- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Consistent Neff fitting in big bang nucleosynthesis analysis

Sougata Ganguly1,*, Tae Hyun Jung1,†, and Seokhoon Yun2,1,‡

  • *Contact author: sganguly0205@ibs.re.kr
  • †Contact author: thjung0720@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: seokhoon.yun@knu.ac.kr
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103526 – Published 15 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/46fz-9wqk

Abstract

The effective number of neutrino species, Neff, serves as a key fitting parameter extensively employed in cosmological studies. In this work, we point out a fundamental inconsistency in the conventional treatment of Neff in big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), particularly regarding its applicability to new physics scenarios where ΔNeff, the deviation of Neff from the standard BBN prediction, is negative. To ensure consistent interpretation, it is imperative to either restrict the allowed range of Neff or systematically adjust neutrino-induced reaction rates based on physically motivated assumptions. As a concrete example, we consider a simple scenario in which a negative ΔNeff arises from entropy injection into the electromagnetic sector due to the decay of long-lived particles after neutrino decoupling. This process dilutes the neutrino density and suppresses the rate of neutrino-driven neutron-proton conversion. Under this assumption, we demonstrate that the resulting BBN constraints on Neff deviate significantly from those obtained by the conventional, but unphysical, extrapolation of dark radiation scenarios into the ΔNeff<0 regime.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. C. Pitrou, A. Coc, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni, Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions, Phys. Rep. 754, 1 (2018).
  2. B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, T.-H. Yeh, and C. Young, Big-bang nucleosynthesis after Planck, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 010; 11 (2020) E02.
  3. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and M. Peloso, A precision calculation of the effective number of cosmological neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 534, 8 (2002).
  4. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti, and P. D. Serpico, Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B729, 221 (2005).
  5. P. F. de Salas and S. Pastor, Relic neutrino decoupling with flavour oscillations revisited, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2016) 051.
  6. M. Escudero Abenza, Precision early universe thermodynamics made simple: Neff and neutrino decoupling in the standard model and beyond, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2020) 048.
  7. K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2020) 012.
  8. M. Cielo, M. Escudero, G. Mangano, and O. Pisanti, Neff in the standard model at NLO is 3.043, Phys. Rev. D 108, L121301 (2023).
  9. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, A lower bound on the mass of cold thermal dark matter from Planck, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 041.
  10. H. Vogel and J. Redondo, Dark radiation constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2014) 029.
  11. M. A. Buen-Abad, G. Marques-Tavares, and M. Schmaltz, Non-Abelian dark matter and dark radiation, Phys. Rev. D 92, 023531 (2015).
  12. Z. Chacko, Y. Cui, S. Hong, and T. Okui, Hidden dark matter sector, dark radiation, and the CMB, Phys. Rev. D 92, 055033 (2015).
  13. K. J. Kelly, M. Sen, and Y. Zhang, Intimate relationship between sterile neutrino dark matter and ΔNeff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 041101 (2021).
  14. C. Giovanetti, M. Lisanti, H. Liu, and J. T. Ruderman, Joint cosmic microwave background and big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on light dark sectors with dark radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021302 (2022).
  15. P. Adshead, P. Ralegankar, and J. Shelton, Dark radiation constraints on portal interactions with hidden sectors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 056.
  16. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  17. E. Calabrese et al. (ACT Collaboration), The atacama cosmology telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 063.
  18. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  19. M. H. Reno and D. Seckel, Primordial nucleosynthesis: The effects of injecting hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3441 (1988).
  20. K. Kohri and J. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes and primordial nucleosynthesis. 1. Effects of hadron injection from low mass holes, Phys. Rev. D 61, 023501 (2000).
  21. K. Kohri, Primordial nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of a massive particle with a relatively short lifetime, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043515 (2001).
  22. M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, Metastable GeV-scale particles as a solution to the cosmological lithium problem, Phys. Rev. D 82, 103514 (2010).
  23. T. H. Jung, T. Okui, K. Tobioka, and J. Wang, New bounds on heavy QCD axions from big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 113, 055002 (2026).
  24. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, Cosmological constraints on late time entropy production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4168 (1999).
  25. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023506 (2000).
  26. T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram, and S. Hannestad, MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2019) 012.
  27. T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram, and S. Hannestad, MeV-scale reheating temperature and cosmological production of light sterile neutrinos, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2020) 015.
  28. M. Ibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakayama, and S. Shirai, Cosmological constraint on dark photon from Neff, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 009.
  29. J.-T. Li, G. M. Fuller, and E. Grohs, Probing dark photons in the early universe with big bang nucleosynthesis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 049.
  30. T.-H. Yeh, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, Limits on non-relativistic matter during Big-bang nucleosynthesis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 016.
  31. M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, and M. Pierre, Cosmology with a very light Lμ−Lτ gauge boson, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 071.
  32. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, Refined bounds on MeV-scale thermal dark sectors from BBN and the CMB, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 004.
  33. H. Esseili and G. D. Kribs, Cosmological implications of gauged U(1)B−L on ΔNeff in the CMB and BBN, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2024) 110.
  34. S. Chang, S. Ganguly, T. H. Jung, T.-S. Park, and C. S. Shin, Constraining MeV to 10 GeV Majorons by big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 110, 015019 (2024).
  35. F. F. Deppisch, T. E. Gonzalo, C. Majumdar, and Z. Zhang, Relaxing limits from big bang nucleosynthesis on heavy neutral leptons with axion-like particles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 054.
  36. T. Kanzaki, M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi, Cosmological constraints on neutrino injection, Phys. Rev. D 76, 105017 (2007).
  37. H. Hong, U. Min, M. Son, and T. You, A cosmic window on the dark axion portal, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 155.
  38. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1990), Vol. 69.
  39. S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).
  40. V. F. Mukhanov, Nucleosynthesis without a computer, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 43, 669 (2004).
  41. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  42. O. Pisanti, A. Cirillo, S. Esposito, F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele, and P. D. Serpico, parthenope: Public algorithm evaluating the nucleosynthesis of primordial elements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 956 (2008).
  43. R. Consiglio, P. F. de Salas, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and O. Pisanti, parthenope reloaded, Comput. Phys. Commun. 233, 237 (2018).
  44. S. Gariazzo, P. F. de Salas, O. Pisanti, and R. Consiglio, parthenope revolutions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108205 (2022).
  45. P. D. Serpico, S. Esposito, F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele, and O. Pisanti, Nuclear reaction network for primordial nucleosynthesis: A detailed analysis of rates, uncertainties and light nuclei yields, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2004) 010.
  46. A. Matsumoto et al., EMPRESS. VIII. A new determination of primordial he abundance with extremely metal-poor galaxies: A suggestion of the lepton asymmetry and implications for the Hubble tension, Astrophys. J. 941, 167 (2022).
  47. A.-K. Burns, T. M. P. Tait, and M. Valli, Indications for a nonzero lepton asymmetry from extremely metal-poor galaxies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 131001 (2023).
  48. M. Escudero, A. Ibarra, and V. Maura, Primordial lepton asymmetries in the precision cosmology era: Current status and future sensitivities from BBN and the CMB, Phys. Rev. D 107, 035024 (2023).
  49. M. Kawasaki and K. Murai, Lepton asymmetric universe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 041.
  50. D. Borah and A. Dasgupta, Large neutrino asymmetry from TeV scale leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035015 (2023).
  51. Y. ChoeJo, K. Enomoto, Y. Kim, and H.-S. Lee, Second leptogenesis: Unraveling the baryon-lepton asymmetry discrepancy, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 003.
  52. M. Escudero, Neutrino decoupling beyond the standard model: CMB constraints on the dark matter mass with a fast and precise Neff evaluation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 007.
  53. T.-H. Yeh, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, The impact of new d(p,γ)3 rates on big bang nucleosynthesis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 046.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103526– Published 15 May, 2026
  • Received 1 September 2025
  • Accepted 23 April 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation