- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Open Access

Information, movement, and adaptation in human vision

Alexander J. H. Houston1,*, David H. Brainard2, Hannah E. Smithson3, and Daniel J. Read4,†

  • *Contact author: Alexander.Houston@glasgow.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: D.J.Read@leeds.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023083 – Published 28 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/l4qd-5s7d

Abstract

Our eyes are never still. Even when fixating, they exhibit small, jittery motions. While it has long been argued that these fixational eye movements (FEMs) aid the acquisition of visual information, a complete theoretical description of their impact on the information available in the early visual system has been lacking. Here, we consider the drift component of FEMs. We describe these FEMs as a diffusive process and build a minimal theoretical model of the early visual response, including the critical process of adaptation (a fading response to a fixed image). We establish the effect of FEMs on the mutual information between a visual stimulus and this response. Our approach identifies the key dimensionless parameters that characterize the effect of fixational eye movements and reveals the regimes in which this effect can be beneficial, detrimental, or negligible. Taking parameter values appropriate for human vision, we show that the spatiotemporal couplings induced by fixational eye movements can explain the qualitative features of the human contrast sensitivity function as well as classic experiments on temporal integration. To our knowledge, the consideration of fixational eye movements in this latter context is unique, and our results suggest the need for future experiments to determine the mechanisms by which spatial and temporal responses are coupled in the human visual system.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

synopsis

Rapid Eye Movements Enhance Information Acquisition

Published 28 April, 2026

A model captures how the retina avoids tuning out during a fixed gaze.

See more in Physics

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (79)

  1. M. Rucci and M. Poletti, Control and functions of fixational eye movements, Annu. Rev. Vision Sci. 1, 499 (2015).
  2. M. F. Land, Motion and vision: why animals move their eyes, J. Comp. Physiol. A 185, 341 (1999).
  3. S. Martinez-Conde, S. L. Macknik, and D. H. Hubel, The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 229 (2004).
  4. R. G. Alexander and S. Martinez-Conde, Fixational eye movements, in Eye Movement Research: An Introduction to its Scientific Foundations and Applications (Springer, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 73–115.
  5. N. R. Bowers, A. E. Boehm, and A. Roorda, The effects of fixational tremor on the retinal image, J. Vision 19, 8 (2019).
  6. M. Rolfs, R. Kliegl, and R. Engbert, Toward a model of microsaccade generation: The case of microsaccadic inhibition, J. Vision 8, 5 (2008).
  7. A.-K. Hauperich, L. K. Young, and H. E. Smithson, What makes a microsaccade? A review of 70 years of research prompts a new detection method, J. Eye Mov. Res. 12, 13 (2019).
  8. W. H. Miller and G. D. Bernard, Averaging over the foveal receptor aperature curtails aliasing, Vision Res. 23, 1365 (1983).
  9. J. Jurin, A Reply to Mr. Robins's Remarks on the Essay Upon Distinct and Indistinct Vision Published at the End of Dr. Smith's Compleat System of Opticks (W. Innys and R. Manby, London, 1739).
  10. R. Waring Darwin and E. Darwin, New experiments on the ocular spectra of light and colours, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. I 76, 313 (1786).
  11. H. Von Helmholtz, Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics (Optical Society of America, Rochester, NY, 1925), Vol. 3.
  12. O. Packer and D. R. Williams, Blurring by fixational eye movements, Vision Res. 32, 1931 (1992).
  13. J. Burge, Image-computable ideal observers for tasks with natural stimuli, Annu. Rev. Vision Sci. 6, 491 (2020).
  14. W. Bialek, Physical limits to sensation and perception, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 16, 455 (1987).
  15. S. Hecht, S. Shlaer, and M. H. Pirenne, Energy, quanta, and vision, J. Gen. Physiol. 25, 819 (1942).
  16. D. A. Baylor, T. D. Lamb, and K.-W. Yau, Responses of retinal rods to single photons, J. Physiol. 288, 613 (1979).
  17. A. Dey, A. J. Zele, B. Feigl, and P. Adhikari, Threshold vision under full-field stimulation: Revisiting the minimum number of quanta necessary to evoke a visual sensation, Vision Res. 180, 1 (2021).
  18. H. B. Barlow, The size of ommatidia in apposition eyes, J. Exp. Biol. 29, 667 (1952).
  19. R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1963), Vol. I.
  20. T. C. McLeish, Are there ergodic limits to evolution? Ergodic exploration of genome space and convergence, Interface Focus 5, 20150041 (2015).
  21. E. N. Clarkson and R. Levi-Setti, Trilobite eyes and the optics of Descartes and Huygens, Nature (London) 254, 663 (1975).
  22. E. Hering, Über die grenzen der sehschärfe, Ber. math.-phys. Cl. D. königl. Sächs. Gesell. Wiss. Leipzig 303, 16 (1899).
  23. M. Rucci, R. Iovin, M. Poletti, and F. Santini, Miniature eye movements enhance fine spatial detail, Nature (London) 447, 852 (2007).
  24. K. Ratnam, N. Domdei, W. M. Harmening, and A. Roorda, Benefits of retinal image motion at the limits of spatial vision, J. Vision 17, 30 (2017).
  25. J. Intoy and M. Rucci, Finely tuned eye movements enhance visual acuity, Nat. Commun. 11, 795 (2020).
  26. J. Nachmias, Determiners of the drift of the eye during monocular fixation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 761 (1961).
  27. R. M. Steinman, G. M. Haddad, A. A. Skavenski, and D. Wyman, Miniature eye movement: The pattern of saccades made by man during maintained fixation may be a refined but useless motor habit, Science 181, 810 (1973).
  28. E. Kowler, Eye movements: The past 25 years, Vision Res. 51, 1457 (2011).
  29. E. Ahissar and A. Arieli, Seeing via miniature eye movements: A dynamic hypothesis for vision, Front. Comput. Neurosci. 6, 89 (2012).
  30. M. Rucci, E. Ahissar, D. C. Burr, I. Kagan, M. Poletti, and J. D. Victor, The visual system does not operate like a camera, J. Vision 25, 2 (2025).
  31. R. Ditchburn and B. Ginsborg, Vision with a stabilized retinal image, Nature (London) 170, 36 (1952).
  32. L. A. Riggs, F. Ratliff, J. C. Cornsweet, and T. N. Cornsweet, The disappearance of steadily fixated visual test objects, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 495 (1953).
  33. M. Rucci and J. D. Victor, The unsteady eye: An information-processing stage, not a bug, Trends Neurosci. 38, 195 (2015).
  34. L. E. Arend Jr., Spatial differential and integral operations in human vision: Implications of stabilized retinal image fading, Psychol. Rev. 80, 374 (1973).
  35. H. L. Averill and F. W. Weymouth, Visual perception and the retinal mosaic. II. The influence of eye-movements on the displacement threshold, J. Comp. Physchol. 5, 147 (1925).
  36. W. H. Marshall and S. A. Talbot, Recent evidence for neural mechanisms in vision leading to a general theory of sensory acuity, in Visual Mechanisms, edited by H. Klüver (Jacques Cattell, Lancaster, PA, 1942), pp. 117–164.
  37. R. M. Steinman and J. Z. Levinson, The role of eye movement in the detection of contrast and spatial detail, in Eye Movements and their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes, edited by E. Kowler (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990), pp. 115–212.
  38. E. Ahissar and A. Arieli, Figuring space by time, Neuron 32, 185 (2001).
  39. U. Tulunay-Keesey and R. M. Jones, The effect of micromovements of the eye and exposure duration on contrast sensitivity, Vision Res. 16, 481 (1976).
  40. M. Gur, Seeing on the fly: Physiological and behavioral evidence show that space-to-space representation and processing enable fast and efficient performance by the visual system, J. Vision 24, 11 (2024).
  41. H. Barlow, Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities, J. Physiol. 141, 337 (1958).
  42. A. B. Watson, Temporal Sensitivity, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, edited by K. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. Thomas (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986), Chap. 6.
  43. M. Potters and W. Bialek, Statistical mechanics and visual signal processing, J. Phys. I 4, 1755 (1994).
  44. D. A. Clark and J. E. Fitzgerald, Optimization in visual motion estimation, Annu. Rev. Vision Sci. 10, 23 (2024).
  45. W. Bialek, Biophysics: Searching for Principles (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012).
  46. H. L. de Vries, The quantum character of light and its bearing upon threshold of vision, the differential sensitivity and visual acuity of the eye, Physica 10, 553 (1943).
  47. A. Rose, The relative sensitivities of television pickup tubes, photographic film, and the human eye, Proc. IRE 30, 293 (1942).
  48. A. Rose, The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 196 (1948).
  49. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/l4qd-5s7d for all derivations of key results, key measures of gaining information about external stimuli, and discussion of alternative forms of temporal filter.
  50. A. T. Rider, G. B. Henning, and A. Stockman, Light adaptation controls visual sensitivity by adjusting the speed and gain of the response to light, PLoS One 14, e0220358 (2019).
  51. J. L. Reiniger, N. Domdei, F. G. Holz, and W. M. Harmening, Human gaze is systematically offset from the center of cone topography, Curr. Biol. 31, 4188 (2021).
  52. J. L. Witten, V. Lukyanova, and W. M. Harmening, Sub-cone visual resolution by active, adaptive sampling in the human foveola, eLife 13, RP98648 (2024).
  53. K. Mergenthaler and R. Engbert, Modeling the control of fixational eye movements with neurophysiological delays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 138104 (2007).
  54. C. J. Herrmann, R. Metzler, and R. Engbert, A self-avoiding walk with neural delays as a model of fixational eye movements, Sci. Rep. 7, 12958 (2017).
  55. X. Kuang, M. Poletti, J. D. Victor, and M. Rucci, Temporal encoding of spatial information during active visual fixation, Curr. Biol. 22, 510 (2012).
  56. J. Porter, A. Guirao, I. G. Cox, and D. R. Williams, Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 1793 (2001).
  57. L. N. Thibos, X. Hong, A. Bradley, and X. Cheng, Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 2329 (2002).
  58. J. G. Robson, Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1141 (1966).
  59. F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings, J. Physiol. 197, 551 (1968).
  60. R. L. De Valois, H. Morgan, and D. M. Snodderly, Psychophysical studies of monkey vision-iii. spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers, Vision Res. 14, 75 (1974).
  61. D. H. Kelly, Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1340 (1979).
  62. H. D. L. Dzn, Experiments on flicker and some calculations on an electrical analogue of the foveal systems, Physica 18, 935 (1952).
  63. A. Casile, J. D. Victor, and M. Rucci, Contrast sensitivity reveals an oculomotor strategy for temporally encoding space, eLife 8, e40924 (2019).
  64. Y. Burak, U. Rokni, M. Meister, and H. Sompolinsky, Bayesian model of dynamic image stabilization in the visual system, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19525 (2010).
  65. M. Rucci and A. Casile, Fixational instability and natural image statistics: Implications for early visual representations, Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 16, 121 (2005).
  66. M. Boi, M. Poletti, J. D. Victor, and M. Rucci, Consequences of the oculomotor cycle for the dynamics of perception, Curr. Biol. 27, 1268 (2017).
  67. C. Enroth-Cugell and J. G. Robson, The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat, J. Physiol. 187, 517 (1966).
  68. C. Enroth-Cugell, J. Robson, D. Schweitzer-Tong, and A. Watson, Spatio-temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation, J. Physiol. 341, 279 (1983).
  69. L. J. Croner and E. Kaplan, Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina, Vision Res. 35, 7 (1995).
  70. D. M. Dacey, Primate retina: cell types, circuits and color opponency, Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 18, 737 (1999).
  71. L. Diller, O. S. Packer, J. Verweij, M. J. McMahon, D. R. Williams, and D. M. Dacey, L and M cone contributions to the midget and parasol ganglion cell receptive fields of macaque monkey retina, J. Neurosci. 24, 1079 (2004).
  72. J. Kulikowski and D. Tolhurst, Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision, J. Physiol. 232, 149 (1973).
  73. D. Lamming, Contrast sensitivity, in Vision and Visual Dysfunction, Vol. 5, edited by J. Cronly-Dillon (Macmillan Press, London, 1991).
  74. W. Hart Jr., The temporal responsiveness of vision, in Adlers Physiology of the Eye, Clinical Application, edited by R. J. Moses and W. M. Hart (The C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, 1987), pp. 429–457.
  75. D. Ruderman and W. Bialek, Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 6, 551 (1993).
  76. W. S. Geisler, Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 167 (2008).
  77. E. G. Wu, N. Brackbill, C. Rhoades, A. Kling, A. R. Gogliettino, N. P. Shah, A. Sher, A. M. Litke, E. P. Simoncelli, and E. Chichilnisky, Fixational eye movements enhance the precision of visual information transmitted by the primate retina, Nat. Commun. 15, 7964 (2024).
  78. F. Rieke, D. Warland, R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W. Bialek, Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997).
  79. J. A. Patrick, N. W. Roach, and P. V. McGraw, Motion-based super-resolution in the peripheral visual field, J. Vision 17, 15 (2017).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 8, 023083– Published 28 April, 2026
  • Received 3 September 2025
  • Accepted 18 February 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation