Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Parity-odd four-point correlation function from the DESI data release 1 luminous red galaxy sample

J. Hou1,2,3,4,*, R. N. Cahn5, J. Aguilar5, S. Ahlen6, D. Bianchi7,8, D. Brooks9, T. Claybaugh5, P. Doel9, J. E. Forero-Romero11,12 et al.

E. Gaztañaga13,14,15, L. Le Guillou23, G. Gutierrez16, C. Howlett17, D. Huterer18,19, M. Ishak20, R. Joyce21, A. Kremin5, O. Lahav9, C. Lamman22, M. Landriau5, A. de la Macorra10, R. Miquel24,25, S. Nadathur14, G. Niz26,27, W. J. Percival28,29,30, F. Prada31, I. Pérez-Ràfols32, G. Rossi33, E. Sanchez34, D. Schlegel5, M. Schubnell18,19, H. Seo35, J. Silber5, D. Sprayberry21, G. Tarlé19, B. A. Weaver21, and H. Zou36

  • *Contact author: jiamin.hou@ast.cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103502 – Published 4 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2dmd-hyt1

Abstract

The parity-odd four-point function provides a unique probe of fundamental symmetries and potential new physics in the large-scale structure of the Universe. We present measurements of the parity-odd four-point function using the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) DR1 luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample and assess its detection significance. Our analysis considers both auto- and cross-correlations, using two complementary approaches to the covariance: (i) the full analytic covariance matrix applied to the uncompressed data vector, and (ii) a compressed data vector combined with a hybrid covariance matrix constructed from simulations and analytic estimates. When using the full analytic covariance matrix without corrections, we observe apparent auto-correlation signals with significance up to 4σ. However, this excess is also consistent with a mismatch between the statistical fluctuations estimated from the simulations and those present in the real data. Our findings therefore suggest that the parity-odd signal in the current DESI DR1 LRG sample is consistent with zero. We note, however, that the low completeness of this sample may have a non-negligible impact on the detection sensitivity. Future data releases with improved completeness will be crucial for further investigation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

14 July, 2026

Correction: One of the authors (R. N. Cahn) was erroneously listed twice so the second occurrence of the name has been removed. The presentation of the names of the first two authors has been fixed.

Article Text

References (64)

  1. Y. Minami and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 221301 (2020).
  2. J. Hou, Z. Slepian, and R. N. Cahn, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, 5701 (2023).
  3. O. H. E. Philcox, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063501 (2022).
  4. O. H. E. Philcox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 181001 (2023).
  5. O. H. E. Philcox and M. Shiraishi, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083514 (2024).
  6. T. C. K. Ng, M. Isi, K. W. K. Wong, and W. M. Farr, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084068 (2023).
  7. S. Jaraba, S. Kuroyanagi, Q. Liang, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 057.
  8. D. Jeong and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 251301 (2012).
  9. D. Jamieson, A. Caravano, J. Hou, Z. Slepian, and E. Komatsu, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 533, 2582 (2024).
  10. T. Kurita, D. Jamieson, E. Komatsu, and F. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 113, 063557 (2026).
  11. Z. Gao, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, and Z. Vlah, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 027.
  12. K. Inomata, M. Kamionkowski, C. M. Toral, and S. R. Taylor, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063547 (2024).
  13. L. Jenks, L. Choi, M. Lagos, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044023 (2023).
  14. R. N. Cahn, Z. Slepian, and J. Hou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 201002 (2023).
  15. A. Krolewski, S. May, K. Smith, and H. Hopkins, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2024) 044.
  16. M. Reinhard, Z. Slepian, J. Hou, and A. Greco, arXiv:2412.16037.
  17. Y. Bao, L.-T. Wang, Z.-Z. Xianyu, and Y.-M. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D 112, 103536 (2025).
  18. H.-T. Cho and K.-W. Ng, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2026) 005.
  19. H.-M. Zhu and U.-L. Pen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111003 (2025).
  20. J. Shim, U.-L. Pen, H.-R. Yu, and T. Okumura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 141002 (2025).
  21. D. Jamieson, A. Caravano, and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D 112, 103531 (2025).
  22. M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, R. Blum, R. Cahn, D. Eisenstein, B. Flaugher, K. Honscheid, R. Kron, O. Lahav, P. McDonald, N. Roe, and D. Schlegel (Representing the DESI Collaboration), arXiv:1308.0847.
  23. A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. E. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, J. Annis, S. Bailey, C. Balland, O. Ballester, C. Baltay, L. Beaufore, C. Bebek, T. C. Beers et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:1611.00036.
  24. A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. E. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, J. Annis, S. Bailey, C. Balland, O. Ballester, C. Baltay, L. Beaufore, C. Bebek, T. C. Beers et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:1611.00037.
  25. B. Abareshi, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander, R. Alfarsy, L. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, J. Ameel, E. Armengaud, J. Asorey, A. Aviles, S. Bailey et al. (DESI Collaboration), Astron. J. 164, 207 (2022).
  26. M. Abdul-Karim, A. G. Adame, D. Aguado, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, G. Aldering, D. M. Alexander, R. Alfarsy, L. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade et al. (DESI Collaboration), arXiv:2503.14745.
  27. A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander, C. Allende Prieto, M. Alvarez, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, S. Avila, A. Aviles, H. Awan et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 028.
  28. M. Abdul-Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, A. Aviles, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, P. Bansal et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  29. J. Hou, R. N. Cahn, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, P. Doel, S. Ferraro, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gaztañaga, L. Le Guillou, G. Gutierrez, K. Honscheid, D. Huterer et al., Phys. Rev. D 112, 122005 (2025).
  30. Z. Slepian, A. Krolewski, A. Greco, S. May, W. Ortola Leonard, F. Kamalinejad, J. Chellino, M. Reinhard, E. Fernandez, F. Prada, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, A. de la Macorra et al., arXiv:2508.09133.
  31. E. F. Schlafly, D. Kirkby, D. J. Schlegel, A. D. Myers, A. Raichoor, K. Dawson, J. Aguilar, C. Allende Prieto, S. Bailey, S. BenZvi, J. Bermejo-Climent, D. Brooks, A. de la Macorra, A. Dey, P. Doel et al., Astron. J. 166, 259 (2023).
  32. J. Guy, S. Bailey, A. Kremin, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander, C. Allende Prieto, S. BenZvi, A. S. Bolton, D. Brooks, E. Chaussidon, A. P. Cooper, K. Dawson, A. de la Macorra, A. Dey, B. Dey et al., Astron. J. 165, 144 (2023).
  33. C. Poppett, L. Tyas, J. Aguilar, C. Bebek, D. Bramall, T. Claybaugh, J. Edelstein, P. Fagrelius, H. Heetderks, P. Jelinsky, S. Jelinsky, R. Lafever, A. Lambert, M. Lampton, M. E. Levi et al., Astron. J. 168, 245 (2024).
  34. T. N. Miller, P. Doel, G. Gutierrez, R. Besuner, D. Brooks, G. Gallo, H. Heetderks, P. Jelinsky, S. M. Kent, M. Lampton, M. E. Levi, M. Liang, A. Meisner, M. J. Sholl, J. H. Silber et al., Astron. J. 168, 95 (2024).
  35. A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. M. Alexander, M. Alvarez, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, S. Avila, A. Aviles, H. Awan, S. Bailey et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 017.
  36. J. Lasker, A. Carnero Rosell, A. D. Myers, A. J. Ross, D. Bianchi, M. M. S. Hanif, R. Kehoe, A. de Mattia, L. Napolitano, W. J. Percival, R. Staten, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, L. Bigwood, D. Brooks et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 127.
  37. The fiducial volume Vfid and the effective number density n¯g are free parameters of the analytic covariance [38]. They are obtained by calibrating the analytic covariance to the simulation covariance. Compared to the parity-even 4PCF analysis [29], the fitted number density here is lower, which is compensated by the fiducial volumes are higher. The results are overall consistent.

  38. J. Hou, R. N. Cahn, O. H. E. Philcox, and Z. Slepian, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043515 (2022).
  39. R. N. Cahn and Z. Slepian, J. Phys. A 56, 325204 (2023).
  40. Z. Slepian and D. J. Eisenstein, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 4142 (2015).
  41. O. H. E. Philcox, Z. Slepian, J. Hou, C. Warner, R. N. Cahn, and D. J. Eisenstein, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 2457 (2021).
  42. We use the GPU version of the public code https://github.com/oliverphilcox/encore with extensions including ℓmax for the 4PCF measurement.

  43. C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, F. Prada, C. Zhao, and G. Yepes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 2621 (2015).
  44. C. Zhao, C.-H. Chuang, J. Bautista, A. de Mattia, A. Raichoor, A. J. Ross, J. Hou, R. Neveux, C. Tao, E. Burtin, K. S. Dawson, S. de la Torre, H. Gil-Marín, J.-P. Kneib, W. J. Percival et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 1149 (2021).
  45. L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, and P. A. Pinto, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 3370 (2019).
  46. N. A. Maksimova, L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose, and T. P. Satterthwaite, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 4017 (2021).
  47. S. Yuan, H. Zhang, A. J. Ross, J. Donald-McCann, B. Hadzhiyska, R. H. Wechsler, Z. Zheng, S. Alam, V. Gonzalez-Perez, J. N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, A. de la Macorra, K. Fanning et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 530, 947 (2024).
  48. For the abacus-Complete mocks, we additionally downsample it to match the number density of the altMTL mocks, so that their statistical fluctuations are comparable as those in the real data.

  49. For the cross-correlation test, we assume that the signal is shared across different patches. However, if the signal peaks in the squeezed limit on large scales, it may extend beyond the coherence length (>500h−1  Mpc) of the sky patches considered in this work, in which case the cross-correlation test may not apply.

  50. For parity-violating models with squeezed signal leading to local modulation, the assumption that ζμ=ζν may not hold.

  51. To obtain the second line of Eq. (21), we used the definition of the trace Tr[C^−1C^μ]=∑i[C^−1C^μ]ii=∑ij(C^−1)ijC^ijμ.

  52. We use scipy.linalg.inv for matrix inversion, which relies on lapack fortran library. For symmetric positive-definite matrices, it uses Cholesky-based algorithm and is generally backward-stable for a O(103)×O(103) matrix. Numerically, we found the condition number defined by the ratio of the maximum to the mininum eigenvalues to be λmax/λmin≈O(104) and the relative matrix reconstruction error ∥C−1C−I∥/∥I∥≈O(10−14). For readers interested in the structure of the normalized correlation matrix, we note that it is visually identical to Figs. 7 and 8 of [2].

  53. This 2% correction directly propagates into the corrected χc2. However, it has only a marginal impact on the final conclusion and would simply reduce the χc2 value slightly further to −2.4σ.

  54. J. Hartlap, P. Simon, and P. Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 399 (2007).
  55. K. S. Dawson, D. J. Schlegel, C. P. Ahn, S. F. Anderson, É. Aubourg, S. Bailey, R. H. Barkhouser, J. E. Bautista, A. Beifiori, A. A. Berlind, V. Bhardwaj, D. Bizyaev, C. H. Blake, M. R. Blanton, M. Blomqvist et al., Astron. J. 145, 10 (2013).
  56. R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J. L. Auguères, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole, M. Cropper, C. Dabin, L. Duvet, A. Ealet, B. Garilli, P. Gondoin, L. Guzzo, J. Hoar, H. Hoekstra et al., arXiv:1110.3193.
  57. Y. Wang, Z. Zhai, A. Alavi, E. Massara, A. Pisani, A. Benson, C. M. Hirata, L. Samushia, D. H. Weinberg, J. Colbert, O. Doré, T. Eifler, C. Heinrich, S. Ho, E. Krause et al., Astrophys. J. 928, 1 (2022).
  58. https://www.desi.lbl.gov/collaborating-institutions.
  59. 10.5281/zenodo.17753485.
  60. L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski, and D. Jeong, Phys. Rev. D 86, 125013 (2012).
  61. A. D. Myers, J. Moustakas, S. Bailey, B. A. Weaver, A. P. Cooper, J. E. Forero-Romero, B. Abolfathi, D. M. Alexander, D. Brooks, E. Chaussidon, C.-H. Chuang, K. Dawson, A. Dey, B. Dey, G. Dhungana et al., Astron. J. 165, 50 (2023).
  62. D. Bianchi, M. M. S. Hanif, A. Carnero Rosell, J. Lasker, A. J. Ross, M. Pinon, A. de Mattia, M. White, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, E. Chaussidon, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 074.
  63. D. Forero-Sánchez, M. Rashkovetskyi, O. Alves, A. de Mattia, N. Padmanabhan, H. Seo, S. Nadathur, A. J. Ross, H. Gil-Marín, P. Zarrouk, J. Yu, Z. Ding, U. Andrade, X. Chen, C. Garcia-Quintero et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 055.
  64. O. H. E. Philcox, J. Hou, and Z. Slepian, arXiv:2108.01670.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation