Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

From coupled Z3 Rabi models to the Z3 Potts model

Anatoliy I. Lotkov1,*, Valerii K. Kozin1, Denis V. Kurlov1, Jelena Klinovaja1, and Daniel Loss1,2,3,4

  • *Contact author: anatolii.lotkov@unibas.ch

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 043046 – Published 14 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ybt7-yh9v

Abstract

We study a Z3-symmetric Rabi model that describes a three-level system coupled to two bosonic modes. We derive a mapping of the two-mode Z3 Rabi model onto a qubit-boson ring. This mapping allows us to formulate a realistic implementation of the Z3 Rabi model based on superconducting qubits. It also provides context for the previously proposed optomechanical implementation of the Z3 Rabi model. In addition, we propose a physical implementation of the Z3 Potts model via a coupled chain of Z3 Rabi models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (85)

  1. W. L. Tan, P. Becker, F. Liu, G. Pagano, K. S. Collins, A. De, L. Feng, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, R. Lundgren, W. Morong, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Domain-wall confinement and dynamics in a quantum simulator, Nat. Phys. 17, 742 (2021).
  2. A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, G. Pagano, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal, Science 372, 1192 (2021).
  3. T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Probing Rényi entanglement entropy via randomized measurements, Science 364, 260 (2019).
  4. J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature (London) 543, 217 (2017).
  5. E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature (London) 534, 516 (2016).
  6. M. Meth, J. Zhang, J. F. Haase, C. Edmunds, L. Postler, A. J. Jena, A. Steiner, L. Dellantonio, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, T. Monz, P. Schindler, C. Muschik, and M. Ringbauer, Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer, Nat. Phys. 21, 570 (2025).
  7. I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 857 (2020).
  8. G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  9. P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. Läuchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature (London) 595, 233 (2021).
  10. T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koyluoglu, J. Feldmeier, P. E. Dolgirev, N. Maskara, M. Kalinowski, S. Sachdev, D. A. Huse, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum coarsening and collective dynamics on a programmable simulator, Nature (London) 638, 86 (2025).
  11. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  12. J. P. Dehollain, U. Mukhopadhyay, V. P. Michal, Y. Wang, B. Wunsch, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, M. S. Rudner, E. Demler, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Nagaoka ferromagnetism observed in a quantum dot plaquette, Nature (London) 579, 528 (2020).
  13. T. Hensgens, T. Fujita, L. Janssen, X. Li, C. J. Van Diepen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, S. Das Sarma, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Quantum simulation of a Fermi–Hubbard model using a semiconductor quantum dot array, Nature (London) 548, 70 (2017).
  14. M. Kiczynski, S. K. Gorman, H. Geng, M. B. Donnelly, Y. Chung, Y. He, J. G. Keizer, and M. Y. Simmons, Engineering topological states in atom-based semiconductor quantum dots, Nature (London) 606, 694 (2022).
  15. C. J. van Diepen, T.-K. Hsiao, U. Mukhopadhyay, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain with gate-defined quantum dots, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041025 (2021).
  16. X. Wang, E. Khatami, F. Fei, J. Wyrick, P. Namboodiri, R. Kashid, A. F. Rigosi, G. Bryant, and R. Silver, Experimental realization of an extended Fermi-Hubbard model using a 2D lattice of dopant-based quantum dots, Nat. Commun. 13, 6824 (2022).
  17. C.-A. Wang, C. Déprez, H. Tidjani, W. I. L. Lawrie, N. W. Hendrickx, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, Probing resonating valence bonds on a programmable germanium quantum simulator, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 58 (2023).
  18. P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter, B. Royer, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, Y. Salathé, A. Akin, S. Storz, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons, Nature (London) 558, 264 (2018).
  19. A. F. van Loo, A. Fedorov, K. Lalumière, B. C. Sanders, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms, Science 342, 1494 (2013).
  20. O. Astafiev, A. M. Zagoskin, A. A. Abdumalikov, Yu. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Resonance fluorescence of a single artificial atom, Science 327, 840 (2010).
  21. J. Braumüller, M. Marthaler, A. Schneider, A. Stehli, H. Rotzinger, M. Weides, and A. V. Ustinov, Analog quantum simulation of the Rabi model in the ultra-strong coupling regime, Nat. Commun. 8, 779 (2017).
  22. D. Braak, Integrability of the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 100401 (2011).
  23. M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015).
  24. Y.-H. Chen, W. Qin, X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Shortcuts to adiabaticity for the quantum Rabi model: Efficient generation of giant entangled cat states via parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023602 (2021).
  25. M.-J. Hwang and M.-S. Choi, Large-scale maximal entanglement and Majorana bound states in coupled circuit quantum electrodynamic systems, Phys. Rev. B 87, 125404 (2013).
  26. V. V. Albert, Quantum Rabi model for N-state atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 180401 (2012).
  27. Y.-Z. Zhang, ZN symmetric chiral Rabi model: A new N-level system, Ann. Phys. 347, 122 (2014).
  28. D. Sedov, V. Kozin, and I. Iorsh, Chiral waveguide optomechanics: First order quantum phase transitions with Z3 symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 263606 (2020).
  29. V. K. Kozin, D. Miserev, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Quantum phase transitions and cat states in cavity-coupled quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033188 (2024).
  30. M. M. Wauters, L. Maffi, and M. Burrello, Engineering a Josephson junction chain for the simulation of the clock model Phys. Rev. B 111, 045418 (2025).
  31. A. I. Lotkov, D. V. Kurlov, V. K. Kozin, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Cat states in one- and two-mode Z3 Rabi models, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 023152 (2026).
  32. Note that we use hats to distinguish the boson operators, â,â†,x̂,p̂.
  33. The X and Z matrices allow us to generalize the qubit Pauli group G2=〈±ijωzkωxl〉j,k,l=01 to the qutrit Pauli group G3=〈±ωjZkXl〉j,k,l=02. The Z3 symmetry group in a qutrit degree of freedom appears naturally as a part of the qutrit Pauli group G3. Strictly speaking, there are two Z3 subgroups in the G3 group: these are generated by the powers of the matrix X and Z. While both subgroups are conjugate to each other, here we choose the subgroup generated by the Z-matrix, Z3=〈Zk〉k=02.
  34. J. Casanova, G. Romero, I. Lizuain, J. J. García-Ripoll, and E. Solano, Deep strong coupling regime of the Jaynes-Cummings model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 263603 (2010).
  35. P. Forn-Díaz, J. J. García-Ripoll, B. Peropadre, J.-L. Orgiazzi, M. A. Yurtalan, R. Belyansky, C. M. Wilson, and A. Lupascu, Ultrastrong coupling of a single artificial atom to an electromagnetic continuum in the nonperturbative regime, Nat. Phys. 13, 39 (2017).
  36. A. Ciani, D. P. DiVincenzo, and B. M. Terhal, Lecture Notes on Quantum Electrical Circuits (TU Delft OPEN Publishing, Delft, The Netherlands, 2024).
  37. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Quantum computation with quantum dots, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
  38. S. Bosco, P. Scarlino, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Fully tunable longitudinal spin-photon interactions in Si and Ge quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 066801 (2022).
  39. S. Felicetti, G. Romero, E. Solano, and C. Sabín, Quantum Rabi model in a superfluid Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 96, 033839 (2017).
  40. I. C. Skogvoll, J. Lidal, J. Danon, and A. Kamra, Tunable anisotropic quantum Rabi model via a magnon–spin-qubit ensemble, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 064008 (2021).
  41. T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. Hümmer, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys. 6, 772 (2010).
  42. F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys. 13, 44 (2017).
  43. E. Vlasiuk, V. K. Kozin, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, I. V. Iorsh, and I. V. Tokatly, Cavity-induced charge transfer in periodic systems: Length-gauge formalism, Phys. Rev. B 108, 085410 (2023).
  44. Z. Chen, Y. Wang, T. Li, L. Tian, Y. Qiu, K. Inomata, F. Yoshihara, S. Han, F. Nori, J. S. Tsai, and J. Q. You, Single-photon-driven high-order sideband transitions in an ultrastrongly coupled circuit-quantum-electrodynamics system, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012325 (2017).
  45. L. S. Ricco, V. K. Kozin, A. C. Seridonio, and I. A. Shelykh, Reshaping the Jaynes-Cummings ladder with Majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. A 106, 023702 (2022).
  46. V. Bouchiat, D. Vion, P. Joyez, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum coherence with a single Cooper pair, Phys. Scr. T76, 165 (1998).
  47. Y. Nakamura, Y. A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box, Nature (London) 398, 786 (1999).
  48. K. W. Lehnert, K. Bladh, L. F. Spietz, D. Gunnarsson, D. I. Schuster, P. Delsing, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Measurement of the excited-state lifetime of a microelectronic circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027002 (2003).
  49. Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001).
  50. J. Siewert, R. Fazio, G. M. Palma, and E. Sciacca, Aspects of qubit dynamics in the presence of leakage, J. Low Temp. Phys. 118, 795 (2000).
  51. S. E. Rasmussen, K. S. Christensen, and N. T. Zinner, Controllable two-qubit swapping gate using superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. B 99, 134508 (2019).
  52. S. E. Shafranjuk, Two-qubit gate based on a multiterminal double-barrier Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B 74, 024521 (2006).
  53. M. Allman, J. Whittaker, M. Castellanos-Beltran, K. Cicak, F. da Silva, M. DeFeo, F. Lecocq, A. Sirois, J. Teufel, J. Aumentado, and R. Simmonds, Tunable resonant and nonresonant interactions between a phase qubit and LC resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 123601 (2014).
  54. Y. Hu, Y.-F. Xiao, Z.-W. Zhou, and G.-C. Guo, Controllable coupling of superconducting transmission-line resonators, Phys. Rev. A 75, 012314 (2007).
  55. M. T. Bell, I. A. Sadovskyy, L. B. Ioffe, A. Yu. Kitaev, and M. E. Gershenson, Quantum superinductor with tunable nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137003 (2012).
  56. N. A. Masluk, I. M. Pop, A. Kamal, Z. K. Minev, and M. H. Devoret, Microwave characterization of Josephson junction arrays: Implementing a low loss superinductance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137002 (2012).
  57. M. Peruzzo, A. Trioni, F. Hassani, M. Zemlicka, and J. M. Fink, Surpassing the resistance quantum with a geometric superinductor, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 044055 (2020).
  58. L. Grünhaupt, M. Spiecker, D. Gusenkova, N. Maleeva, S. T. Skacel, I. Takmakov, F. Valenti, P. Winkel, H. Rotzinger, W. Wernsdorfer, A. V. Ustinov, and I. M. Pop, Granular aluminium as a superconducting material for high-impedance quantum circuits, Nat. Mater. 18, 816 (2019).
  59. I. V. Pechenezhskiy, R. A. Mencia, L. B. Nguyen, Y.-H. Lin, and V. E. Manucharyan, The superconducting quasicharge qubit, Nature (London) 585, 368 (2020).
  60. S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, Schrieffer–Wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems, Ann. Phys. 326, 2793 (2011).
  61. F. Y. Wu, The Potts model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982).
  62. R. J. Baxter, Critical antiferromagnetic square-lattice Potts model, Proc. R. Soc. A 383, 43 (1982).
  63. D. Aharonov, I. Arad, E. Eban, and Z. Landau, Polynomial quantum algorithms for additive approximations of the Potts model and other points of the Tutte plane, arXiv:quant-ph/0702008.
  64. S. Okada, M. Ohzeki, and K. Tanaka, Efficient quantum and simulated annealing of Potts models using a half-hot constraint, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 094801 (2020).
  65. V. K. Kozin, E. Thingstad, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Cavity-enhanced superconductivity via band engineering, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035410 (2025).
  66. V. K. Kozin, D. Miserev, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Schottky anomaly in a cavity-coupled double quantum well, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033239 (2025).
  67. C. Schneider, D. Porras, and T. Schaetz, Experimental quantum simulations of many-body physics with trapped ions, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 024401 (2012).
  68. L. Timm, Dynamics of ion Coulomb crystals, Doctoral thesis, Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, 2023.
  69. A. Bermudez, T. Schaetz, and D. Porras, Synthetic gauge fields for vibrational excitations of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 150501 (2011).
  70. B. Vermersch, T. Ramos, P. Hauke, and P. Zoller, Implementation of chiral quantum optics with Rydberg and trapped-ion setups, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063830 (2016).
  71. P. Roushan, C. Neill, A. Megrant, Y. Chen, R. Babbush, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, et al., Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a synthetic magnetic field, Nat. Phys. 13, 146 (2017).
  72. P. Kiefer, F. Hakelberg, M. Wittemer, A. Bermúdez, D. Porras, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Floquet-engineered vibrational dynamics in a two-dimensional array of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213605 (2019).
  73. O. Băzăvan, S. Saner, E. Tirrito, G. Araneda, R. Srinivas, and A. Bermudez, Synthetic Z2 gauge theories based on parametric excitations of trapped ions, Commun. Phys. 7, 229 (2024).
  74. E. Kapit, Quantum simulation architecture for lattice bosons in arbitrary, tunable, external gauge fields, Phys. Rev. A 87, 062336 (2013).
  75. K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconfigurable Josephson circulator/directional amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015).
  76. X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-X. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rep. 718–719, 1 (2017).
  77. X. Cao, A. Irfan, M. Mollenhauer, K. Singirikonda, and W. Pfaff, Parametrically controlled chiral interface for superconducting quantum devices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064023 (2024).
  78. P. Fendley, Parafermionic edge zero modes in Zn-invariant spin chains, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P11020.
  79. F. Ronetti, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Clock model and parafermions in Rashba nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235410 (2021).
  80. A. Calzona, T. Meng, M. Sassetti, and T. L. Schmidt, Z4 parafermions in one-dimensional fermionic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 98, 201110(R) (2018).
  81. L. Mazza, F. Iemini, M. Dalmonte, and C. Mora, Nontopological parafermions in a one-dimensional fermionic model with even multiplet pairing, Phys. Rev. B 98, 201109 (2018).
  82. A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys.-Usp. 44, 131 (2001).
  83. E. Fradkin and L. P. Kadanoff, Disorder variables and para-fermions in two-dimensional statistical mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 170, 1 (1980).
  84. M. Valentini, O. Sagi, L. Baghumyan, T. de Gijsel, J. Jung, S. Calcaterra, A. Ballabio, J. Aguilera Servin, K. Aggarwal, M. Janik, T. Adletzberger, R. Seoane Souto, M. Leijnse, J. Danon, C. Schrade, E. Bakkers, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, and G. Katsaros, Parity-conserving Cooper-pair transport and ideal superconducting diode in planar germanium, Nat. Commun. 15, 169 (2024).
  85. To not overcomplicate the notation, here we denote Sz(t)=eiHQB,distSz(k=0)e−iHQB,dist.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation