Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum dynamical entropy and non-Markovianity: A collisional model perspective

Giovanni Nichele1,2,3,* and Fabio Benatti2,3

  • *Contact author: gnichele@umk.pl

Phys. Rev. A 114, 052406 – Published 2 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qv8g-x9k5

Abstract

Accessing the physical mechanisms behind non-Markovian phenomena in open quantum dynamics requires the study of the full multitime statistical properties of the joint system-environment dynamics. This is impossible at the level of the reduced dynamics of the open system alone as the latter is obtained by suitably eliminating the environment. The task is instead made possible by considering multitime correlation functions involving observables of the open system, only: the open system-environment interactions turn them into global ones, thus building up correlations between the two systems. Multitime correlations form the basis of both the theory of quantum stochastic processes and of the Alicki-Lindblad-Fannes dynamical entropy (ALF entropy for short). This latter quantity provides for quantum systems a measure of the dynamical entropy production as the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy does for classical systems. Indeed, in the following we propose the open-system ALF entropy as a measure of non-Markovianity signaling deviations from the so-called quantum regression regime. In turn, the operational interpretation of the open-system ALF entropy makes it a suitable witness of backflow of information from the environment to the open system. In the case of a collisional model whereby the dissipative dynamics of a finite-level system is obtained by its coupling to an infinite classical spin chain, the ALF entropy can be explicitly computed. It turns out to depend on the parameters characterizing the statistical properties of the environment and can be related to the activation and superactivation of memory effects in the open quantum system.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Quantum dynamical entropy and dissipative information flows

Giovanni Nichele and Fabio Benatti
APS Open Sci. 1, L000196 (2026)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. L. Li, M. J. Hall, and H. M. Wiseman, Concepts of quantum non-Markovianity: A hierarchy, Phys. Rep. 759, 1 (2018).
  2. D. Chruściński, Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime, Phys. Rep. 992, 1 (2022).
  3. Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and non-Markovianity of quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010).
  4. Á. Rivas and S. F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction, Springer Briefs in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2012).
  5. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
  6. M. Lax, Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state, Phys. Rev. 129, 2342 (1963).
  7. D. Lonigro and D. Chruściński, Quantum regression beyond the Born-Markov approximation for generalized spin-boson models, Phys. Rev. A 105, 052435 (2022).
  8. D. Lonigro and D. Chruściński, Quantum regression in dephasing phenomena, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55, 225308 (2022).
  9. L. Accardi, A. Frigerio, and J. T. Lewis, Quantum stochastic processes, Pub. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 18, 97 (1982).
  10. L. Accardi, Topics in quantum probability, Phys. Rep. 77, 169 (1981).
  11. G. Lindblad, Non-Markovian quantum stochastic processes and their entropy, Commun. Math. Phys. 65, 281 (1979).
  12. J. Lewis, Quantum stochastic processes I, Phys. Rep. 77, 339 (1981).
  13. A. Frigerio, Quantum stochastic processes II, Phys. Rep. 77, 351 (1981).
  14. R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Quantum Dynamical Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
  15. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016).
  16. S. Milz, D. Egloff, P. Taranto, T. Theurer, M. B. Plenio, A. Smirne, and S. F. Huelga, When is a non-Markovian quantum process classical? Phys. Rev. X 10, 041049 (2020).
  17. U. Shrikant and P. Mandayam, Quantum non-Markovianity: Overview and recent developments, Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 1134583 (2023).
  18. S. Milz and K. Modi, Quantum stochastic processes and quantum non-Markovian phenomena, PRX Quantum 2, 030201 (2021).
  19. F. A. Pollock, C. Rodríguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Operational Markov condition for quantum processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 040405 (2018).
  20. F. A. Pollock, C. Rodríguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Non-Markovian quantum processes: Complete framework and efficient characterization, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012127 (2018).
  21. G. Chiribella, G. M. D'Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Quantum circuit architecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 060401 (2008).
  22. A. A. Budini, Quantum non-Markovian processes break conditional past-future independence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 240401 (2018).
  23. A. A. Budini, Quantum non-Markovian environment-to-system backflows of information: Nonoperational vs. operational approaches, Entropy 24, 649 (2022).
  24. I. Vilkoviskiy, M. Sonner, Q. C. Huang, W. W. Ho, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Temporal entanglement transition in chaotic quantum many-body dynamics, arXiv:2511.03846.
  25. G. Lindblad, in Quantum Probability and Applications III, edited by L. Accardi and W. von Waldenfels (Springer, Berlin, 1988), pp. 183–191.
  26. R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Defining quantum dynamical entropy, Lett. Math. Phys. 32, 75 (1994).
  27. F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti, and G. M. Palma, Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions, Phys. Rep. 954, 1 (2022).
  28. S. Campbell and B. Vacchini, Collision models in open system dynamics: A versatile tool for deeper insights? Europhys. Lett. 133, 60001 (2021).
  29. F. Benatti and G. Nichele, Superactivation of memory effects in a classical Markov environment, Phys. Scr. 100, 065115 (2025).
  30. G. Nichele and F. Benatti, companion paper, Quantum dynamical entropy and dissipative information flows, APS Open Sci. 1, L000196 (2026).
  31. O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1 (Springer, Berlin, 1987).
  32. S. Wißmann, H.-P. Breuer, and B. Vacchini, Generalized trace-distance measure connecting quantum and classical non-Markovianity, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042108 (2015).
  33. F. Benatti, D. Chruściński, and G. Nichele, Quantum versus classical P -divisibility, Phys. Rev. A 110, 052212 (2024).
  34. D. Amato, P. Facchi, and G. Marmo, Bridging classical and quantum worlds: Maps, states, and evolutions, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 33, 2650011 (2026).
  35. F. Benatti, D. Chruściński, and S. Filippov, Tensor power of dynamical maps and positive versus completely positive divisibility, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012112 (2017).
  36. F. Benatti and G. Nichele, Open quantum dynamics: Memory effects and superactivation of backflow of information, Mathematics 12, 37 (2023).
  37. C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  38. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
  39. Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non-Markovianity: Characterization, quantification and detection, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 094001 (2014).
  40. P. Walters, An Introduction to Ergodic Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1982), Vol. 79.
  41. M. Ohya and D. Petz, Quantum Entropy and its Use (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
  42. G. Murphy, C*-Algebras and Operator Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1990).
  43. R. Alicki, Information-theoretical meaning of quantum-dynamical entropy, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052302 (2002).
  44. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
  45. G. Lindblad, Entropy, information and quantum measurements, Commun. Math. Phys. 33, 305 (1973).
  46. B. Schumacher, Sending entanglement through noisy quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2614 (1996).
  47. H.-P. Breuer, G. Amato, and B. Vacchini, Mixing-induced quantum non-Markovianity and information flow, New J. Phys. 20, 043007 (2018).
  48. F. Buscemi, R. Gangwar, K. Goswami, H. Badhani, T. Pandit, B. Mohan, S. Das, and M. N. Bera, Causal and noncausal revivals of information: A new regime of non-Markovianity in quantum stochastic processes, PRX Quantum 6, 020316 (2025).
  49. C. Bäcker, K. Beyer, and W. T. Strunz, Local disclosure of quantum memory in non-Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 060402 (2024).
  50. F. Settimo, A. Smirne, K. Luoma, B. Vacchini, J. Piilo, and D. Chruściński, Divisibility of dynamical maps: Schrödinger versus Heisenberg picture, PRX Quantum 7, 010340 (2026).
  51. N. Megier, D. Chruściński, J. Piilo, and W. T. Strunz, Eternal non-Markovianity: From random unitary to Markov chain realisations, Sci. Rep. 7, 6379 (2017).
  52. H.-B. Chen, J.-Y. Lien, G.-Y. Chen, and Y.-N. Chen, Hierarchy of non-Markovianity and k-divisibility phase diagram of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042105 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation