Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constrain the χcJ→D(*)D¯(*) effective couplings via the X(3872)→π0χcJ decays

Zhao-Sai Jia1,2, Gang Li1,*, and Zhen-Hua Zhang3,†

  • *Contact author: gli@qfnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: zhhzhang@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 074035 – Published 27 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/51z1-qls5

Abstract

Hidden-charm decays provide irreplaceable platforms for probing the structures of charmoniumlike states, such as X(3872), Y(4260), and Zc(3900), and their heavy-quark-symmetry partners. In the hadronic molecular scenario, these hidden-charm decays are dominated by intermediate meson loops (IMLs), and the couplings of χcJ→D(*)D¯(*) are essential building blocks of the amplitudes for the pionic and radiative transitions of the charmoniumlike states to the χcJ and hc states, e.g., X(3872)→π0χcJ,ππχcJ,γχcJ, and Y(4260)→π0hc,ηhc. These couplings cannot be extracted from the partial decay widths of the χcJ directly and only have estimated values from the vector meson dominance (VMD) model. Utilizing the recent precise determination of the pole position and the isospin breaking properties of the X(3872), we give an estimation on the upper bounds of the absolute values of the χcJ→D(*)D¯(*) couplings. Our results show that the VMD model may overestimate the χcJ→D(*)D¯(*) couplings considering the X(3872) as a DD¯* hadronic molecule with a binding energy about tens of keV. These upper limits can be used and tested in other hidden-charm transitions of the charmoniumlike states to the χcJ and hc.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 062C01 (2016).
  2. A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark resonances, Phys. Rep. 668, 1 (2017).
  3. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  4. S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018).
  5. M. Karliner, J. L. Rosner, and T. Skwarnicki, Multiquark states, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 17 (2018).
  6. Y. S. Kalashnikova and A. V. Nefediev, X(3872) in the molecular model, Phys. Usp. 62, 568 (2019).
  7. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  8. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  9. M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rep. 1108, 1 (2025).
  10. J.-H. Chen, J. Chen, F.-K. Guo, Y.-G. Ma, C.-P. Shen, Q.-Y. Shou, Q. Shou, Q. Wang, J.-J. Wu, and B.-S. Zou, Production of exotic hadrons in pp and nuclear collisions, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 55 (2025).
  11. Z.-G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 21, 016300 (2026).
  12. S. Dubynskiy and M. B. Voloshin, Pionic transitions from X(3872) to χcJ, Phys. Rev. D 77, 014013 (2008).
  13. S. Fleming and T. Mehen, Hadronic decays of the X(3872) to χcJ in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 78, 094019 (2008).
  14. G. Li and X.-H. Liu, Investigating possible decay modes of Y(4260) under D1(2420)D¯+c.c. molecular state ansatz, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094008 (2013).
  15. T. Mehen, Hadronic loops versus factorization in effective field theory calculations of X(3872)→χcJπ0, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034019 (2015).
  16. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of the decay X(3872)→π0χc1(1P), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 202001 (2019).
  17. V. Bhardwaj et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for X(3872) and X(3915) decay into χc1π0 in B decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 99, 111101 (2019).
  18. Z.-Y. Zhou, M.-T. Yu, and Z. Xiao, Decays of X(3872) to χcJπ0 and J/ψπ+π−, Phys. Rev. D 100, 094025 (2019).
  19. Q. Wu, D.-Y. Chen, and T. Matsuki, A phenomenological analysis on isospin-violating decay of X(3872), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 193 (2021).
  20. Z.-G. Wang, Decipher the width of the X(3872) via the QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014017 (2024).
  21. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Search for the decay χc1(3872)→π+π−χc1, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071101 (2024).
  22. N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Toward an estimate of the amplitude X(3872)→π0χc1(1P), Phys. Rev. D 109, 036028 (2024).
  23. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Search for X(3872)→π0π0χc1,2, Phys. Rev. D 110, 072015 (2024).
  24. N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Tentative estimates of B(X(3872)→π0π0χc1) and B(X(3872)→π+π−χc1), Phys. Rev. D 110, 016023 (2024).
  25. S.-D. Liu, F. Wang, Z.-S. Jia, G. Li, X.-H. Liu, and J.-J. Xie, Pionic transitions of the spin-2 partner of X(3872) to χcJ, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054048 (2024).
  26. S.-D. Liu, Q. Wu, and G. Li, Hadronic decays of possible pseudoscalar P-wave DD¯*/D¯D* molecular state, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074002 (2025).
  27. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, G. Li, U.-G. Meissner, and Q. Zhao, Effect of charmed meson loops on charmonium transitions, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034013 (2011).
  28. P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and T. N. Pham, Nonfactorizable contributions in B decays to charmonium: The case of B−→K−hc, Phys. Rev. D 69, 054023 (2004).
  29. A. Deandrea, G. Nardulli, and A. D. Polosa, J/ψ couplings to charmed resonances and to π, Phys. Rev. D 68, 034002 (2003).
  30. V. A. Novikov, L. B. Okun, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, M. B. Voloshin, and V. I. Zakharov, Charmonium and gluons: Basic experimental facts and theoretical introduction, Phys. Rep. 41, 1 (1978).
  31. E. V. Veliev, H. Sundu, K. Azizi, and M. Bayar, Scalar quarkonia at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 82, 056012 (2010).
  32. P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and T. N. Pham, B−→K−χc0 decay from charmed meson rescattering, Phys. Lett. B 542, 71 (2002).
  33. J. M. Dias, T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Y. Zhang, and Z.-H. Zhang, Dispersive analysis of the isospin breaking in the X(3872)→J/ψπ+π− and X(3872)→J/ψπ+π0π− decays, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014031 (2025).
  34. T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Precise determination of the properties of X(3872) and of its isovector partner Wc1, arXiv:2502.04458.
  35. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Coupled-channel analysis of the χc1(3872) line shape with BESIII data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 151903 (2024).
  36. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of the ψ2(3823) and χc1(3872) states in B+→(Jψπ+π−)K+ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 123.
  37. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of sizeable ω contribution to χc1(3872)→π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, L011103 (2023).
  38. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  39. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B±→K±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  40. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Bounds on the width, mass difference and other properties of X(3872)→π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. D 84, 052004 (2011).
  41. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for a charged partner of the X(3872) in the B meson decay B→X−K, X−→J/ψπ−π0, Phys. Rev. D 71, 031501 (2005).
  42. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Determination of the X(3872) meson quantum numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 222001 (2013).
  43. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Quantum numbers of the X(3872) state and orbital angular momentum in its ρ0Jψ decay, Phys. Rev. D 92, 011102 (2015).
  44. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of the lineshape of the χc1(3872) state, Phys. Rev. D 102, 092005 (2020).
  45. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  46. A. Esposito, A. Glioti, D. Germani, and A. D. Polosa, A short review on the compositeness of the X(3872), Riv. Nuovo Cimento 48, 95 (2025).
  47. K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Evidence for X(3872)→γJ/ψ and the sub-threshold decay X(3872)→ωJ/ψ, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Lepton-Photon Interactions at High Energy (LP 2005) (2005).
  48. P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Evidence for the decay X(3872)→J/ψω, Phys. Rev. D 82, 011101 (2010).
  49. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of e+e−→γωJ/ψ and Observation of X(3872)→ωJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232002 (2019).
  50. M. Suzuki, The X(3872) boson: Molecule or charmonium, Phys. Rev. D 72, 114013 (2005).
  51. J. Abdallah et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), Search for single top production via FCNC at LEP at s=189−208  GeV, Phys. Lett. B 590, 21 (2004).
  52. C. Meng and K.-T. Chao, Decays of the X(3872) and χc1(2P) charmonium, Phys. Rev. D 75, 114002 (2007).
  53. D. Gamermann and E. Oset, Isospin breaking effects in the X(3872) resonance, Phys. Rev. D 80, 014003 (2009).
  54. D. Gamermann, J. Nieves, E. Oset, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Couplings in coupled channels versus wave functions: application to the X(3872) resonance, Phys. Rev. D 81, 014029 (2010).
  55. K. Terasaki, ω−ρ0 mixing as a possible origin of the hypothetical isospin non-conservation in the X(3872)→π+π−J/ψ decay, Prog. Theor. Phys. 122, 1285 (2010).
  56. M. Karliner and H. J. Lipkin, Isospin violation in X(3872): Explanation from a new tetraquark model, arXiv:1008.0203.
  57. N. Li and S.-L. Zhu, Isospin breaking, coupled-channel effects and diagnosis of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 86, 074022 (2012).
  58. N. Achasov, Electro-weak production of pseudovector C-even heavy quarkonia in electron-positron collisions on Belle II and BES III, EPJ Web Conf. 212, 02001 (2019).
  59. L. Meng, G.-J. Wang, B. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Revisit the isospin violating decays of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 104, 094003 (2021).
  60. N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Decay X(3872)→π0π+π− and S-wave D0D¯0→π+π− scattering length, Phys. Rev. D 99, 116023 (2019).
  61. J. H. Yin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for X(3872)→π+π−π0 at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052004 (2023).
  62. Z.-H. Zhang, T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Rusetsky, Predicting isovector charmonium-like states from X(3872) properties, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 130.
  63. F. Aceti, R. Molina, and E. Oset, The X(3872)→J/ψγ decay in the DD¯* molecular picture, Phys. Rev. D 86, 113007 (2012).
  64. F. Aceti, R. Molina, and E. Oset, The X(3872)→J/ψγ, J/ψππ and J/ψπππ decays in the DD¯* molecular picture, Proc. Sci., QNP2012 (2012) 072.
  65. H.-D. Cai, Z.-S. Jia, G. Li, and S.-D. Liu, Hidden charmed decays of X(3872) within the DD¯* molecular framework, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114024 (2025).
  66. M. Albaladejo, F. K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Decay widths of the spin-2 partners of the X(3872), Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 547 (2015).
  67. J. Hu and T. Mehen, Chiral Lagrangian with heavy quark-diquark symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054003 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation