- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fermion discretization effects in the two-flavor lattice Schwinger model: A study with matrix product states

Tim Schwägerl1,2, Karl Jansen3,1, and Stefan Kühn1

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 094501 – Published 3 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5kwl-8dhm

Abstract

We present a comprehensive tensor network study of staggered, Wilson, and twisted mass fermions in the Hamiltonian formulation, using the massive two-flavor Schwinger model as a benchmark. Particular emphasis is placed on twisted mass fermions, whose properties in this context have not been systematically explored before. We confirm the expected O(a) improvement in the free theory and observe that this improvement persists in the interacting case. By leveraging an electric-field-based method for mass renormalization, we reliably tune to maximal twist and establish the method’s applicability in the two-flavor model. Once mass renormalization is included, the pion mass exhibits rapid convergence to the continuum limit. Finite-volume effects are addressed using two complementary approaches: dispersion relation fits and finite-volume scaling. Our results show excellent agreement with semiclassical predictions and reveal a milder volume dependence for twisted mass fermions compared to staggered and Wilson discretizations. In addition, we observe clear isospin-breaking effects, suggesting intriguing parallels with lattice QCD. These findings highlight the advantages of twisted mass fermions for Hamiltonian simulations and motivate their further exploration—particularly in view of future applications to higher-dimensional lattice gauge theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang, Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice (Springer, Berlin, 2010), Vol. 788.
  2. H. J. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction (Fourth Edition) (World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 2012).
  3. Y. Aoki et al., FLAG review 2024, arXiv:2411.04268.
  4. E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Sign problem in the numerical simulation of many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9301 (1990).
  5. J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).
  6. M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, Tensor networks and their use for lattice gauge theories, Proc. Sci., (LATTICE2018) (2019) 022.
  7. M. C. Bañuls and K. Cichy, Review on novel methods for lattice gauge theories, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 024401 (2020).
  8. M. C. Bañuls et al., Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies, Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 165 (2020).
  9. M. Rigobello, S. Notarnicola, G. Magnifico, and S. Montangero, Entanglement generation in 1+1D QED scattering processes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114501 (2021).
  10. M. Rigobello, G. Magnifico, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Hadrons in (1+1)D Hamiltonian hardcore lattice QCD, arXiv:2308.04488.
  11. I. Papaefstathiou, J. Knolle, and M. C. Bañuls, Real-time scattering in the lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014504 (2025).
  12. T. Angelides, Y. Guo, K. Jansen, S. Kühn, and G. Magnifico, Meson thermalization with a hot medium in the open Schwinger model, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 195.
  13. Y. Chai, Y. Guo, and S. Kühn, Scalable quantum algorithm for meson scattering in a lattice gauge theory, arXiv:2505.21240.
  14. T. Felser, P. Silvi, M. Collura, and S. Montangero, Two-dimensional quantum-link lattice quantum electrodynamics at finite density, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041040 (2020).
  15. G. Magnifico, T. Felser, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Lattice quantum electrodynamics in (3+1)-dimensions at finite density with tensor networks, Nat. Commun. 12, 3600 (2021).
  16. G. Cataldi, G. Magnifico, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Simulating (2+1)d SU(2) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory at finite density with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033057 (2024).
  17. G. Magnifico, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, P. Majcen, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Tensor networks for lattice gauge theories beyond one dimension, Commun. Phys. 8, 322 (2025).
  18. P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, A remnant of chiral symmetry on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2649 (1982).
  19. S. Aoki, New phase structure for lattice QCD with Wilson fermions, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2653 (1984).
  20. M. Lüscher, Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, Phys. Lett. B 428, 342 (1998).
  21. R. Frezzotti, P. A. Grassi, S. Sint, and P. Weisz, Lattice QCD with a chirally twisted mass term, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 058.
  22. L. H. Karsten, Lattice fermions in Euclidean space-time, Phys. Lett. B 104, 315 (1981).
  23. F. Wilczek, Lattice fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2397 (1987).
  24. A. Boriçi, Creutz fermions on an orthogonal lattice, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074504 (2008).
  25. H. R. Quinn and M. Weinstein, New formulation for the lattice-fermion derivative: Locality and chirality without spectrum doubling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2617 (1986).
  26. J. H. Weber, Properties of minimally doubled fermions, Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz, 2015.
  27. T. Angelides, L. Funcke, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, Computing the mass shift of Wilson and staggered fermions in the lattice Schwinger model with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014516 (2023).
  28. A. Shindler, Twisted mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rep. 461, 37 (2008).
  29. D. Albandea and P. Hernández, Chiral and isospin breaking in the two-flavor Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074503 (2025).
  30. K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
  31. M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, K. Jansen, and H. Saito, Chiral condensate in the Schwinger model with matrix product operators, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094512 (2016).
  32. L. Funcke, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054507 (2020).
  33. T. V. Zache, M. Van Damme, J. C. Halimeh, P. Hauke, and D. Banerjee, Toward the continuum limit of a (1+1)D quantum link Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 106, L091502 (2022).
  34. M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, Density induced phase transitions in the Schwinger model: A study with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 071601 (2017).
  35. E. Itou, A. Matsumoto, and Y. Tanizaki, Calculating composite-particle spectra in Hamiltonian formalism and demonstration in 2-flavor QED1+1D, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 231.
  36. L. Funcke, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, Exploring the CP-violating Dashen phase in the Schwinger model with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014504 (2023).
  37. E. Itou, A. Matsumoto, and Y. Tanizaki, Dmrg study of the theta-dependent mass spectrum in the 2-flavor Schwinger model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 155.
  38. R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, B. T. Søgaard, and B. Zan, Phase diagram of the two-flavor Schwinger model at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 031603 (2024).
  39. S. Kühn, L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, M.-O. Pleinert, S. Schuster, and J. von Zanthier, Exploring the phase structure of the multi-flavor Schwinger model with quantum computing, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2022 (2023) 020.
  40. R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Scalable circuits for preparing ground states on digital quantum computers: The Schwinger model vacuum on 100 qubits, PRX Quantum 5, 020315 (2024).
  41. L. W. Anderson, M. Kiffner, T. O’Leary, J. Crain, and D. Jaksch, Solving lattice gauge theories using the quantum Krylov algorithm and qubitization, Quantum 9, 1669 (2025).
  42. T. Angelides, P. Naredi, A. Crippa, K. Jansen, S. Kühn, I. Tavernelli, and D. S. Wang, First-order phase transition of the Schwinger model with a quantum computer, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 6 (2025).
  43. S. Schuster, S. Kühn, L. Funcke, T. Hartung, M.-O. Pleinert, J. v. Zanthier, and K. Jansen, Studying the phase diagram of the three-flavor Schwinger model in the presence of a chemical potential with measurement- and gate-based quantum computing, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114508 (2024).
  44. Y. Guo, T. Angelides, K. Jansen, and S. Kühn, Concurrent VQE for simulating excited states of the Schwinger model, arXiv:2407.15629.
  45. N. Christian, K. Jansen, K. Nagai, and B. Pollakowski, Scaling test of fermion actions in the Schwinger model, Nucl. Phys. B739, 60 (2006).
  46. R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. Zan, Discrete chiral symmetry and mass shift in the lattice Hamiltonian approach to the Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043133 (2022).
  47. M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, K. Jansen, and J. I. Cirac, The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with matrix product states, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 158.
  48. A. V. Smilga, Critical amplitudes in two-dimensional theories, Phys. Rev. D 55, R443 (1997).
  49. Y. Hosotani and R. Rodriguez, Bosonized massive N-flavor Schwinger model, J. Phys. A 31, 9925 (1998).
  50. J. Schwinger, Gauge invariance and mass. II, Phys. Rev. 128, 2425 (1962).
  51. C. Adam, Massive Schwinger model within mass perturbation theory, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 259, 1 (1997).
  52. D. Gepner, Non-Abelian bosonization and multiflavor QED and QCD in two dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B252, 481 (1985).
  53. I. Affleck, On the realization of chiral symmetry in (1+1) dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B265, 448 (1986).
  54. S. Coleman, More about the massive Schwinger model, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 101, 239 (1976).
  55. C. J. Hamer, Z. Weihong, and J. Oitmaa, Series expansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamiltonian lattice theory, Phys. Rev. D 56, 55 (1997).
  56. T. V. Zache, F. Hebenstreit, F. Jendrzejewski, M. K. Oberthaler, J. Berges, and P. Hauke, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories using Wilson fermions, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 034010 (2018).
  57. G. Mazzola, S. V. Mathis, G. Mazzola, and I. Tavernelli, Gauge-invariant quantum circuits for U(1) and Yang-Mills lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043209 (2021).
  58. R. Frezzotti and G. C. Rossi, Chirally improving Wilson fermions—I. O(a) improvement, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2004) 007.
  59. S. Aoki and O. Bär, Twisted mass QCD, O(a) improvement, and Wilson chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 70, 116011 (2004).
  60. S. Aoki and O. Bär, Automatic o(a) improvement for twisted mass QCD in the presence of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 74, 034511 (2006).
  61. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011).
  62. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022).
  63. J. Haegeman, Variational renormalization group methods for extended quantum systems, Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University. Faculty of Sciences, 2011.
  64. C. Pineda, T. Barthel, and J. Eisert, Unitary circuits for strongly correlated fermions, Phys. Rev. A 81, 050303 (2010).
  65. C. V. Kraus, N. Schuch, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Fermionic projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052338 (2010).
  66. P. Corboz, R. Orús, B. Bauer, and G. Vidal, Simulation of strongly correlated fermions in two spatial dimensions with fermionic projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B 81, 165104 (2010).
  67. B. Efron, The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans (SIAM, 1982).
  68. K. Jansen, C. McNeile, C. Michael, K. Nagai, M. Papinutto, J. Pickavance, A. Shindler, C. Urbach, and I. Wetzorke, Flavour breaking effects of wilson twisted mass fermions, Phys. Lett. B 624, 334 (2005).
  69. M. Luscher, Volume dependence of the energy spectrum in massive quantum field theories. 1. Stable particle states, Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 177 (1986).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 094501– Published 3 November, 2025
  • Received 23 September 2025
  • Accepted 16 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation