Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dynamical determination of the cut-off scale in loop-induced neutrino mass models with noninvertible symmetry

Hiroshi Okada* and Jia-Jun Wu†

  • *Contact author: hiroshi3okada@htu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: wujiajun@htu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 035018 – Published 11 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/56z9-4xjs

Abstract

We propose our framework as an effective field theory valid below the cutoff scale Λ, in which we explain the tiny scale of neutrino masses by integrating a noninvertible symmetry with the dynamical determination of the cutoff scale. In our model, we introduce three families of SU(2)L quintet fermions (ΣR) and a quartet scalar (ϕ4), both of which are charged under the Fibonacci fusion rule (FFR). A central feature of this construction is that the vacuum expectation value (VEV) v4 of ϕ4 is induced at the one-loop level via dynamical symmetry breaking. To resolve the inherent arbitrariness of the cutoff scale Λ in loop-induced VEV models, we identify Λ with the scale at which the SU(2)L gauge coupling g2 encounters the renormalization group evolution (RGE) of g2, naturally fixing the physical cutoff within the range of approximately 105 to 107  GeV. Quantitatively, this framework yields v4∼0.07–0.1  GeV, which in turn leads to neutrino Yukawa couplings on the order of 10−3. This result provides a significantly more natural explanation for the neutrino mass hierarchy compared to standard seesaw models, which typically require couplings as small as 10−6 or less. Notably, our approach maintains a relatively simple particle content and does not necessitate additional (gauge) bosons for symmetry breaking.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. A. Zee, Phys. Lett. 93B, 389 (1980).
  2. K. S. Babu, Phys. Lett. B 203, 132 (1988).
  3. E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 73, 077301 (2006).
  4. R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and G. C. Joshi, Z. Phys. C 44, 441 (1989).
  5. S. Kanemura and H. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 86, 073006 (2012).
  6. H. Okada and Y. Orikasa, Phys. Rev. D 93, 013008 (2016).
  7. M. Suzuki and L.-X. Xu, arXiv:2503.19964.
  8. T. Kobayashi, H. Okada, and H. Otsuka, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 111.
  9. T. Nomura and H. Okada, arXiv:2506.16706.
  10. H. Okada and Y. Shigekami, arXiv:2507.16198.
  11. S. Jangid and H. Okada, arXiv:2508.16174.
  12. S. Jangid and H. Okada, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2026, 053B05 (2026).
  13. T. Nomura, H. Okada, and Y. Shigekami, Phys. Rev. D 113, 115041 (2026).
  14. H. Okada and Y. Shoji, arXiv:2512.20891.
  15. H. Okada and Y. Shigekami, arXiv:2601.15749.
  16. J. Chen, C.-Q. Geng, H. Okada, and J.-J. Wu, Nucl. Phys. B1025, 117391 (2026).
  17. B.-Y. Qu, Z. Jiang, and G.-J. Ding, arXiv:2602.24214.
  18. T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Tanimoto, and H. Uchida, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 189.
  19. T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, and M. Tanimoto, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 117.
  20. T. Kobayashi, Y. Nishioka, H. Otsuka, and M. Tanimoto, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 177.
  21. T. Nomura and O. Popov, arXiv:2507.10299.
  22. Q. Liang and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139706 (2025).
  23. T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 113, 055016 (2026).
  24. T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Tanimoto, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 113, 095034 (2026).
  25. Y. Nakai, H. Otsuka, Y. Shigekami, and Z. Zhang, arXiv:2512.21509.
  26. T. Kobayashi, H. Mita, H. Otsuka, and R. Sakuma, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2026, 033B01 (2026).
  27. T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka, arXiv:2512.16376.
  28. T. Nomura, H. Okada, and Y. Shigekami, arXiv:2603.15382.
  29. W. Abdallah et al. (CEPC Study Group), Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 8, 1 (2024); 9, 184(E) (2025).
  30. W. Wang and Z.-L. Han, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 166.
  31. T. Nomura and H. Okada, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055027 (2019).
  32. T. Nomura and H. Okada, Phys. Dark Universe 26, 100359 (2019).
  33. T. Nomura and H. Okada, Phys. Lett. B 792, 424 (2019).
  34. T. Nomura and H. Okada, Nucl. Phys. B943, 114621 (2019).
  35. T. Nomura and H. Okada, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095017 (2017).
  36. T. Nomura and H. Okada, Phys. Lett. B 783, 381 (2018).
  37. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  38. S. Kanemura, T. Matsui, and H. Sugiyama, Phys. Lett. B 727, 151 (2013).
  39. S. Kanemura, K. Nishiwaki, H. Okada, Y. Orikasa, S. C. Park, and R. Watanabe, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 123B04 (2016).
  40. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, Nucl. Phys. B222, 83 (1983).
  41. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, Nucl. Phys. B236, 221 (1984).
  42. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, Nucl. Phys. B249, 70 (1985).
  43. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).
  44. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  45. J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Nucl. Phys. B618, 171 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation