Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Spectrum of open confining strings in the large-Nc limit

Alireza Sharifian*

Andreas Athenodorou†

Pedro Bicudo‡

  • Computation-based Science and Technology Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, 20 Kavafi Str., Nicosia 2121, Cyprus

  • *Contact author: alireza.sharifian@tecnico.ulisboa.pt
  • †Contact author: a.athenodorou@cyi.ac.cy
  • ‡Contact author: bicudo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt

Phys. Rev. D 112, 094517 – Published 26 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2g74-q38h

Abstract

In this study, we conduct a thorough examination of the spectrum of the open confining string in 3+1 dimensions, commonly referred to as the open flux tube, across various gauge groups of SU(Nc). Our primary objective is to explore its behavior as we approach the large-Nc limit and the identification of possible world-sheet axion states. Specifically, we undertake a detailed analysis of the associated spectrum for Nc=3, 4, 5, 6. This marks the first systematic investigation of the open flux-tube spectrum within the context of the large-Nc limit. More specifically, we analyze the spectra of flux tubes that form between a static quark-antiquark pair, considering a significant number of radial excitations and eight irreducible representations characterized by the quantum numbers of angular momentum Λ, charge conjugation and parity ηCP, and the reflection symmetry ε for Λ=0. To this purpose we employ a diverse set of suitable operators, an anisotropic action, and smearing techniques, and solve the generalized eigenvalue problem. We compare our findings with predictions from the Nambu-Goto string model to assess potential tensions indicative of novel phenomena such as the existence of axionlike state along the flux-tube world sheet. Notably, we provide undoubted evidence of the existence of a massive axionlike particle with the same mass as the corresponding axion extracted within the context of closed flux tube. This strengthens the conjecture that the axion is a property of the world sheet of the QCD string.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (75)

  1. Simons Collaboration on Confinement and QCD Strings, https://simonsconfinementcollaboration.org/.
  2. A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz, and M. Teper, Phys. Lett. B 656, 132 (2007).
  3. A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz, and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2011) 030.
  4. A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz, and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 042.
  5. A. Athenodorou, S. Dubovsky, C. Luo, and M. Teper, arXiv:2411.03435.
  6. Y. Nambu, Phys. Lett. 80B, 372 (1979).
  7. T. Goto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 46, 1560 (1971).
  8. B. Zwiebach, A First Course in String Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
  9. O. Aharony and E. Karzbrun, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2009) 012.
  10. M. Luscher and P. Weisz, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2004) 014.
  11. S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger, and V. Gorbenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 062006 (2013).
  12. A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2021 (2022) 103 [arXiv:2112.11213].
  13. C. Morningstar, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 53, 914 (1997).
  14. A. Sharifian, N. Cardoso, and P. Bicudo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114507 (2023).
  15. B. Lucini and M. Panero, Phys. Rep. 526, 93 (2013).
  16. A. V. Manohar, in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 68: Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions (1998), pp. 1091–1169.
  17. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974).
  18. A. Dromard and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074505 (2014).
  19. A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 082.
  20. C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia, B. Lucini, and D. Vadacchino, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137281 (2022).
  21. S. Capitani, O. Philipsen, C. Reisinger, C. Riehl, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034502 (2019).
  22. L. Müller, O. Philipsen, C. Reisinger, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054503 (2019).
  23. B. Blossier, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, T. Mendes, and R. Sommer, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 094.
  24. S. Deser and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 65B, 369 (1976).
  25. L. Brink, P. Di Vecchia, and P. S. Howe, Phys. Lett. 65B, 471 (1976).
  26. A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. 103B, 207 (1981).
  27. A. M. Polyakov, Gauge Fields and Strings (Harwood Academic Publishers, New York, NY, 1987), Vol. 3.
  28. J. F. Arvis, Phys. Lett. 127B, 106 (1983).
  29. M. Lüscher, K. Symanzik, and P. Weisz, Nucl. Phys. B173, 365 (1980).
  30. J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1681 (1991).
  31. H. B. Meyer, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 066.
  32. J. M. Drummond, arXiv:hep-th/0411017.
  33. N. D. Hari Dass, P. Matlock, and Y. Bharadwaj, arXiv:0910.5615.
  34. O. Aharony and M. Field, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2011) 065.
  35. O. Aharony and N. Klinghoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2010) 058.
  36. P. Atkins, J. De Paula, and J. Keeler, Atkins’ Physical Chemistry, 11th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017).
  37. K. J. Juge, J. Kuti, and C. Morningstar, in Proceedings of Wako 2003, Color Confinement and Hadrons in Quantum Chromodynamics (2004), p. 221.
  38. A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 063.
  39. A. Athenodorou, S. Dubovsky, C. Luo, and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 082.
  40. S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger, and V. Gorbenko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 120, 399 (2015).
  41. C. Chen, P. Conkey, S. Dubovsky, and G. Hernández-Chifflet, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114024 (2018).
  42. K. J. Juge, J. Kuti, and C. Morningstar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 161601 (2003).
  43. F. Karbstein, A. Peters, and M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2014) 114.
  44. C. Schlosser and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054503 (2022).
  45. C. Schlosser and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074504 (2025).
  46. N. Cardoso and P. Bicudo, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 509 (2013).
  47. M. Garcia Perez and P. van Baal, Phys. Lett. B 392, 163 (1997).
  48. B. Lucini, M. Teper, and U. Wenger, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2004) 012.
  49. F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. B205, 285 (1982).
  50. T. R. Klassen, Nucl. Phys. B533, 557 (1998).
  51. A. Amado, N. Cardoso, and P. Bicudo, arXiv:1309.3859.
  52. I. T. Drummond, A. Hart, R. R. Horgan, and L. C. Storoni, Phys. Rev. D 66, 094509 (2002).
  53. C. Albanese et al. (APE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 192, 163 (1987).
  54. C. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D 69, 054501 (2004).
  55. A. Huntley and C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B270, 123 (1986).
  56. P. Bicudo, N. Cardoso, and M. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114507 (2018).
  57. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 262001 (2009).
  58. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards, and C. E. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034508 (2010).
  59. P. Bicudo, A. Peters, S. Velten, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114506 (2021).
  60. C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Cichy, A. Dromard, E. Garcia-Ramos, K. Jansen, U. Wenger, and F. Zimmermann, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 424 (2020).
  61. B. B. Brandt, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 008.
  62. A. Gonzalez-Arroyo and M. Okawa, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1524 (2013).
  63. B. B. Brandt, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2011) 040.
  64. B. B. Brandt, Proc. Sci., EPS-HEP2013 (2013) 540 [arXiv:1308.4993].
  65. B. B. Brandt and M. Meineri, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 1643001 (2016).
  66. B. B. Brandt, Proc. Sci., Confinement2018 (2018) 039 [arXiv:1811.11779].
  67. M. Billo, M. Caselle, F. Gliozzi, M. Meineri, and R. Pellegrini, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2012) 130.
  68. M. Caselle, E. Cellini, and A. Nada, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 090.
  69. M. Caselle, N. Magnoli, A. Nada, M. Panero, D. Panfalone, and L. Verzichelli, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 198.
  70. A. Baffigo and M. Caselle, Phys. Rev. D 109, 034520 (2024).
  71. G. S. Bali, F. Bursa, L. Castagnini, S. Collins, L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, and M. Panero, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2013) 071.
  72. R. C. Brower, C.-I. Tan, and E. Thompson, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 4508 (2005).
  73. A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, D. Elander, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, and M. Piai, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 114.
  74. A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz, and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 019.
  75. A. sharifian, A. Athenodorou, and P. Bicudo, 10.5281/zenodo.16404034 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation