Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Universal two-zero texture in SO(10): Implications of JUNO observations and realization from noninvertible symmetries

Zi-Qiang Chen1,2,3,*, Wen-Hao Jiang1,2,3,†, and Ye-Ling Zhou1,‡

  • *Contact author: chenziqiang22@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • †Contact author: jiangwenhao25@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • ‡Contact author: zhouyeling@ucas.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 055035 – Published 21 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3j92-vkm7

Abstract

We apply the universal two-zero texture (UTZT) to all quark and lepton mass matrices in the SO(10) grand unified framework. With charged fermion masses fixed at their best-fit values, this texture contains only seven free parameters to account for nine flavor observables, rendering it highly predictive. Motivated by the recent JUNO indication in favor of the normal ordering of light neutrino masses, we perform an updated analysis of the UTZT in SO(10). The texture remains fully compatible with all current flavor data. The Dirac phase is predicted mainly in two regions, one of which matches very well with current data. A meV-scale mββ is predicted, beyond the sensitivity bound of future neutrinoless double beta decay measurements. We further explore the origin of the UTZT from noninvertible symmetries, without introducing additional low-energy degrees of freedom. We show that the UTZT can be realized through noninvertible selection rules arising from the Z3 gauging of ZN, with a minimal realization corresponding to N=7.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (73)

  1. H. Fritzsch, Phys. Lett. 70B, 436 (1977).
  2. S. Weinberg, Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 38, 185 (1977).
  3. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Lett. 70B, 418 (1977); 72B, 504(E) (1978).
  4. H. Fritzsch, Phys. Lett. 73B, 317 (1978).
  5. H. Fritzsch, Nucl. Phys. B155, 189 (1979).
  6. D. s. Du and Z. z. Xing, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2349 (1993).
  7. H. Fritzsch and Z. z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 353, 114 (1995).
  8. Z. z. Xing, J. Phys. G 23, 1563 (1997).
  9. H. Fritzsch and Z. z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 555, 63 (2003).
  10. Z. z. Xing and H. Zhang, J. Phys. G 30, 129 (2004).
  11. Z. z. Xing and Z. h. Zhao, Nucl. Phys. B897, 302 (2015).
  12. H. Fritzsch, Z. z. Xing, and D. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B974, 115634 (2022).
  13. P. H. Frampton, S. L. Glashow, and D. Marfatia, Phys. Lett. B 536, 79 (2002).
  14. Z. z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 530, 159 (2002).
  15. Z. z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 539, 85 (2002).
  16. H. Fritzsch, Z. z. Xing, and S. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 083.
  17. P. B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, Phys. Rev. D 109, 055028 (2024).
  18. P. B. Denton, J. Gehrlein, and H. Truelson, arXiv:2606.05291.
  19. Z. z. Xing and H. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 569, 30 (2003).
  20. Y. L. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 86, 093011 (2012).
  21. J. Barranco, D. Delepine, and L. Lopez-Lozano, Phys. Rev. D 86, 053012 (2012).
  22. H. Fritzsch and S. Zhou, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1457 (2013).
  23. J. Liao, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, Phys. Rev. D 87, 073013 (2013).
  24. M. J. S. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 806, 135483 (2020).
  25. M. J. S. Yang, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 013B12 (2022).
  26. G. X. Fang and Y. L. Zhou, Chin. Phys. C 49, 103107 (2025).
  27. G. Altarelli and D. Meloni, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 021.
  28. K. S. Babu, B. Bajc, and S. Saad, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 136.
  29. K. S. Babu, T. Fukuyama, S. Khan, and S. Saad, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 045.
  30. T. Ohlsson and M. Pernow, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 085.
  31. V. S. Mummidi and K. M. Patel, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 042.
  32. B. Fu, S. F. King, L. Marsili, S. Pascoli, J. Turner, and Y. L. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 072.
  33. B. Fu, S. F. King, L. Marsili, S. Pascoli, J. Turner, and Y. L. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 109, 5 (2024).
  34. K. S. Babu, C. S. Fong, and S. Saad, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 151.
  35. A. Dueck and W. Rodejohann, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 024.
  36. S. Saad, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 058.
  37. K. S. Babu, P. Di Bari, C. S. Fong, and S. Saad, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 190.
  38. Z. Q. Chen, G. X. Fang, and Y. L. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 113, 115024 (2026).
  39. A. Abusleme et al. (JUNO Collaboration), Nature (London) 654, 343 (2026).
  40. Y. F. Wang, JUNO Experiment, in Talk presented in Neutrino 2026, Ivrine, 2026, https://indico.global/event/15740/contributions/155563/.
  41. W. Grimus, A. S. Joshipura, L. Lavoura, and M. Tanimoto, Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 227 (2004).
  42. F. Gonzalez Canales, A. Mondragon, and M. Mondragon, Fortschr. Phys. 61, 546 (2013).
  43. P. M. Ferreira, W. Grimus, D. Jurčiukonis, and L. Lavoura, Nucl. Phys. B906, 289 (2016).
  44. I. P. Ivanov and L. Lavoura, J. Phys. G 43, 105005 (2016).
  45. T. Ohlsson and M. Pernow, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 111.
  46. M. Lindestam, T. Ohlsson, and M. Pernow, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 009.
  47. D. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B952, 114935 (2020).
  48. J. N. Lu, X. G. Liu, and G. J. Ding, Phys. Rev. D 101, 115020 (2020).
  49. Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S. H. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161601 (2022).
  50. C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011034 (2023).
  51. C. Cordova, S. Hong, S. Koren, and K. Ohmori, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031033 (2024).
  52. C. Cordova, S. Hong, and S. Koren, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031011 (2025).
  53. T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 120.
  54. T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, and M. Tanimoto, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 117.
  55. G. C. Branco, L. Lavoura, and F. Mota, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3443 (1989).
  56. Z. Jiang, B. Y. Qu, and G. J. Ding, Phys. Rev. D 112, 115029 (2025).
  57. T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, M. Tanimoto, and H. Uchida, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 189.
  58. T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 113, 055016 (2026).
  59. B. Y. Qu, Z. Jiang, and G. J. Ding, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2026) 245.
  60. S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio, and M. Malinsky, Phys. Rev. D 80, 015013 (2009).
  61. S. F. King, S. Pascoli, J. Turner, and Y. L. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 225.
  62. W. Grimus and H. Kuhbock, Eur. Phys. J. C 51, 721 (2007).
  63. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. B 603, 35 (2004).
  64. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 091804 (2005).
  65. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 72, 075009 (2005).
  66. G. Altarelli and G. Blankenburg, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 133.
  67. B. Dutta, Y. Mimura, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095021 (2009).
  68. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  69. S. Davidson and A. Ibarra, Phys. Lett. B 535, 25 (2002).
  70. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  71. J. Dong, T. Jeric, T. Kobayashi, R. Nishida, and H. Otsuka, Phys. Rev. D 113, 056028 (2026).
  72. T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka, arXiv:2512.16376.
  73. https://github.com/YeLingZhou/UTZT_SO10.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation