- Open Access
High-Threshold, Low-Overhead and Single-Shot Decodable Fault-Tolerant Quantum Memory
PRX Quantum 7, 020310 – Published 17 April, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/67xf-zdjb
Abstract
We present a family of quantum low-density parity-check codes, which we call radial codes, obtained from the lifted product of a specific subset of classical quasicyclic codes. The codes are defined using a pair of integers and have parameters , with numerical studies suggesting average-case distance linear in . In simulations of circuit-level noise, we observe comparable error suppression to surface codes of similar distance while using approximately five times fewer physical qubits. This is true even when radial codes are decoded using a single-shot approach, which can allow for faster logical clock speeds and reduced decoding complexity. We describe an intuitive visual representation, canonical basis of logical operators and optimal-length stabilizer measurement circuits for these codes, and argue that their error correction capabilities, tunable parameters and small size make them promising candidates for implementation on near-term quantum devices.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Popular Summary
Quantum low-density parity-check codes are a compelling alternative to the surface code for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Beyond improved encoding density, an often overlooked advantage is that some constructions support the single-shot property, which enables more efficient decoding and can reduce the time required to execute logical operations. In this work, we introduce radial codes, a new family specifically designed to exhibit this single-shot behavior. We present several examples at experimentally relevant scales that are competitive with state-of-the-art bivariate bicycle codes. We analyze their confinement properties and verify the single-shot behavior through numerical simulations.
Article Text
References (41)
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University, New York, NY, USA, 2011), 10th ed.
- N. P. Breuckmann and J. N. Eberhardt, Balanced product quantum codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 67, 6653 (2021).
- P. Panteleev and G. Kalachev, in Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2022 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022), pp. 375–388.
- I. Dinur, M.-H. Hsieh, T.-C. Lin, and T. Vidick, Good quantum LDPC codes with linear time decoders, in Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing STOC 2023 (Association for Computing Machinery, Orlando, FL, USA, 2023), pp. 905–918.
- A. Leverrier and G. Zémor, in 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (IEEE Computer Society, 2022), pp. 872–883.
- P. Panteleev and G. Kalachev, Quantum LDPC codes with almost linear minimum distance, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 68, 213 (2022).
- P. Panteleev and G. Kalachev, Degenerate quantum LDPC codes with good finite length performance, Quantum 5, 585 (2021).
- J. Roffe, L. Z. Cohen, A. O. Quintavalle, D. Chandra, and E. T. Campbell, Bias-tailored quantum LDPC codes, Quantum 7, 1005 (2023).
- N. Raveendran, N. Rengaswamy, F. Rozpedek, A. Raina, L. Jiang, and B. Vasić, Finite rate QLDPC-GKP coding scheme that surpasses the CSS Hamming bound, Quantum 6, 767 (2022).
- Q. Xu, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, C. A. Pattison, N. Raveendran, D. Bluvstein, J. Wurtz, B. Vasić, M. D. Lukin, L. Jiang, and H. Zhou, Constant-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation with reconfigurable atom arrays, Nat. Phys. 20, 1084 (2024).
- E. Sabo, L. G. Gunderman, B. Ide, M. Vasmer, and G. Dauphinais, Weight-reduced stabilizer codes with lower overhead, PRX Quantum 5, 040302 (2024).
- S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory, Nature 627, 778 (2024).
- Tools for generation and study of quantum radial codes, https://github.com/tRowans/radial-codes-public
- M. Fossorier, Quasi-cyclic low-density parity-check codes from circulant permutation matrices, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 50, 1788 (2004).
- We thank Min Ye for this observation and for identifying an issue with a related claim in the previous version of this work. We note also that the instances where this is not the case are typically outside the parameter regime we will consider, although it is an interesting question for future work to understand the origin of these instances and identify a better set of conditions on the input matrices. Practically, we verify this condition on the number of linear dependencies explicitly for all generated codes.
- L. P. Pryadko, V. A. Shabashov, and V. K. Kozin, QDistRnd: A GAP package for computing the distance of quantum error-correcting codes, J. Open Source Software 7, 4120 (2022).
- A. O. Quintavalle, M. Vasmer, J. Roffe, and E. T. Campbell, Single-shot error correction of three-dimensional homological product codes, PRX Quantum 2, 020340 (2021).
- H.-K. Lin, P. K. Lim, A. A. Kovalev, and L. P. Pryadko, Abelian multi-cycle codes for single-shot error correction, arXiv:2506.16910 [quant-ph].
- L. P. Pryadko and W. Zeng, dist-m4ri: Distance of a classical or quantum CSS code, 2024, https://github.com/QEC-pages/dist-m4ri
- A. Jacob, C. McLauchlan, and D. E. Browne, Single-shot decoding and fault-tolerant gates with trivariate tricycle codes, arXiv:2508.08191 [quant-ph].
- A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).
- C. Gidney, Stim: A fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quantum 5, 497 (2021).
- C. Gidney, M. Newman, A. Fowler, and M. Broughton, A fault-tolerant honeycomb memory, Quantum 5, 605 (2021).
- B. J. Brown, N. H. Nickerson, and D. E. Browne, Fault-tolerant error correction with the gauge color code, Nat. Commun. 7, 12302 (2016).
- Of course, it is also possible to use the measurement outcomes from stim to decode on the Tanner graph for the quantum code rather than on the DEM. Such a strategy may work well in codes such as the 3D gauge color code [37] or 3D subsystem toric code [38] which use matching decoders, but will work very poorly for decoders such as BP which are highly dependent on the details of the graph.
- E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).
- L. Berent, T. Hillmann, J. Eisert, R. Wille, and J. Roffe, Analog information decoding of Bosonic quantum low-density parity-check codes, PRX Quantum 5, 020349 (2024).
- A. Gong, S. Cammerer, and J. M. Renes, Toward low-latency iterative decoding of QLDPC codes under circuit-level noise, arXiv:2403.18901 [quant-ph].
- L. Skoric, D. E. Browne, K. M. Barnes, N. I. Gillespie, and E. T. Campbell, Parallel window decoding enables scalable fault tolerant quantum computation, Nat. Commun. 14, 7040 (2023).
- S. Huang and S. Puri, Increasing memory lifetime of quantum low-density parity check codes with sliding-window noisy syndrome decoding, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012453 (2024).
- Note that this does not have to be true in more general codes, e.g., subsystem [39] and Floquet/dynamic [40, 41] codes, where detecting regions can span multiple measurement cycles.
- J. Roffe, D. R. White, S. Burton, and E. Campbell, Decoding across the quantum low-density parity-check code landscape, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043423 (2020).
- J. Roffe, LDPC: Python tools for low density parity check codes, 2022, https://pypi.org/project/ldpc/
- T. Hillmann, L. Berent, A. O. Quintavalle, J. Eisert, R. Wille, and J. Roffe, Localized statistics decoding: A parallel decoding algorithm for quantum low-density parity-check codes, Nat. Commun. 16, 8214 (2025).
- D. Bluvstein et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58 (2024).
- O. Higgott and N. P. Breuckmann, Improved single-shot decoding of higher-dimensional hypergraph-product codes, PRX Quantum 4, 020332 (2023).
- H. Bombín, Gauge color codes: Optimal transversal gates and gauge fixing in topological stabilizer codes, New J. Phys. 17, 083002 (2015).
- A. Kubica and M. Vasmer, Single-shot quantum error correction with the three-dimensional subsystem toric code, Nat. Commun. 13, 6272 (2022).
- O. Higgott and N. P. Breuckmann, Subsystem codes with high thresholds by Gauge fixing and reduced qubit overhead, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031039 (2021).
- A. Townsend-Teague, J. M. de la Fuente, and M. Kesselring, Floquetifying the colour code, Electron. Proc. Theor. Comput. Sci. 384, 265 (2023).
- M. Davydova, N. Tantivasadakarn, and S. Balasubramanian, Floquet codes without parent subsystem codes, PRX Quantum 4, 020341 (2023).
