- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Optical interference by amplitude measurement: Spectral analysis

Xuan Tang and Z. Y. Ou*

  • *Contact author: jeffou@cityu.edu.hk
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013122 – Published 3 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wqz3-749q

Abstract

Optical interference usually requires two interfering paths to be balanced within the coherence length. For the case of unbalanced paths, interference effects can be recovered in the frequency-domain analysis of the superposed resultant optical field because optical frequency filtering in the spectral analysis of the optical field lengthens the coherence length to overcome the path imbalance. However, since optical detection usually is intensity measurement that loses the phase information of the detected optical field, the output photocurrent of intensity measurement cannot recover the lost interference effect in the postprocessing of the data such as electronic spectral analysis. On the other hand, if amplitude measurement can be used to measure the resultant optical field from the path-unbalanced superposition of two fields, the output photocurrent carries complete information of two fields and can restore interference in postdetection processing, even though no interference shows up in direct intensity measurement. In this paper, we use homodyne detection method for amplitude measurement to analyze the output of a path-unbalanced interferometer in the spectral domain. Since complete information about the superposed optical field is contained in the photocurrent, spectral analysis shows interference fringes in frequency that reveal information about the path imbalance. It is found that shot noise is the limiting factor in the visibility of interference but can be reduced with a squeezed state input in the unused port of the unbalanced interferometer. This approach is a different paradigm from the traditional one for studying the coherence between optical fields and should find wide application in remote sensing and precision measurement.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (15)

  1. D. F. James and E. Wolf, Some new aspects of Young's interference experiment, Phys. Lett. A 157, 6 (1991).
  2. G. S. Agarwal and D. F. James, Spectral changes in the Mach-Zehnder interferometer, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1431 (1993).
  3. X. Y. Zou, T. P. Grayson, and L. Mandel, Observation of quantum interference effects in the frequency domain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3041 (1992).
  4. D. L. Jacobson, S. A. Werner, and H. Rauch, Spectral modulation and squeezing at high-order neutron interferences, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3196 (1994).
  5. N. Huo, L. Cui, Y. Zhang, W. Zhao, X. Guo, X. Li, and Z. Y. Ou, Measurement-dependent erasure of distinguishability for the observation of interference in an unbalanced SU(1, 1) interferometer, PRX Quantum 3, 020313 (2022).
  6. Y. Zhang, X. Tang, X. Guo, L. Cui, X. Li, and Z. Y. Ou, Optical interference by amplitude measurement, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013255 (2025).
  7. Z. Y. Ou and H. J. Kimble, Probability distribution of photoelectric currents in photodetection processes and its connection to the measurement of a quantum state, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3126 (1995).
  8. L.-A. Wu, M. Xiao, and H. J. Kimble, Squeezed states of light from an optical parametric oscillator, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1465 (1987).
  9. Z. Y. Ou, C. K. Hong, and L. Mandel, Coherence properties of squeezed light and the degree of squeezing, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1574 (1987).
  10. Z. Y. J. Ou, Quantum Optics for Experimentalists (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2017).
  11. C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981).
  12. M. Xiao, L.-A. Wu, and H. J. Kimble, Precision measurement beyond the shot-noise limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 278 (1987).
  13. A. Lukashchuk, J. Riemensberger, M. Karpov, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Dual chirped microcomb based parallel ranging at megapixel-line rates, Nat. Commun. 13, 3280 (2022).
  14. T. Kim, P. Bhargava, and V. Stojanovic, Optimal spectral estimation and system trade-off in long-distance frequency-modulated continuous-wave LIDAR, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (IEEE, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2018), pp. 1583–1587.
  15. X. Fang, Y. Zhu, X. Cai, W. Hu, Z. He, S. Yu, and F. Zhang, Overcoming laser phase noise for low-cost coherent optical communication, Nat. Commun. 15, 6339 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013122– Published 3 February, 2026
  • Received 27 August 2025
  • Accepted 6 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation