Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Exploratory calculation of KL→μ+μ− decay from lattice QCD at physical pion mass

Peter Boyle1,2, En-Hung Chao3, Norman Christ3, Ceran Hu3, Luchang Jin4, and Yidi Zhao3

Phys. Rev. D 113, 074523 – Published 30 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/22hn-ymsd

Abstract

We compute the complex, long-distance two-photon-exchange amplitude which contributes to the rare KL→μ+μ− decay from lattice QCD. We use a 243×64 physical-pion-mass gauge field ensemble at an inverse lattice spacing of 1.023 GeV and a QED∞-based formalism. Our implementation strategies for all five non-SU(3)-flavor-suppressed diagram topologies are given in detail. We achieve a 25% statistical precision on the dispersive part of this long-distance amplitude. This calculation is carried out with 2+1 quark flavors and therefore requires the addition of counterterms to compensate for the absence of the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani mechanism. These counterterms are not included in the current calculation and will be the subject of a second paper. Although a direct comparison to experiment cannot yet be made because of those omitted counterterms, the present exploratory calculation allows one to identify principal sources of statistical uncertainty in this calculation. The precision of our results is limited by the reconstruction of the physical contribution of the η intermediate state, for which various strategies are tested and compared.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. D. Ambrose et al. (E871 Collaboration), Improved branching ratio measurement for the decay KL0→μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1389 (2000).
  2. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  3. M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Charm quark contribution to KL→μ+μ− at next-to-next-to-leading, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 122002 (2006).
  4. B. R. Martin, E. De Rafael, and J. Smith, Neutral kaon decays into lepton pairs, Phys. Rev. D 2, 179 (1970).
  5. G. D’Ambrosio, G. Isidori, and J. Portoles, Can we extract short distance information from B(KL→μ+μ−), Phys. Lett. B 423, 385 (1998).
  6. M. Knecht, S. Peris, M. Perrottet, and E. de Rafael, Decay of pseudoscalars into lepton pairs and large N(c) QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5230 (1999).
  7. G. Isidori and R. Unterdorfer, On the short distance constraints from KL,S→μ+μ−, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2004) 009,
  8. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and J. R. de Elvira, Improved standard-model prediction for KL→ℓ+ℓ−, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 071.
  9. T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, and C. Lehner, Lattice calculation of hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014503 (2016).
  10. T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, C. Lehner, and C. Tu (RBC, UKQCD Collaborations), Hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomaly from lattice QCD with infinite volume QED at physical pion mass, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014501 (2025).
  11. N. Asmussen, E.-H. Chao, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, R. J. Hudspith, H. B. Meyer, and A. Nyffeler, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon g−2 from lattice QCD: Semi-analytical calculation of the QED kernel, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 040.
  12. E.-H. Chao, R. J. Hudspith, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, H. B. Meyer, and K. Ottnad, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g−2)μ from lattice QCD: A complete calculation, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 651 (2021).
  13. E.-H. Chao, R. J. Hudspith, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, and H. B. Meyer, The charm-quark contribution to light-by-light scattering in the muon (g−2) from lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 664 (2022).
  14. N. H. Christ, X. Feng, L. Jin, C. Tu, and Y. Zhao, Calculating the two-photon contribution to π0→e+e− decay amplitude, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2020) 097 [arXiv:2001.05642].
  15. N. H. Christ, X. Feng, L. Jin, C. Tu, and Y. Zhao, Lattice QCD calculation of the two-photon contributions to KL→μ+μ− and π0→e+e− decays, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2020) 128.
  16. N. Christ, X. Feng, L. Jin, C. Tu, and Y. Zhao, Lattice QCD calculation of π0→e+e− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 191901 (2023).
  17. E.-H. Chao and N. Christ, Calculating the two-photon exchange contribution to KL→μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054514 (2024).
  18. Z. Bai, N. H. Christ, T. Izubuchi, C. T. Sachrajda, A. Soni, and J. Yu, KL−KS mass difference from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 112003 (2014).
  19. Y. Huo, N. H. Christ, and B. Wang, Enhanced lattice QCD studies on ϵK and ΔMK, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2024 (2025) 239.
  20. N. H. Christ, X. Feng, G. Martinelli, and C. T. Sachrajda, Effects of finite volume on the KL−KS mass difference, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114510 (2015).
  21. X.-Y. Tuo and X. Feng, Finite-volume formalism for physical processes with an electroweak loop integral, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034512 (2025).
  22. G. Isidori, G. Martinelli, and P. Turchetti, Rare kaon decays on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 633, 75 (2006).
  23. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  24. C. Lehner and C. Sturm, Matching factors for Delta S=1 four-quark operators in RI/SMOM schemes, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014001 (2011).
  25. T. Blum, P. A. Boyle, D. Hoying, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, C. Kelly, C. Lehner, A. Soni, and M. Tomii (RBC, UKQCD Collaborations), ΔI=3/2 and ΔI=1/2 channels of K→ππ decay at the physical point with periodic boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094517 (2023).
  26. N. H. Christ, X. Feng, A. Portelli, and C. T. Sachrajda (RBC, UKQCD Collaborations), Prospects for a lattice computation of rare kaon decay amplitudes: K→πℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094512 (2015).
  27. J. Tu, Lattice QCD simulations towards strong and weak coupling limits, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia U., 2020.
  28. T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, and C. Lehner, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 132002 (2020).
  29. G. McGlynn, Algorithmic improvements for weak coupling simulations of domain wall fermions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 (2016) 019.
  30. H. Yin and R. D. Mawhinney, Improving DWF simulations: The force gradient integrator and the Möbius accelerated DWF solver, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2011 (2011) 051 [arXiv:1111.5059].
  31. E.-H. Chao, Progress on KL→μ+μ− from lattice QCD, in 12th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle (2024), arXiv:2403.18885.
  32. C. W. Bernard, T. Draper, A. Soni, H. D. Politzer, and M. B. Wise, Application of chiral perturbation theory to K→2 pi decays, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2343 (1985).
  33. P. A. Boyle, Conserved currents and results from 2+1f dynamical Mobius DWF simulations at the physical point, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2014 (2015) 087.
  34. B. Blossier, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, T. Mendes, and R. Sommer, On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 094,
  35. D. Gomez Dumm and A. Pich, Long distance contributions to the KL→μ+μ− decay width, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4633 (1998).
  36. G. Buchalla and A. J. Buras, The rare decays K+→π+νν¯ and KL→μ+μ− beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B412, 106 (1994).
  37. X. Feng, L. Jin, and M. J. Riberdy, Lattice QCD calculation of the pion mass splitting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 052003 (2022).
  38. G. Buchalla and A. J. Buras, Two loop large mt electroweak corrections to K→πνν¯ for arbitrary Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 57, 216 (1998).
  39. I. Montvay and G. Munster, Quantum fields on a lattice, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997).
  40. C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang, Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice, Vol. 788 (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
  41. P. A. Boyle, G. Cossu, A. Yamaguchi, and A. Portelli, Grid: A next generation data parallel C++ QCD library, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 (2016) 023.
  42. A. Yamaguchi, P. Boyle, G. Cossu, G. Filaci, C. Lehner, and A. Portelli, Grid: OneCode and FourAPIs, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 035 [arXiv:2203.06777].
  43. C. Jung, Overview of Columbia Physics System (CPS), Proc. Sci. LATTICE2013 (2014) 417.
  44. R. G. Edwards and B. Joo (SciDAC, LHPC, and UKQCD Collaborations), The Chroma software system for lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 140, 832 (2005).
  45. QDP++, https://github.com/usqcd-software/qdpxx/tree/master.
  46. T. Blum et al. (RBC, UKQCD Collaborations), Domain wall QCD with physical quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074505 (2016).
  47. Y. Zhao, Lattice calculation of the π0→e+e− and the KL→γγ decays, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia U., 2022.
  48. J. Foley, K. Jimmy Juge, A. O’Cais, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, and J.-I. Skullerud, Practical all-to-all propagators for lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 172, 145 (2005).
  49. L. Giusti, P. Hernandez, M. Laine, P. Weisz, and H. Wittig, Low-energy couplings of QCD from current correlators near the chiral limit, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 013.
  50. J. Bijnens, P. Dhonte, and F. Borg, K→3 pi decays in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B648, 317 (2003).
  51. S. Weinberg, New test for ΔI=12 in K+ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 87 (1960); Phys. Rev. Lett.4, 585(E) (1960).
  52. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities, Phys. Lett. 37B, 95 (1971).
  53. E. Witten, Global aspects of current algebra, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983).
  54. M. J. Savage, M. E. Luke, and M. B. Wise, The rare decays π0→e+e−, η→e+e− and η→μ+μ− in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B 291, 481 (1992).
  55. S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler, A Primer for Chiral Perturbation Theory, Vol. 830 (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
  56. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, and J. Lüdtke, Improved standard-model prediction for π0→e+e−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 172004 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation