Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Trainable, self-verifying variational quantum eigensolver using adiabatic warm starts

Bojan Žunkovič1,2,*, Marco Ballarin3, Lewis Wright3, and Michael Lubasch3,†

  • *Contact author: bojan.zunkovic@fri.uni-lj.si
  • †Contact author: michael.lubasch@quantinuum.com

Phys. Rev. Research 8, L042013 – Published 29 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/m538-45pk

Abstract

We study an adiabatic variant of the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) in which VQE is performed iteratively for a sequence of Hamiltonians along an adiabatic path. We derive the conditions under which gradient-based optimization successfully prepares the adiabatic ground states. These conditions define a trainable tracking region. Additionally, when combined with a gap lower bound, energy-standard-deviation measurements certify eigenstate accuracy at run-time and verify convergence to the global optimum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (45)

  1. M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Variational quantum algorithms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 625 (2021).
  2. K. Bharti, A. Cervera-Lierta, T. H. Kyaw, T. Haug, S. Alperin-Lea, A. Anand, M. Degroote, H. Heimonen, J. S. Kottmann, T. Menke, W.-K. Mok, S. Sim, L.-C. Kwek, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015004 (2022).
  3. J. Tilly, H. Chen, S. Cao, D. Picozzi, K. Setia, Y. Li, E. Grant, L. Wossnig, I. Rungger, G. H. Booth, and J. Tennyson, The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices, Phys. Rep. 986, 1 (2022).
  4. M. Larocca, S. Thanasilp, S. Wang, K. Sharma, J. Biamonte, P. J. Coles, L. Cincio, J. R. McClean, Z. Holmes, and M. Cerezo, Barren plateaus in variational quantum computing, Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 174 (2025).
  5. E. R. Anschuetz and B. T. Kiani, Quantum variational algorithms are swamped with traps, Nat. Commun. 13, 7760 (2022).
  6. A. Gheorghiu, T. Kapourniotis, and E. Kashefi, Verification of quantum computation: An overview of existing approaches, Theory Comput. Syst. 63, 715 (2019).
  7. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution, arXiv:quant-ph/0001106.
  8. T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018).
  9. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm, arXiv:1411.4028.
  10. D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, and M. Troyer, Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042303 (2015).
  11. A. Garcia-Saez and J. I. Latorre, Addressing hard classical problems with adiabatically assisted variational quantum eigensolvers, arXiv:1806.02287.
  12. M.-C. Chen, M. Gong, X. Xu, X. Yuan, J.-W. Wang, C. Wang, C. Ying, J. Lin, Y. Xu, Y. Wu, S. Wang, H. Deng, F. Liang, C.-Z. Peng, S. C. Benjamin, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Demonstration of adiabatic variational quantum computing with a superconducting quantum coprocessor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180501 (2020).
  13. S. M. Harwood, D. Trenev, S. T. Stober, P. Barkoutsos, T. P. Gujarati, S. Mostame, and D. Greenberg, Improving the variational quantum eigensolver using variational adiabatic quantum computing, ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 3, 1 (2022).
  14. B. F. Schiffer, J. Tura, and J. I. Cirac, Adiabatic spectroscopy and a variational quantum adiabatic algorithm, PRX Quantum 3, 020347 (2022).
  15. I. Kolotouros, I. Petrongonas, M. Prokop, and P. Wallden, Simulating adiabatic quantum computing with parameterized quantum circuits, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 015003 (2025).
  16. C. Sanavio, F. Mascherpa, A. Marruzzo, A. Amendola, and S. Succi, Variational-adiabatic quantum solver for systems of linear equations with warm starts, arXiv:2505.24285.
  17. N. N. Hegade, K. Paul, Y. Ding, M. Sanz, F. Albarrán-Arriagada, E. Solano, and X. Chen, Shortcuts to adiabaticity in digitized adiabatic quantum computing, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 024038 (2021).
  18. Z. Zhan, C. Run, Z. Zong, L. Xiang, Y. Fei, Z. Sun, Y. Wu, Z. Jia, P. Duan, J. Wu, Y. Yin, and G. Guo, Experimental determination of electronic states via digitized shortcut to adiabaticity and sequential digitized adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 034050 (2021).
  19. P. Chandarana, N. N. Hegade, K. Paul, F. Albarrán-Arriagada, E. Solano, A. del Campo, and X. Chen, Digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013141 (2022).
  20. N. N. Hegade, X. Chen, and E. Solano, Digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042030 (2022).
  21. E. Karacan, C. Mc Keever, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, and M. Lubasch, Filter-enhanced adiabatic quantum computing on a digital quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033153 (2025).
  22. S. V. Romero, A.-M. Visuri, A. G. Cadavid, A. Simen, E. Solano, and N. N. Hegade, Bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum algorithm for higher-order binary optimization, Commun. Phys. 8, 348 (2025).
  23. B. A. Bhargava, S. Kumar, A.-M. Visuri, P. A. Erdman, E. Solano, and N. N. Hegade, Constant depth digital-analog counterdiabatic quantum computing, arXiv:2601.01154.
  24. A. Cervera-Lierta, J. S. Kottmann, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Meta-variational quantum eigensolver: Learning energy profiles of parameterized Hamiltonians for quantum simulation, PRX Quantum 2, 020329 (2021).
  25. P. Chandarana, P. S. Vieites, N. N. Hegade, E. Solano, Y. Ban, and X. Chen, Meta-learning digitized-counterdiabatic quantum optimization, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 045007 (2023).
  26. J. Miao, C.-Y. Hsieh, and S.-X. Zhang, Neural-network-encoded variational quantum algorithms, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 014053 (2024).
  27. C. Mc Keever and M. Lubasch, Towards adiabatic quantum computing using compressed quantum circuits, PRX Quantum 5, 020362 (2024).
  28. R. Puig, M. Drudis, S. Thanasilp, and Z. Holmes, Variational quantum simulation: A case study for understanding warm starts, PRX Quantum 6, 010317 (2025).
  29. H. Mhiri, R. Puig, S. Lerch, M. S. Rudolph, T. Chotibut, S. Thanasilp, and Z. Holmes, A unifying account of warm start guarantees for patches of quantum landscapes, arXiv:2502.07889.
  30. M. Ballarin, J. J. García-Ripoll, D. Hayes, and M. Lubasch, Efficient quantum state preparation of multivariate functions using tensor networks, arXiv:2511.15674.
  31. R. Puig, B. Casas, A. Cervera-Lierta, Z. Holmes, and A. Pérez-Salinas, Warm starts, cold states: Exploiting adiabaticity for variational ground-states, arXiv:2602.06137.
  32. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv:1412.6980.
  33. J. Stokes, J. Izaac, N. Killoran, and G. Carleo, Quantum natural gradient, Quantum 4, 269 (2020).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/m538-45pk for additional information on the proofs of Theorems t1 and t2, trainability within the tracking region, extension to ε-exact representability, numerical analysis, and measurement cost and stability under shot noise, which include Refs. [44, 45].
  35. Y. Nesterov, Lectures on Convex Optimization, Springer Optimization and Its Applications Vol. 137 (Springer, Cham, 2018).
  36. L. Hackl, T. Guaita, T. Shi, J. Haegeman, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, Geometry of variational methods: Dynamics of closed quantum systems, SciPost Phys. 9, 048 (2020).
  37. B. Žunkovič, P. Torta, G. Pecci, G. Lami, and M. Collura, Variational ground-state quantum adiabatic theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 130601 (2025).
  38. T. Kadowaki and H. Nishimori, Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355 (1998).
  39. P. Hauke, H. G. Katzgraber, W. Lechner, H. Nishimori, and W. D. Oliver, Perspectives of quantum annealing: Methods and implementations, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 054401 (2020).
  40. C. Kokail, C. Maier, R. van Bijnen, T. Brydges, M. K. Joshi, P. Jurcevic, C. A. Muschik, P. Silvi, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models, Nature (London) 569, 355 (2019).
  41. Y. Subaşı, R. D. Somma, and D. Orsucci, Quantum algorithms for systems of linear equations inspired by adiabatic quantum computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 060504 (2019).
  42. P. C. S. Costa, D. An, Y. R. Sanders, Y. Su, R. Babbush, and D. W. Berry, Optimal scaling quantum linear-systems solver via discrete adiabatic theorem, PRX Quantum 3, 040303 (2022).
  43. P. C. S. Costa, D. An, R. Babbush, and D. Berry, The discrete adiabatic quantum linear system solver has lower constant factors than the randomized adiabatic solver, Quantum 9, 1887 (2025).
  44. W. Hoeffding, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 13 (1963).
  45. D. Hsu, S. Kakade, and T. Zhang, A tail inequality for quadratic forms of subgaussian random vectors, Electron. Commun. Probab. 17, 1 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation