Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Quantum dynamical entropy and dissipative information flows

Giovanni Nichele1,2,3,* and Fabio Benatti2,3

  • *Contact author: gnichele@umk.pl

APS Open Sci. 1, L000196 – Published 2 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6hlj-9t5r

Abstract

The Alicki-Lindblad-Fannes (ALF) dynamical entropy measures the rate at which new information is gathered about a quantum system by inspecting its long-time evolution. After extending the ALF entropy to open quantum dynamics, we propose it as a measure of backflow of information from the environment. We show that the behavior of the open-system ALF entropy is a stronger witness than existing approaches based only on the open-system reduced dynamics. In the case of a qubit collisionally coupled to a classical spin chain, we obtain an exact expression for the open-system ALF entropy explicitly depending on the environment correlations. An extreme case shows how the information flow from environment to system corresponds to vanishing entropy production as for reversible finite quantum systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Quantum dynamical entropy and non-Markovianity: A collisional model perspective

Giovanni Nichele and Fabio Benatti
Phys. Rev. A 114, 052406 (2026)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. D. Chruściński, Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime, Phys. Rep. 992, 1 (2022).
  2. L. Li, M. J. Hall, and H. M. Wiseman, Concepts of quantum non-Markovianity: A hierarchy, Phys. Rep. 759, 1 (2018).
  3. Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non-Markovianity: Characterization, quantification and detection, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 094001 (2014).
  4. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
  5. N. Megier, A. Smirne, and B. Vacchini, Entropic bounds on information backflow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 030401 (2021).
  6. A. Smirne, N. Megier, and B. Vacchini, Holevo skew divergence for the characterization of information backflow, Phys. Rev. A 106, 012205 (2022).
  7. B. Vacchini, Open Quantum Systems: Foundations and Theory (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2024).
  8. F. Settimo, H.-P. Breuer, and B. Vacchini, Entropic and trace-distance-based measures of non-Markovianity, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042212 (2022).
  9. S. Milz, M. S. Kim, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Completely positive divisibility does not mean Markovianity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 040401 (2019).
  10. F. Benatti and G. Nichele, Superactivation of memory effects in a classical Markov environment, Phys. Scr. 100, 065115 (2025).
  11. L. Accardi, A. Frigerio, and J. T. Lewis, Quantum stochastic processes, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 18, 97 (1982).
  12. L. Accardi, Topics in quantum probability, Phys. Rep. 77, 169 (1981).
  13. G. Lindblad, Non-Markovian quantum stochastic processes and their entropy, Commun. Math. Phys. 65, 281 (1979).
  14. S. Milz and K. Modi, Quantum stochastic processes and quantum non-Markovian phenomena, PRX Quantum 2, 030201 (2021).
  15. F. A. Pollock, C. Rodríguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Operational Markov condition for quantum processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 040405 (2018).
  16. F. A. Pollock, C. Rodríguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Non-Markovian quantum processes: Complete framework and efficient characterization, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012127 (2018).
  17. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Quantum circuit architecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 060401 (2008).
  18. S. Milz, D. Egloff, P. Taranto, T. Theurer, M. B. Plenio, A. Smirne, and S. F. Huelga, When is a non-Markovian quantum process classical? Phys. Rev. X 10, 041049 (2020).
  19. A. A. Budini, Quantum non-Markovian processes break conditional past-future independence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 240401 (2018).
  20. A. A. Budini, Quantum non-Markovian environment-to-system backflows of information: Nonoperational vs. operational approaches, Entropy 24, 649 (2022).
  21. I. Vilkoviskiy, M. Sonner, Q. C. Huang, W. W. Ho, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Temporal entanglement transition in chaotic quantum many-body dynamics, arXiv:2511.03846.
  22. K. E. Petersen, Ergodic Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).
  23. R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Defining quantum dynamical entropy, Lett. Math. Phys. 32, 75 (1994).
  24. G. Lindblad, Dynamical entropy for quantum systems, in Quantum Probability and Applications III, edited by L. Accardi and W. von Waldenfels (Springer, Berlin, 1988), pp. 183–191.
  25. R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Quantum Dynamical Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
  26. F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti, and G. M. Palma, Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions, Phys. Rep. 954, 1 (2022).
  27. G. Nichele and F. Benatti, companion paper, Quantum dynamical entropy and non-Markovianity: A collisional model perspective, Phys. Rev. A 114, 052406 (2026).
  28. R. Alicki, Information-theoretical meaning of quantum-dynamical entropy, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052302 (2002).
  29. M. Lax, Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state, Phys. Rev. 129, 2342 (1963).
  30. D. Lonigro and D. Chruściński, Quantum regression beyond the Born-Markov approximation for generalized spin-boson models, Phys. Rev. A 105, 052435 (2022).
  31. T. Rybár, S. N. Filippov, M. Ziman, and V. Bužek, Simulation of indivisible qubit channels in collision models, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45, 154006 (2012).
  32. N. K. Bernardes, A. R. R. Carvalho, C. H. Monken, and M. F. Santos, Environmental correlations and Markovian to non-Markovian transitions in collisional models, Phys. Rev. A 90, 032111 (2014).
  33. N. K. Bernardes, A. Cuevas, A. Orieux, C. H. Monken, P. Mataloni, F. Sciarrino, and M. F. Santos, Experimental observation of weak non-Markovianity, Sci. Rep. 5, 17520 (2015).
  34. C. Bäcker, K. Beyer, and W. T. Strunz, Local disclosure of quantum memory in non-Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 060402 (2024).
  35. H.-P. Breuer, G. Amato, and B. Vacchini, Mixing-induced quantum non-Markovianity and information flow, New J. Phys. 20, 043007 (2018).
  36. F. Buscemi, R. Gangwar, K. Goswami, H. Badhani, T. Pandit, B. Mohan, S. Das, and M. N. Bera, Causal and noncausal revivals of information: A new regime of non-Markovianity in quantum stochastic processes, PRX Quantum 6, 020316 (2025).
  37. N. Megier, D. Chruściński, J. Piilo, and W. T. Strunz, Eternal non-Markovianity: From random unitary to Markov chain realisations, Sci. Rep. 7, 6379 (2017).
  38. F. Benatti and G. Nichele, Open quantum dynamics: Memory effects and superactivation of backflow of information, Mathematics 12, 37 (2023).
  39. H.-B. Chen, J.-Y. Lien, G.-Y. Chen, and Y.-N. Chen, Hierarchy of non-Markovianity and k-divisibility phase diagram of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042105 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation