- Open Access
Entanglement witness for combined atom interferometer-mechanical oscillator setup
Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043116 – Published 29 October, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rdyx-y8yx
Abstract
We investigate how to entangle an atom interferometer and a macroscopic mechanical oscillator to create nonclassical states of the oscillator. This work is done in the context of an experimental-theoretical collaboration that aims to implement the proposal in the paper “Using an Atom Interferometer to Infer Gravitational Entanglement Generation,” written by Carney et al. [PRX Quantum 2, 030330 (2021)]. Here, we propose an entanglement witness (EW), from whose violation the generation of entanglement can be determined. We do this for three scenarios: the noiseless case, when including thermal noise, and with atomic dephasing. Thermal noise can arise from two sources: the first being when the oscillator starts in a thermal state, and the second when a continuous thermal bath is in contact with the oscillator. We find that for the appropriate oscillator quality factor , violation always exists for any value of coupling and thermal occupancy . Cooling the oscillator to its ground state provides an improvement in the EW violation than when starting in a thermal state; in this case, we find that couplings of require at least measurements for violation to be observed. For atomic dephasing, we find that EW violation can exist for an atom interferometer with a coherence time of 600 s, which is the parameter our experimental collaborators hope to reach. Finally, we consider how to use magnetic interactions to realize this idea within the context of the torsional pendulum that has been planned for our collaboration.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (35)
- D. Carney, H. Müller, and J. M. Taylor, Using an atom interferometer to infer gravitational entanglement generation, PRX Quantum 2, 030330 (2021).
- J. Kong, R. Jiménez-Martínez, C. Troullinou, V. G. Lucivero, G. Tóth, and M. W. Mitchell, Measurement-induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system, Nat. Commun. 11, 2415 (2020).
- S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroš, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240401 (2017).
- H. P. Bartling, M. H. Abobeih, B. Pingault, M. J. Degen, S. J. H. Loenen, C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, Entanglement of spin-pair qubits with intrinsic dephasing times exceeding a minute, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011048 (2022).
- X.-M. Bai, C.-P. Gao, J.-Q. Li, N. Liu, and J.-Q. Liang, Entanglement dynamics for two spins in an optical cavity–field interaction induced decoherence and coherence revival, Opt. Express 25, 17051 (2017).
- E. Rosenfeld, R. Riedinger, J. Gieseler, M. Schuetz, and M. D. Lukin, Efficient entanglement of spin qubits mediated by a hot mechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 250505 (2021).
- C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damskägg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanpää, Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscillators, Nature (London) 556, 478 (2018).
- R. Riedinger, A. Wallucks, I. Marinković, C. Löschnauer, M. Aspelmeyer, S. Hong, and S. Gröblacher, Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators, Nature (London) 556, 473 (2018).
- O. Bengyat, A. Di Biagio, M. Aspelmeyer, and M. Christodoulou, Gravity-mediated entanglement between oscillators as quantum superposition of geometries, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056046 (2024).
- J.-X. Liu, J.-Y. Yang, T.-X. Lu, Y.-F. Jiao, and H. Jing, Phase-controlled robust quantum entanglement of remote mechanical oscillators, Phys. Rev. A 109, 023519 (2024).
- J.-Y. Kao and C.-H. Chou, Quantum entanglement in coupled harmonic oscillator systems: From micro to macro, New J. Phys. 18, 073001 (2016).
- P. Laha, L. Slodička, D. W. Moore, and R. Filip, Thermally induced entanglement of atomic oscillators, Opt. Express 30, 8814 (2022).
- A. Jellal, F. Madouri, and A. Merdaci, Entanglement in coupled harmonic oscillators studied using a unitary transformation, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P09015.
- R. A. Thomas, M. Parniak, C. Østfeldt, C. B. Møller, C. Bærentsen, Y. Tsaturyan, A. Schliesser, J. Appel, E. Zeuthen, and E. S. Polzik, Entanglement between distant macroscopic mechanical and spin systems, Nat. Phys. 17, 228 (2021).
- C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995).
- H.-Y. Lo, D. Kienzler, L. de Clercq, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, B. C. Keitch, and J. P. Home, Spin–motion entanglement and state diagnosis with squeezed oscillator wavepackets, Nature (London) 521, 336 (2015).
- C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 240402 (2017).
- D. Kafri and J. M. Taylor, A noise inequality for classical forces, arXiv:1311.4558.
- J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
- O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009).
- L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2722 (2000).
- V. Xu, M. Jaffe, C. D. Panda, S. L. Kristensen, L. W. Clark, and H. Müller, Probing gravity by holding atoms for 20 seconds, Science 366, 745 (2019).
- Z. Yuan, S. Mukherjee, J. D. Thompson, N. P. de Leon, A. Gardill, and S. Kolkowitz, An instructional lab apparatus for quantum experiments with single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Am. J. Phys. 92, 892 (2024).
- J. Rovny, S. Gopalakrishnan, A. C. B. Jayich et al., Nanoscale diamond quantum sensors for many-body physics, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 753 (2024).
- H. F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Violation of local uncertainty relations as a signature of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 68, 032103 (2003).
- Quantum states of light, http://www.quantum.physik.uni-potsdam.de/teaching/ws2009/qo1/script-ch34.pdf.
- D. A. Steck, Cesium D Line data, 1998, Revision 1.6, October 2003, https://steck.us/alkalidata/cesiumnumbers.1.6.pdf.
- PubChem Compound Summary for CID 5352425, Lead, National Center for Biotechnology Information, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Lead.
- R. Fitzpatrick, Magnetic susceptibility and permeability, 2006, https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node74.html.
- PubChem Compound Summary for CID 23964, Tungsten, National Center for Biotechnology Information, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Tungsten.
- A. Caciagli, R. J. Baars, A. P. Philipse, and B. W. Kuipers, Exact expression for the magnetic field of a finite cylinder with arbitrary uniform magnetization, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 456, 423 (2018).
- The structure of diamond, https://chemart.rice.edu/Diamond.html.
- P. Rabl, P. Cappellaro, M. V. G. Dutt, L. Jiang, J. R. Maze, and M. D. Lukin, Strong magnetic coupling between an electronic spin qubit and a mechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. B 79, 041302(R) (2009).
- J. Teissier, A. Barfuss, P. Appel, E. Neu, and P. Maletinsky, Strain coupling of a nitrogen-vacancy center spin to a diamond mechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020503 (2014).
- T. Delord, P. Huillery, L. Nicolas, and G. Hétet, Spin-cooling of the motion of a trapped diamond, Nature (London) 580, 56 (2020).