- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Role of critical sets in the permeability of random fracture networks: A percolation scaling perspective

Tingchang Yin1,2,3 and Sergio Andres Galindo-Torres1,2,*

  • *Contact author: s.torres@westlake.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043060 – Published 16 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/m38d-24dl

Abstract

Fracture networks in the subsurface often comprise multiple fracture sets, introducing anisotropy and heterogeneity due to wide variations in fracture orientations, sizes, and conductivities. In this study, we develop a finite-size scaling (FSS) hypothesis, rooted in percolation theory, to highlight the role of critical sets—those that conduct the majority of flow—in controlling the permeability of random fracture networks. Definitions of the FSS input quantities are provided, incorporating nondimensionalizations to account for the complexity of the networks, based on the statistical properties of the fracture parameters across all sets. For cases where critical sets are present, we emphasize their dominant role and propose modified definitions based solely on the parameters of these critical sets, in line with the idea that the density of critical sets determines the magnitude of permeability. FSS results demonstrate that the hypothesis serves as a universal model for characterizing anisotropic permeability in complex fracture networks, provided that the influence of critical sets is properly addressed. This finding can be extended to other complex systems where conductive objects can be categorized into distinct sets.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. E. Bonnet, O. Bour, N. E. Odling, P. Davy, I. Main, P. Cowie, and B. Berkowitz, Scaling of fracture systems in geological media, Rev. Geophys. 39, 347 (2001).
  2. H. S. Viswanathan, J. Ajo-Franklin, J. T. Birkholzer, J. W. Carey, Y. Guglielmi, J. Hyman, S. Karra, L. J. Pyrak-Nolte, H. Rajaram, G. Srinivasan et al., From fluid flow to coupled processes in fractured rock: Recent advances and new frontiers, Rev. Geophys. 60, e2021RG000744 (2022).
  3. Q. Gan and D. Elsworth, Production optimization in fractured geothermal reservoirs by coupled discrete fracture network modeling, Geothermics 62, 131 (2016).
  4. B. Berkowitz and I. Balberg, Percolation theory and its application to groundwater hydrology, Water Resour. Res. 29, 775 (1993).
  5. J. D. Hyman, M. Dentz, A. Hagberg, and P. K. Kang, Emergence of stable laws for first passage times in three-dimensional random fracture networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 248501 (2019).
  6. D. T. Snow, Anisotropie permeability of fractured media, Water Resour. Res. 5, 1273 (1969).
  7. M. Oda, Permeability tensor for discontinuous rock masses, Géotechnique 35, 483 (1985).
  8. S. R. Broadbent and J. M. Hammersley, Percolation processes: I. Crystals and mazes, in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1957), Vol. 53, pp. 629–641.
  9. A. Hunt, R. Ewing, and B. Ghanbarian, Percolation Theory for Flow in Porous Media (Springer Cham, Switzerland, 2014), Vol. 880, pp. 1–33.
  10. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, London, 2018).
  11. A. G. Hunt, Continuum percolation theory and Archie's law, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, 2004GL020817 (2004).
  12. M. Sahimi, Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock: From Classical Methods to Modern Approaches (John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim, Germany, 2011).
  13. A. Hunt, A new conceptual model for forest fires based on percolation theory, Complexity 13, 12 (2008).
  14. G. Oliveira, Early epidemic spread, percolation and COVID-19, J. Math. Biol. 81, 1143 (2020).
  15. S. Hu, Z. Yang, Z. Wang, S. A. Galindo Torres, and L. Li, Self-organized criticality of natural lakes revealed by the percolation model based on topographic wetness index, Commun. Phys. 8, 129 (2025).
  16. K. Christensen, Percolation theory, Imperial College London 1, 87 (2002).
  17. M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, Scaling theory for finite-size effects in the critical region, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1516 (1972).
  18. E. Brézin, An investigation of finite size scaling, J. Phys. France 43, 15 (1982).
  19. T. Man, H. E. Huppert, L. Li, and S. A. Galindo-Torres, Finite-size analysis of the collapse of dry granular columns, Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL096054 (2021).
  20. M. Masihi and P. R. King, A correlated fracture network: Modeling and percolation properties, Water Resour. Res. 43, 2006WR005331 (2007).
  21. J. Li and S.-L. Zhang, Finite-size scaling in stick percolation, Phys. Rev. E 80, 040104 (2009).
  22. S. Sadeghnejad, M. Masihi, and P. King, Dependency of percolation critical exponents on the exponent of power law size distribution, Physica A 392, 6189 (2013).
  23. T. Yin, T. Man, and S. A. Galindo-Torres, Universal scaling solution for the connectivity of discrete fracture networks, Physica A 599, 127495 (2022).
  24. S.-H. Yook, W. Choi, and Y. Kim, Conductivity of stick percolation clusters with anisotropic alignments, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 61, 1257 (2012).
  25. S. Galindo-Torres, T. Molebatsi, X.-Z. Kong, A. Scheuermann, D. Bringemeier, and L. Li, Scaling solutions for connectivity and conductivity of continuous random networks, Phys. Rev. E 92, 041001 (2015).
  26. T. Yin, T. Man, L. Li, and S. A. Galindo-Torres, Finite-size scaling for the permeability of discrete fracture networks, Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL100837 (2023).
  27. M. Esmaeilpour, C. Chen, S. Sadeghnejad, and B. Ghanbarian, Scale-dependent permeability in geologic formations: Renormalization group theory and finite-size scaling analysis, Adv. Water Resour. 203, 105019 (2025).
  28. T. Yin, T. Man, P. Zhang, and S. A. Galindo-Torres, Péclet-number-dependent longitudinal dispersion in discrete fracture networks, Water Resour. Res. 60, e2024WR038437 (2024).
  29. J. Zhan, J. Chen, P. Xu, W. Zhang, X. Han, and X. Zhou, Automatic identification of rock fracture sets using finite mixture models, Math. Geosci. 49, 1021 (2017).
  30. D. J. Sanderson, D. C. Peacock, and C. W. Nixon, Fracture sets and sequencing, Earth-Sci. Rev. 257, 104888 (2024).
  31. Y. Ji, S. Song, W. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Xue, and J. Chen, Automatic identification of rock fractures based on deep learning, Eng. Geol. 345, 107874 (2025).
  32. H. Yin, W. Zhang, C. Lu, X. Wang, C. Cao, J. Wang, J. Chen, T. Li, and B. Han, Rapid characterization of high-steep slope rock mass integrity using fractal dimension of thermal infrared point cloud, Eng. Geol. 354, 108161 (2025).
  33. W. Zhang, H. Yin, J. Chen, C. Lu, T. Li, B. Han, Z. Zhao, J. Wang, and J. Chen, Identification and thermal characteristics of linear discontinuities on a high-steep slope using UAV with thermal infrared imager, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 186, 106025 (2025).
  34. J. Gong and W. Rossen, Modeling flow in naturally fractured reservoirs: Effect of fracture aperture distribution on dominant sub-network for flow, Pet. Sci. 14, 138 (2017).
  35. J. Wang, W. Zhang, H. Yin, Y. Wang, J. Han J. Chen et al., Stability analysis of a high-steep slope based on multi-scale structural geological model and 3D fracture connectivity, Landslides 22, 3081 (2025).
  36. T. Yin and S. A. Galindo-Torres,  cuDFNsys, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16451295.
  37. J.-F. Thovert, V. V. Mourzenko, and P. Adler, Percolation in three-dimensional fracture networks for arbitrary size and shape distributions, Phys. Rev. E 95, 042112 (2017).
  38. P. A. Witherspoon, J. S. Wang, K. Iwai, and J. E. Gale, Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture, Water Resour. Res. 16, 1016 (1980).
  39. J. Hyman, M. Dentz, A. Hagberg, and P. K. Kang, Linking structural and transport properties in three-dimensional fracture networks, J. Geophys. Res. B: Solid Earth 124, 1185 (2019).
  40. R. W. Zimmerman and I.-W. Yeo, Fluid flow in rock fractures: From the Navier-Stokes equations to the cubic law, Geophys. Monogr.-American Geophysical Union 122, 213 (2000).
  41. C. Bahriawati and C. Carstensen, Three MATLAB implementations of the lowest-order Raviart-Thomas MFEM with a posteriori error control, Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 5, 333 (2005).
  42. V. Mourzenko, J.-F. Thovert, and P. Adler, Trace analysis for fracture networks with anisotropic orientations and heterogeneous distributions, Phys. Rev. E 83, 031104 (2011).
  43. I. Balberg, C. Anderson, S. Alexander, and N. Wagner, Excluded volume and its relation to the onset of percolation, Phys. Rev. B 30, 3933 (1984).
  44. V. Mourzenko, J.-F. Thovert, and P. Adler, Percolation of three-dimensional fracture networks with power-law size distribution, Phys. Rev. E 72, 036103 (2005).
  45. C. Klimczak, R. A. Schultz, R. Parashar, and D. M. Reeves, Cubic law with aperture-length correlation: Implications for network scale fluid flow, Hydrogeol. J. 18, 851 (2010).
  46. T. Yin, Data for “role of critical sets in the permeability of random fracture networks: A percolation scaling perspective”, Mendeley Data, V1 (2025), 10.17632/5ky27g7db6.1.
  47. M. Khamforoush and K. Shams, Percolation thresholds of a group of anisotropic three-dimensional fracture networks, Physica A 385, 407 (2007).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 043060– Published 16 October, 2025
  • Received 20 May 2025
  • Accepted 7 September 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation