Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Exact baryon-meson relation for b→sνν¯

Teppei Kitahara1,2,*, Manas Kumar Mohapatra3,†, and Kota Sasaki1,‡

  • *Contact author: kitahara@chiba-u.jp
  • †Contact author: manasmohapatra12@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: sasaki@chiba-u.jp

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075019 – Published 13 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/19ml-r53z

Abstract

We derive an exact relation among the normalized branching fractions of Λb→Λνν¯ and B→K(*)νν¯, within the lepton-number-conserving effective Hamiltonian in which only active neutrinos contribute to the invisible final state. Although the effective Hamiltonian contains 18 independent Wilson coefficients, the three normalized rates depend on only two independent combinations of them, leading to an exact algebraic relation. Remarkably, the central values of the coefficients of this baryon-meson relation are close to 1/4 and 3/4, which appear in the heavy-to-heavy b→c semileptonic sum rule among the branching fractions of Λb→Λcτν¯ and B→D(*)τν¯. Once the decay rate of B→K*νν¯ is measured, the decay rate of Λb→Λνν¯ can be determined in a model-independent manner for new-physics scenarios involving only active neutrino interactions, thereby providing a clean target prediction for future experiments. This clearly demonstrates that observables in baryonic and mesonic b→sνν¯ transitions will serve as a compact consistency test and a powerful probe for discriminating among new-physics scenarios.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (79)

  1. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970).
  2. M. Algueró, J. Matias, B. Capdevila, and A. Crivellin, Disentangling lepton flavor universal and lepton flavor universality violating effects in b→sℓ+ℓ− transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 113007 (2022).
  3. M. Algueró, A. Biswas, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and M. Novoa-Brunet, To (b)e or not to (b)e: No electrons at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 648 (2023).
  4. B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, and J. Matias, Review of semileptonic B anomalies, Eur. Phys. J. ST 233, 409 (2024).
  5. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, B anomalies in the post RK(*) era, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115037 (2023).
  6. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 184.
  7. W. Altmannshofer, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, New strategies for New Physics search in B→K*νν¯, B→Kνν¯ and B→Xsνν¯ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 022.
  8. M. Bartsch, M. Beylich, G. Buchalla, and D. N. Gao, Precision flavour physics with B→Kνν¯ and B→Kl+l−, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2009) 011.
  9. Belle-II Collaboration, Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  10. Belle Collaboration, Search for B→h(*)νν¯ with the full Belle ϒ(4S) data sample, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111103 (2013).
  11. Belle Collaboration, Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017).
  12. BABAR Collaboration, Search for the rare decay B→Kνν¯, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112002 (2010).
  13. BABAR Collaboration, Search for B→K(*)νν¯ and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 112005 (2013).
  14. C.-H. Chen and C. Q. Geng, Study of Λb→Λνν¯ with polarized baryons, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054005 (2001).
  15. W. Altmannshofer, S. A. Gadam, and K. Toner, New strategies for new physics search with Λb→Λνν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075005 (2025).
  16. D. Das, D. Shameer, and R. Sain, Λb→Λ(*)νν¯ decays and the recent Belle-II B+→K+νν¯ data, Phys. Rev. D 112, 013012 (2025).
  17. N. Das and R. Dutta, New physics analysis of Λb→(Λ*(→pK−),Λ(→pπ))(μ+μ−,νν¯) baryonic decays under SMEFT framework, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095051 (2023).
  18. J.-P. Lee, Λb→Λ(*)νν¯ and b→sB decays. arXiv:2509.26370.
  19. Q.-Y. Hu and Z.-B. Duan, Influence of invisible light particles on Λb→ΛEmiss, Phys. Rev. D 112, 095007 (2025).
  20. T. M. Aliev and M. Savci, Unparticle physics effects in Λb→Λ+missing energy processes, Phys. Lett. B 662, 165 (2008).
  21. B. B. Sirvanli, Semileptonic Λb→Λνν¯ decay in the Leptophobic Z′ model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 347 (2008).
  22. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Rare charm c→uνν¯ dineutrino null tests for e+e− machines, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015033 (2021).
  23. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 061.
  24. H. Gisbert, The role of dineutrino modes in the search for new physics, in 56th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories (Association for International Meetings in Fundamental Science, Paris, France, 2022), arXiv:2205.07534.
  25. M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, S. de Boer, M. Moscati, U. Nierste, I. Nisandzic, and T. Kitahara, Impact of polarization observables and Bc→τν on new physics explanations of the b→cτν anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 99, 075006 (2019).
  26. M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, T. Kitahara, M. Moscati, U. Nierste, and I. Nisandzic, Addendum to “Impact of polarization observables and Bc→τν on new physics explanations of the b→cτν anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 035035 (2019).
  27. M. Fedele, M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, U. Nierste, and R. Watanabe, Impact of Λb→Λcτν measurement on new physics in b→clν transitions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055005 (2023).
  28. W.-F. Duan, S. Iguro, X.-Q. Li, R. Watanabe, and Y.-D. Yang, On sum rules for semi-leptonic b→c and b→u decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 166.
  29. M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, Heavy quark symmetry behind b→c semileptonic sum rule, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 112.
  30. M. Endo, S. Iguro, T. Kretz, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, b→c semileptonic sum rule: Extension to angular observables, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 961 (2025).
  31. M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, b→c semileptonic sum rule: Current status and prospects, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 143.
  32. M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, and R. Watanabe, Constructing heavy-quark sum rule for b→c meson and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014021 (2026).
  33. S. Iguro, b→c semileptonic sum rule: SU(3)F symmetry violation, in 60th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions: Moriond QCD (Association for International Meetings in Fundamental Science, Paris, France, 2026), arXiv:2604.05186.
  34. S. Jia, W. Xiong, and C. Shen, Status and prospects of exotic hadrons at belle II, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 121301 (2023).
  35. LHCb Collaboration, Enhanced production of Λb0 baryons in high-multiplicity pp collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081901 (2024).
  36. J. B. Guimarães da Costa et al., CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2—Physics & Detector, arXiv:1811.10545.
  37. FCC Collaboration, FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
  38. G. Bernardi et al., The future circular collider: A summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process, arXiv:2203.06520.
  39. H. Cheng et al. (on behalf of CEPC Physics Study Group), The Physics potential of the CEPC. Prepared for the US Snowmass Community Planning Exercise (Snowmass 2021), in Snowmass 2021 (2022).
  40. Y. Amhis, M. Kenzie, M. Reboud, and A. R. Wiederhold, Prospects for searches of b→sνν¯ decays at FCC-ee, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 144.
  41. N. Rajeev and R. Dutta, Consequences of b→sμ+μ− anomalies on B→K(*)νν¯,Bs→(η,eta′)νν¯ and Bs→ϕνν¯ decay observables, Phys. Rev. D 105, 115028 (2022).
  42. N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
  43. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  44. L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza, and A. Stanzione, Probing third-generation New Physics with K→πνν¯ and B→K(*)νν¯, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139295 (2025).
  45. A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, and T. Kitahara, Discriminating tauphilic leptoquark explanations of the B anomalies via K→πνν¯ and B→Kνν¯, Phys. Rev. D 112, 095016 (2025).
  46. UTfit Collaboration, New UTfit analysis of the unitarity triangle in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa scheme, Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 34, 37 (2023).
  47. M. Fael, J. Jenkins, E. Lunghi, and Z. Polonsky, The Standard Model prediction for the rare decay B→Xsνν¯, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 217.
  48. M. Misiak and J. Urban, QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes, Phys. Lett. B 451, 161 (1999).
  49. G. Buchalla and A. J. Buras, The rare decays K→πνν¯, B→Xνν¯ and B→l+l−: An Update, Nucl. Phys. B548, 309 (1999).
  50. J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for the K→πνν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034030 (2011).
  51. Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 41, 2630011 (2026).
  52. L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Ota, Effective field theory approach to b→sℓℓ(′), B→K(*)νν¯ and B→D(*)τν with third generation couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181801 (2015).
  53. S. Saad and A. Thapa, Common origin of neutrino masses and RD(*), RK(*) anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015014 (2020).
  54. A. V. Bednyakov and A. I. Mukhaeva, Impact of a nonuniversal Z′ on the B→K(*)l+l− and B→K(*)νν¯ processes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115033 (2023).
  55. A. J. Buras and P. Stangl, On the interplay of constraints from Bs, D, and K meson mixing in Z′ models with implications for b→sνν¯ transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 519 (2025).
  56. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Dispersive analysis of B→K(*) and Bs→ϕ form factors, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 153.
  57. J. Gao, U.-G. Meißner, Y.-L. Shen, and D.-H. Li, Precision calculations of B→K* form factors from SCET sum rules beyond leading-power contributions, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014032 (2025).
  58. W. Detmold and S. Meinel, Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− form factors, differential branching fraction, and angular observables from lattice QCD with relativistic b quarks, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074501 (2016).
  59. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, B→Vℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  60. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
  61. L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯), Phys. Lett. B 848, 138411 (2024).
  62. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯ branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015006 (2024).
  63. G. Hiller and R. Zwicky, (A)symmetries of weak decays at and near the kinematic endpoint, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 042.
  64. N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Weak decays of heavy mesons in the static quark approximation, Phys. Lett. B 232, 113 (1989).
  65. N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Weak transition form factors between heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B 237, 527 (1990).
  66. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯ in light of the new Belle II measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075019 (2024).
  67. K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the B→Kνν excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
  68. E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, Explaining the B+→K+νν¯ excess via a massless dark photon, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 460 (2024).
  69. B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kνν¯ decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 172.
  70. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B+→K++ invisible measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 168.
  71. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024).
  72. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035010 (2025).
  73. T. Felkl, S. L. Li, and M. A. Schmidt, A tale of invisibility: Constraints on new physics in b→sνν, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 118.
  74. A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics in K→πνν¯ and B→K(K*)νν¯ observables, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 087.
  75. C. S. Kim, D. Sahoo, and K. N. Vishnudath, Searching for signatures of new physics in B→Kνν¯ to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 882 (2024).
  76. M. Endo, K. Fridell, S. Iwamoto, Y. Mura, and K. Yamamoto, Feasibility study of lepton number violation in rare B and K meson decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 132.
  77. M. Endo, S. Iguro, S. Mishima, T. Uchiyama, and R. Watanabe, Semileptonic sum rules in heavy-to-light charm decays, arXiv:2605.21908.
  78. E. Kou and P. Urquijo, The belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019).
  79. Belle-II Collaboration, First search for B→Xsνν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 231801 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation