Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing spontaneous CP violation through precision Higgs observables

Tanmoy Mondal1,* and Kei Yagyu2,†

  • *Contact author: tanmoy.mondal@pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in
  • †Contact author: yagyu@rs.tus.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 112, 115011 – Published 3 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4cn8-1njd

Abstract

We investigate the implications of spontaneous CP violation in the general two Higgs doublet model, which leads to a nondecoupling structure of the Higgs sector. All the masses of the Higgs bosons are purely determined by the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs fields, and are thus constrained to be smaller than O(500)  GeV by the perturbative unitarity bound. Such a nondecoupling nature predicts sizable deviations from the Standard Model expectations in the observables of the discovered Higgs boson (h). We find that the magnitude of deviations in Bh→γγ (Bh→Zγ) are larger than ∼10%(4%) in the Higgs alignment limit. Moreover, we show that a robust correlation emerges between the deviations in the one-loop corrected hhh coupling and Bh→γγ to be, e.g., 200% (50%) and −10.3% (−10.8%), respectively, under the constraints from theoretical bounds and current experimental data. Using a few benchmark points, we highlight that flavor-violating decays of the additional Higgs bosons can be sizable due to the constrained structure of the Yukawa interactions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. J. Charles, A. Hocker, H. Lacker, S. Laplace, F. R. Le Diberder, J. Malcles, J. Ocariz, M. Pivk, and L. Roos (CKMfitter Group), Eur. Phys. J. C 41, 1 (2005).
  2. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  3. A. D. Sakharov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967).
  4. T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1226 (1973).
  5. J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, Phys. Rev. D 72, 095002 (2005).
  6. L. Lavoura and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4619 (1994).
  7. B. Grzadkowski, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 084.
  8. B. Grzadkowski, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, Phys. Rev. D 94, 115002 (2016).
  9. S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1958 (1977).
  10. A. Pich and P. Tuzon, Phys. Rev. D 80, 091702(R) (2009).
  11. U. Nierste, M. Tabet, and R. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 031801 (2020).
  12. G. Barenboim, M. Gorbahn, U. Nierste, and M. Raidal, Phys. Rev. D 65, 095003 (2002).
  13. M. Nebot, F. J. Botella, and G. C. Branco, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 711 (2019).
  14. M. Nebot, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115002 (2020).
  15. C. Miró, M. Nebot, and D. Queiroz, Phys. Rev. D 111, L111703 (2025).
  16. G. Bhattacharyya and D. Das, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015005 (2015).
  17. F. Arco, D. Domenech, M. J. Herrero, and R. A. Morales, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095013 (2023).
  18. P. M. Ferreira, R. Santos, and A. Barroso, Phys. Lett. B 603, 219 (2004); 629, 114(E) (2005).
  19. A. Barroso, P. M. Ferreira, and R. Santos, Phys. Lett. B 632, 684 (2006).
  20. A. Barroso, P. M. Ferreira, and R. Santos, Phys. Lett. B 652, 181 (2007).
  21. S. Davidson and H. E. Haber, Phys. Rev. D 72, 035004 (2005); 72, 099902(E) (2005).
  22. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Nature (London) 607, 52 (2022); 612, E24 (2022).
  23. S. Kanemura, S. Kiyoura, Y. Okada, E. Senaha, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 558, 157 (2003).
  24. S. Kanemura, Y. Okada, E. Senaha, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 70, 115002 (2004).
  25. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000), Vol. 80, ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].
  26. G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B160, 151 (1979).
  27. N. Deshpande and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 18, 2574 (1978).
  28. S. Nie and M. Sher, Phys. Lett. B 449, 89 (1999).
  29. S. Kanemura, T. Kasai, and Y. Okada, Phys. Lett. B 471, 182 (1999).
  30. S. Kanemura, T. Kubota, and E. Takasugi, Phys. Lett. B 313, 155 (1993).
  31. I. Ginzburg and I. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. D 72, 115010 (2005).
  32. S. Kanemura and K. Yagyu, Phys. Lett. B 751, 289 (2015).
  33. B. Grinstein, C. W. Murphy, and P. Uttayarat, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 070.
  34. V. Cacchio, D. Chowdhury, O. Eberhardt, and C. W. Murphy, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 026.
  35. C. W. Murphy, Phys. Rev. D 96, 036006 (2017).
  36. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 964 (1990).
  37. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. D 46, 381 (1992).
  38. W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, Phys. Lett. B 645, 355 (2007).
  39. W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, Phys. Lett. B 668, 252 (2008).
  40. G. Branco, P. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. Silva, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  41. P. Asadi, M. R. Buckley, H. He, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055005 (2022).
  42. UTfit Collaboration, New physics fit results: Summer 2023, http://www.utfit.org/UTfit/ResultsSummer2023NP (2023).
  43. A. Crivellin, C. Greub, and A. Kokulu, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094031 (2013).
  44. B. Altunkaynak, W.-S. Hou, Y. Kao, M. Kohda, and J. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 751, 135 (2015).
  45. ATLAS Collaboration, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 145.
  46. CMS Collaboration, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 096.
  47. ATLAS Collaboration, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 157.
  48. CMS Collaboration, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 018.
  49. ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2024-005, 2024, ATLAS Conference Note, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2872781.
  50. CMS Collaboration, Report No. CMS-PAS-HIG-23-010, 2024, CMS Physics Analysis Summary, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2872625.
  51. T. Roussy et al., Science 381, 46 (2023).
  52. S. M. Barr, E. M. Freire, and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2626 (1990).
  53. S. Kanemura, M. Kubota, and K. Yagyu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 026.
  54. W. Altmannshofer, B. Assi, J. Brod, N. Hamer, J. Julio, P. Uttayarat, and D. Volkov, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 156.
  55. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 088.
  56. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 843, 137745 (2023).
  57. M. Cepeda et al., CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 221 (2019).
  58. D. K. Ghosh, W.-S. Hou, and T. Modak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 221801 (2020).
  59. W.-S. Hou and M. Krab, Phys. Rev. D 110, L011702 (2024).
  60. H. Bahl, T. Stefaniak, and J. Wittbrodt, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 183.
  61. T. Mondal and P. Sanyal, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 040.
  62. W.-S. Hou and M. Krab, Phys. Rev. D 111, L031701 (2025).
  63. W.-S. Hou and M. Krab, Phys. Rev. D 111, 115036 (2025).
  64. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  65. J. Alwall et al., J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  66. R. V. Harlander, S. Liebler, and H. Mantler, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1605 (2013).
  67. R. V. Harlander, S. Liebler, and H. Mantler, Comput. Phys. Commun. 212, 239 (2017).
  68. S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973).
  69. L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3320 (1974).
  70. K. Enomoto, S. Kanemura, and Y. Mura, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 104.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation