Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constraining axion properties with radio telescopes

Patrick J. Fox1, Neal Weiner2, and Huangyu Xiao1,3

  • 1Theoretical Physics Department, Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 2Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA
  • 3Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

Phys. Rev. D 113, 055038 – Published 25 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2n16-pqdh

Abstract

Axion dark matter or any ultralight bosonic dark matter can go through Bose-Einstein condensation due to the large phase density, leading to the formation of axion stars or solitons in dark matter halo centers. The formation rate is enhanced in the presence of the substructures expected in the postinflationary scenario for the QCD axion or axionlike particles. An axion star will continue to grow until a critical mass is reached, after which it collapses and then explodes, with the emission of relativistic axions, in a process called an “axinovae.” There can also be accompanying photon emission due to the stimulated decay of axions in the coherent compact axion star. In axion models with a modest enhancement (κ∼O(10)) of the axion-photon coupling gaγ=κα/(2πfa) axinovae will contain a significant flux of radio photons. We determine the range of parameters over which axinovae can be detectable with radio transient searches.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (94)

  1. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  2. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  3. J. E. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979).
  4. L. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. 120B, 133 (1983).
  5. M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. 120B, 137 (1983).
  6. J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. 120B, 127 (1983).
  7. R. D. Peccei, Lect. Notes Phys. 741, 3 (2008).
  8. P. J. Fox, N. Weiner, and H. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095043 (2023).
  9. J. Eby, M. Leembruggen, L. Street, P. Suranyi, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. D 100, 063002 (2019).
  10. D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 011301 (2017).
  11. J. Eby, M. Leembruggen, P. Suranyi, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 066.
  12. T. Helfer, D. J. E. Marsh, K. Clough, M. Fairbairn, E. A. Lim, and R. Becerril, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2017) 055.
  13. P.-H. Chavanis, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023009 (2018).
  14. H. Zhang, Symmetry 12, 25 (2019).
  15. R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, Phys. Rev. 187, 1767 (1969).
  16. M. Membrado, J. Abad, A. F. Pacheco, and J. Sanudo, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2736 (1989).
  17. L. Visinelli, S. Baum, J. Redondo, K. Freese, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B 777, 64 (2018).
  18. P.-H. Chavanis, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043531 (2011).
  19. P. H. Chavanis and L. Delfini, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043532 (2011).
  20. P.-H. Chavanis, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083007 (2016).
  21. For larger fa the gravitational cross section can become important. The associated timescale for this τgrav∼mav6/(48π3GN2n2), see [8, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26] for more details.

  22. D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 151301 (2018).
  23. B. Eggemeier and J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 100, 063528 (2019).
  24. J. Chen, X. Du, E. Lentz, and D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023009 (2022).
  25. K. Kirkpatrick, A. E. Mirasola, and C. Prescod-Weinstein, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103012 (2020).
  26. J. Chen, X. Du, E. W. Lentz, D. J. E. Marsh, and J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083022 (2021).
  27. A. S. Dmitriev, D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 091001 (2024).
  28. A. Arza, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 250 (2019).
  29. A. Caputo, M. Regis, M. Taoso, and S. J. Witte, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 027.
  30. A. Arza and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131804 (2019).
  31. A. Arza, T. Schwetz, and E. Todarello, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2020) 013.
  32. Y. Sun, K. Schutz, A. Nambrath, C. Leung, and K. Masui, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063007 (2022).
  33. M. A. Buen-Abad, J. Fan, and C. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 105, 075006 (2022).
  34. Y. Sun, K. Schutz, H. Sewalls, C. Leung, and K. W. Masui, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043042 (2024).
  35. P. S. B. Dev, F. Ferrer, and T. Okawa, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2024) 045.
  36. M. P. Hertzberg and E. D. Schiappacasse, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2018) 004.
  37. Z. Wang, L. Shao, and L. X. Li, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2020) 038.
  38. L. M. Chung-Jukko, E. A. Lim, D. J. E. Marsh, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, E. de Jong, and B.-X. Ge, Phys. Rev. D 108, L061302 (2023).
  39. H. Di, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 283 (2024).
  40. D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023501 (2020).
  41. M. A. Amin and Z.-G. Mou, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2021) 024.
  42. M. A. Amin, A. J. Long, Z.-G. Mou, and P. Saffin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 182.
  43. M. Escudero, C. K. Pooni, M. Fairbairn, D. Blas, X. Du, and D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043018 (2024).
  44. M. A. Amin, A. J. Long, and E. D. Schiappacasse, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2023) 015.
  45. H. Di, H. Shi, and Z. Yi, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023011 (2025).
  46. H. Di, L. Shao, Z. Yi, and S.-B. Kong, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103031 (2024).
  47. D. Maseizik and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083015 (2024).
  48. D. Maseizik, S. Mondal, H. Seong, and G. Sigl, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 033.
  49. D. Maseizik, J. Eby, H. Seong, and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D 111, 063017 (2025).
  50. H. Di, Z. Yi, H. Shi, and Y. Gong, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 555 (2025).
  51. E. D. Schiappacasse, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 085.
  52. We thank Junwu Huang for bringing this to our attention.

  53. A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, M. Galanis, D. Racco, O. Simon, and J. O. Thompson, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 106.
  54. N. Siemonsen, C. Mondino, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, J. Huang, M. Baryakhtar, and W. E. East, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075025 (2023).
  55. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1799 (1987).
  56. A. Prabhu, arXiv:2006.10231.
  57. J. I. Mcdonald and L. B. Ventura, arXiv:2008.12923.
  58. D. Croon, D. McKeen, N. Raj, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 083021 (2020).
  59. Z. Yin and L. Visinelli, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2024) 013.
  60. P. W. Graham and H. Ramani, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075011 (2024).
  61. P. W. Graham and H. Ramani, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075012 (2024).
  62. J. H. Chang, P. J. Fox, and H. Xiao, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2024) 023.
  63. Y. Bai, X. Du, and Y. Hamada, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2022) 041.
  64. S. J. Witte, S. Baum, M. Lawson, M. C. D. Marsh, A. J. Millar, and G. Salinas, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063013 (2023).
  65. C. Kouvaris, T. Liu, and K.-F. Lyu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 023008 (2024).
  66. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  67. R. Schutzhold, H. Gies, and G. Dunne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130404 (2008).
  68. C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250402 (2010).
  69. V. F. Bashmakov, E. N. Nerush, I. Y. Kostyukov, A. M. Fedotov, and N. B. Narozhny, arXiv:1310.4077.
  70. P. Agrawal, J. Fan, M. Reece, and L.-T. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 006.
  71. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, F. Rompineve, and A. Tesi, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 095.
  72. R. Daido, F. Takahashi, and N. Yokozaki, Phys. Lett. B 780, 538 (2018).
  73. L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez, and A. Ringwald, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 184.
  74. L. Walters, J. E. Shroyer, M. Edenton, P. Agrawal, B. Johnson, B. J. Kavanagh, D. J. E. Marsh, and L. Visinelli, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123002 (2024).
  75. W. H. Press and P. Schechter, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 (1974).
  76. R. Braun, A. Bonaldi, T. Bourke, E. Keane, and J. Wagg, arXiv:1912.12699.
  77. D. J. Bacon et al. (SKA Collaboration), Pub. Astron. Soc. Aust. 37, e007 (2020).
  78. For lower frequencies, it is also required that the plasma frequency is smaller than ma/2 to not kinematically block photon emissions from axion star collapse, which requires axions with masses ma>2×10−14  eV to explode in the current universe [79].

  79. A. Berlin, J. A. Dror, X. Gan, and J. T. Ruderman, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 046.
  80. C. O’Hare, cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits, https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/ (2020).
  81. S. Alexander, G. Beck, S. Loane, and T. Manton, arXiv:2508.04784.
  82. H. Xiao, I. Williams, and M. McQuinn, Phys. Rev. D 104, 023515 (2021).
  83. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996).
  84. L. Dai and J. Miralda-Escudé, Astron. J. 159, 49 (2020).
  85. C. A. J. O’Hare, G. Pierobon, J. Redondo, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 105, 055025 (2022).
  86. A. E. Nelson and H. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 98, 063516 (2018).
  87. L. Visinelli and J. Redondo, Phys. Rev. D 101, 023008 (2020).
  88. N. Blinov, M. J. Dolan, and P. Draper, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035002 (2020).
  89. R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 251802 (2020).
  90. C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015003 (2020).
  91. C. Eröncel and G. Servant, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2023) 009.
  92. C. Eröncel, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Sørensen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 053.
  93. M. Redi and A. Tesi, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095032 (2023).
  94. K. Harigaya and L.-T. Wang, arXiv:2211.08289.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation