Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fixation probabilities for multiallele Moran dynamics with weak selection

Ian Braga1,2, Lucas Wardil2, and Ricardo Martinez-Garcia1,3,4,*

  • *Contact author: r.martinez-garcia@hzdr.de

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 043021 – Published 7 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mcqq-jdwy

Abstract

Fixation probabilities are essential for characterizing stochastic evolutionary dynamics, but analytical results remain limited mainly to systems with two competing types. We develop a perturbative framework to compute fixation probabilities in multiallele Moran processes under weak selection. Exploiting the general structure of the backward Fokker-Planck operator in this regime, we show that fixation probabilities admit a systematic expansion around their neutral solution. We first introduce the framework for M competing alleles with multivariate polynomial fitness functions. We then apply it to three biologically motivated examples: a constant-fitness model, which we solve for an arbitrary number of alleles; a three-allele coordination game in which allele fitness increases with its frequency in the population; and a three-allele model of clonal interference between mutualistic alleles. These results extend the analytical understanding of fixation probabilities beyond pairwise interactions, establishing a framework for investigating multistrategy stochastic evolutionary dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. P. D. Taylor and L. B. Jonker, Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics, Math. Biosci. 40, 145 (1978).
  2. A. Traulsen and C. Hauert, Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics, in Reviews of Nonlinear Dynamics and Complexity, edited by H. G. Schuster (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2009), Vol. 2, pp. 25–61.
  3. G. W. A. Constable, T. Rogers, A. J. McKane, and C. E. Tarnita, Demographic noise can reverse the direction of deterministic selection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4745 (2016).
  4. M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
  5. M. Kimura, The neutral theory of molecular evolution: A review of recent evidence, Jpn. J. Genet. 66, 367 (1991).
  6. A. V. Gore, K. A. Tomins, J. Iben, L. Ma, D. Castranova, A. E. Davis, A. Parkhurst, W. R. Jeffery, and B. M. Weinstein, An epigenetic mechanism for cavefish eye degeneration, Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1155 (2018).
  7. N. A. Wright, D. W. Steadman, and C. C. Witt, Predictable evolution toward flightlessness in volant island birds, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4765 (2016).
  8. P. A. P. Moran, Random processes in genetics, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 54, 60 (1958).
  9. J. Díaz and D. Mitsche, A survey of the modified Moran process and evolutionary graph theory, Comput. Sci. Rev. 39, 100347 (2021).
  10. D. M. McCandlish, C. L. Epstein, and J. B. Plotkin, Formal properties of the probability of fixation: Identities, inequalities and approximations, Theor. Popul. Biol. 99, 98 (2015).
  11. W. J. Ewens, The probability of survival of a new mutant in a fluctuating environment, Heredity 18, 553 (1963).
  12. S. Karlin and H. M. Taylor, A First Course in Stochastic Processes (Academic Press, New York, NY, 1975).
  13. B. Allen, G. Lippner, Y. T. Chen, B. Fotouhi, N. Momeni, S. T. Yau, and M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure, Nature (London) 544, 227 (2017).
  14. L. Hindersin and A. Traulsen, Most undirected random graphs are amplifiers of selection for birth–death dynamics, PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004437 (2015).
  15. E. Lieberman, C. Hauert, and M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary dynamics on graphs, Nature (London) 433, 312 (2005).
  16. H. Ohtsuki, C. Hauert, E. Lieberman, and M. A. Nowak, A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks, Nature (London) 441, 502 (2006).
  17. P. M. Altrock and A. Traulsen, Deterministic evolutionary game dynamics in finite populations, Phys. Rev. E 80, 011909 (2009).
  18. D. B. Saakian, T. Yakushkina, and E. V. Koonin, Allele fixation probability in a Moran model with fluctuating fitness landscapes, Phys. Rev. E 99, 022407 (2019).
  19. T. Antal and I. Scheuring, Fixation of strategies for an evolutionary game in finite populations, Bull. Math. Biol. 68, 1923 (2006).
  20. E. M. Ferreira and A. G. M. Neves, Fixation probabilities for the Moran process with three or more strategies: General and coupling results, J. Math. Biol. 81, 277 (2020).
  21. S. Lessard and P. Lahaie, Fixation probability with multiple alleles and projected average allelic effect on selection, Theor. Popul. Biol. 75, 266 (2009).
  22. A. Traulsen, J. C. Claussen, and C. Hauert, Coevolutionary dynamics: From finite to infinite populations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 238701 (2005).
  23. A. Traulsen, J. C. Claussen, and C. Hauert, Coevolutionary dynamics in large, but finite populations, Phys. Rev. E 74, 011901 (2006).
  24. C. W. Gardiner, Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences, 4th ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  25. J. Gore, H. Youk, and A. van Oudenaarden, Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast, Nature (London) 459, 253 (2009).
  26. S. E. Darch, S. A. West, K. Winzer, and S. P. Diggle, Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8259 (2012).
  27. N. O. Handegard, K. M. Boswell, C. C. Ioannou, S. P. Leblanc, D. B. Tjøstheim, and I. D. Couzin, The dynamics of coordinated group hunting and collective information transfer among schooling prey, Curr. Biol. 22, 1213 (2012).
  28. P. J. Gerrish and R. E. Lenski, The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population, Genetica 102, 127 (1998).
  29. M. M. Desai and D. S. Fisher, Beneficial mutation–selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection, Genetics 176, 1759 (2007).
  30. R. Toral and P. Colet, Stochastic Numerical Methods: An Introduction for Students and Scientists (Wiley, Weinheim, 2014).
  31. J. Grilli, G. Barabás, M. J. Michalska-Smith, and S. Allesina, Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models, Nature (London) 548, 210 (2017).
  32. M. Assaf and B. Meerson, Extinction of metastable stochastic populations, Phys. Rev. E 81, 021116 (2010).
  33. T. L. Czárán, R. F. Hoekstra, and L. Pagie, Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 786 (2002).
  34. J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
  35. A. Traulsen, J. C. Claussen, and C. Hauert, Stochastic differential equations for evolutionary dynamics with demographic noise and mutations, Phys. Rev. E 85, 041901 (2012).
  36. B. Allen and C. E. Tarnita, Measures of success in a class of evolutionary models with fixed population size and structure, J. Math. Biol. 68, 109 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation