Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Relaxation and decay of collective modes in open quantum systems

Alexander Volya1,* and Vladimir Zelevinsky2

  • *Contact author: avolya@fsu.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043214 – Published 24 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t73t-vzwr

Abstract

In a quantum many-body system, such as atoms, molecules, and atomic nuclei, interparticle interactions generate a complex quantum level scheme that can be analyzed progressively: from the simplest picture of independent quasiparticles moving in a self-consistent mean field to more complete descriptions that include residual interactions and the opening of decay channels above some excitation thresholds. Residual interactions lead to two seemingly contrasting phenomena: the emergence of collective modes (such as rotational and vibrational excitations) associated with specific symmetries, and internal thermalization, which gives rise to features of quantum chaos and causes these collective modes to damp. The picture becomes more intricate once decay channels become energetically accessible, allowing the system to decay irreversibly by means such as particle emission and thus transition to an open quantum regime. In this work, we investigate the competition between internal many-body dynamics and explicit, irreversible decay. These processes can occur on comparable timescales, leading to an initial stage of rapid dynamics followed by equilibration. We show that the decay of the faster components drives the system into an exponentially decaying regime, characterized by a noisy decay current. For this study, we adopt a general, albeit simplified, model of a collective mode embedded in a chaotic background and coupled to open decay channels. The interplay of timescales revealed in this framework appears to reflect universal features of open quantum systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  2. J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 082001 (2018).
  3. S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022).
  4. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  5. K. K. W. Ma, A. Volya, and K. Yang, Eigenstate thermalization and disappearance of quantum many-body scar states in weakly interacting fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214313 (2022).
  6. G. E. Mitchell, A. Richter, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Random matrices and chaos in nuclear physics: Nuclear reactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2845 (2010).
  7. V. Zelevinsky, B. A. Brown, N. Frazier, and M. Horoi, The nuclear shell model as a testing ground for many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rep. 276, 85 (1996).
  8. F. Borgonovi, F. Izrailev, L. Santos, and V. Zelevinsky, Quantum chaos and thermalization in isolated systems of interacting particles, Phys. Rep. 626, 1 (2016).
  9. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008).
  10. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vidmar, Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states, PRX Quantum 3, 030201 (2022).
  11. E. J. Heller, Bound-state eigenfunctions of classically chaotic Hamiltonian systems: Scars of periodic orbits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1515 (1984).
  12. P. Bortignon, A. Bracco, and R. A. Broglia, Giant Resonances (CRC Press, London, 2020).
  13. V. Zelevinsky and A. Volya, Mesoscopic Nuclear Physics: From Nucleus to Quantum Chaos to Quantum Signal Transmission (World Scientific, Singapore, 2023).
  14. P. E. Hodgson, Pre-equilibrium processes in nuclear reactions, Nature (London) 292, 671 (1981).
  15. A. Volya, Time-dependent approach to the continuum shell model, Phys. Rev. C 79, 044308 (2009).
  16. S. M. Wang and W. Nazarewicz, Fermion pair dynamics in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 142501 (2021).
  17. S. M. Wang, W. Nazarewicz, A. Volya, and Y. G. Ma, Probing the nonexponential decay regime in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023183 (2023).
  18. M. Peshkin, A. Volya, and V. Zelevinsky, Non-exponential and oscillatory decays in quantum mechanics, Europhys. Lett. 107, 40001 (2014).
  19. A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Time-dependent relaxation of observables in complex quantum systems, J. Phys. Complex. 1, 025007 (2020).
  20. H. Feshbach, Unified theory of nuclear reactions, Ann. Phys. 5, 357 (1958).
  21. H. Feshbach, A unified theory of nuclear reactions. II, Ann. Phys. 19, 287 (1962).
  22. N. Auerbach and V. Zelevinsky, Super-radiant dynamics, doorways and resonances in nuclei and other open mesoscopic systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 106301 (2011).
  23. V. Zelevinsky and A. Volya, Physics of Atomic Nuclei (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2017).
  24. A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian and continuum shell model, Phys. Rev. C 67, 054322 (2003).
  25. A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Discrete and continuum spectra in the unified shell model approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 052501 (2005).
  26. A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Continuum shell model, Phys. Rev. C 74, 064314 (2006).
  27. J. B. Ehrman, On the displacement of corresponding energy levels of C13 and N13, Phys. Rev. 81, 412 (1951).
  28. R. G. Thomas, An analysis of the energy levels of the mirror nuclei, C13 and N13, Phys. Rev. 88, 1109 (1952).
  29. E. J. Torres-Herrera, A. M. García-García, and L. F. Santos, Generic dynamical features of quenched interacting quantum systems: Survival probability, density imbalance, and out-of-time-ordered correlator, Phys. Rev. B 97, 060303 (2018).
  30. M. Schiulaz, E. J. Torres-Herrera, and L. F. Santos, Thouless and relaxation time scales in many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174313 (2019).
  31. Yu. A. Litvinov et al., Observation of non-exponential orbital electron capture decays of hydrogen-like Pr140 and Pm142 ions, Phys. Lett. B 664, 162 (2008).
  32. P. M. Walker, A neutrino’s wobble? Nature (London) 453, 864 (2008).
  33. A. Nikolaenko, S. Sachdev, and A. A. Patel, Theory of shot noise in strange metals, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043143 (2023).
  34. J. F. Qu, S. P. Benz, H. Rogalla, W. L. Tew, D. R. White, and K. L. Zhou, Johnson noise thermometry, Meas. Sci. Technol. 30, 112001 (2019).
  35. H. B. Callen and T. A. Welton, Irreversibility and generalized noise, Phys. Rev. 83, 34 (1951).
  36. A. Volya, M. Barbui, V. Z. Goldberg, and G. V. Rogachev, Superradiance in alpha clustered mirror nuclei, Commun Phys 5, 322 (2022).
  37. C. H. Lewenkopf and V. G. Zelevinsky, Single and multiple giant resonances: Counterplay of collective and chaotic dynamics, Nucl. Phys. A 569, 183 (1994).
  38. A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Many-body dynamics coupled to continuum and “pygmy”-resonances, AIP Conf. Proc. 802, 296 (2005).
  39. A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Collective many-body dynamics in the vicinity of nuclear driplines, Nucl. Phys. A 788, 251 (2007).
  40. N. Michel and M. Płoszajczak, Gamow Shell Model, The Unified Theory of Nuclear Structure and Reactions, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Cham, 2021), Vol. 983.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation