Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Rapidity-dependent spin decomposition of the nucleon

Florian Hechenberger1,*, Kiminad A. Mamo2,3,†, and Ismail Zahed1,‡

  • *Contact author: florian.hechenberger@stonybrook.edu
  • †Contact author: kamamo@wm.edu, kamamo@jlab.org
  • ‡Contact author: ismail.zahed@stonybrook.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 034027 – Published 23 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4rqm-dxz2

Abstract

We revisit the two-dimensional Fourier transform of generalized parton distributions (GPDs) at nonzero skewness. At η=0 it reduces to the standard impact-parameter density, while at η≠0 it is an off-forward amplitude that we interpret as a genuine parton–nucleon correlation. Its overall strength (the transverse-plane integral of the density) is fixed by the GPD at the kinematic point t=−cη=−4η2mN2/(1−η2) and decreases monotonically with the rapidity gap Δy=ln[(1+η)/(1−η)]=2 artanh(η). This rapidity dependence implies rapidity-modified Ji identities that connect helicity, orbital, and total angular momenta of the correlation in closed form. To quantify these effects, we construct leading-twist quark and gluon GPDs in a string-based conformal framework: conformal moments are parametrized by linear open- and closed-string Regge trajectories with slopes constrained by parton distribution functions (PDFs), hadron/glueball spectroscopy, and form-factor data, and GPDs are reconstructed over the full (x,η,t) domain by Mellin-Barnes inversion with next-to-leading order evolution. We find qualitative agreement (and fair quantitative agreement within quoted uncertainties) for several moments and selected nonsinglet x-space channels at μ=2  GeV when compared with lattice QCD, while we also identify channels with visible tension and discuss likely sources (PDF priors and t-slope systematics).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. D. Müller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes, and J. Hořejši, Fortschr. Phys. 42, 101 (1994).
  2. X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610 (1997).
  3. A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 380, 417 (1996).
  4. A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5524 (1997).
  5. X.-D. Ji and J. Osborne, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094018 (1998).
  6. M. Diehl, Phys. Rep. 388, 41 (2003).
  7. A. V. Belitsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rep. 418, 1 (2005).
  8. A. Accardi et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 268 (2016).
  9. A. Accardi et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 173 (2024).
  10. D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1141 (1977).
  11. M. Burkardt, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 173 (2003).
  12. M. Diehl, Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 223 (2002); 31, 277(E) (2003).
  13. K. A. Mamo and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 241901 (2024).
  14. K. A. Mamo and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114016 (2024).
  15. F. Hechenberger, K. A. Mamo, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074018 (2025).
  16. R. C. Brower, J. Polchinski, M. J. Strassler, and C.-I. Tan, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 005.
  17. R. C. Brower, M. Djuric, and C.-I. Tan, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2009) 063.
  18. X.-D. Ji, W. Melnitchouk, and X. Song, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5511 (1997).
  19. K. Kumericki, S. Liuti, and H. Moutarde, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 157 (2016).
  20. D. Mueller and A. Schafer, Nucl. Phys. B739, 1 (2006).
  21. A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189 (2009).
  22. M. Hirai, S. Kumano, and N. Saito, Phys. Rev. D 74, 014015 (2006).
  23. R. Nishio and T. Watari, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125001 (2014).
  24. K. Kumericki, D. Mueller, and K. Passek-Kumericki, Nucl. Phys. B794, 244 (2008).
  25. C. Alexandrou, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, A. Scapellato, and F. Steffens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 262001 (2020).
  26. J. Holligan and H.-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034503 (2024).
  27. C. Lorcé, Phys. Lett. B 735, 344 (2014).
  28. C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenrath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, H. Panagopoulos, and G. Spanoudes, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094513 (2020).
  29. J. Liang, Y.-B. Yang, T. Draper, M. Gong, and K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074505 (2018).
  30. J. Green, N. Hasan, S. Meinel, M. Engelhardt, S. Krieg, J. Laeuchli, J. Negele, K. Orginos, A. Pochinsky, and S. Syritsyn, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114502 (2017).
  31. S. Bhattacharya, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, X. Gao, A. Metz, J. Miller, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, F. Steffens, and Y. Zhao, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 146.
  32. P. Hagler et al. (LHPC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 77, 094502 (2008).
  33. O. V. Teryaev, arXiv:hep-ph/9904376.
  34. S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang, B.-Q. Ma, and I. Schmidt, Nucl. Phys. B593, 311 (2001).
  35. G. Basar, D. E. Kharzeev, H.-U. Yee, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 85, 105005 (2012).
  36. Y. Liu and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 100, 046005 (2019).
  37. F. Hechenberger, GitHub, 2025, repository linked to zenodo, https://github.com/HechenMountain/stringy-gpds.
  38. F. Hechenberger, Zenodo, 2025, 10.5281/zenodo.15738460.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation