089.
  15. T. Li, A. Mansha, and R. Sun, Revisiting the supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 82 (2021).
  16. T. Li, A. Mansha, R. Sun, L. Wu, and W. He, N=1 supersymmetric SU(12)C×SU(2)L×SU(2)R models, SU(4)C×SU(6)L×SU(2)R models, and SU(4)C×SU(2)L×SU(6)R models from intersecting D6-branes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 046018 (2021).
  17. A. Mansha, T. Li, M. Sabir, and L. Wu, Three-family supersymmetric Pati-Salam models with symplectic groups from intersecting D6-branes, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 151 (2024).
  18. A. Mansha, T. Li, and L. Wu, The hidden sector variations in the N=1 supersymmetric three-family Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1067 (2023).
  19. M. Sabir, A. Mansha, T. Li, and Z.-W. Wang, Fermion masses and mixings in the supersymmetric Pati-Salam landscape from Intersecting D6-Branes, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 252.
  20. M. Sabir, A. Mansha, T. Li, and Z.-W. Wang, SUSY breaking soft terms in the supersymmetric Pati-Salam landscape from intersecting D6-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 201.
  21. M. Sabir, A. Mansha, T. Li, and Z.-W. Wang, Fermion masses and mixings in string theory with Dirac neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 111, L071702 (2025).
  22. A. Mansha, T. Li, and M. Sabir, Revisiting the supersymmetric trinification models from intersecting D6-branes, Commun. Theor. Phys. 76, 095201 (2024).
  23. B. Assel, K. Christodoulides, A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, and J. Rizos, Classification of heterotic Pati-Salam models, Nucl. Phys. B844, 365 (2011).
  24. A. E. Faraggi, V. G. Matyas, and B. Percival, Classification of nonsupersymmetric Pati-Salam heterotic string models, Phys. Rev. D 104, 046002 (2021).
  25. R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, F. Marchesano, and G. Shiu, Chiral D-brane models with frozen open string moduli, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 050.
  26. S. Forste and I. Zavala, Oddness from rigidness, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2008) 086.
  27. R. Blumenhagen, V. Braun, B. Kors, and D. Lust, Orientifolds of K3 and Calabi-Yau manifolds with intersecting D-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2002) 026.
  28. L. E. Ibanez and R. Richter, Stringy instantons and Yukawa couplings in MSSM-like orientifold models, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2009) 090.
  29. R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, and T. Weigand, Spacetime instanton corrections in 4D string vacua: The seesaw mechanism for D-Brane models, Nucl. Phys. B771, 113 (2007).
  30. L. E. Ibanez and A. M. Uranga, Neutrino Majorana masses from string theory instanton effects, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2007) 052.
  31. S. A. Abel and M. D. Goodsell, Realistic Yukawa couplings through instantons in intersecting brane worlds, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2007) 034.
  32. R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, D. Lust, R. Richter, and T. Weigand, Non-perturbative Yukawa couplings from string instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 061602 (2008).
  33. T. D. Brennan, F. Carta, and C. Vafa, The string landscape, the swampland, and the missing corner, Proc. Sci., TASI2017 (2017) 015 [arXiv:1711.00864].
  34. H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, Four-dimensional N=4 SYM theory and the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 102, 026003 (2020).
  35. H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa, and K. Xu, Finite landscape of 6D N=(1,0) supergravity, arXiv:2411.19155.
  36. G. J. Loges and G. Shiu, 134 billion intersecting brane models, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 097.
  37. N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland, arXiv:2212.06187.
  38. E. Palti, The swampland: Introduction and review, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  39. M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the swampland program in string compactifications, Phys. Rep. 989, 1 (2022).
  40. T. Van Riet and G. Zoccarato, Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related swampland topics, Phys. Rep. 1049, 1 (2024).
  41. A. Mansha, M. Sabir, T. Li, and L. Wang, Three family supersymmetric Pati-Salam model from rigid intersecting D6-branes, Phys. Rev. D 111, L121904 (2025).
  42. S. Forste and G. Honecker, Rigid D6-branes on T6/(Z2xZ2MxΩR) with discrete torsion, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2011) 091.
  43. M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory, Phys. Lett. B 149B, 117 (1984).
  44. J. F. G. Cascales and A. M. Uranga, Chiral 4D string vacua with D branes and NSNS and RR fluxes, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 011.
  45. F. Marchesano and G. Shiu, MSSM vacua from flux compactifications, Phys. Rev. D 71, 011701 (2005).
  46. F. Marchesano and G. Shiu, Building MSSM flux vacua, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2004) 041.
  47. A. M. Uranga, D-brane probes, RR tadpole cancellation and K-theory charge, Nucl. Phys. B598, 225 (2001).
  48. M. Cvetic, P. Langacker, and J. Wang, Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in Standard-like Models with intersecting D6-branes, Phys. Rev. D 68, 046002 (2003).
  49. D. Lust, P. Mayr, R. Richter, and S. Stieberger, Scattering of gauge, matter, and moduli fields from intersecting branes, Nucl. Phys. B696, 205 (2004).
  50. R. Blumenhagen, B. Kors, D. Lust, and S. Stieberger, Four-dimensional string compactifications with D-branes, orientifolds and fluxes, Phys. Rep. 445, 1 (2007).
  51. P. H. Ginsparg, Gauge and gravitational couplings in four-dimensional string theories, Phys. Lett. B 197, 139 (1987).
  52. Y. Hamada, T. Kobayashi, and S. Uemura, Standard Model–like D-brane models and gauge couplings, Nucl. Phys. B897, 563 (2015).
  53. K. R. Dienes and J. March-Russell, Realizing higher level gauge symmetries in string theory: New embeddings for string GUTs, Nucl. Phys. B479, 113 (1996).
  54. K. Ishiguro, S. Nishimura, and H. Otsuka, Autoencoder-driven clustering of intersecting D-brane models via tadpole charge, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 133.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation