- Open Access
Strain-stress relationships for coherent in-plane strain in heterostructures with monoclinic crystal systems: - on - as example
Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 044075 – Published 23 October, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5gx2-kn6m
Abstract
In this work, we derive the relationship between the states of strain and stress in pseudomorphic epitaxial layers on a substrate with differing equilibrium lattice parameters under symmetry-conserving conditions for the case of monoclinic crystal symmetry. We compare surface vectors across the template-epitaxial layer interface and impose conditions of a stress-free epitaxial layer. As a result, we demonstrate the theoretical existence of up to three possible unit cells that can establish on a given template. We demonstrate this approach for the special case of symmetry-conserving strain in a class of templates with surface orientations. We use - on - as an example. We discuss the effects of the composition and surface orientation on the formation of three elastically stable unit cells, their strain and stress tensors, unit-cell axes, unit-cell volumes, lattice spacings, elastic potential energies, and stress-free directions. The previous paradigm for epitaxial layer growth, where the only stress-free direction is perpendicular to the growing surface, is not generally valid for low-symmetry materials. In the example here, we find that, in addition to the stress-free growth direction for crystallographic planes with low Miller indices, two possible competing domains can exist with stress-free directions oblique to the surface of the template for almost all planes . We further demonstrate the effect of the orientation-dependent differently strained domains and calculate the strain-shifted anisotropic band-to-band transitions for - on -. We also provide examples of x-ray diffraction analyses, which may help guide the search for the occurrence of such differently strained unit cells in epitaxial layers grown by experiment, here taking the surface orientation as case for demonstration.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (58)
- H. Peelaers, D. Steiauf, J. B. Varley, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, alloys for transparent electronics, Phys. Rev. B 92, 085206 (2015).
- J. A. Spencer, A. L. Mock, A. G. Jacobs, M. Schubert, Y. Zhang, and M. J. Tadjer, A review of band structure and material properties of transparent conducting and semiconducting oxides: , , , , , , , , and , Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 011315 (2022).
- P. Mazzolini, C. Wouters, M. Albrecht, A. Falkenstein, M. Martin, P. Vogt, and O. Bierwagen, Molecular beam epitaxy of -() on - (010): Compositional control, layer quality, anisotropic strain relaxation, and prospects for two-dimensional electron gas confinement, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 12793 (2024).
- R. Korlacki, M. Hilfiker, J. Knudtson, M. Stokey, U. Kilic, A. Mauze, Y. Zhang, J. Speck, V. Darakchieva, and M. Schubert, Strain and composition dependencies of the near-band-gap optical transitions in monoclinic alloys with coherent biaxial in-plane strain on , Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 064019 (2022).
- H. Peelaers, J. B. Varley, J. S. Speck, and C. G. Van de Walle, Structural and electronic properties of - alloys, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 242101 (2018).
- X. Liu and C.-K. Tan, Electronic properties of monoclinic alloys by first-principle, AIP Adv. 9, 035318 (2019).
- J. Åhman, G. Svensson, and J. Albertsson, A reinvestigation of -gallium oxide, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 52, 1336 (1996).
- P. Vogt and O. Bierwagen, The competing oxide and sub-oxide formation in metal-oxide molecular beam epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 081910 (2015).
- S. J. Hao, M. Hetzl, F. Schuster, K. Danielewicz, A. Bergmaier, G. Dollinger, Q. L. Sai, C. T. Xia, T. Hoffmann, M. Wiesinger, S. Matich, W. Aigner, and M. Stutzmann, Growth and characterization of - thin films on different substrates, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 105701 (2019).
- D. Seo, S. Kim, H.-Y. Kim, D.-W. Jeon, J.-H. Park, and W. S. Hwang, Heteroepitaxial growth of single-crystalline - on using MOCVD, Cryst. Growth Des. 23, 7090 (2023).
- Q. Cao, L. He, H. Xiao, X. Feng, Y. Lv, and J. Ma, - epitaxial films deposited on epi-/sapphire (0001) substrates by MOCVD, Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 77, 58 (2018).
- Q. Cao, L. He, X. Feng, H. Xiao, and J. Ma, Effect of annealing on the structural and optical properties of - films prepared on gadolinium gallium garnet (110) by MOCVD, Ceram. Int. 44, 830 (2018).
- H. Sun, K.-H. Li, C. T. Castanedo, S. Okur, G. S. Tompa, T. Salagaj, S. Lopatin, A. Genovese, and X. Li, HCl flow-induced phase change of -, -, and - films grown by MOCVD, Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 2370 (2018).
- W. Mi, J. Ma, C. Luan, Y. Lv, H. Xiao, and Z. Li, Characterization of - epitaxial films grown on (111) substrates by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition, Mat. Lett. 87, 109 (2012).
- G. Pozina, C.-W. Hsu, N. Abrikossova, M. A. Kaliteevski, and C. Hemmingsson, Development of - layers growth on sapphire substrates employing modeling of precursors ratio in halide vapor phase epitaxy reactor, Sci. Rep. 10, 22261 (2020).
- V. Nikolaev, A. Pechnikov, S. Stepanov, I. Nikitina, A. Smirnov, A. Chikiryaka, S. Sharofidinov, V. Bougrov, and A. Romanov, Epitaxial growth of () - on (0001) sapphire substrates by halide vapour phase epitaxy, Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 47, 16 (2016).
- D. Guo, Z. Wu, P. Li, Y. An, H. Liu, X. Guo, H. Yan, G. Wang, C. Sun, L. Li, and W. Tang, Fabrication of - thin films and solar-blind photodetectors by laser MBE technology, Opt. Mater. Express 4, 1067 (2014).
- T. Itoh, A. Mauze, Y. Zhang, and J. S. Speck, Epitaxial growth of - on (110) substrate by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 152105 (2020).
- P. Yan, Z. Zhang, Y. Xu, H. Chen, D. Chen, Q. Feng, S. Xu, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, and Y. Hao, Heteroepitaxial growth and band alignment of - on substrate grown by non-vacuum mist-CVD, Vacuum 204, 111381 (2022).
- R. Wakabayashi, K. Yoshimatsu, M. Hattori, and A. Ohtomo, Epitaxial structure and electronic property of - films grown on (100) substrates by pulsed-laser deposition, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 162101 (2017).
- F. Egyenes-Pörsök, F. Gucmann, K. Hušeková, E. Dobročka, M. Sobota, M. Mikolášek, K. Fröhlich, and M. Ťapajna, Growth of -and - epitaxial layers on sapphire substrates using liquid-injection MOCVD, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 35, 115002 (2020).
- Y. Yao, S. Okur, L. A. Lyle, G. S. Tompa, T. Salagaj, N. Sbrockey, R. F. Davis, and L. M. Porter, Growth and characterization of -, -, and -phases of using MOCVD and HVPE techniques, Mat. Res. Lett. 6, 268 (2018).
- D. Wang, L. He, X. Ma, H. Xiao, Y. Le, and J. Ma, Preparation and properties of heteroepitaxial - films on (100) substrates by MOCVD, Mater. Charact. 165, 110391 (2020).
- S. Nakagomi and Y. Kokubun, Crystal orientation of monoclinic - thin films formed on cubic substrates with a - interfacial layer, J. Cryst. Growth 479, 67 (2017).
- X. Tang, K.-H. Li, C.-H. Liao, D. Zheng, C. Liu, R. Lin, N. Xiao, S. Krishna, J. Tauboada, and X. Li, Epitaxial growth of - (-201) thin film on four-fold symmetry (001) substrate for heterogeneous integrations, J. Mater. Chem. C 9, 15868 (2021).
- A. Mock, S. Richter, A. Papamichail, V. Stanishev, M. Ghezellou, J. Ul-Hassan, A. Popp, S. Bin Anooz, D. Gogova, P. Ranga, S. Krishnamoorthy, R. Korlacki, M. Schubert, and V. Darakchieva, Effective uniaxial dielectric function tensor and optical phonons in ()-oriented - films with equally distributed sixfold-rotation domains, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 044003 (2024).
- N. Nepal, D. S. Katzer, B. P. Downey, V. D. Wheeler, L. O. Nyakiti, D. F. Storm, M. T. Hardy, J. A. Freitas, E. N. Jin, D. Vaca, L. Yates, S. Graham, S. Kumar, and D. J. Meyer, Heteroepitaxial growth of - films on via molecular beam epitaxy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 38, 063406 (2020).
- Y. Yan, Z. Zhang, D. Liu, L. Zeng, H. Chen, D. Chen, W. Zhu, Q. Feng, Y. Zhang, W. Mao, et al., High-quality heteroepitaxial growth of - with buffer layer based on Mist-CVD, Vacuum 231, 113777 (2025).
- Y. Oshima, E. G. Víllora, and K. Shimamura, Quasi-heteroepitaxial growth of - on off-angled sapphire (0001) substrates by halide vapor phase epitaxy, J. Cryst. Growth 410, 53 (2015).
- Z. Wen, X. Zhai, K. Khan, O. Odabasi, M. Kim, and E. Ahmadi, (010) - growth using tritertiarybutylaluminum as gas precursor via hybrid molecular beam epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 162103 (2024).
- J. Sarker, P. Garg, A. Rauf, A. R. Nirjhar, H.-L. Huang, M. Zhu, A. F. M. A. U. Bhuiyan, L. Meng, H. Zhao, J. Hwang, E. Osei-Agyemang, S. Ahmed, and B. Mazumder, Microscopic and spectroscopic investigation of films: Unraveling the impact of growth orientation and aluminum content, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 12, 2301016 (2025).
- A. F. M. A. U. Bhuiyan, Z. Feng, L. Meng, and H. Zhao, MOCVD growth of (010) - thin films, J. Mater Res. 36, 4804 (2021).
- A. F. M. A. Uddin Bhuiyan, L. Meng, H.-L. Huang, J. Sarker, C. Chae, B. Mazumder, J. Hwang, and H. Zhao, Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition of -() thin films on (001) - substrates, APL Mater. 11, 041112 (2023).
- F. Alema, T. Itoh, W. Brand, M. Tadjer, A. Osinsky, and J. S. Speck, grown high composition nitrogen doped -- using MOCVD, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 41, 042709 (2023).
- J. S. Lundh, K. Huynh, M. Liao, W. Olsen, K. Pan, K. Sasaki, K. Konishi, H. N. Masten, J. K. Hite, M. A. Mastro, N. A. Mahadik, M. Goorsky, A. Kuramata, K. D. Hobart, T. J. Anderson, and M. J. Tadjer, Experimental determination of critical thickness limitations of (010) -() heteroepitaxial films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 222104 (2023).
- A. Mauze, T. Itoh, Y. Zhang, E. Deagueros, F. Wu, and J. S. Speck, Coherently strained (001) -() thin films -: Growth and compositional analysis, J. Appl. Phys. 132, 115302 (2022).
- L. G. Bir and G. E. Pikus, Symmetry and Strain-Induced Effects in Semiconductors (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974).
- C. Zhang, X. Wu, Y. Xing, L. Zhou, H. Zhou, S. Li, and N. Xu, A first-principles study of hydrostatic strain engineering on the electronic properties of -, Phys. B Condens. Matter 660, 414851 (2023).
- H.-L. Huang, J. M. Johnson, C. Chae, A. Senckowski, M. H. Wong, and J. Hwang, Atomic scale mechanism of to phase transformation in gallium oxide, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 251602 (2023).
- S. Seacat, J. L. Lyons, and H. Peelaers, Computational design of optimal heterostructures for , Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 014601 (2024).
- L. M. Barmore, J. Jesenovec, J. S. McCloy, and M. D. McCluskey, Photoluminescence of in - and () under pressure, J. Appl. Phys. 133, 175703 (2023).
- Y. Xu, J.-H. Park, Z. Yao, C. Wolverton, M. Razeghi, J. Wu, and V. P. Dravid, Strain-induced metastable phase stabilization in thin films, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 5536 (2019).
- R. Zhang, M. Li, G. Wu, L. Li, Z. Zhang, K. Liang, and W. Shen, Modulating electronic properties of - by strain engineering, Results Phys. 52, 106916 (2023).
- Y. Hara, W. Zhu, G. Deng, E. Marin, Q. Guo, and G. Pezzotti, Spatially resolved Raman piezospectroscopy for nondestructive evaluation of residual stress in - films, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 56, 125102 (2023).
- T. Uchida and R. Sugie, Thermal stress analysis in die-attached - using Raman spectroscopy, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 62, SF1003 (2023).
- R. Korlacki, M. Stokey, A. Mock, S. Knight, A. Papamichail, V. Darakchieva, and M. Schubert, Strain and stress relationships for optical phonon modes in monoclinic crystals with - as an example, Phys. Rev. B 102, 180101(R) (2020).
- N. Hasuike, I. Maeda, S. Isaji, K. Kobayashi, K. Ohira, and T. Isshiki, Micro-Raman spectroscopy of bending stresses in -(001) wafer, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 62, SF1020 (2023).
- S. Mu, H. Peelaers, Y. Zhang, M. Wang, and C. G. Van de Walle, Orientation-dependent band offsets between and , Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 252104 (2020).
- J.-M. Wagner and F. Bechstedt, Properties of strained wurtzite and : Ab initio studies, Phys. Rev. B 66, 115202 (2002).
- V. Darakchieva, P. P. Paskov, T. Paskova, J. Birch, S. Tungasmita, and B. Monemar, Deformation potentials of the E1(TO) mode in , Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2302 (2002).
- V. Darakchieva, T. Paskova, M. Schubert, H. Arwin, P. P. Paskov, B. Monemar, D. Hommel, M. Heuken, J. Off, F. Scholz, B. A. Haskell, P. T. Fini, J. S. Speck, and S. Nakamura, Anisotropic strain and phonon deformation potentials in , Phys. Rev. B 75, 195217 (2007).
- M.-Y. Xie, F. Tasnádi, I. A. Abrikosov, L. Hultman, and V. Darakchieva, Elastic constants, composition, and piezolectric polarization in : From ab initio calculations to experimental implications for the applicability of Vegard’s rule, Phys. Rev. B 86, 155310 (2012).
- M. Grundmann, Strain in pseudomorphic monoclinic -based heterostructures, Phys. Status Solidi B 254, 1700134 (2017).
- M. Schubert, R. Korlacki, S. Knight, T. Hofmann, S. Schöche, V. Darakchieva, E. Janzén, B. Monemar, D. Gogova, Q.-T. Thieu, R. Togashi, H. Murakami, Y. Kumagai, K. Goto, A. Kuramata, S. Yamakoshi, and M. Higashiwaki, Anisotropy, phonon modes, and free charge carrier parameters in monoclinic -gallium oxide single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125209 (2016).
- Note that the reciprocal vectors could also be expressed by introducing the factor , i.e., . The difference between this and Eq. (2) lies only in a common factor applied to all lengths of the subsequent reciprocal vectors, which is irrelevant to the role they play in this derivation. The reciprocal vectors are used to express the normal to any given surface .
- C. Kranert, M. Jenderka, J. Lenzner, M. Lorenz, H. von Wenckstern, R. Schmidt-Grund, and M. Grundmann, Lattice parameters and Raman-active phonon modes of -(), J. Appl. Phys. 117, 125703 (2015).
- This definition of the elements of here is useful because the tensor elements refer to the changes of the intrinsic lattice parameters, , , , and for a given epitaxial layer, regardless of the actual orientation of the unit cell within a given epitaxial layer relative to the substrate. In this respect, the coordinate system for the substrate is irrelevant.
- Note the structure of the determinant for the stress tensor, where the component always factorizes out. This yields trivial solutions for all cases when the axis is perpendicular to the surface, (010). Then the direction is also parallel to the surface normal . Hence, for growth on , only one stress-free solution exists, with a stress-free direction not parallel to the surface, which is then obviously the surface normal. For almost all other crystallographic surfaces, the stress-free directions are neither parallel nor perpendicular to the surface, and all represent potential stable unit cells during growth.