Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Chiral gravitational waves from multiphase magnetogenesis

H. V. Ragavendra1,2, Gianmassimo Tasinato3,4, and L. Sriramkumar5

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103547 – Published 29 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/49qy-k7fy

Abstract

Cosmological vector fields are central to many early-Universe phenomena, including inflationary dynamics, primordial magnetogenesis, and dark-matter scenarios. However, constructing models able to generate cosmological magnetic fields while avoiding strong coupling, backreaction, and cosmic microwave background constraints remains challenging. We study a novel mechanism in which brief non-slow-roll phases during inflation amplify primordial magnetic fields at small scales, while maintaining theoretical consistency and observational viability. We incorporate parity-violating interactions in the vector sector and demonstrate, for the first time in a non-slow-roll framework, that chirality can significantly boost magnetic-field amplitudes and imprint distinctive polarization-dependent spectral features. We complement detailed numerical computations with an analytical treatment yielding compact expressions for chiral vector mode functions that reproduce the main spectral properties. We then develop a systematic formalism to evaluate the stochastic gravitational-wave background naturally induced at second order by these amplified fields, identifying both an intensity component and a circularly polarized contribution with characteristic frequency profiles. We discuss detection prospects with future multiband gravitational-wave observatories, showing that chiral signatures could provide a distinctive observational probe. Our results introduce new avenues for enhancing primordial magnetic fields and their associated gravitational-wave signals, opening promising possibilities for their future detection and interpretation, both with cosmological and gravitational-wave probes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (72)

  1. A. Maleknejad, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and J. Soda, Gauge fields and inflation, Phys. Rep. 528, 161 (2013).
  2. M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Inflation produced, large scale magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2743 (1988).
  3. B. Ratra, Cosmological “seed” magnetic field from inflation, Astrophys. J. Lett. 391, L1 (1992).
  4. F. Finelli and A. Gruppuso, Resonant amplification of gauge fields in expanding universe, Phys. Lett. B 502, 216 (2001).
  5. A. L. Maroto, Primordial magnetic fields from metric perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 64, 083006 (2001).
  6. A. L. Maroto, Cosmological magnetic fields induced by metric perturbations after inflation, in 5th International Conference on Particle Physics and the Early Universe (2001); arXiv:hep-ph/0111268.
  7. S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, A. Notari, and A. Riotto, Large-scale magnetic fields from density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 71, 043502 (2005).
  8. J. Martin and J. Yokoyama, Generation of large-scale magnetic fields in single-field inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2008) 025.
  9. V. Demozzi, V. Mukhanov, and H. Rubinstein, Magnetic fields from inflation?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2009) 025.
  10. S. Kanno, J. Soda, and M.-a. Watanabe, Cosmological magnetic fields from inflation and backreaction, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2009) 009.
  11. K. Bamba and M. Sasaki, Large-scale magnetic fields in the inflationary universe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2007) 030.
  12. K. Bamba, C. Q. Geng, and S. H. Ho, Large-scale magnetic fields from inflation due to Chern-Simons-like effective interaction, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2008) 013.
  13. N. Barnaby, R. Namba, and M. Peloso, Observable non-Gaussianity from gauge field production in slow roll inflation, and a challenging connection with magnetogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 85, 123523 (2012).
  14. R. J. Z. Ferreira, R. K. Jain, and M. S. Sloth, Inflationary magnetogenesis without the strong coupling problem, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 004.
  15. R. J. Z. Ferreira, R. K. Jain, and M. S. Sloth, Inflationary magnetogenesis without the strong coupling problem II: Constraints from CMB anisotropies and B-modes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2014) 053.
  16. P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Vector dark matter from inflationary fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103520 (2016).
  17. R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Cosmological magnetic fields: Their generation, evolution and observation, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013).
  18. K. Subramanian, The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 076901 (2016).
  19. O. Özsoy and G. Tasinato, Inflation and primordial black holes, Universe 9, 203 (2023).
  20. S. Tripathy, D. Chowdhury, R. K. Jain, and L. Sriramkumar, Challenges in the choice of the nonconformal coupling function in inflationary magnetogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063519 (2022).
  21. S. Tripathy, D. Chowdhury, H. V. Ragavendra, R. K. Jain, and L. Sriramkumar, Circumventing the challenges in the choice of the nonconformal coupling function in inflationary magnetogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043501 (2023).
  22. B. Atkins, D. Chowdhury, A. Marriott-Best, and G. Tasinato, Inflationary magnetogenesis beyond slow-roll and its induced gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063534 (2025).
  23. G. Tasinato, An analytic approach to non-slow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023535 (2021).
  24. G. Tasinato, Large |η| approach to single field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043526 (2023).
  25. L. Sorbo, Parity violation in the cosmic microwave background from a pseudoscalar inflaton, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2011) 003.
  26. C. Caprini and L. Sorbo, Adding helicity to inflationary magnetogenesis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2014) 056.
  27. K.-W. Ng, S.-L. Cheng, and W. Lee, Inflationary dilaton-axion magnetogenesis, Chin. J. Phys. 53, 110105 (2015).
  28. G. Tasinato, A scenario for inflationary magnetogenesis without strong coupling problem, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2015) 040.
  29. K. Subramanian, Magnetic fields in the early universe, Astron. Nachr. 331, 110 (2010).
  30. R. Sharma, K. Subramanian, and T. R. Seshadri, Generation of helical magnetic field in a viable scenario of inflationary magnetogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 97, 083503 (2018).
  31. D. Chowdhury, L. Sriramkumar, and M. Kamionkowski, Enhancing the cross-correlations between magnetic fields and scalar perturbations through parity violation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2018) 031.
  32. S. Okano and T. Fujita, Chiral gravitational waves produced in a helical magnetogenesis model, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 026.
  33. A. Brandenburg, Y. He, and R. Sharma, Simulations of helical inflationary magnetogenesis and gravitational waves, Astrophys. J. 922, 192 (2021).
  34. S. Tripathy, D. Chowdhury, H. V. Ragavendra, and L. Sriramkumar, Cross-correlation between the curvature perturbations and magnetic fields in pure ultraslow roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063550 (2025).
  35. T. Papanikolaou, C. Tzerefos, S. Capozziello, and G. Lambiase, Gravitational-wave signatures of gravito-electromagnetic couplings, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 051.
  36. H. V. Ragavendra and L. Sriramkumar, Observational imprints of enhanced scalar power on small scales in ultra slow roll inflation and associated non-Gaussianities, Galaxies 11, 34 (2023).
  37. N. Bhaumik and R. K. Jain, Primordial black holes dark matter from inflection point models of inflation and the effects of reheating, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 037.
  38. H. V. Ragavendra, P. Saha, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Silk, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctuated inflation, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083510 (2021).
  39. A. Marriott-Best, M. Peloso, and G. Tasinato, New gravitational wave probe of vector dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103511 (2025).
  40. M. La Rosa and G. Tasinato, Ultralight dark matter from non-slow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 123542 (2025).
  41. C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. P. Patil, Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2019) 028.
  42. O. Özsoy and G. Tasinato, On the slope of the curvature power spectrum in non-attractor inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 048.
  43. H. V. Ragavendra, A. K. Sarkar, and S. K. Sethi, Constraining ultra slow roll inflation using cosmological datasets, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 088.
  44. A. Talebian and H. Firouzjahi, Axion ultraslow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 123548 (2025).
  45. V. A. Acciari et al. (MAGIC Collaboration), A lower bound on intergalactic magnetic fields from time variability of 1ES 0229+200 from MAGIC and Fermi/LAT observations, Astron. Astrophys. 670, A145 (2023).
  46. L. Burmeister, P. Da Vela, F. Longo, G. Marti-Devesa, M. Meyer, F. Saturni, A. Stamerra, and P. Veres, Constraints on the intergalactic magnetic field from Fermi-LAT observations of GRB 221009A, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043041 (2026).
  47. A. Zucca, Y. Li, and L. Pogosian, Constraints on primordial magnetic fields from Planck combined with the south pole telescope CMB B-mode polarization measurements, Phys. Rev. D 95, 063506 (2017).
  48. D. Paoletti, J. Chluba, F. Finelli, and J. A. Rubino-Martin, Improved CMB anisotropy constraints on primordial magnetic fields from the post-recombination ionization history, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 185 (2019).
  49. D. Paoletti and F. Finelli, Constraints on primordial magnetic fields from magnetically-induced perturbations: Current status and future perspectives with LiteBIRD and future ground based experiments, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2019) 028.
  50. R. Durrer, L. Hollenstein, and R. K. Jain, Can slow roll inflation induce relevant helical magnetic fields?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 037.
  51. F. R. Urban, On inflating magnetic fields, and the backreactions thereof, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2011) 012.
  52. N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, and M. Shiraishi, Parity-violating CMB correlators with non-decaying statistical anisotropy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2015) 039.
  53. G. ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974).
  54. C. Caprini and R. Durrer, Gravitational wave production: A strong constraint on primordial magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 65, 023517 (2001).
  55. A. Mack, T. Kahniashvili, and A. Kosowsky, Microwave background signatures of a primordial stochastic magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 65, 123004 (2002).
  56. G. Domènech, Scalar induced gravitational waves review, Universe 7, 398 (2021).
  57. D. Chowdhury, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, The rise of the primordial tensor spectrum from an early scalar-tensor epoch, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 010.
  58. A. Marriott-Best, D. Chowdhury, A. Ghoshal, and G. Tasinato, Exploring cosmological gravitational wave backgrounds through the synergy of LISA and the Einstein telescope, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103001 (2025).
  59. T. L. Smith, E. Pierpaoli, and M. Kamionkowski, A new cosmic microwave background constraint to primordial gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 021301 (2006).
  60. P. Auclair et al. (LISA Cosmology Working Group), Cosmology with the laser interferometer space antenna, Living Rev. Relativity 26, 5 (2023).
  61. M. Colpi et al. (LISA Collaboration), LISA definition study report, arXiv:2402.07571.
  62. A. Abac et al. (ET Collaboration), The science of the Einstein telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 081.
  63. T. L. Smith and R. Caldwell, Sensitivity to a frequency-dependent circular polarization in an isotropic stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044036 (2017).
  64. R. Kato and J. Soda, Probing circular polarization in stochastic gravitational wave background with pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 93, 062003 (2016).
  65. J. E. Gammal et al. (LISA Cosmology Working Group), Reconstructing primordial curvature perturbations via scalar-induced gravitational waves with LISA, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 062.
  66. A. Ghaleb, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Bayesian reconstruction of primordial perturbations from induced gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 112, 123538 (2025).
  67. N. Seto, Prospects for direct detection of circular polarization of gravitational-wave background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 151101 (2006).
  68. N. Seto, Quest for circular polarization of gravitational wave background and orbits of laser interferometers in space, Phys. Rev. D 75, 061302 (2007).
  69. V. Domcke, J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, L. Sorbo, and G. Tasinato, Measuring the net circular polarization of the stochastic gravitational wave background with interferometers, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2020) 028.
  70. N. M. J. Cruz, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Measuring the circular polarization of gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103505 (2024).
  71. H. V. Ragavendra and N. Bartolo, Twisted echoes of an odd quartet: Scalar-induced gravitational waves as a probe of primordial parity-violation, arXiv:2507.02733.
  72. E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, A. Papageorgiou, and C. Z. Gatica, Pure chromo-natural inflation: Signatures of particle production from weak to strong backreaction, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 042.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation