Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Comment on “Scaling and universality at noisy quench dynamical quantum phase transitions”

Jesko Sirker

Phys. Rev. B 114, 206301 – Published 5 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/47dr-7f4r

Abstract

In [S. Ansari et al., Phys. Rev. B 112, 054304 (2025)], dynamical quantum phase transitions (DQPTs)—nonanalyticities in the Loschmidt return rate at critical times—are investigated in the presence of noise for a two-band model. The authors report that DQPTs persist even after averaging over the noise and they use their results to derive dynamical phase diagrams. The protocol used approximates the noise-averaged mixed state, obtained using a master equation, by a pure state, characterized by its excitation probability. In this comment we rigorously show that: (i) This approximation is exponentially poor in the thermodynamic limit. (ii) When using the correct metric, the Loschmidt echo of two density matrices in any two-dimensional Hilbert space can become zero if and only if both density matrices are pure, ruling out DQPTs for nonzero noise. (iii) An a posteriori reinterpretation of the results as an interferometric protocol is possible but such a protocol is unsuitable to investigate the effects of noise on DQPTs because it is inherently blind to decoherence. We also investigate alternative natural ways to average over noise realizations and show that in all of them DQPTs are smoothed out.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Comments & Replies

Reply to “Comment on ‘Scaling and universality at noisy quench dynamical quantum phase transitions’ ”

S. Ansari, R. Jafari, A. Akbari, and M. Abdi
Phys. Rev. B 114, 206302 (2026)

Article Text

Original Article

Scaling and universality at noisy quench dynamical quantum phase transitions

Saeid Ansari, R. Jafari, Alireza Akbari, and Mehdi Abdi
Phys. Rev. B 112, 054304 (2025)

References (9)

  1. M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135704 (2013).
  2. F. Andraschko and J. Sirker, Dynamical quantum phase transitions and the Loschmidt echo: A transfer matrix approach, Phys. Rev. B 89, 125120 (2014).
  3. M. Heyl, F. Pollmann, and B. Dóra, Detecting equilibrium and dynamical quantum phase transitions in Ising chains via out-of-time-ordered correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 016801 (2018).
  4. A. Uhlmann, The “transition probability” in the state space of a*-algebra, Rep. Math. Phys. 9, 273 (1976).
  5. D. Bures, An extension of Kakutani s theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite w*-algebras, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 135, 199 (1969).
  6. N. Sedlmayr, M. Fleischhauer, and J. Sirker, Fate of dynamical phase transitions at finite temperatures and in open systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045147 (2018).
  7. S. Ansari, R. Jafari, A. Akbari, and M. Abdi, Scaling and universality at noisy quench dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 112, 054304 (2025).
  8. M. Heyl and J. C. Budich, Dynamical topological quantum phase transitions for mixed states, Phys. Rev. B 96, 180304(R) (2017).
  9. U. Bhattacharya, S. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Dutta, Mixed state dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 180303(R) (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation