Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Entanglement viscosity: From unitarity to irreversibility in accelerated frames

G. Yu. Prokhorov*

  • *Contact author: prokhorov@theor.jinr.ru

Phys. Rev. D 114, L041703 – Published 21 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2f7b-l381

Abstract

We demonstrate that the unitarity of quantum field theory, through the positivity of spectral densities, underlies thermodynamic irreversibility for a subsystem separated by a horizon, in direct analogy with the irreversibility of renormalization-group flows. To this end, we explicitly find the shear and bulk viscosities—the entanglement viscosities—for thermal radiation in Rindler space using the universal spectral representation. A direct consequence of the obtained general formulas is the relationship between the acceleration-induced shear viscosity in flat space and the conformal quantum anomaly in curved space, pointing to a possible novel probe of the conformal anomaly in systems with extreme acceleration. Moreover, for conformal field theories, we explicitly show that globally entanglement viscosity saturates the Kovtun-Son-Starinets bound.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. I Prigogine, Time, structure, and fluctuations, Science 201, 777 (1978).
  2. Edward Witten, Introduction to black hole thermodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 430 (2025).
  3. W. G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  4. J. J Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, On the duality condition for quantum fields, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 17, 303 (1976).
  5. A. B. Zamolodchikov, Irreversibility of the flux of the renormalization group in a 2d field theory, JETP Lett. 43, 730 (1986).
  6. Andrea Cappelli, Daniel Friedan, and Jose I. Latorre, C theorem and spectral representation, Nucl. Phys. B352, 616 (1991).
  7. Zohar Komargodski and Adam Schwimmer, On renormalization group flows in four dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2011) 099.
  8. Thibaut Damour, Quelques proprietes mecaniques, electromagnet iques, thermodynamiques et quantiques des trous noir, Ph.D. thesis, Paris U., VI-VII, 1979.
  9. Maulik Parikh and Frank Wilczek, An action for black hole membranes, Phys. Rev. D 58, 064011 (1998).
  10. P. Kovtun, Dan T. Son, and Andrei O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005).
  11. Goffredo Chirco, Christopher Eling, and Stefano Liberati, The universal viscosity to entropy density ratio from entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 82, 024010 (2010).
  12. Dmitry D. Lapygin, Georgy Yu. Prokhorov, Oleg V. Teryaev, and Valentin I. Zakharov, Viscosity, entanglement, and acceleration, Phys. Rev. D 112, 065012 (2025).
  13. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics: Volume 6, (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1987).
  14. Oleg Teryaev, Velocity-like maximum polarization: Irreversibility and quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. C 106, L012201 (2022).
  15. Michael Smolkin and Sergey N. Solodukhin, Correlation functions on conical defects, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044008 (2015).
  16. Sergey N. Solodukhin, The a-theorem and entanglement entropy, arXiv:1304.4411.
  17. J. I. Kapusta and Charles Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  18. R. V. Khakimov, G. Yu. Prokhorov, and O. V. Teryaev, Entanglement viscosity to entropy density ratio for spin-3/2 theory, arXiv:2605.22409.
  19. Sašo Grozdanov and Andrei O. Starinets, Second-order transport, quasinormal modes and zero-viscosity limit in the Gauss-Bonnet holographic fluid, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 166.
  20. F. Becattini, Thermodynamic equilibrium with acceleration and the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. D 97, 085013 (2018).
  21. William G. Unruh and Nathan Weiss, Acceleration radiation in interacting field theories, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1656 (1984).
  22. Konrad Osterwalder and Robert Schrader, Axioms for Euclidean Green’s functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 83 (1973).
  23. E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics, Part 2, Course of Theoretical Physics Vol. 9 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980).
  24. Dam T. Son, Hydrodynamics and gauge/gravity duality, Acta Phys. Pol. B 39, 3173 (2008).
  25. Mikko Laine and Aleksi Vuorinen, Basics of thermal field theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 925, 1 (2016).
  26. Dmitri Kharzeev and Kirill Tuchin, Bulk viscosity of QCD matter near the critical temperature, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 093.
  27. N. N. Bogoliubov and D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to Theory of Quantized Fields, Monograph & Texts in Physics & Astronomical (John Wiley & Sons, Nashville, TN, 1959).
  28. Sergey N. Solodukhin, Entanglement entropy of black holes, Living Rev. Relativity 14, 8 (2011).
  29. A. P. Prudnikov, Yu. A. Brychkov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series: Special Functions Vol. 2 (Taylor & Francis, London, England, 1998).
  30. Ugo Moschella and Richard Schaeffer, A Note on canonical quantization of fields on a manifold, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2009) 033.
  31. G. Yu. Prokhorov and O. V. Teryaev, Causality, the Kovtun-Son-Starinets bound, and a novel sum rule for spectral densities, arXiv:2604.04222.
  32. M. J. Duff, Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly, Classical Quantum Gravity 11, 1387 (1994).
  33. M. R. Brown, A. C. Ottewill, and Don N. Page, Conformally invariant quantum field theory in static Einstein space-times, Phys. Rev. D 33, 2840 (1986).
  34. H. Osborn and A. C. Petkou, Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 231, 311 (1994).
  35. Pavel Kovtun and Adam Ritz, Universal conductivity and central charges, Phys. Rev. D 78, 066009 (2008).
  36. Alex Buchel, Robert C. Myers, and Aninda Sinha, Beyond eta/s=1/4 pi, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2009) 084.
  37. Aninda Sinha and Robert C. Myers, The viscosity bound in string theory, Nucl. Phys. A830, 295C (2009).
  38. Dam T. Son and Piotr Surowka, Hydrodynamics with triangle anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 191601 (2009).
  39. Kenji Fukushima, Dmitri E. Kharzeev, and Harmen J. Warringa, The chiral magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008).
  40. Karl Landsteiner, Eugenio Megias, and Francisco Pena-Benitez, Gravitational anomaly and transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 021601 (2011).
  41. G. Yu. Prokhorov, O. V. Teryaev, and V. I. Zakharov, Hydrodynamic manifestations of gravitational chiral anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 151601 (2022).
  42. Georgy Yu. Prokhorov, Oleg V. Teryaev, and Valentin I. Zakharov, Gravitational chiral anomaly and anomalous transport for fields with spin 3/2, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137839 (2023).
  43. G. Yu. Prokhorov, D. A. Shohonov, O. V. Teryaev, N. S. Tsegelnik, and V. I, Zakharov, Modeling of acceleration in heavy-ion collisions: Occurrence of temperature below the Unruh temperature, Phys. Rev. C 112, 064907 (2025).
  44. Dmitrii Diakonov, De Sitter entropy: On-shell versus off-shell, Phys. Lett. B 871, 139967 (2025).
  45. Francesco Becattini, Asaad Daher, and Xin-Li Sheng, Entropy current and entropy production in relativistic spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138533 (2024).
  46. J. Erdmenger and H. Osborn, Conserved currents and the energy momentum tensor in conformally invariant theories for general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B483, 431 (1997).
  47. Iurii Karpenko and Francesco Becattini, Lambda polarization in heavy ion collisions: From RHIC BES to LHC energies, Nucl. Phys. A982, 519 (2019).
  48. M. N. Chernodub, V. A. Goy, A. V. Molochkov, D. V. Stepanov, and A. S, Pochinok, Extreme softening of QCD phase transition under weak acceleration: First-principles Monte Carlo results for gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 111904 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation