- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Feasibility of multi-gigahertz satellite-to-ground secure quantum communication

Oliver M. Crampton1,2,*, Thomas Roger1, Chithrabhanu Perumangatt1, Ravinder Singh1, Robert I. Woodward1, Davide G. Marangon1, Ross J. Donaldson2, R. Mark Stevenson1, and Andrew J. Shields1

  • *Contact author: omc2000@hw.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023256 – Published 8 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y12y-yk88

Abstract

We investigate the feasibility of satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution (QKD) at multi-GHz clock rates, where secure key generation time is constrained, due to low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite overpasses (≈300 s). Higher repetition rates offer a direct route to increased secure key rate (SKR), though system performance is fundamentally limited by detector timing jitter, optical coupling losses, and atmospheric turbulence, depending on receiver architecture. We combine finite-key modeling, detailed detector timing characterization, adaptive optics (AO) modeling, and real-time free-space QKD experiments at 1 GHz to evaluate practical receiver configurations based on multi-mode fiber-coupled avalanche photodiodes (MMF-APDs) and single-mode fiber-coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SMF-SNSPDs), at projected rates >1 GHz. The results indicate clear operating regimes across a range of atmospheric conditions: MMF-APDs maximize secure key rates below ∼1 GHz, mainly due to their low coupling loss. However, low-jitter SMF-SNSPDs are required to obtain positive key rates at higher clock rates—with modeling and measured timing responses of our hardware indicating an estimated optimal operating point near ∼7.2 GHz—though AO correction is required for effective single-mode coupling under turbulence. The experimental and projected results provide quantitative performance bounds and realistic design targets for future high-rate satellite QKD systems, while highlighting the technological requirements needed to achieve end-to-end operation beyond the GHz regime.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (97)

  1. V. Mavroeidis, K. Vishi, M. D. Zych, and A. Jøsang, The impact of quantum computing on present cryptography, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 9, 405 (2018).
  2. M. Lucamarini, Z. L. Yuan, J. F. Dynes, and A. J. Shields, Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters, Nature (London) 557, 400 (2018).
  3. Y. Li, W.-Q. Cai, J.-G. Ren, C.-Z. Wang, M. Yang, L. Zhang, H.-Y. Wu, L. Chang, J.-C. Wu, B. Jin et al., Microsatellite-based real-time quantum key distribution, Nature (London) 640, 47 (2025).
  4. C. Bonato, A. Tomaello, V. Da Deppo, G. Naletto, and P. Villoresi, Feasibility of satellite quantum key distribution, New J. Phys. 11, 045017 (2009).
  5. J. Sidhu, T. Brougham, D. McArthur, R. Pousa, and D. Oi, Finite key effects in satellite quantum key distribution, npj Quantum Inf 8, 18 (2022).
  6. T. Islam, J. S. Sidhu, B. L. Higgins, T. Brougham, T. Vergoossen, D. K. Oi, T. Jennewein, and A. Ling, Finite-resource performance of small-satellite-based quantum-key-distribution missions, PRX Quantum 5, 030101 (2024).
  7. R. J. Hughes, W. T. Buttler, P. G. Kwiat, S. K. Lamoreaux, G. G. Luther, G. L. Morgan, J. E. Nordholt, and C. G. Peterson, Quantum cryptography for secure free-space communications, in Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XI, edited by G. S. Mecherle (SPIE, San Jose, CA, United States, 1999), Vol. 3615, pp. 98–103.
  8. A. Tomaello, C. Bonato, V. Da Deppo, G. Naletto, and P. Villoresi, Link budget and background noise for satellite quantum key distribution, Adv. Space Res. 47, 802 (2011).
  9. J.-P. Bourgoin, N. Gigov, B. L. Higgins, Z. Yan, E. Meyer-Scott, A. K. Khandani, N. Lütkenhaus, and T. Jennewein, Experimental quantum key distribution with simulated ground-to-satellite photon losses and processing limitations, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052339 (2015).
  10. V. M. Acosta, D. Dequal, M. Schiavon, A. Montmerle-Bonnefois, C. B. Lim, J.-M. Conan, and E. Diamanti, Analysis of satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution with adaptive optics, New J. Phys. 26, 023039 (2024).
  11. S.-K. Liao, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Li, J.-G. Ren, J. Yin, Q. Shen, Y. Cao, Z.-P. Li et al., Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution, Nature (London) 549, 43 (2017).
  12. J.-G. Ren, P. Xu, H.-L. Yong, L. Zhang, S.-K. Liao, J. Yin, W.-Y. Liu, W.-Q. Cai, M. Yang, L. Li et al., Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation, Nature (London) 549, 70 (2017).
  13. C.-Y. Lu, Y. Cao, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, Micius quantum experiments in space, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035001 (2022).
  14. T. Roger, R. Singh, C. Perumangatt, D. G. Marangon, M. Sanzaro, P. R. Smith, R. I. Woodward, and A. J. Shields, Real-time gigahertz free-space quantum key distribution within an emulated satellite overpass, Sci. Adv. 9, eadj5873 (2023).
  15. F. Grünenfelder, A. Boaron, D. Rusca, A. Martin, and H. Zbinden, Performance and security of 5 GHz repetition rate polarization-based quantum key distribution, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 144003 (2020).
  16. Z.-X. Wang, H.-X. Xu, J. Li, H.-C. Yu, J.-Q. Huang, H. Han, C.-L. Wang, P. Zhang, F.-F. Yin, K. Xu et al., 10 GHz robust polarization modulation towards high-speed satellite-based quantum communication, EPJ Quantum Technol. 12, 47 (2025).
  17. G. Buller and R. Collins, Single-photon generation and detection, Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 012002 (2010).
  18. R. Bedington, J. M. Arrazola, and A. Ling, Progress in satellite quantum key distribution, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 30 (2017).
  19. S. Ecker, B. Liu, J. Handsteiner, M. Fink, D. Rauch, F. Steinlechner, T. Scheidl, A. Zeilinger, and R. Ursin, Strategies for achieving high key rates in satellite-based QKD, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 5 (2021).
  20. B. Korzh, Q.-Y. Zhao, J. P. Allmaras, S. Frasca, T. M. Autry, E. A. Bersin, A. D. Beyer, R. M. Briggs, B. Bumble, M. Colangelo, et al., Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector, Nat. Photon. 14, 250 (2020).
  21. D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and V. B. Verma, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm, Optica 7, 1649 (2020).
  22. M. T. Gruneisen, B. A. Sickmiller, M. B. Flanagan, J. P. Black, K. E. Stoltenberg, and A. W. Duchane, Adaptive spatial filtering for daytime satellite quantum key distribution, in Emerging Technologies in Security and Defence II; and Quantum-Physics-Based Information Security III, edited by K. L. Lewis, R. C. Hollins, T. J. Merlet, A. Toet, M. T. Gruneisen, M. Dusek, and J. G. Rarity (SPIE, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2014), Vol. 9254, pp. 7–20.
  23. M. T. Gruneisen, M. B. Flanagan, and B. A. Sickmiller, Modeling satellite-Earth quantum channel downlinks with adaptive-optics coupling to single-mode fibers, Opt. Eng. 56, 1 (2017).
  24. C. B. Lim, A. Montmerle-Bonnefois, C. Petit, J.-F. Sauvage, S. Meimon, P. Perrault, F. Mendez, B. Fleury, J. Montri, J.-M. Conan et al., Single-mode fiber coupling with adaptive optics for free-space optical communication under strong scintillation, in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) (IEEE, Portland, OR, USA, 2019), pp. 1–6.
  25. M. Chen, C. Liu, and H. Xian, Experimental demonstration of single-mode fiber coupling over relatively strong turbulence with adaptive optics, Appl. Opt. 54, 8722 (2015).
  26. Y. Bian, Y. Li, E. Chen, W. Li, X. Hong, J. Qiu, and J. Wu, Free-space to single-mode fiber coupling efficiency with optical system aberration and fiber positioning error under atmospheric turbulence, J. Opt. 24, 025703 (2022).
  27. D. Zheng, Y. Li, E. Chen, B. Li, D. Kong, W. Li, and J. Wu, Free-space to few-mode-fiber coupling under atmospheric turbulence, Opt. Express 24, 18739 (2016).
  28. Y. Dikmelik and F. M. Davidson, Fiber-coupling efficiency for free-space optical communication through atmospheric turbulence, Appl. Opt. 44, 4946 (2005).
  29. J. Ma, L. Ma, Q. Yang, and Q. Ran, Statistical model of the efficiency for spatial light coupling into a single-mode fiber in the presence of atmospheric turbulence, Appl. Opt. 54, 9287 (2015).
  30. L. Zhang, M. Gu, T. Jia, R. Xu, C. Wan, L. Kang, J. Chen, and P. Wu, Multimode fiber coupled superconductor nanowire single-photon detector, IEEE Photonics J. 6, 1 (2014).
  31. J. Chang, I. E. Zadeh, J. W. N. Los, J. Zichi, A. Fognini, M. Gevers, S. Dorenbos, S. F. Pereira, P. Urbach, and V. Zwiller, Multimode-fiber-coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with high detection efficiency and time resolution, Appl. Opt. 58, 9803 (2019).
  32. F. Fleming, W. McCutcheon, E. E. Wollman, A. D. Beyer, V. Anant, B. Korzh, J. P. Allmaras, L. Narváez, S. Leedumrongwatthanakun, G. S. Buller, M. Malik, and M. D. Shaw, High-efficiency, high-count-rate 2D superconducting nanowire single-photon detector array, Opt. Express 33, 27602 (2025).
  33. N. Calandri, Q.-Y. Zhao, D. Zhu, A. Dane, and K. K. Berggren, Superconducting nanowire detector jitter limited by detector geometry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 152601 (2016).
  34. M. Lucamarini, K. Patel, J. Dynes, B. Fröhlich, A. Sharpe, A. Dixon, Z. Yuan, R. Penty, and A. Shields, Efficient decoy-state quantum key distribution with quantified security, Opt. Express 21, 24550 (2013).
  35. X. Ma, B. Qi, Y. Zhao, and H.-K. Lo, Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012326 (2005).
  36. A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
  37. F. M. Davidson and X. Sun, Gaussian approximation versus nearly exact performance analysis of optical communication systems with PPM signaling and APD receivers, IEEE Trans. Commun. 36, 1185 (1988).
  38. P. J. Clarke, R. J. Collins, P. A. Hiskett, M.-J. García-Martínez, N. J. Krichel, A. McCarthy, M. G. Tanner, J. A. O’Connor, C. M. Natarajan, S. Miki et al., Analysis of detector performance in a gigahertz clock rate quantum key distribution system, New J. Phys. 13, 075008 (2011).
  39. M. Stipčević, D. Wang, and R. Ursin, Characterization of a commercially available large area, high detection efficiency single-photon avalanche diode, J. Lightwave Technol. 31, 3591 (2013).
  40. A. Ingargiola, M. Assanelli, A. Gallivanoni, I. Rech, M. Ghioni, and S. Cova, Avalanche buildup and propagation effects on photon-timing jitter in Si-SPAD with non-uniform electric field, in Advanced Photon Counting Techniques III, edited by M. A. Itzler and J. C. Campbell (SPIE, Orlando, Florida, 2009), Vol. 7320, pp. 103–114.
  41. M. Sidorova, A. Semenov, A. Kuzmin, I. Charaev, S. Doerner, and M. Siegel, Intrinsic jitter in photon detection by straight superconducting nanowires, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 1 (2018).
  42. T. Seki, H. Shibata, H. Takesue, Y. Tokura, and N. Imoto, Comparison of timing jitter between NbN superconducting single-photon detector and avalanche photodiode, Physica C 470, 1534 (2010).
  43. F. Rosset, A. Pilotto, L. Selmi, M. Antonelli, F. Arfelli, G. Biasiol, G. Cautero, D. De Angelis, F. Driussi, R. Menk et al., A model for the jitter of avalanche photodiodes with separate absorption and multiplication regions, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 977, 164346 (2020).
  44. F. Sun, Y. Xu, Z. Wu, and J. Zhang, A simple analytic modeling method for SPAD timing jitter prediction, IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 7, 261 (2019).
  45. A. Lee, A. T. Castillo, C. Whitehill, and R. Donaldson, Quantum bit error rate timing jitter dependency on multi-mode fibers, Opt. Express 31, 6076 (2023).
  46. A. R. Pérez, M. F. V. Suárez, A. P. Serrano, J. M. G. Tijero, and I. E. Moscardo, Characterization of optical pulses generated by gain switching a 1310 nm VCSEL, in X Reunión Española de Optoelectrónica OPTOEL2017, 12-14 Julio, Santiago de Compostela (2017).
  47. G. Hasnain, J. Wiesenfeld, T. Damen, J. Shah, J. Wynn, Y. Wang, and A. Cho, Electrically gain-switched vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 4, 6 (2002).
  48. K. M. Krishna, M. G. Madhan, and P. Ashok, Study of gain switching in vertical cavity surface emitting laser under different electrical pulse inputs, Def. Sci. J. 70, 538 (2020).
  49. P. Pepeljugoski, J. Lin, J. Gamelin, M. Hong, and K. Lau, Ultralow timing jitter in electrically gain-switched vertical cavity surface emitting lasers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1588 (1993).
  50. P. Pepeljugoski, D. Cutrer, and K. Lau, 3.4 ps wide compressed optical pulses from electrically gain-switched vertical cavity surface emitting laser, Electron. Lett. 30, 491 (1994).
  51. A. Asahara, S. Chen, T. Ito, M. Yoshita, W. Liu, B. Zhang, T. Suemoto, and H. Akiyama, Direct generation of 2-ps blue pulses from gain-switched InGaN VCSEL assessed by up-conversion technique, Sci. Rep. 4, 6401 (2014).
  52. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/y12y-yk88 for additional data, supporting figures, and experimental methods.
  53. I. Khader, H. Bergeron, L. C. Sinclair, W. C. Swann, N. R. Newbury, and J.-D. Deschênes, Time synchronization over a free-space optical communication channel, Optica 5, 1542 (2018).
  54. K. U. Schreiber, I. Prochazka, P. Lauber, U. Hugentobler, W. Schafer, L. Cacciapuoti, and R. Nasca, Ground-based demonstration of the European Laser Timing (ELT) experiment, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57, 728 (2010).
  55. T. Ritz, D. Coogan, J. W. Conklin, J. T. Coffaro, P. Serra, S. Nydam, J. Hanson, A. N. Nguyen, C. Priscal, J. Stupl et al., Laser time-transfer facility and preliminary results from the CHOMPTT CubeSat mission, Adv. Space Res. 71, 4498 (2023).
  56. I. Prochazka and F. Yang, Photon counting module for laser time transfer via Earth orbiting satellite, J. Mod. Opt. 56, 253 (2009).
  57. H. Dai, Q. Shen, C.-Z. Wang, S.-L. Li, W.-Y. Liu, W.-Q. Cai, S.-K. Liao, J.-G. Ren, J. Yin, Y.-A. Chen et al., Towards satellite-based quantum-secure time transfer, Nat. Phys. 16, 848 (2020).
  58. H. Yang, H. Wang, X. Wang, H. Yi, W. Yang, H. Wang, and S. Zhang, Picosecond-precision optical two-way time transfer in free space using flexible binary offset carrier modulation, OSA Continuum 3, 1264 (2020).
  59. F. R. Giorgetta, W. C. Swann, L. C. Sinclair, E. Baumann, I. Coddington, and N. R. Newbury, Optical two-way time and frequency transfer over free space, Nat. Photon. 7, 434 (2013).
  60. I. Karakosta-Amarantidou, R. Yehia, and M. Schiavon, Free-space model for a balloon-based quantum network, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023199 (2025).
  61. A. Scriminich, G. Foletto, F. Picciariello, A. Stanco, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and F. Vedovato, Optimal design and performance evaluation of free-space quantum key distribution systems, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 045029 (2022).
  62. I. Karakosta-Amarantidou, R. Yehia, and M. Schiavon, Balloon_qnet code, Zenodo, 2025, https://zenodo.org/records/15388482.
  63. D. L. Fried, Statistics of a geometric representation of wavefront distortion, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1427 (1965).
  64. S. Arisa, Y. Takayama, H. Endo, R. Shimizu, M. Fujiwara, and M. Sasaki, Coupling efficiency of laser beam to multimode fiber for free space optical communication, in International Conference on Space Optics—ICSO 2014 (SPIE, 2017), Vol. 10563, pp. 264–271.
  65. J. Niu and J. Xu, Coupling efficiency of laser beam to multimode fiber, Opt. Commun. 274, 315 (2007).
  66. M. Diab, A. N. Dinkelaker, J. Davenport, K. Madhav, and M. M. Roth, Starlight coupling through atmospheric turbulence into few-mode fibres and photonic lanterns in the presence of partial adaptive optics correction, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 1557 (2020).
  67. S. Minardi, R. Harris, and L. Labadie, Astrophotonics: Astronomy and modern optics, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 29, 6 (2021).
  68. X. Fan, D. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Yang, and J. Ma, Few-mode fiber coupling efficiency for free-space optical communication, J. Lightwave Technol. 39, 1823 (2021).
  69. V. D. Correia, M. A. Fernandes, P. P. Monteiro, F. P. Guiomar, and G. M. Fernandes, On the impact and mitigation of turbulence in fiber-coupled FSO systems, IEEE Access 12, 69505 (2024).
  70. Y. Dikmelik and F. M. Davidson, Fiber coupling efficiency for free-space optical communication through atmospheric turbulence, in Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XVI, edited by S. Mecherle, C. Y. Young, and J. S. Stryjewski (SPIE, San Jose, CA, 2004), Vol. 5338, pp. 76–80.
  71. S. Selvanandan and P. Anbarasan, Power coupling efficiency enhancement in multimode step-index fiber using refractive and diffractive microlenses, Int. J. Opt. 2010, 1 (2010).
  72. A. H. Fahim Raouf, M. Safari, and M. Uysal, Performance analysis of quantum key distribution in underwater turbulence channels, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37, 564 (2020).
  73. L. Scarfe, F. Hufnagel, M. F. Ferrer-Garcia, A. D’Errico, K. Heshami, and E. Karimi, Fast adaptive optics for high-dimensional quantum communications in turbulent channels, Commun. Phys. 8, 79 (2025).
  74. E. D. Caldwell, W. C. Swann, J. L. Ellis, M. I. Bodine, C. Mak, N. Kuczun, N. R. Newbury, L. C. Sinclair, A. Muschinski, and G. B. Rieker, Optical timing jitter due to atmospheric turbulence: Comparison of frequency comb measurements to predictions from micrometeorological sensors, Opt. Express 28, 26661 (2020).
  75. R. Singh, T. Roger, C. Perumangatt, M. Sanzaro, R. Woodward, and A. Shields, QKD secret key scaling with ground station aperture size and satellite overpass, in Quantum 2.0 (Optica Publishing Group, 2024), pp. QTh3A–38.
  76. B. Qi, C.-H. F. Fung, H.-K. Lo, and X. Ma, Time-shift attack in practical quantum cryptosystems, arXiv:quant-ph/0512080.
  77. Y. Zhao, C.-H. F. Fung, B. Qi, C. Chen, and H.-K. Lo, Quantum hacking: Experimental demonstration of time-shift attack against practical quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A 78, 042333 (2008).
  78. S. Dunne, Rage against the dying of the light: Regulation of light pollution from satellites, U. Ill. L. Rev. 1021 (2023).
  79. D. Vasylyev, W. Vogel, and F. Moll, Satellite-mediated quantum atmospheric links, Phys. Rev. A 99, 053830 (2019).
  80. I. Ali, N. Al-Dhahir, and J. E. Hershey, Predicting the visibility of LEO satellites, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 35, 1183 (2002).
  81. H. Weichel, Laser Beam Propagation in the Atmosphere (SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington, 1990), Vol. 3.
  82. L. C. Andrews and R. L. Phillips, Laser Beam Propagation Through Random Media, 2nd ed. (SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington, 2005).
  83. H. Zhan, E. Wijerathna, and D. Voelz, Is the formulation of the Fried parameter accurate in the strong turbulent scattering regime? OSA Continuum 3, 2653 (2020).
  84. S. Shaklan and F. Roddier, Coupling starlight into single-mode fiber optics, Appl. Opt. 27, 2334 (1988).
  85. R. K. Tyson and B. W. Frazier, Principles of Adaptive Optics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2022).
  86. L. Canuet, N. Védrenne, J.-M. Conan, C. Petit, G. Artaud, A. Rissons, and J. Lacan, Statistical properties of single-mode fiber coupling of satellite-to-ground laser links partially corrected by adaptive optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 35, 148 (2018).
  87. R. J. Noll, Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207 (1976).
  88. G. D. Boreman and C. Dainty, Zernike expansions for non-Kolmogorov turbulence, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 517 (1996).
  89. R. Singh, C. Perumangatt, T. Roger, and A. Shields, Feasibility of real-time satellite to ground QKD, in CLEO: Fundamental Science (Optica Publishing Group, 2023), pp. JW2A–101.
  90. K. Saucke, C. Seiter, F. Heine, M. Gregory, D. Tröndle, E. Fischer, T. Berkefeld, M. Feriencik, M. Feriencik, I. Richter et al., The Tesat transportable adaptive optical ground station, in Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXVIII, edited by H. Hemmati and D. M. Boroson (SPIE, San Francisco, California, 2016), Vol. 9739, pp. 37–47.
  91. K. Saucke, F. Heine, D. Tröndle, P. M. Pimentel, E. Fischer, T. Berkefeld, M. Feriencik, I. Richter, M. Lutzer, and R. Meyer, The Tesat transportable adaptive optical ground station and the operational experiences, in International Conference on Space Optics—ICSO 2016 (SPIE, 2017), Vol. 10562, pp. 1033–1056.
  92. M. Toyoshima, Y. Takayama, T. Takahashi, K. Suzuki, S. Kimura, K. Takizawa, T. Kuri, W. Klaus, M. Toyoda, H. Kunimori et al., Ground-to-satellite laser communication experiments, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 23, 10 (2008).
  93. J.-C. Richard, S. Poulenard, X. Gnata, L. Coret, T. Anfray, M. Crosnier, T. Marduel, L. Zurawski, S. Montigaud, F. Lacoste et al., In-orbit testing of GEO feeder links with TELEO, in International Conference on Space Optics—ICSO 2024 (SPIE, 2025), Vol. 13699, pp. 58–78.
  94. M. Lucamarini, J. F. Dynes, B. Fröhlich, Z. Yuan, and A. J. Shields, Security bounds for efficient decoy-state quantum key distribution, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 21, 197 (2015).
  95. H.-L. Yin, M.-G. Zhou, J. Gu, Y.-M. Xie, Y.-S. Lu, and Z.-B. Chen, Tight security bounds for decoy-state quantum key distribution, Sci. Rep. 10, 14312 (2020).
  96. C. C. W. Lim, M. Curty, N. Walenta, F. Xu, and H. Zbinden, Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022307 (2014).
  97. C. J. Clopper and E. S. Pearson, The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial, Biometrika 26, 404 (1934).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023256– Published 8 June, 2026
  • Received 12 September 2025
  • Accepted 9 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation