- Open Access
Exact baryon-meson relation for
Phys. Rev. D 114, 075019 – Published 13 October, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/19ml-r53z
Abstract
We derive an exact relation among the normalized branching fractions of and , within the lepton-number-conserving effective Hamiltonian in which only active neutrinos contribute to the invisible final state. Although the effective Hamiltonian contains 18 independent Wilson coefficients, the three normalized rates depend on only two independent combinations of them, leading to an exact algebraic relation. Remarkably, the central values of the coefficients of this baryon-meson relation are close to and , which appear in the heavy-to-heavy semileptonic sum rule among the branching fractions of and . Once the decay rate of is measured, the decay rate of can be determined in a model-independent manner for new-physics scenarios involving only active neutrino interactions, thereby providing a clean target prediction for future experiments. This clearly demonstrates that observables in baryonic and mesonic transitions will serve as a compact consistency test and a powerful probe for discriminating among new-physics scenarios.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (79)
- S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970).
- M. Algueró, J. Matias, B. Capdevila, and A. Crivellin, Disentangling lepton flavor universal and lepton flavor universality violating effects in transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 113007 (2022).
- M. Algueró, A. Biswas, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and M. Novoa-Brunet, To (b)e or not to (b)e: No electrons at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 648 (2023).
- B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, and J. Matias, Review of semileptonic B anomalies, Eur. Phys. J. ST 233, 409 (2024).
- T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, anomalies in the post era, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115037 (2023).
- A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, decays in the Standard Model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 184.
- W. Altmannshofer, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, New strategies for New Physics search in , and decays, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 022.
- M. Bartsch, M. Beylich, G. Buchalla, and D. N. Gao, Precision flavour physics with and , J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2009) 011.
- Belle-II Collaboration, Evidence for decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
- Belle Collaboration, Search for with the full Belle data sample, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111103 (2013).
- Belle Collaboration, Search for decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017).
- BABAR Collaboration, Search for the rare decay , Phys. Rev. D 82, 112002 (2010).
- BABAR Collaboration, Search for and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 112005 (2013).
- C.-H. Chen and C. Q. Geng, Study of with polarized baryons, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054005 (2001).
- W. Altmannshofer, S. A. Gadam, and K. Toner, New strategies for new physics search with decays, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075005 (2025).
- D. Das, D. Shameer, and R. Sain, decays and the recent Belle-II data, Phys. Rev. D 112, 013012 (2025).
- N. Das and R. Dutta, New physics analysis of baryonic decays under SMEFT framework, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095051 (2023).
- J.-P. Lee, and decays. arXiv:2509.26370.
- Q.-Y. Hu and Z.-B. Duan, Influence of invisible light particles on , Phys. Rev. D 112, 095007 (2025).
- T. M. Aliev and M. Savci, Unparticle physics effects in energy processes, Phys. Lett. B 662, 165 (2008).
- B. B. Sirvanli, Semileptonic decay in the Leptophobic model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 347 (2008).
- R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Rare charm dineutrino null tests for machines, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015033 (2021).
- R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 061.
- H. Gisbert, The role of dineutrino modes in the search for new physics, in 56th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories (Association for International Meetings in Fundamental Science, Paris, France, 2022), arXiv:2205.07534.
- M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, S. de Boer, M. Moscati, U. Nierste, I. Nisandzic, and T. Kitahara, Impact of polarization observables and on new physics explanations of the anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 99, 075006 (2019).
- M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, T. Kitahara, M. Moscati, U. Nierste, and I. Nisandzic, Addendum to “Impact of polarization observables and on new physics explanations of the anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 035035 (2019).
- M. Fedele, M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, U. Nierste, and R. Watanabe, Impact of measurement on new physics in transitions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055005 (2023).
- W.-F. Duan, S. Iguro, X.-Q. Li, R. Watanabe, and Y.-D. Yang, On sum rules for semi-leptonic and decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 166.
- M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, Heavy quark symmetry behind semileptonic sum rule, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 112.
- M. Endo, S. Iguro, T. Kretz, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, semileptonic sum rule: Extension to angular observables, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 961 (2025).
- M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, semileptonic sum rule: Current status and prospects, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 143.
- M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, Constructing heavy-quark sum rule for meson and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014021 (2026).
- S. Iguro, semileptonic sum rule: symmetry violation, in 60th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD (Association for International Meetings in Fundamental Science, Paris, France, 2026), arXiv:2604.05186.
- S. Jia, W. Xiong, and C. Shen, Status and prospects of exotic hadrons at belle II, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 121301 (2023).
- LHCb Collaboration, Enhanced production of baryons in high-multiplicity collisions at , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081901 (2024).
- J. B. Guimarães da Costa et al., CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2—Physics & Detector, arXiv:1811.10545.
- FCC Collaboration, FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
- G. Bernardi et al., The future circular collider: A summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process, arXiv:2203.06520.
- H. Cheng et al. (on behalf of CEPC Physics Study Group), The Physics potential of the CEPC. Prepared for the US Snowmass Community Planning Exercise (Snowmass 2021), in Snowmass 2021 (2022).
- Y. Amhis, M. Kenzie, M. Reboud, and A. R. Wiederhold, Prospects for searches of decays at FCC-ee, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 144.
- N. Rajeev and R. Dutta, Consequences of anomalies on and decay observables, Phys. Rev. D 105, 115028 (2022).
- N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
- M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
- L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza, and A. Stanzione, Probing third-generation New Physics with and , Phys. Lett. B 861, 139295 (2025).
- A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, and T. Kitahara, Discriminating tauphilic leptoquark explanations of the B anomalies via and , Phys. Rev. D 112, 095016 (2025).
- UTfit Collaboration, New UTfit analysis of the unitarity triangle in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa scheme, Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 34, 37 (2023).
- M. Fael, J. Jenkins, E. Lunghi, and Z. Polonsky, The Standard Model prediction for the rare decay , J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 217.
- M. Misiak and J. Urban, QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes, Phys. Lett. B 451, 161 (1999).
- G. Buchalla and A. J. Buras, The rare decays , and : An Update, Nucl. Phys. B548, 309 (1999).
- J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for the decays, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034030 (2011).
- Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 41, 2630011 (2026).
- L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Ota, Effective field theory approach to , and with third generation couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181801 (2015).
- S. Saad and A. Thapa, Common origin of neutrino masses and , anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015014 (2020).
- A. V. Bednyakov and A. I. Mukhaeva, Impact of a nonuniversal on the and processes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115033 (2023).
- A. J. Buras and P. Stangl, On the interplay of constraints from , D, and K meson mixing in models with implications for transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 519 (2025).
- N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Dispersive analysis of and form factors, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 153.
- J. Gao, U.-G. Meißner, Y.-L. Shen, and D.-H. Li, Precision calculations of form factors from SCET sum rules beyond leading-power contributions, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014032 (2025).
- W. Detmold and S. Meinel, form factors, differential branching fraction, and angular observables from lattice QCD with relativistic quarks, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074501 (2016).
- A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
- D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting decays in the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
- L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, Understanding the first measurement of , Phys. Lett. B 848, 138411 (2024).
- R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, Implications of an enhanced branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015006 (2024).
- G. Hiller and R. Zwicky, (A)symmetries of weak decays at and near the kinematic endpoint, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 042.
- N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Weak decays of heavy mesons in the static quark approximation, Phys. Lett. B 232, 113 (1989).
- N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Weak transition form factors between heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B 237, 527 (1990).
- X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, Revisiting models that enhance in light of the new Belle II measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075019 (2024).
- K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
- E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, Explaining the excess via a massless dark photon, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 460 (2024).
- B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, Deciphering the Belle II data on decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 172.
- X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II invisible measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 168.
- P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in , Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024).
- P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Impact of new invisible particles on observables, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035010 (2025).
- T. Felkl, S. L. Li, and M. A. Schmidt, A tale of invisibility: Constraints on new physics in , J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 118.
- A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics in and observables, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 087.
- C. S. Kim, D. Sahoo, and K. N. Vishnudath, Searching for signatures of new physics in to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 882 (2024).
- M. Endo, K. Fridell, S. Iwamoto, Y. Mura, and K. Yamamoto, Feasibility study of lepton number violation in rare and meson decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 132.
- M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, T. Uchiyama, and R. Watanabe, Semileptonic sum rules in heavy-to-light charm decays, arXiv:2605.21908.
- E. Kou and P. Urquijo, The belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019).
- Belle-II Collaboration, First search for decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 231801 (2026).