Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Quantum geometric bounds in spinful systems with trivial band topology

Wojciech J. Jankowski1,*, Robert-Jan Slager1,2, and Gunnar F. Lange3,4,†

  • *Contact author: wjj25@cam.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: g.f.lange@fys.uio.no

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L042011 – Published 9 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zlxq-fxgc

Abstract

We derive quantum geometric bounds in spinful systems with spin topology characterized by a single Z index protected by a spin gap. Our bounds provide geometric conditions on the spin topology, distinct from the known quantum geometric bounds associated with Wilson loops and nontrivial band topologies. As a result, we obtain broader bounds in time-reversal symmetric systems with a nontrivial Z2 index and also bounds in systems with a trivial Z2 index, where the quantum metric should be otherwise unbounded. We benchmark these findings with first-principles calculations in elemental bismuth realizing a nontrivial even spin-Chern number. Moreover, we connect these bounds to optical responses and show their robustness in the presence of disorder within a real-space marker formulation, demonstrating that spin-resolved quantum geometry is observable in realistic experimental settings of impure materials. Finally, we connect spin bounds to quantum Cramér-Rao bounds that are central to quantum metrology, showing that elemental Bi and other spin-topological phases hold promises for topological free fermion quantum sensors.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (76)

  1. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  2. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  3. N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
  4. R.-J. Slager, A. Mesaros, V. Juričić, and J. Zaanen, The space group classification of topological band-insulators, Nat. Phys. 9, 98 (2013).
  5. J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.-J. Slager, Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band structure combinatorics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041069 (2017).
  6. H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups, Nat. Commun. 8, 50 (2017).
  7. R.-J. Slager, The translational side of topological band insulators, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 128, 24 (2019).
  8. B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature (London) 547, 298 (2017).
  9. L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011).
  10. Q. Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Y.-S. Wu, Quantized Hall conductance as a topological invariant, Phys. Rev. B 31, 3372 (1985).
  11. F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
  12. J. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980).
  13. N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997).
  14. R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: A geometrical theory, Eur. Phys. J. B 79, 121 (2011).
  15. J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency divergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041041 (2020).
  16. J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nat. Phys. 18, 290 (2022).
  17. P. Törmä, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us? Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 240001 (2023).
  18. A. Bouhon, A. Timmel, and R.-J. Slager, Quantum geometry beyond projective single bands, arXiv:2303.02180.
  19. R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165139 (2014).
  20. F. Xie, Z. Song, B. Lian, and B. A. Bernevig, Topology-bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167002 (2020).
  21. Y.-Q. Zhu, W. Zheng, S.-L. Zhu, and G. Palumbo, Band topology of pseudo-Hermitian phases through tensor Berry connections and quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B 104, 205103 (2021).
  22. W. J. Jankowski, A. S. Morris, A. Bouhon, F. N. Ünal, and R.-J. Slager, Optical manifestations and bounds of topological Euler class, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081103 (2025).
  23. S. Kwon and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometric bound and ideal condition for Euler band topology, Phys. Rev. B 109, L161111 (2024).
  24. W. J. Jankowski, A. S. Morris, Z. Davoyan, A. Bouhon, F. N. Ünal, and R.-J. Slager, Non-Abelian Hopf-Euler insulators, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075135 (2024).
  25. J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, and B. A. Bernevig, Universal Wilson loop bound of quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 086401 (2025).
  26. I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach, Phys. Rev. B 62, 1666 (2000).
  27. M. Yu, Y. Liu, P. Yang, M. Gong, Q. Cao, S. Zhang, H. Liu, M. Heyl, T. Ozawa, N. Goldman, and J. Cai, Quantum Fisher information measurement and verification of the quantum Cramér–Rao bound in a solid-state qubit, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 56 (2022).
  28. B. Mera, A. Zhang, and N. Goldman, Relating the topology of Dirac Hamiltonians to quantum geometry: When the quantum metric dictates Chern numbers and winding numbers, SciPost Phys. 12, 018 (2022).
  29. M. Yu, X. Li, Y. Chu, B. Mera, F. N. Ünal, P. Yang, Y. Liu, N. Goldman, and J. Cai, Experimental demonstration of topological bounds in quantum metrology, Nat. Sci. Rev. 11 nwae065 (2024).
  30. T. B. Wahl, W. J. Jankowski, A. Bouhon, G. Chaudhary, and R.-J. Slager, Exact projected entangled pair ground states with topological Euler invariant, Nat. Commun. 16, 284 (2025).
  31. C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
  32. S. Sarkar, C. Mukhopadhyay, A. Alase, and A. Bayat, Free-fermionic topological quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 090503 (2022).
  33. J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 023001 (2020).
  34. C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005).
  35. C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).
  36. S. Murakami, Quantum spin Hall effect and enhanced magnetic response by spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 236805 (2006).
  37. I. K. Drozdov, A. Alexandradinata, S. Jeon, S. Nadj-Perge, H. Ji, R. J. Cava, B. Andrei Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, One-dimensional topological edge states of bismuth bilayers, Nat. Phys. 10, 664 (2014).
  38. S. Ito, B. Feng, M. Arita, A. Takayama, R.-Y. Liu, T. Someya, W.-C. Chen, T. Iimori, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, C.-M. Cheng, S.-J. Tang, F. Komori, K. Kobayashi, T.-C. Chiang, and I. Matsuda, Proving nontrivial topology of pure bismuth by quantum confinement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 236402 (2016).
  39. L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump, Phys. Rev. B 74, 195312 (2006).
  40. E. Prodan, Robustness of the spin-Chern number, Phys. Rev. B 80, 125327 (2009).
  41. B. Peng, G. F. Lange, D. Bennett, K. Wang, R.-J. Slager, and B. Monserrat, Photoinduced electronic and spin topological phase transitions in monolayer bismuth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 116601 (2024).
  42. G. F. Lange, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, Spin texture as a bulk indicator of fragile topology, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033013 (2023).
  43. R. González-Hernández and B. Uribe, Average spin Chern number, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125129 (2024).
  44. K.-S. Lin, G. Palumbo, Z. Guo, Y. Hwang, J. Blackburn, D. P. Shoemaker, F. Mahmood, Z. Wang, G. A. Fiete, B. J. Wieder, and B. Bradlyn, Spin-resolved topology and partial axion angles in three-dimensional insulators, Nat. Commun. 15, 550 (2024).
  45. D. N. Sheng, Z. Y. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. D. M. Haldane, Quantum spin-Hall effect and topologically invariant Chern numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036808 (2006).
  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/zlxq-fxgc for details on the properties of the projected spin operator (Sec. I), derivation of spin-resolved quantum geometric bounds (Sec. II), connections of spin-resolved geometry to quantum geometry (Sec. III), effects of spin-orbit coupling and spin-orbit entanglement (Sec. IV), optical responses due to spin-resolved quantum geometry (Sec. V), details of first-principles calculations (Sec. VI), quantum metrology with spin-resolved geometry (Sec. VII), spin-resolved geometry in minimal models realizing spin topology (Sec. VIII), real-space formulation of spin-resolved geometry and spin-topological bounds in the presence of disorder (Sec. IX), and numerical details on the disorder calculations (Sec. X). The Supplemental Material also contains Refs. [62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76].
  47. Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Fundamental bound on topological gap, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011052 (2024).
  48. A. Bouhon, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and R.-J. Slager, Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band representations and topological crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 100, 195135 (2019).
  49. T. Nagao, J. T. Sadowski, M. Saito, S. Yaginuma, Y. Fujikawa, T. Kogure, T. Ohno, Y. Hasegawa, S. Hasegawa, and T. Sakurai, Nanofilm allotrope and phase transformation of ultrathin Bi film on Si(111)−7×7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 105501 (2004).
  50. S. Singh, Z. Zanolli, M. Amsler, B. Belhadji, J. O. Sofo, M. J. Verstraete, and A. H. Romero, Low-energy phases of Bi monolayer predicted by structure search in two dimensions, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 7324 (2019).
  51. Y. Bai, L. Cai, N. Mao, R. Li, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and C. Niu, Doubled quantum spin Hall effect with high-spin Chern number in α-antimonene and α-bismuthene, Phys. Rev. B 105, 195142 (2022).
  52. S. H. Simon and M. S. Rudner, Contrasting lattice geometry dependent versus independent quantities: Ramifications for Berry curvature, energy gaps, and dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 102, 165148 (2020).
  53. N. Baù and A. Marrazzo, Theory of local Z2 topological markers for finite and periodic two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054203 (2024).
  54. R. Favata and A. Marrazzo, Single-point spin Chern number in a supercell framework, Electron. Struct. 5, 014005 (2023).
  55. D. Ceresoli and R. Resta, Orbital magnetization and Chern number in a supercell framework: Single k-point formula, Phys. Rev. B 76, 012405 (2007).
  56. A. Johan Skarpeid, H. G. Hugdal, T. Salamone, M. Amundsen, and S. H. Jacobsen, Non-constant geometric curvature for tailored spin–orbit coupling and chirality in superconductor-magnet heterostructures, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 235302 (2024).
  57. J. Herzog-Arbeitman, V. Peri, F. Schindler, S. D. Huber, and B. A. Bernevig, Superfluid weight bounds from symmetry and quantum geometry in flat bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 087002 (2022).
  58. W. J. Jankowski, J. J. P. Thompson, B. Monserrat, and R.-J. Slager, Excitonic topology and quantum geometry in organic semiconductors, Nat. Commun. 16, 4661 (2025).
  59. J. J. P. Thompson, W. J. Jankowski, R.-J. Slager, and B. Monserrat, Topologically-enhanced exciton transport, arXiv:2410.00967.
  60. D. Bałut, B. Bradlyn, and P. Abbamonte, Quantum entanglement and quantum geometry measured with inelastic X-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125161 (2025).
  61. M. Kang, S. Kim, Y. Qian, P. M. Neves, L. Ye, J. Jung, D. Puntel, F. Mazzola, S. Fang, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, J. Fuji, I. Vobornik, J.-H. Park, J. G. Checkelsky, B.-J. Yang, and R. Comin, Measurements of the quantum geometric tensor in solids, Nat. Phys. 21, 110 (2025).
  62. M. Lysne, M. Schüler, and P. Werner, Quantum optics measurement scheme for quantum geometry and topological invariants, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 156901 (2023).
  63. R. Bianco and R. Resta, Mapping topological order in coordinate space, Phys. Rev. B 84, 241106 (2011).
  64. T. Ozawa and N. Goldman, Extracting the quantum metric tensor through periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B 97, 201117 (2018).
  65. S. Kivelson, Wannier functions in one-dimensional disordered systems: Application to fractionally charged solitons, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4269 (1982).
  66. P. Giannozzi et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
  67. P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonfà, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Ferrari Ruffino, A. Ferretti, N. Marzari, I. Timrov, A. Urru, and S. Baroni, quantum espresso toward the exascale, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 154105 (2020).
  68. T. Sohier, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Density functional perturbation theory for gated two-dimensional heterostructures: Theoretical developments and application to flexural phonons in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075448 (2017).
  69. A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90.: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008).
  70. A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309 (2014).
  71. G. Pizzi et al., wannier90 as a community code: New features and applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020).
  72. J. Henke, M. Kurttutan, J. Kruthoff, and J. van Wezel, Topological invariants of rotationally symmetric crystals, Phys. Rev. B 104, L201110 (2021).
  73. X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085308 (2006).
  74. A. Marrazzo and R. Resta, Local theory of the insulating state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 166602 (2019).
  75. M. S. M. de Sousa, A. L. Cruz, and W. Chen, Mapping quantum geometry and quantum phase transitions to real space by a fidelity marker, Phys. Rev. B 107, 205133 (2023).
  76. N. Baù and A. Marrazzo, Local Chern marker for periodic systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014206 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation