Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Boundary conditions and Dirac fields on AdSn

Claudio Dappiaggi* and Andrea Parpinel†

  • *Contact author: claudio.dappiaggi@unipv.it
  • †Contact author: andrea.parpinel01@universitadipavia.it

Phys. Rev. D 113, 125028 – Published 22 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2t3p-pwz3

Abstract

We study Dirac fields on AdSn in both global and Poincaré charts and, for each mass window, we classify the boundary conditions at conformal infinity that ensure the existence of advanced and retarded propagators. We distinguish the well-known MIT–bag class from a generalized family, thereby extending to arbitrary dimensions the procedure initiated in [D. S. Blanco, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 64, 032301 (2023).]. As in the scalar case, we show that suitable generalized boundary data can support bound states. In four dimensions, we work out two explicit examples: (i) the MIT case, for which we construct the advanced/retarded propagators and the two-point function of the associated ground state and (ii) a representative generalized boundary condition, for which we construct the propagators and exhibit a normalizable bound state.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. M. Benini, C. Dappiaggi, and T. P. Hack, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330023 (2013).
  2. K. Fredenhagen and K. Rejzner, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 031101 (2016).
  3. Advances in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory, edited by R. Brunetti, C. Dappiaggi, K. Fredenhagen, and J. Yngvason, Mathematical Physics Studies (Springer, New York, 2015), p. 470.
  4. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1984), p. 506.
  5. C. Bär, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfäffle, Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2008). p. 202.
  6. C. J. Fewster and R. Verch, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 235027 (2013).
  7. H. Sahlmann and R. Verch, Commun. Math. Phys. 214, 705 (2000).
  8. C. Dappiaggi, G. Nosari, and N. Pinamonti, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 19, 12 (2016).
  9. S. J. Avis, C. J. Isham, and D. Storey, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3565 (1978).
  10. C. Dappiaggi and H. R. C. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D 94, 125016 (2016).
  11. C. Dappiaggi and H. R. C. Ferreira, Rev. Math. Phys. 30, 1850004 (2017).
  12. C. Dappiaggi and A. Marta, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 24, 28 (2021).
  13. B. S. Kay, Rev. Math. Phys. SI 1, 167 (1992).
  14. K. Johnson, Acta Phys. Pol. B 6, 865 (1975).
  15. D. S. Blanco, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 64, 032301 (2023).
  16. N. Grosse and S. Murro, Doc. Math. 25, 737 (2020).
  17. C. Dappiaggi, T. P. Hack, and N. Pinamonti, Rev. Math. Phys. 21, 1241 (2009).
  18. B. Costeri, C. Dappiaggi, B. A. Juárez-Aubry, and R. D. Singh, arXiv:2509.26035.
  19. K. H. Rehren, Ann. Henri Poincare 1, 607 (2000).
  20. C. Dappiaggi, H. R. C. Ferreira, and A. Marta, Phys. Rev. D 98, 025005 (2018).
  21. J. P. M. Pitelli, Phys. Rev. D 99, 108701 (2019).
  22. B. Allen and C. A. Lütken, Commun. Math. Phys. 106, 201 (1986).
  23. A. Zettl, Sturm-Liouville Theory (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2005), Vol. 121, p. 328.
  24. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions (Release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15), https://dlmf.nist.gov/.
  25. P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 144, 249 (1982).
  26. V. F. Foit, D. Kabat, and G. Lifschytz, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 129.
  27. R. Camporesi and A. Higuchi, J. Geom. Phys. 20, 1 (1996).
  28. I. Stakgold and M. J. Holst, Green’s Functions and Boundary Value Problems (Wiley, New York, 2011), p. 1267.
  29. V. Moretti, Spectral Theory and Quantum Mechanics: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theories, Symmetries and Introduction to the Algebraic Formulation (Springer, New York, 2017), p. 950.
  30. O. Gannot and M. Wrochna, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 21, 67 (2022).
  31. C. Dappiaggi and A. Marta, Mathematische Nachrichten 295, 1934 (2022).
  32. C. Gérard and T. Stoskopf, Rev. Math. Phys. 20, 4 (2022).
  33. L. d. Campos, C. Dappiaggi, and L. Sinibaldi, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138348 (2024).
  34. M. J. Radzikowski, Commun. Math. Phys. 179, 529 (1996).
  35. M. J. Radzikowski, Commun. Math. Phys. 180, 1 (1996).
  36. K. Rejzner, Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory (Springer, New York, 2016), p. 180.
  37. N. Drago, N. Ginoux, and , S. Murro Doc. Math. 27, 1693 (2022).
  38. C. Dappiaggi, H. R. C. Ferreira, and B. A. Juárez-Aubry, Phys. Rev. D 97, 085022 (2018).
  39. C. Dappiaggi, B. A. Juárez-Aubry, and A. Marta, Phys. Rev. D 105, 105017 (2022).
  40. B. A. Juárez-Aubry and R. Weder, J. Phys. A 54, 105203 (2021).
  41. L. Hodgkinson and J. Louko, Phys. Rev. D 86, 064031 (2012).
  42. K. K. Ng, L. Hodgkinson, J. Louko, R. B. Mann, and E. Martin-Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 90, 064003 (2014).
  43. L. J. Henderson, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, A. R. H. Smith, and J. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135732 (2020).
  44. L. De Souza Campos and C. Dappiaggi, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136198 (2021).
  45. L. de Souza Campos and J. P. M. Pitelli, Phys. Rev. D 104, 085020 (2021).
  46. V. H. M. Ramos, J. P. M. Pitelli, and J. C. A. Barata, Phys. Rev. D 112, 124035 (2025).
  47. H. B. Lawson and M. L. Michelsohn, Spin Geometry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998). p. 440.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation