- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Scaling and universality at noisy quench dynamical quantum phase transitions

Saeid Ansari1,*, R. Jafari2,3,4,†, Alireza Akbari5,‡, and Mehdi Abdi6,§

  • *Contact author: ansari@bzte.ac.ir; saeid.ansari@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: raadmehr.jafari@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: alireza@bimsa.cn
  • §Contact author: mehabdi@gmail.com
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 112, 054304 – Published 4 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mkll-nd46

Abstract

Dynamical quantum phase transitions (DQPTs) have been studied in the extended XY model under both noiseless and noisy linear driven staggered field cases. In the time-independent staggered field case, the model exhibits a single critical point where the transition occurs from the spin-liquid phase to the antiferromagnetic phase. In the noiseless ramp case, unlike the transverse field XY model where DQPT always occurs for a quench crossing the single critical point, there is a critical sweep velocity above which the kinks corresponding to a DQPT are completely removed. Furthermore, in this case there are only two critical modes whose excitation probability is one-half. In the presence of a Gaussian white noise, we find that this critical sweep velocity decreases by increasing the noise strength, and scales linearly with the square of the noise intensity. A surprising result occurs when the noise intensity and sweep velocity are about the same order of magnitude: The number of critical modes is significantly increased, signaling a region with multiple critical modes. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the scaling of the dynamical free energy near the DQPT time is the same for both noiseless and noisy ramp quenches.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (133)

  1. A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
  2. M. A. Cazalilla and M. Rigol, Focus on dynamics and thermalization in isolated quantum many-body systems, New J. Phys. 12, 055006 (2010).
  3. M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed matter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1405 (2011).
  4. D. Bernard and B. Doyon, Conformal field theory out of equilibrium: A review, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064005.
  5. P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and G. Mussardo, Introduction to ‘quantum integrability in out of equilibrium systems', J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064001.
  6. C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 056001 (2016).
  7. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  8. A. Mitra, Quantum quench dynamics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 245 (2018).
  9. G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions, Nature (London) 515, 237 (2014).
  10. A. J. Daley, H. Pichler, J. Schachenmayer, and P. Zoller, Measuring entanglement growth in quench dynamics of bosons in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 020505 (2012).
  11. M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. Lüschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015).
  12. J.-y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science 352, 1547 (2016).
  13. N. Fläschner, D. Vogel, M. Tarnowski, B. S. Rem, D.-S. Lühmann, M. Heyl, J. C. Budich, L. Mathey, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology, Nat. Phys. 14, 265 (2018).
  14. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  15. P. Jurcevic, H. Shen, P. Hauke, C. Maier, T. Brydges, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, M. Heyl, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Direct observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions in an interacting many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 080501 (2017).
  16. E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller et al., Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature (London) 534, 516 (2016).
  17. B. Neyenhuis, J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, J. Smith, A. C. Lee, P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Observation of prethermalization in long-range interacting spin chains, Sci. Adv. 3, e1700672 (2017).
  18. J. Smith, A. Lee, P. Richerme, B. Neyenhuis, P. W. Hess, P. Hauke, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder, Nat. Phys. 12, 907 (2016).
  19. K. Yang, L. Zhou, W. Ma, X. Kong, P. Wang, X. Qin, X. Rong, Y. Wang, F. Shi, J. Gong, and J. Du, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085308 (2019).
  20. X.-Y. Guo, C. Yang, Y. Zeng, Y. Peng, H.-K. Li, H. Deng, Y.-R. Jin, S. Chen, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of a dynamical quantum phase transition by a superconducting qubit simulation, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044080 (2019).
  21. K. Wang, X. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Simulating dynamic quantum phase transitions in photonic quantum walks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 020501 (2019).
  22. X.-Y. Xu, Q.-Q. Wang, M. Heyl, J. C. Budich, W.-W. Pan, Z. Chen, M. Jan, K. Sun, J.-S. Xu, Y.-J. Han et al., Measuring a dynamical topological order parameter in quantum walks, Light Sci. Appl. 9, 7 (2020).
  23. M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135704 (2013).
  24. M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 054001 (2018).
  25. R. Jafari, H. Johannesson, A. Langari, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Quench dynamics and zero-energy modes: The case of the Creutz model, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054302 (2019).
  26. R. Jafari and H. Johannesson, Loschmidt echo revivals: Critical and noncritical, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 015701 (2017).
  27. U. Divakaran, Three-site interacting spin chain in a staggered field: Fidelity versus Loschmidt echo, Phys. Rev. E 88, 052122 (2013).
  28. X.-Y. Hou, Q.-C. Gao, H. Guo, Y. He, T. Liu, and C.-C. Chien, Ubiquity of zeros of the Loschmidt amplitude for mixed states in different physical processes and its implication, Phys. Rev. B 102, 104305 (2020).
  29. K. Najafi, M. A. Rajabpour, and J. Viti, Light-cone velocities after a global quench in a noninteracting model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 205103 (2018).
  30. K. Najafi, M. A. Rajabpour, and J. Viti, Return amplitude after a quantum quench in the XY chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 083102.
  31. B. Yan, L. Cincio, and W. H. Zurek, Information scrambling and Loschmidt echo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 160603 (2020).
  32. T. V. Zache, N. Mueller, J. T. Schneider, F. Jendrzejewski, J. Berges, and P. Hauke, Dynamical topological transitions in the massive Schwinger model with a θ term, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 050403 (2019).
  33. S. Mukherjee and T. Nag, Dynamics of decoherence of an entangled pair of qubits locally connected to a one-dimensional disordered spin chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 043108.
  34. Q. Wang and H. T. Quan, Probing the excited-state quantum phase transition through statistics of Loschmidt echo and quantum work, Phys. Rev. E 96, 032142 (2017).
  35. J. M. Zhang and H.-T. Yang, Sudden jumps and plateaus in the quench dynamics of a Bloch state, Europhys. Lett. 116, 10008 (2016).
  36. J. M. Zhang and H.-T. Yang, Cusps in the quench dynamics of a Bloch state, Europhys. Lett. 114, 60001 (2016).
  37. M. Serbyn and D. A. Abanin, Loschmidt echo in many-body localized phases, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014202 (2017).
  38. R. Jafari, Quench dynamics and ground state fidelity of the one-dimensional extended quantum compass model in a transverse field, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 185004 (2016).
  39. F. Andraschko and J. Sirker, Dynamical quantum phase transitions and the Loschmidt echo: A transfer matrix approach, Phys. Rev. B 89, 125120 (2014).
  40. S. Vajna and B. Dóra, Topological classification of dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155127 (2015).
  41. C. Karrasch and D. Schuricht, Dynamical phase transitions after quenches in nonintegrable models, Phys. Rev. B 87, 195104 (2013).
  42. S. Vajna and B. Dóra, Disentangling dynamical phase transitions from equilibrium phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 89, 161105 (2014).
  43. R. Jafari, Dynamical quantum phase transition and quasi particle excitation, Sci. Rep. 9, 2871 (2019).
  44. D. Mondal and T. Nag, Anomaly in the dynamical quantum phase transition in a non-Hermitian system with extended gapless phases, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054308 (2022).
  45. J. J. Mendoza-Arenas, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the one-dimensional extended Fermi–Hubbard model, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 043101.
  46. N. Sedlmayr, P. Jaeger, M. Maiti, and J. Sirker, Bulk-boundary correspondence for dynamical phase transitions in one-dimensional topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 97, 064304 (2018).
  47. N. Sedlmayr, M. Fleischhauer, and J. Sirker, Fate of dynamical phase transitions at finite temperatures and in open systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045147 (2018).
  48. A. Khatun and S. M. Bhattacharjee, Boundaries and unphysical fixed points in dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 160603 (2019).
  49. C. Ding, Dynamical quantum phase transition from a critical quantum quench, Phys. Rev. B 102, 060409(R) (2020).
  50. S. De Nicola, A. A. Michailidis, and M. Serbyn, Entanglement view of dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 040602 (2021).
  51. A. D. Verga, Entanglement dynamics and phase transitions of the Floquet cluster spin chain, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085116 (2023).
  52. L. Rossi and F. Dolcini, Nonlinear current and dynamical quantum phase transitions in the flux-quenched Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 045410 (2022).
  53. N. A. Khan, P. Wang, M. Jan, and G. Xianlong, Anomalous correlation-induced dynamical phase transitions, Sci. Rep. 13, 9470 (2023).
  54. J. C. Halimeh, D. Trapin, M. Van Damme, and M. Heyl, Local measures of dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075130 (2021).
  55. A. L. Corps, A. Relaño, and J. C. Halimeh, Unifying finite-temperature dynamical and excited-state quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043080 (2024).
  56. M. Van Damme, J.-Y. Desaules, Z. Papić, and J. C. Halimeh, Anatomy of dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033090 (2023).
  57. J. C. Halimeh, M. Van Damme, L. Guo, J. Lang, and P. Hauke, Dynamical phase transitions in quantum spin models with antiferromagnetic long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 104, 115133 (2021).
  58. S. Porta, F. Cavaliere, M. Sassetti, and N. T. Ziani, Topological classification of dynamical quantum phase transitions in the XY chain, Sci. Rep. 10, 12766 (2020).
  59. M. Sadrzadeh, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Dynamical topological quantum phase transitions at criticality, Phys. Rev. B 103, 144305 (2021).
  60. C. Y. Wong and W. C. Yu, Loschmidt amplitude spectrum in dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 105, 174307 (2022).
  61. C. Rylands, E. A. Yuzbashyan, V. Gurarie, A. Zabalo, and V. Galitski, Loschmidt echo of far-from-equilibrium fermionic superfluids, Ann. Phys. 435, 168554 (2021).
  62. M. Abdi, Dynamical quantum phase transition in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. B 100, 184310 (2019).
  63. L. Zhou and Q. Du, Non-Hermitian topological phases and dynamical quantum phase transitions: A generic connection, New J. Phys. 23, 063041 (2021).
  64. T. I. Vanhala and T. Ojanen, Theory of the Loschmidt echo and dynamical quantum phase transitions in disordered Fermi systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033178 (2023).
  65. D. Mondal and T. Nag, Finite-temperature dynamical quantum phase transition in a non-Hermitian system, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184311 (2023).
  66. K. Cao, W. Li, M. Zhong, and P. Tong, Influence of weak disorder on the dynamical quantum phase transitions in the anisotropic XY chain, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014207 (2020).
  67. T. Masłowski and N. Sedlmayr, Dynamical bulk-boundary correspondence and dynamical quantum phase transitions in higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094306 (2023).
  68. K. Wrześniewski, I. Weymann, N. Sedlmayr, and T. Domański, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in a mesoscopic superconducting system, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094514 (2022).
  69. T. Masłowski and N. Sedlmayr, Quasiperiodic dynamical quantum phase transitions in multiband topological insulators and connections with entanglement entropy and fidelity susceptibility, Phys. Rev. B 101, 014301 (2020).
  70. P. Uhrich, N. Defenu, R. Jafari, and J. C. Halimeh, Out-of-equilibrium phase diagram of long-range superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 101, 245148 (2020).
  71. Y. Zeng, B. Zhou, and S. Chen, Dynamical singularity of the rate function for quench dynamics in finite-size quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134302 (2023).
  72. S. Stumper, M. Thoss, and J. Okamoto, Interaction-driven dynamical quantum phase transitions in a strongly correlated bosonic system, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013002 (2022).
  73. W. C. Yu, P. D. Sacramento, Y. C. Li, and H.-Q. Lin, Correlations and dynamical quantum phase transitions in an interacting topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085104 (2021).
  74. V. Vijayan, L. Chotorlishvili, A. Ernst, S. S. P. Parkin, M. I. Katsnelson, and S. K. Mishra, Topological dynamical quantum phase transition in a quantum skyrmion phase, Phys. Rev. B 107, L100419 (2023).
  75. X.-J. Yu, Dynamical phase transition and scaling in the chiral clock Potts chain, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062215 (2023).
  76. S. M. Bhattacharjee, Complex dynamics approach to dynamical quantum phase transitions: The Potts model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035130 (2024).
  77. L. G. C. Lakkaraju, S. K. Haldar, and A. Sen(De), Predicting a topological quantum phase transition from dynamics via multisite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022436 (2024).
  78. T. Puskarov and D. Schuricht, Time evolution during and after finite-time quantum quenches in the transverse-field Ising chain, SciPost Phys. 1, 003 (2016).
  79. U. Mishra, R. Jafari, and A. Akbari, Disordered Kitaev chain with long-range pairing: Loschmidt echo revivals and dynamical phase transitions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 375301 (2020).
  80. U. Divakaran, S. Sharma, and A. Dutta, Tuning the presence of dynamical phase transitions in a generalized XY spin chain, Phys. Rev. E 93, 052133 (2016).
  81. S. Sharma, U. Divakaran, A. Polkovnikov, and A. Dutta, Slow quenches in a quantum Ising chain: Dynamical phase transitions and topology, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144306 (2016).
  82. S. Zamani, J. Naji, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Scaling and universality at ramped quench dynamical quantum phase transitions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 355401 (2024).
  83. R. Jafari, A. Langari, S. Eggert, and H. Johannesson, Dynamical quantum phase transitions following a noisy quench, Phys. Rev. B 109, L180303 (2024).
  84. R. Baghran, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Competition of long-range interactions and noise at a ramped quench dynamical quantum phase transition: The case of the long-range pairing Kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064302 (2024).
  85. P. D. Sacramento and W. C. Yu, Distribution of Fisher zeros in dynamical quantum phase transitions of two-dimensional topological systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134301 (2024).
  86. S. Haldar, S. Roy, T. Chanda, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Multipartite entanglement at dynamical quantum phase transitions with nonuniformly spaced criticalities, Phys. Rev. B 101, 224304 (2020).
  87. S. Ye, Z. Zhou, N. A. Khan, and G. Xianlong, Energy-dependent dynamical quantum phase transitions in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. A 109, 043319 (2024).
  88. K. Das Agarwal, T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. Sen(De), Detecting exceptional points through dynamics in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012226 (2024).
  89. S. Zamani, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transition in the extended XY model: Nonadiabatic to adiabatic topological transition, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144306 (2020).
  90. A. Kosior and K. Sacha, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in discrete time crystals, Phys. Rev. A 97, 053621 (2018).
  91. R. Jafari and A. Akbari, Floquet dynamical phase transition and entanglement spectrum, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012204 (2021).
  92. A. Kosior, A. Syrwid, and K. Sacha, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in systems with broken continuous time and space translation symmetries, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023612 (2018).
  93. J. Naji, M. Jafari, R. Jafari, and A. Akbari, Dissipative Floquet dynamical quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 105, 022220 (2022).
  94. R. Jafari, A. Akbari, U. Mishra, and H. Johannesson, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions under synchronized periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094311 (2022).
  95. J. Naji, R. Jafari, L. Zhou, and A. Langari, Engineering Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094314 (2022).
  96. J. C. Budich and M. Heyl, Dynamical topological order parameters far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085416 (2016).
  97. U. Bhattacharya, S. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Dutta, Mixed state dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 180303(R) (2017).
  98. X. Nie, B.-B. Wei, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, X. Zhao, C. Qiu, Y. Tian, Y. Ji, T. Xin, D. Lu, and J. Li, Experimental observation of equilibrium and dynamical quantum phase transitions via out-of-time-ordered correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 250601 (2020).
  99. T. Tian, H.-X. Yang, L.-Y. Qiu, H.-Y. Liang, Y.-B. Yang, Y. Xu, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions with correspondence in an excited state phase diagram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 043001 (2020).
  100. P. Zoller, G. Alber, and R. Salvador, ac Stark splitting in intense stochastic driving fields with Gaussian statistics and non-Lorentzian line shape, Phys. Rev. A 24, 398 (1981).
  101. X. Chen, A. Ruschhaupt, S. Schmidt, A. del Campo, D. Guéry-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, Fast optimal frictionless atom cooling in harmonic traps: Shortcut to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 063002 (2010).
  102. P. Doria, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Optimal control technique for many-body quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190501 (2011).
  103. J. Marino and A. Silva, Relaxation, prethermalization, and diffusion in a noisy quantum Ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 86, 060408(R) (2012).
  104. J. Marino and A. Silva, Nonequilibrium dynamics of a noisy quantum Ising chain: Statistics of work and prethermalization after a sudden quench of the transverse field, Phys. Rev. B 89, 024303 (2014).
  105. P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
  106. H. Pichler, J. Schachenmayer, J. Simon, P. Zoller, and A. J. Daley, Noise- and disorder-resilient optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 86, 051605(R) (2012).
  107. B. Dóra, F. Pollmann, J. Fortágh, and G. Zaránd, Loschmidt echo and the many-body orthogonality catastrophe in a qubit-coupled Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 046402 (2013).
  108. S. Bhattacharjee and A. Dutta, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in extended transverse Ising models, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134306 (2018).
  109. S. Sharma, A. Russomanno, G. E. Santoro, and A. Dutta, Loschmidt echo and dynamical fidelity in periodically driven quantum systems, EPL 106, 67003 (2014).
  110. R. Jafari, M. Kargarian, A. Langari, and M. Siahatgar, Phase diagram and entanglement of the Ising model with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B 78, 214414 (2008).
  111. I. Titvinidze and G. Japaridze, Phase diagram of the spin S=1/2 extended XY model, Eur. Phys. J. B 32, 383 (2003).
  112. M. Fabrizio, Superconductivity from doping a spin-liquid insulator: A simple one-dimensional example, Phys. Rev. B 54, 10054 (1996).
  113. M. Suzuki, Relationship among exactly soluble models of critical phenomena. I: 2D Ising model, dimer problem and the generalized XY-model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 46, 1337 (1971).
  114. M. Suzuki, The dimer problem and the generalized X-model, Phys. Lett. A 34, 338 (1971).
  115. R. Jafari, Thermodynamic properties of the one-dimensional extended quantum compass model in the presence of a transverse field, Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 167 (2012).
  116. N. V. Vitanov, Transition times in the Landau-Zener model, Phys. Rev. A 59, 988 (1999).
  117. N. V. Vitanov and B. M. Garraway, Landau-Zener model: Effects of finite coupling duration, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4288 (1996).
  118. S. Suzuki and M. Okada, Simulated quantum annealing by the real-time evolution, Lect. Notes Phys. 679, 207 (2005).
  119. C. De Grandi and A. Polkovnikov, Adiabatic perturbation theory: From Landau–Zener problem to quenching through a quantum critical point, Lect. Notes Phys. 802, 75 (2010).
  120. G. Szegö, Review: Higher transcendental functions, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 60, 405 (1954).
  121. M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, and R. H. Romer, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover, New York, 1988).
  122. A. Dutta, A. Rahmani, and A. del Campo, Anti-Kibble-Zurek behavior in crossing the quantum critical point of a thermally isolated system driven by a noisy control field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 080402 (2016).
  123. Y. Bando, Y. Susa, H. Oshiyama, N. Shibata, M. Ohzeki, F. J. Gómez-Ruiz, D. A. Lidar, S. Suzuki, A. del Campo, and H. Nishimori, Probing the universality of topological defect formation in a quantum annealer: Kibble-Zurek mechanism and beyond, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033369 (2020).
  124. A. Chenu, M. Beau, J. Cao, and A. del Campo, Quantum simulation of generic many-body open system dynamics using classical noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 140403 (2017).
  125. R. Jafari, A. Asadian, M. Abdi, and A. Akbari, Dynamics of decoherence in a noisy driven environment, Sci. Rep. 15, 16582 (2025).
  126. S. Sadeghizade, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Anti-Kibble-Zurek behavior in the quantum XY spin-12 chain driven by correlated noisy magnetic field and anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 111, 104310 (2025).
  127. J. Łuczka, Quantum open systems in a two-state stochastic reservoir, Czechoslov. J. Phys. 41, 289 (1991).
  128. A. A. Budini, Non-Markovian Gaussian dissipative stochastic wave vector, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012106 (2000).
  129. J. I. Costa-Filho, R. B. B. Lima, R. R. Paiva, P. M. Soares, W. A. M. Morgado, R. L. Franco, and D. O. Soares-Pinto, Enabling quantum non-Markovian dynamics by injection of classical colored noise, Phys. Rev. A 95, 052126 (2017).
  130. A. Kiely, Exact classical noise master equations: Applications and connections, Europhys. Lett. 134, 10001 (2021).
  131. M. Heyl, Scaling and universality at dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 140602 (2015).
  132. S. Kheiri, R. Jafari, S. Mahdavifar, E. Nedaaee Oskoee, and A. Akbari (unpublished).
  133. E. A. Novikov, Functionals and the random-force method in turbulence theory, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1290 (1965).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 112, 054304– Published 4 August, 2025
  • Received 11 April 2025
  • Revised 12 July 2025
  • Accepted 15 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation