Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum observables over time for information recovery

Gabriele Bressanini1,*, Farhan Hanif1, Hyukjoon Kwon2, and M. S. Kim1,2

  • *Contact author: gabriele.bressanini@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 033208 – Published 19 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/schg-nl3m

Abstract

We introduce the concept of quantum observables over time (QOOT), an operator that jointly describes two observables at two distinct time points, as a dual of the quantum state over time formalism. We provide a full characterization of the conditions under which a QOOT can be properly defined, via a no-go theorem. We use QOOTs to establish a notion of time reversal for generic quantum channels with respect to a reference observable, enabling the systematic construction of recovery maps that preserve the latter. These recovery maps, although generally nonphysical, can be decomposed into realizable channels, enabling their application in noiseless expectation value estimation tasks. We provide explicit examples and compare our protocol with other error mitigation methods. We show that our protocol retrieves the noiseless expectation value of the reference observable and can achieve optimal sampling overhead, outperforming probabilistic error cancellation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  2. M. M. Wilde, Quantum Information Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013).
  3. J. Fullwood and A. J. Parzygnat, On quantum states over time, Proc. R. Soc. A 478, 20220104 (2022).
  4. A. J. Parzygnat and F. Buscemi, Axioms for retrodiction: Achieving time-reversal symmetry with a prior, Quantum 7, 1013 (2023).
  5. A. J. Parzygnat and J. Fullwood, From time-reversal symmetry to quantum Bayes' rules, PRX Quantum 4, 020334 (2023).
  6. D. Petz, Sufficient subalgebras and the relative entropy of states of a von Neumann algebra, Commun. Math. Phys. 105, 123 (1986).
  7. H. Kwon, R. Mukherjee, and M. S. Kim, Reversing Lindblad dynamics via continuous Petz recovery map, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 020403 (2022).
  8. H. Barnum and E. Knill, Reversing quantum dynamics with near-optimal quantum and classical fidelity, J. Math. Phys. 43, 2097 (2002).
  9. M. M. Wilde, Recoverability in quantum information theory, Proc. R. Soc. A 471, 20150338 (2015).
  10. K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017).
  11. M. S. Leifer and R. W. Spekkens, Towards a formulation of quantum theory as a causally neutral theory of Bayesian inference, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052130 (2013).
  12. D. Horsman, C. Heunen, M. F. Pusey, J. Barrett, and R. W. Spekkens, Can a quantum state over time resemble a quantum state at a single time? Proc. R. Soc. A 473, 20170395 (2017).
  13. M. Ohya, Note on quantum probability, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 38, 402 (1983).
  14. M. Ohya, On compound state and mutual information in quantum information theory (corresp.), IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 29, 770 (1983).
  15. M. Asorey, A. Kossakowski, G. Marmo, and E. G. Sudarshan, Relations between quantum maps and quantum states, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 12, 319 (2005).
  16. S. H. Lie and N. H. Y. Ng, Quantum state over time is unique, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033144 (2024).
  17. J. F. Fitzsimons, J. A. Jones, and V. Vedral, Quantum correlations which imply causation, Sci. Rep. 5, 18281 (2015).
  18. M. S. Leifer, Quantum dynamics as an analog of conditional probability, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042310 (2006).
  19. F. Buscemi, M. Dall'Arno, M. Ozawa, and V. Vedral, Direct observation of any two-point quantum correlation function, arXiv:1312.4240.
  20. J. Jiang, K. Wang, and X. Wang, Physical implementability of linear maps and its application in error mitigation, Quantum 5, 600 (2021).
  21. S. Endo, S. C. Benjamin, and Y. Li, Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031027 (2018).
  22. X. Zhao, B. Zhao, Z. Xia, and X. Wang, Information recoverability of noisy quantum states, Quantum 7, 978 (2023).
  23. A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275 (1972).
  24. W. Hoeffding, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 13 (1963).
  25. X. Zhao, L. Zhang, B. Zhao, and X. Wang, Power of quantum measurement in simulating unphysical operations, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013334 (2025).
  26. Z. Cai, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, W. J. Huggins, Y. Li, J. R. McClean, and T. E. O'Brien, Quantum error mitigation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045005 (2023).
  27. C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation, Phys. Rev. A 80, 012304 (2009).
  28. S. Khatri, K. Sharma, and M. M. Wilde, Information-theoretic aspects of the generalized amplitude-damping channel, Phys. Rev. A 102, 012401 (2020).
  29. A. Taylor, G. Bressanini, H. Kwon, and M. S. Kim, Quantum error cancellation in photonic systems: Undoing photon losses, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022622 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation