Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Effects of flavor-mixings on charged kaon and pion parton distribution functions

Fabio L. Braghin1,* and Parada T. P. Hutauruk2,†

  • 1Instituto de Física, Federal University of Goiás, Avenida Esperança, s/n, 74690-900, Goiânia, GO, Brazil
  • 2International Institute for Sustainability with Knotted Chiral Meta Matter (WPI-SKCM2), Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8531, Japan

  • *Contact author: braghin@ufg.br
  • †Contact author: phutauruk@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 114, 054046 – Published 23 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2xjj-bfcf

Abstract

We investigate the charged kaon and pion parton distribution functions (PDFs) in the U(3) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model, considering a novel flavor-mixing interaction arising from vacuum polarization that differs from the instanton-induced ’t Hooft interaction. In this work, the proper-time regularization scheme is employed, and, effectively, it might take quark confinement into account. The gap equations, the meson masses, and the meson-quark coupling constants are calculated in the presence of flavor-mixing interactions. The valence-quark distributions of the charged kaon and pion are calculated and compared with existing experimental data and Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum analysis results at scales μ2=4 and 27  GeV2. The strength of mixing effects on the PDFs is found to be proportional to the quark effective masses and their differences. We further find that the dominant flavor-mixing effects in the pion valence up-quark distribution at scales μ2=27 and 4  GeV2 are around x≃0.3 and x≃0.8, while for the kaon, the effects are shown at around x≃0.2 and x≃0.7. We also find similar strength of mixing effects on the PDFs at both scales μ2=4 and 27  GeV2; however, it certainly improves the pion and kaon PDFs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. C. Lorcé, A. Metz, B. Pasquini, and P. Schweitzer, Parton distribution functions and their generalizations, Encycl. Part. Phys. 2, 167 (2026).
  2. F. Gross et al., 50 years of quantum chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023).
  3. P. T. P. Hutauruk, I. C. Cloet, and A. W. Thomas, Flavor dependence of the pion and kaon form factors and parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. C 94, 035201 (2016).
  4. A. Watanabe, T. Sawada, and C. W. Kao, Kaon quark distribution functions in the chiral constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074015 (2018).
  5. T. Frederico and G. A. Miller, Deep inelastic structure function of the pion in the null plane phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 50, 210 (1994).
  6. W. Bentz, T. Hama, and T. Matsuki, K. Yazaki, NJL model on the light cone, and pion structure function, Nucl. Phys. A651, 143 (1999).
  7. C. Avila, J. C. Sanabria, and J. Magnin, Pion and kaon parton distribution functions in a meson cloud model, Phys. Rev. D 67, 034022 (2003); 68, 079902(E) (2003).
  8. T. Nguyen, A. Bashir, and C. D. Roberts, P. C. Tandy, Pion and kaon valence-quark parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 062201 (2011).
  9. P. T. P. Hutauruk, Pseudoscalar meson parton distributions within gauge-invariant nonlocal chiral quark model, Symmetry 17, 971 (2025).
  10. P. T. P. Hutauruk and S.-i. Nam, Parton distribution functions for pseudoscalar mesons in the confining effective chiral quark theory, Makara J. Sci. 26, 296 (2022).
  11. J. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Cai, X. Chen, and Q. Wang, Valence quark distributions of pions: Insights from Tsallis entropy, Chin. Phys. C 50, 013103 (2026).
  12. M. Aicher, A. Schafer, and W. Vogelsang, Soft-gluon resummation and the valence parton distribution function of the pion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252003 (2010).
  13. G. A. Miller, A. K. Opper, and E. J. Stephenson, Charge symmetry breaking and QCD, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 253 (2006).
  14. J. T. Londergan, J. C. Peng, and A. W. Thomas, Charge symmetry at the partonic level, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2009 (2010).
  15. J. T. Londergan and A. W. Thomas, The validity of charge symmetry for parton distributions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 49 (1998).
  16. G. A. Miller, B. M. K. Nefkens, and I. Slaus, Charge symmetry, quarks and mesons, Phys. Rep. 194, 1 (1990).
  17. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Quark masses, Phys. Rep. 87, 77 (1989).
  18. J. Donoghue, Light quark masses, and chiral symmetry, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 39, 1 (1989).
  19. X. G. Wang, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young, Electromagnetic contribution to charge symmetry violation in parton distributions, Phys. Lett. B 753, 595 (2016).
  20. A. W. Thomas, X. G. Wang, and R. D. Young, Electromagnetic contribution to the proton-neutron mass splitting, Phys. Rev. C 91, 015209 (2015).
  21. P. T. P. Hutauruk, W. Bentz, I. C. Cloët, and A. W. Thomas, Effects of charge symmetry breaking on form factors of the pion and kaon, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Conf. Proc. 26, 031005 (2019).
  22. E. Sather, Isospin violating quark distributions in the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B 274, 433 (1992).
  23. R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, H. Stuben, A. W. Thomas, F. Winter, R. D. Young, and J. M. Zanotti, Charge symmetry breaking in parton distribution functions from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 83, 051501 (2011).
  24. P. E. Shanahan, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, H. Stüben, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, and J. M. Zanotti, Charge symmetry violation in the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 91, 113006 (2015).
  25. J. Arrington et al., Revealing the structure of light pseudoscalar mesons at the electron–ion collider, J. Phys. G 48, 075106 (2021).
  26. D. P. Anderle et al., Electron-ion collider in China, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16, 64701 (2021).
  27. T. Sawada, W.-C. Chang, S. Kumano, J.-C. Peng, S. Sawada, and K. Tanaka, Accessing proton generalized parton distributions and pion distribution amplitudes with the exclusive pion-induced Drell-Yan process at J-PARC, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114034 (2016).
  28. B. Adams et al., Letter of intent: A new QCD facility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COMPASS++/AMBER), arXiv:1808.00848.
  29. Z. Lu, Z. Yu, T. Lin, Y.-T. Liang, R. Wang, W. Chang, and W. Xiong, Feasibility study of pion and kaon structure via the Sullivan process at the EicC, Phys. Rev. D 113, 114002 (2026).
  30. J. T. Londergan, G. T. Carvey, G. Q. Liu, E. N. Rodionov, and A. W. Thomas, Drell-Yan processes as a probe of charge symmetry violation in the pion and the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B 340, 115 (1994).
  31. H. T. Klest, Drell-Yan process at the electron-ion collider, Phys. Rev. D 113, 094029 (2026).
  32. M. Ding, K. Raya, D. Binosi, L. Chang, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Symmetry, symmetry breaking, and pion parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054014 (2020).
  33. G. ’t Hooft, How instantons solve the U(1) problem, Phys. Rep. 142, 357 (1986).
  34. F. L. Braghin, Flavor-dependent U(3) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio coupling constant, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094028 (2021).
  35. F. L. Braghin, Mixing interactions, and effects in the NJL-model, Proc. Sci. CD2024 (2026) 075 [arXiv:2501.07658].
  36. F. L. Braghin, Strangeness content of the pion in the U(3) Nambu–Jona–Lasinio model, J. Phys. G 49, 055101 (2022); 50, 119501(E) (2023).
  37. F. L. Braghin, Quark-antiquark states of the lightest scalar mesons within the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with flavor-dependent coupling constants, J. Phys. G 50, 095101 (2023).
  38. F. L. Braghin, B. El-Bennich, and F. E. Serna, Charge dependence of mesons with flavored contact-interaction couplings, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014010 (2026).
  39. W. de Sousa and F. L. Braghin, U(5) Nambu–Jona–Lasinio model with flavor dependent coupling constants: pseudoscalar and scalar mesons masses, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 271 (2026).
  40. U. Vogl and W. Weise, The Nambu and Jona Lasinio model: Its implications for hadrons and nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27, 195 (1991).
  41. S. P. Klevansky, The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
  42. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, QCD phenomenology based on a chiral effective Lagrangian, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
  43. J. Bijnens, Chiral Lagrangians and Nambu-Jona-Lasinio-like models, Phys. Rep. 265, 369 (1996).
  44. M. Miyama and S. Kumano, Numerical solution of Q2 evolution equations in a brute force method, Comput. Phys. Commun. 94, 185 (1996).
  45. J. S. Conway et al., Experimental study of muon pairs produced by 252-GeV pions on tungsten, Phys. Rev. D 39, 92 (1989).
  46. P. C. Barry, C.-R. Ji, N. Sato, and W. Melnitchouk, Global QCD analysis of pion parton distributions with threshold resummation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 232001 (2021).
  47. R. J. Crewther, Status of the U(1) Problem, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 2N8, 63 (1979), https:// inspirehep.net/literature/132197.
  48. Z. Fan and H.-W. Lin, Gluon parton distribution of the pion from lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136778 (2021).
  49. A. Salas-Chavira, Z. Fan, and H.-W. Lin, First glimpse into the kaon gluon parton distribution using lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094510 (2022).
  50. J. Holligan and H.-W. Lin, Pion valence quark distribution at physical pion mass of Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD, J. Phys. G 51, 065101 (2024).
  51. H.-W. Lin, J.-W. Chen, Z. Fan, J.-H. Zhang, and R. Zhang, Valence-quark distribution of the kaon and pion from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014516 (2021).
  52. P. T. P. Hutauruk, W. Bentz, I. C. Cloët, and A. W. Thomas, Charge symmetry breaking effects in pion and kaon structure, Phys. Rev. C 97, 055210 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation