Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Decay and production properties of a strange double-charm pentaquark

Zi-Yan Yang1,2,3,* and Wei Chen4,5,†

  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering and Robotic Engineering, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou 510800, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Atomic and Subatomic Structure and Quantum Control (MOE), Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Structure and Fundamental Interactions of Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 3Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Southern Nuclear Science Computing Center, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 4School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • 5Southern Center for Nuclear-Science Theory (SCNT), Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huizhou 516000, Guangdong Province, China

  • *Contact author: yangzh@gcu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: chenwei29@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 054021 – Published 16 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/31lx-524s

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the decay and production properties of the strange double-charm pentaquark Pccs++ with strangeness S=−1. Building upon our previous work predicting its JP=1/2− molecular configuration, we employ three-point QCD sum rules to calculate its strong decay widths and estimate its production branching ratio via Ξbc+ baryon decays. The total strong decay width to the ΞccK¯ and Ωccπ final-state channels is determined as 85±19  MeV. Furthermore, using a rescattering mechanism, we analyze the Ξbc+→Ds*−Ξcc++→D−Pccs++ process and estimate the production branching ratio to be Br(Ξbc+→D−Pccs++)=(4.3−1.5+2.0)×10−6. The relatively narrow width and detectable branching ratio suggest the possibility searching for this pentaquark state in the future.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  2. G. Zweig, in Developments in the Quark Theory of Hadrons, edited by D. Lichtenberg and S. P. Rosen (Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, 1964), Vol. 1, pp. 22–101.
  3. M. Nielsen, F. S. Navarra, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rep. 497, 41 (2010).
  4. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  5. J.-M. Richard, Few Body Syst. 57, 1185 (2016).
  6. A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Phys. Rep. 668, 1 (2017).
  7. A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017).
  8. F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018).
  9. R. M. Albuquerque, J. M. Dias, K. P. Khemchandani, A. M. Torres, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and C. M. Zanetti, J. Phys. G 46, 093002 (2019).
  10. Y. R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
  11. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C. Z. Yuan, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  12. J.-M. Richard, A. Valcarce, and J. Vijande, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 412, 168009 (2020).
  13. R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and E. M. Savchenko, Universe 7, 94 (2021).
  14. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  15. L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  16. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  17. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  18. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 751 (2022).
  19. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012017 (2023).
  20. M.-J. Yan, X.-H. Liu, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 98, 091502 (2018).
  21. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 125201 (2021).
  22. R. Chen, A. Hosaka, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 116012 (2017).
  23. Z.-H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074004 (2017).
  24. R. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Huang, and C.-F. Qiao, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134869 (2019).
  25. B. Wang, K. Chen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 074035 (2024).
  26. F.-B. Duan, Q.-N. Wang, Z.-Y. Yang, X.-L. Chen, and W. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094018 (2024).
  27. F. L. Wang and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074022 (2023).
  28. F. L. Wang and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014043 (2024).
  29. L. C. Sheng, J. Y. Huo, R. Chen, F. L. Wang, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054044 (2024).
  30. R. Chen, N. Li, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Lett. B 822, 136693 (2021).
  31. Y. Xing and Y. Niu, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 978 (2021).
  32. Q.-S. Zhou, K. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. C 98, 045204 (2018).
  33. Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 826 (2018).
  34. W. Park, S. Cho, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094023 (2019).
  35. U. Özdem, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 936 (2022).
  36. U. Özdem, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 10 (2025).
  37. H. Y. Zhou, F. L. Wang, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034034 (2022).
  38. S. H. Zhu, F. L. Wang, and X. Liu, arXiv:2510.18492.
  39. Z.-Y. Yang, Q. Wang, and W. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056022 (2024).
  40. J.-W. Li, M.-Z. Yang, and D.-S. Du, HEPNP 27, 665 (2003); arXiv:hep-ph/0206154.
  41. H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014030 (2005).
  42. C.-D. Lü, Y.-L. Shen, and W. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 73, 034005 (2006).
  43. J.-J. Han, H.-Y. Jiang, W. Liu, Z.-J. Xiao, and F.-S. Yu, Chin. Phys. C 45, 053105 (2021).
  44. C.-P. Jia, H.-Y. Jiang, J.-P. Wang, and F.-S. Yu, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 072.
  45. Y.-K. Chen, J.-J. Han, Q.-F. Lü, J.-P. Wang, and F.-S. Yu, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 71 (2021).
  46. Z.-Y. Yang, Q. Wang, and W. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 111, 076030 (2025).
  47. Y.-K. Hsiao, S.-T. Cai, and Y.-L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 076020 (2025).
  48. L. J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein, and S. Yazaki, Phys. Rep. 127, 1 (1985).
  49. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147, 385 (1979).
  50. P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, At the Frontier of Particle Physics, edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), Vol. 3, pp. 1495–1576.
  51. S. Narison, Cambridge Monogr. Part. Phys., Nucl. Phys., Cosmol. 17, 1 (2007).
  52. J.-R. Zhang and M.-Q. Huang, Chin. Phys. C 33, 1385 (2009).
  53. B. S. Zou and F. Hussain, Phys. Rev. C 67, 015204 (2003).
  54. M. Jamin, J. A. Oller, and A. Pich, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 237 (2002).
  55. M. Jamin and A. Pich, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 74, 300 (1999).
  56. B. L. Ioffe, Nucl. Phys. B188, 317 (1981); B191, 591(E) (1981).
  57. Y. Chung, H. G. Dosch, M. Kremer, and D. Schall, Z. Phys. C 25, 151 (1984).
  58. H. G. Dosch, M. Jamin, and S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 220, 251 (1989).
  59. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, N. Offen, and Y. M. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 83, 094031 (2011).
  60. A. Francis, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, and K. Maltman, Phys. Rev. D 99, 054505 (2019).
  61. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  62. Z.-G. Wang, Front. Phys. 21, 016300 (2026).
  63. Z. S. Brown, W. Detmold, S. Meinel, and K. Orginos, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094507 (2014).
  64. Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. A 45, 267 (2010).
  65. Y.-J. Shi, W. Wang, and Z.-X. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 568 (2020).
  66. M. Wirbel, B. Stech, and M. Bauer, Z. Phys. C 29, 637 (1985).
  67. M. Bauer, B. Stech, and M. Wirbel, Z. Phys. C 34, 103 (1987).
  68. W. Wang, F.-S. Yu, and Z.-X. Zhao, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 781 (2017).
  69. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  70. O. Gortchakov, M. P. Locher, V. E. Markushin, and S. von Rotz, Z. Phys. A 353, 447 (1996).
  71. Q. Wu, D.-Y. Chen, and R. Ji, Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 071301 (2021).
  72. Y.-W. Pan, M.-Z. Liu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114022 (2023).
  73. Q. Wu and D.-Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094003 (2024).
  74. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 095.
  75. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 45, 093002 (2021).
  76. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 47, 093001 (2023).
  77. X.-Y. Zhao, L. Guo, X.-C. Zheng, H.-Y. Bi, X.-G. Wu, and Q.-W. Ke, Chin. Phys. C 49, 053103 (2025).
  78. H.-H. Ma, J.-J. Niu, and L. Guo, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 197.
  79. H.-Y. Bi, R.-Y. Zhang, X.-G. Wu, W.-G. Ma, X.-Z. Li, and S. Owusu, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074020 (2017).
  80. P.-H. Zhang, L. Guo, X.-C. Zheng, and Q.-W. Ke, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034016 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation