Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Unifying framework for amplification mechanisms: Spectral criticality, resonance, and nonnormality

Virgile Troude and Didier Sornette

Phys. Rev. Research 7, L042048 – Published 1 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kdgw-shxf

Abstract

We bring together three key amplification mechanisms in linear dynamical systems: spectral criticality, resonance, and nonnormality. We present a unified linear framework that both distinguishes and quantitatively links these effects through two fundamental parameters: (1) the spectral distance to a conventional bifurcation or to a resonance and (2) a nonnormal index K (or condition number κ) that measures the obliqueness of the eigenvectors. Closed-form expressions for the system's response in the form of the variance v∞ of the observable responding to both Gaussian noise and periodic forcing reveal a general amplification law v∞=v0(1+G(K)) with nonnormal gain G(K)∝K2 represented in universal phase diagrams. By reanalyzing a model of remote earthquake triggering based on breaking of Hamiltonian symmetry, we illustrate how our two-parameter framework significantly expands both the range of conditions under which amplification can occur and the magnitude of the resulting response, revealing a broad pseudocritical regime associated with large κ that previous single-parameter approaches overlooked. Similarly, in the non-Hermitian extensions of quantum optics provided by forward four-wave mixing experiments, we show the presence of a counterintuitive gain-from-loss effect that directly manifests nonnormal amplification in a propagating-wave setting. This predicts the possibility to engineer transient optical energy amplification without the need for true lasing or exact PT-symmetry breaking. Our framework applies to many other physical, natural, and social systems and offers diagnostic tools to distinguish true critical behavior from transient amplification driven by nonnormality.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (24)

  1. M. I. Maturana, C. Meisel, K. Dell, P. J. Karoly, W. D'souza, D. B. Grayden, A. N. Burkitt, P. Jiruska, J. Kudlacek, J. Hlinka et al., Critical slowing down as a biomarker for seizure susceptibility, Nat. Commun. 11, 2172 (2020).
  2. J. Royer, B. C. Bernhardt, S. Larivière, E. Gleichgerrcht, B. J. Vorderwülbecke, S. Vulliémoz, and L. Bonilha, Epilepsy and brain network hubs, Epilepsia 63, 537 (2022).
  3. S. Tang and S. Allesina, Reactivity and stability of large ecosystems, Front. Ecol. Evol. 2, 21 (2014).
  4. M. Hirota, M. Holmgren, E. H. Van Nes, and M. Scheffer, Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions, Science 334, 232 (2011).
  5. D. Sornette, Why Stock Markets Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2017), Vol. 49, 2nd printing.
  6. L. Busto-Moner, J. Morival, H. Ren, A. Fahim, Z. Reitz, T. L. Downing, and E. L. Read, Stochastic modeling reveals kinetic heterogeneity in post-replication DNA methylation, PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007195 (2020).
  7. M. Scheffer, J. Bascompte, W. Brock, V. Brovkin, S. R. Carpenter, V. Dakos, H. Held, E. H. Van Nes, M. Rietkerk, and G. Sugihara, Early-warning signals for critical transition, Nature (London) 461, 53 (2009).
  8. V. Troude, S. Lera, K. Wu, and D. Sornette, Pseudo-bifurcations in stochastic nonnormal systems, arXiv:2412.01833.
  9. M. Embree and L. N. Trefethen, Spectra and Pseudospectra: The Behavior of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2005).
  10. B. K. Murphy and K. D. Miller, Balanced amplification: A new mechanism of selective amplification of neural activity patterns, Neuron 61, 635 (2009).
  11. J. D. O’Brien, K. A. Oliveira, J. P. Gleeson, and M. Asllani, Hierarchical route to the emergence of leader nodes in real-world networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023117 (2021).
  12. L. N. Trefethen, A. E. Trefethen, S. C. Reddy, and T. A. Driscoll, Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues, Science 261, 578 (1993).
  13. V. Troude and D. Sornette, Accelerated transition rates in generalized Kramers problems for non-variational, nonnormal system, arXiv:2502.05251.
  14. E. Glötzl and O. Richters, Helmholtz decomposition and potential functions for n-dimensional analytic vector fields, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 525, 127138 (2023).
  15. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/kdgw-shxf for derivations details and further explanation.
  16. H. Charan, O. Gendelman, I. Procaccia, and Y. Sheffer, Giant amplification of small perturbations in frictional amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. E 101, 062902 (2020).
  17. F. F. Pollitz, R. S. Stein, V. Sevilgen, and R. Bürgmann, The 11 April 2012 East Indian Ocean earthquake triggered large aftershocks worldwide, Nature (London) 490, 250 (2012).
  18. M. M. Mendoza, A. Ghosh, and S. S. Rai, Dynamic triggering of small local earthquakes in the central Himalaya, Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9581 (2016).
  19. R. T. O’Malley, D. Mondal, C. Goldfinger, and M. J. Behrenfeld, Evidence of systematic triggering at teleseismic distances following large earthquakes, Sci. Rep. 8, 11611 (2018).
  20. C. Qi, M. Wang, G. Kocharyan, A. Kunitskikh, and Z. Wang, Dynamically triggered seismicity on a tectonic scale: A review, Deep Underground Sci. Eng. 3, 1 (2024).
  21. H. Charan, A. Pomyalov, and I. Procaccia, Generic mechanism for remote triggering of earthquakes, Phys. Rev. E 104, 044903 (2021).
  22. A. Krasnok, N. Nefedkin, and A. Alù, Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 63, 110 (2021).
  23. R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys. 14, 11 (2018).
  24. Y. Jiang, Y. Mei, Y. Zuo, Y. Zhai, J. Li, J. Wen, and S. Du, Anti-parity-time symmetric optical four-wave mixing in cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 193604 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation