Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dilepton production as a probe of pion condensation in hot and dense QCD matter

Aritra Bandyopadhyay1,2,*, Chowdhury Aminul Islam3,†, Krzysztof Redlich1,4,‡, and Chihiro Sasaki1,5,§

  • *Contact author: aritra.bandyopadhyay@e-uvt.ro
  • †Contact author: caislam.phys@aliah.ac.in
  • ‡Contact author: krzysztof.redlich@uwr.edu.pl
  • §Contact author: chihiro.sasaki@uwr.edu.pl

Phys. Rev. D 113, 114044 – Published 23 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/15p8-7znz

Abstract

We investigate dilepton production from an isospin-asymmetric hot and dense medium in order to explore the role of isospin imbalance in electromagnetic spectral properties. We focus in particular on modifications of the dilepton production rate associated with the onset of pion condensation, which can occur in the presence of a finite isospin chemical potential. We employ the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with isoscalar-vector interaction. We examine the phase structure in the T−μI plane and estimate the vector current correlator-resummed dilepton rate for an effective quark chemical potential. We find that the interplay between isospin asymmetry, pion condensation, and vector interactions leads to nontrivial modifications of the dilepton yield. In particular, we observe two key features of the pion condensed phase: an enhancement at lower invariant mass and a prominent plateaulike structure which also help clearly identify the pion condensed phase from a chirally broken/restored phase. These results highlight the potential sensitivity of dilepton observables to pion-condensed phase of QCD matter, with possible implications for future low-energy heavy-ion collision experiments as well as isospin-rich environments such as neutron star matter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Lett. 78B, 150 (1978).
  2. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 022301 (2014); 113, 049903(A) (2014).
  3. A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 93, 014904 (2016).
  4. L. D. McLerran and T. Toimela, Phys. Rev. D 31, 545 (1985).
  5. K. Kajantie, J. I. Kapusta, L. D. McLerran, and A. Mekjian, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2746 (1986).
  6. H. A. Weldon, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2384 (1990).
  7. R. Rapp and J. Wambach, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 25, 1 (2000).
  8. R. Rapp and H. van Hees, Phys. Lett. B 753, 586 (2016).
  9. R. Arnaldi et al. (NA60 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162302 (2006).
  10. D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 592 (2001).
  11. K. Fukushima and C. Sasaki, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 72, 99 (2013).
  12. G. Aarts et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133, 104070 (2023).
  13. J. B. Kogut and D. Toublan, Phys. Rev. D 64, 034007 (2001).
  14. J. B. Kogut and D. K. Sinclair, Phys. Rev. D 66, 034505 (2002).
  15. B. B. Brandt, G. Endrodi, and S. Schmalzbauer, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054514 (2018).
  16. B. B. Brandt, G. Endrodi, E. S. Fraga, M. Hippert, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and S. Schmalzbauer, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094510 (2018).
  17. P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2009) 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
  18. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  19. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961).
  20. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
  21. M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
  22. L. Turko, Z. Phys. C 61, 297 (1994).
  23. H. Abuki, R. Anglani, R. Gatto, M. Pellicoro, and M. Ruggieri, Phys. Rev. D 79, 034032 (2009).
  24. J. O. Andersen and L. Kyllingstad, J. Phys. G 37, 015003 (2009).
  25. G.-f. Sun, L. He, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 75, 096004 (2007).
  26. D. Ebert and K. G. Klimenko, Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 771 (2006).
  27. D. Ebert and K. G. Klimenko, J. Phys. G 32, 599 (2006).
  28. L. He, M. Jin, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 74, 036005 (2006).
  29. L.-y. He, M. Jin, and P.-f. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 71, 116001 (2005).
  30. L. He and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. B 615, 93 (2005).
  31. A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, G. Pettini, and L. Ravagli, Phys. Rev. D 69, 096004 (2004).
  32. D. Toublan and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Lett. B 564, 212 (2003).
  33. M. Frank, M. Buballa, and M. Oertel, Phys. Lett. B 562, 221 (2003).
  34. C.-f. Mu, L.-y. He, and Y.-x. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 82, 056006 (2010).
  35. T. Xia, L. He, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056013 (2013).
  36. D. Ebert, T. G. Khunjua, and K. G. Klimenko, Phys. Rev. D 94, 116016 (2016).
  37. T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, R. N. Zhokhov, and V. C. Zhukovsky, Phys. Rev. D 95, 105010 (2017).
  38. T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, and R. N. Zhokhov, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 006.
  39. T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, and R. N. Zhokhov, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034009 (2019).
  40. T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, and R. N. Zhokhov, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 148.
  41. Z.-Y. Lu, C.-J. Xia, and M. Ruggieri, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 46 (2020).
  42. S. S. Avancini, A. Bandyopadhyay, D. C. Duarte, and R. L. S. Farias, Phys. Rev. D 100, 116002 (2019).
  43. B. S. Lopes, S. S. Avancini, A. Bandyopadhyay, D. C. Duarte, and R. L. S. Farias, Phys. Rev. D 103, 076023 (2021).
  44. S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
  45. K. Fukushima, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114028 (2008); 78, 039902(E) (2008).
  46. T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 91, 045003 (2015).
  47. M. S. Ali, D. Biswas, and C. A. Islam, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 240 (2025).
  48. C. Sasaki, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. D 75, 054026 (2007).
  49. R. M. Davidson and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Lett. B 359, 273 (1995).
  50. C. A. Islam, S. Majumder, N. Haque, and M. G. Mustafa, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 011.
  51. T. Ablyazimov et al. (CBM Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 60 (2017).
  52. H. Sako et al., Nucl. Phys. A931, 1158 (2014).
  53. V. Kekelidze, A. Kovalenko, R. Lednicky, V. Matveev, I. Meshkov, A. Sorin, and G. Trubnikov, Nucl. Phys. A967, 884 (2017).
  54. F. Karsch, M. Mustafa, and M. Thoma, Phys. Lett. B 497, 249 (2001).
  55. M. G. Mustafa, A. Bandyopadhyay, and C. A. Islam, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 148, 104234 (2026).
  56. J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  57. M. L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  58. T. D. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 222001 (2003).
  59. Y. Aoki, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B 643, 46 (2006).
  60. T. Bhattacharya et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 082001 (2014).
  61. A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 90, 094503 (2014).
  62. N. M. Bratovic, T. Hatsuda, and W. Weise, Phys. Lett. B 719, 131 (2013).
  63. J. Steinheimer and S. Schramm, Phys. Lett. B 696, 257 (2011).
  64. K. Masuda, T. Hatsuda, and T. Takatsuka, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 013D01 (2016).
  65. P. V. Buividovich, D. Smith, and L. von Smekal, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014511 (2021).
  66. A. Bandyopadhyay, C. A. Islam, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Available at https://github.com/ariban136/dilepton_PC (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation