Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Tailoring interaction ranges in atom arrays

T. Botzung1, G. Creutzer2, C. Sayrin2,3, and J. Schachenmayer1,*

  • *Contact author: schachenmayer@unistra.fr

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L022019 – Published 30 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xk9t-jhq8

Abstract

We introduce a method to synthetically engineer the range of dipolar interactions in tweezer atom arrays by effectively modifying the electromagnetic environment with far-detuned relay atoms. We derive equations of motion for the atoms of interest after adiabatic elimination of the relay atoms. We show the effectiveness of the scheme for realistic experimental parameter regimes with circular and low-angular-momentum Rydberg-atom states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (85)

  1. M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010).
  2. A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132 (2020).
  3. M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits, AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 023501 (2021).
  4. X. Wu, X. Liang, Y. Tian, F. Yang, C. Chen, Y.-C. Liu, M. K. Tey, and L. You, A concise review of Rydberg atom based quantum computation and quantum simulation, Chin. Phys. B 30, 020305 (2021).
  5. F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Snigirev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033104 (2024).
  6. R. Tao, M. Ammenwerth, F. Gyger, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, High-fidelity detection of large-scale atom arrays in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 013401 (2024).
  7. H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits, Nature 647, 60 (2025).
  8. R. Lin, H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, Z.-R. Zhao, L.-T. Zheng, T.-R. Hu, H.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, W.-J. Ma, Y. Gao, Y.-K. Zhu, Z.-F. Su, W.-L. Ouyang, Y.-C. Zhang, J. Rui, M.-C. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, AI-enabled rapid assembly of thousands of defect-free neutral atom arrays with constant-time-overhead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 060602 (2025).
  9. G. Pichard, D. Lim, E. Bloch, J. Vaneecloo, L. Bourachot, G.-J. Both, G. Mériaux, S. Dutartre, R. Hostein, J. Paris, B. Ximenez, A. Signoles, A. Browaeys, T. Lahaye, and D. Dreon, Rearrangement of individual atoms in a 2000-site optical-tweezer array at cryogenic temperatures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 024073 (2024).
  10. K. Barnes et al., Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits, Nat. Commun. 13, 2779 (2022).
  11. T. M. Graham, L. Phuttitarn, R. Chinnarasu, Y. Song, C. Poole, K. Jooya, J. Scott, A. Scott, P. Eichler, and M. Saffman, Midcircuit measurements on a single-species neutral alkali atom quantum processor, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041051 (2023).
  12. W. Huie, L. Li, N. Chen, X. Hu, Z. Jia, W. K. C. Sun, and J. P. Covey, Repetitive readout and real-time control of nuclear spin qubits in Yb171 atoms, PRX Quantum 4, 030337 (2023).
  13. M. A. Norcia et al., Midcircuit qubit measurement and rearrangement in a Yb171 atomic array, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041034 (2023).
  14. D. Bluvstein et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature (London) 626, 58 (2024).
  15. H. Kim, W. Lee, H.-g. Lee, H. Jo, Y. Song, and J. Ahn, In situ single-atom array synthesis using dynamic holographic optical tweezers, Nat. Commun. 7, 13317 (2016).
  16. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  17. D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016).
  18. D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature (London) 604, 451 (2022).
  19. A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pichler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator, Nature (London) 568, 207 (2019).
  20. S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature (London) 595, 227 (2021).
  21. G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  22. R. M. W. van Bijnen and T. Pohl, Quantum magnetism and topological ordering via Rydberg dressing near Förster resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 243002 (2015).
  23. J. Zeiher, J.-Y. Choi, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Pohl, R. van Bijnen, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Coherent many-body spin dynamics in a long-range interacting Ising chain, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041063 (2017).
  24. S. de Léséleuc, S. Weber, V. Lienhard, D. Barredo, H. P. Büchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Accurate mapping of multilevel Rydberg atoms on interacting spin-1/2 particles for the quantum simulation of Ising models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113602 (2018).
  25. P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. Läuchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature (London) 595, 233 (2021).
  26. S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. Büchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms, Science 365, 775 (2019).
  27. D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and C. S. Adams, Coherent excitation transfer in a spin chain of three Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 113002 (2015).
  28. V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. Weber, D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, R. Bai, N. Lang, M. Fleischhauer, H. P. Büchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Realization of a density-dependent Peierls phase in a synthetic, spin-orbit coupled Rydberg system, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021031 (2020).
  29. Y. Han and W. Yi, Tuning excitation transport in a dissipative Rydberg ring, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 033201 (2024).
  30. P. Li, J. Qian, and W. Zhang, Quantum-preserved transport of excitations in Rydberg-dressed atom arrays, Quantum Front. 4, 5 (2025).
  31. J. Zhang, J. Unmuth-Yockey, J. Zeiher, A. Bazavov, S.-W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, Quantum simulation of the universal features of the Polyakov loop, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 223201 (2018).
  32. A. Celi, B. Vermersch, O. Viyuela, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and P. Zoller, Emerging two-dimensional gauge theories in Rydberg configurable arrays, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021057 (2020).
  33. F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020).
  34. Y. Cheng and H. Zhai, Emergent U(1) lattice gauge theory in Rydberg atom arrays, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 566 (2024).
  35. M. Marcuzzi, J. Minář, D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, H. Labuhn, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, E. Levi, and I. Lesanovsky, Facilitation dynamics and localization phenomena in Rydberg lattice gases with position disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 063606 (2017).
  36. R. Sahay, F. Machado, B. Ye, C. R. Laumann, and N. Y. Yao, Emergent ergodicity at the transition between many-body localized phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 100604 (2021).
  37. S. Haroche, Nobel lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1083 (2013).
  38. A. Facon, E.-K. Dietsche, D. Grosso, S. Haroche, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, A sensitive electrometer based on a Rydberg atom in a Schrödinger-cat state, Nature (London) 535, 262 (2016).
  39. E. K. Dietsche, A. Larrouy, S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, High-sensitivity magnetometry with a single atom in a superposition of two circular Rydberg states, Nat. Phys. 15, 326 (2019).
  40. T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cortiñas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dotsenko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux, Th. Jolicoeur, and M. Brune, Towards quantum simulation with circular Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011032 (2018).
  41. F. Meinert, C. Hölzl, M. A. Nebioglu, A. D’Arnese, P. Karl, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, Indium tin oxide films meet circular Rydberg atoms: Prospects for novel quantum simulation schemes, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023192 (2020).
  42. S. R. Cohen and J. D. Thompson, Quantum computing with circular Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 2, 030322 (2021).
  43. T. Cantat-Moltrecht, R. Cortiñas, B. Ravon, P. Méhaignerie, S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond, M. Favier, M. Brune, and C. Sayrin, Long-lived circular Rydberg states of laser-cooled rubidium atoms in a cryostat, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022032(R) (2020).
  44. J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional Ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins, Nature (London) 484, 489 (2012).
  45. J. Schachenmayer, B. P. Lanyon, C. F. Roos, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth in quench dynamics with variable range interactions, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031015 (2013).
  46. T. Graß and M. Lewenstein, Trapped-ion quantum simulation of tunable-range Heisenberg chains, EPJ Quantum Technol. 1, 1 (2014).
  47. R. Islam, C. Senko, W. C. Campbell, S. Korenblit, J. Smith, A. Lee, E. E. Edwards, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, and C. Monroe, Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interactions in a quantum simulator, Science 340, 583 (2013).
  48. P. Richerme, C. Senko, S. Korenblit, J. Smith, A. Lee, R. Islam, W. C. Campbell, and C. Monroe, Quantum catalysis of magnetic phase transitions in a quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 100506 (2013).
  49. K. Kim, M.-S. Chang, R. Islam, S. Korenblit, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Entanglement and tunable spin-spin couplings between trapped ions using multiple transverse modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 120502 (2009).
  50. C.-C. J. Wang, A. C. Keith, and J. K. Freericks, Phonon-mediated quantum spin simulator employing a planar ionic crystal in a Penning trap, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013422 (2013).
  51. T. G. Walker and M. Saffman, Consequences of Zeeman degeneracy for the van der Waals blockade between Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032723 (2008).
  52. F. Hummel, S. Weber, J. Mögerle, H. Menke, J. King, B. Bloom, S. Hofferberth, and M. Li, Engineering Rydberg-pair interactions in divalent atoms with hyperfine-split ionization thresholds, Phys. Rev. A 110, 042821 (2024).
  53. A. Paris-Mandoki, H. Gorniaczyk, C. Tresp, I. Mirgorodskiy, and S. Hofferberth, Tailoring Rydberg interactions via Förster resonances: state combinations, hopping and angular dependence, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 164001 (2016).
  54. Y. Han, H. Li, and W. Yi, Interaction-enhanced superradiance of a Rydberg-atom array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 243401 (2024).
  55. P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body system, Nature (London) 511, 202 (2014).
  56. P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature (London) 511, 198 (2014).
  57. M. Cheneau, Experimental tests of Lieb-Robinson bounds, in The Physics and Mathematics of Elliott Lieb, edited by R. L. Frank, A. Laptev, M. Lewin, and R. Seiringer (European Mathematical Society—EMS—Publishing House GmbH, Berlin, 2022), pp. 225–245.
  58. C.-F. Chen and A. Lucas, Finite speed of quantum scrambling with long range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250605 (2019).
  59. T. Kuwahara and K. Saito, Strictly linear light cones in long-range interacting systems of arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031010 (2020).
  60. M. C. Tran, C.-F. Chen, A. Ehrenberg, A. Y. Guo, A. Deshpande, Y. Hong, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, and A. Lucas, Hierarchy of linear light cones with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031009 (2020).
  61. M. C. Tran, A. Y. Guo, C. L. Baldwin, A. Ehrenberg, A. V. Gorshkov, and A. Lucas, Lieb-Robinson light cone for power-law interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 160401 (2021).
  62. S. Maity, U. Bhattacharya, and A. Dutta, One-dimensional quantum many body systems with long-range interactions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 013001 (2020).
  63. A. Dutta, Quantum spin glass with long-range random interactions, Phys. Rev. B 65, 224427 (2002).
  64. C. Monthus, Dyson hierarchical long-ranged quantum spin-glass via real-space renormalization, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2015) P10024.
  65. L. Rademaker and D. A. Abanin, Slow nonthermalizing dynamics in a quantum spin glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260405 (2020).
  66. B. Ravon, P. Méhaignerie, Y. Machu, A. D. Hernández, M. Favier, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and C. Sayrin, Array of individual circular Rydberg atoms trapped in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 093401 (2023).
  67. R. H. Lehmberg, Radiation from an N-atom system. I. General formalism, Phys. Rev. A 2, 883 (1970).
  68. W. R. Anderson, J. R. Veale, and T. F. Gallagher, Resonant dipole-dipole energy transfer in a nearly frozen Rydberg gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 249 (1998).
  69. I. Mourachko, D. Comparat, F. de Tomasi, A. Fioretti, P. Nosbaum, V. M. Akulin, and P. Pillet, Many-body effects in a frozen Rydberg gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 253 (1998).
  70. W. R. Anderson, M. P. Robinson, J. D. D. Martin, and T. F. Gallagher, Dephasing of resonant energy transfer in a cold Rydberg gas, Phys. Rev. A 65, 063404 (2002).
  71. M. Mudrich, N. Zahzam, T. Vogt, D. Comparat, and P. Pillet, Back and forth transfer and coherent coupling in a cold Rydberg dipole gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 233002 (2005).
  72. R. Zwanzig, Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 1338 (1960).
  73. F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032111 (2012).
  74. S. Schütz, J. Schachenmayer, D. Hagenmüller, G. K. Brennen, T. Volz, V. Sandoghdar, T. W. Ebbesen, C. Genes, and G. Pupillo, Ensemble-induced strong light-matter coupling of a single quantum emitter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 113602 (2020).
  75. D. Hagenmüller, S. Schütz, G. Pupillo, and J. Schachenmayer, Adiabatic elimination for ensembles of emitters in cavities with dissipative couplings, Phys. Rev. A 102, 013714 (2020).
  76. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/xk9t-jhq8 for details on robustness with respect to magic angle deviations, robustness against losses and dephasing, validity of the adiabatic and near-field regime, details about the geometrical configuration, comparison between full and effective model, analytical form of the effective coupling matrix, and quality of the power-law fits, which includes Ref. [77].
  77. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005).
  78. P. Méhaignerie, Y. Machu, A. Durán Hernández, G. Creutzer, D. Papoular, J. Raimond, C. Sayrin, and M. Brune, Interacting circular Rydberg atoms trapped in optical tweezers, PRX Quantum 6, 010353 (2025).
  79. R. C. Teixeira, A. Larrouy, A. Muni, L. Lachaud, J.-M. Raimond, S. Gleyzes, and M. Brune, Preparation of long-lived, non-autoionizing circular Rydberg states of strontium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 263001 (2020).
  80. C. Hölzl, A. Götzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth, and F. Meinert, Long-lived circular Rydberg qubits of alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021024 (2024).
  81. H. Wu, R. Richaud, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, Millisecond-lived circular Rydberg atoms in a room-temperature experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 023202 (2023).
  82. Y. Machu, A. Durán-Hernández, G. Creutzer, A. A. Young, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and C. Sayrin, Non-destructive optical read-out and manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms, arXiv:2509.24691.
  83. S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species Rydberg array, Nat. Phys. 20, 1744 (2024).
  84. L. Zhu, J. Luke, R. Shaham, Y.-X. Liu, and K.-K. Ni, Probing dipolar interactions between Rydberg atoms and ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 153001 (2025).
  85. T. Botzung, Data - Tailoring interaction ranges in atom arrays [Data set], Zenodo (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18247451.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation