Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Boson-fermion universality of mesoscopic entanglement fluctuations in free systems

Cunzhong Lou1,2,*, Chushun Tian2,*, Zhixing Zou3,2, Tao Shi2, and Lih-King Lim1,†

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: lihking@zju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023297 – Published 24 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jhlh-pcm9

Abstract

Entanglement fluctuations associated with the Schrödinger evolution of wave functions offer a unique perspective on various fundamental issues ranging from quantum thermalization to state preparation in quantum devices. Very recently, a subset of the present authors showed that, in a class of free-fermion lattice models and interacting spin chains, entanglement dynamics enters into a new regime at long time, with entanglement probes displaying persistent temporal fluctuations, whose statistics falls into the seemingly disparate paradigm of mesoscopic fluctuations in condensed-matter physics. This motivates us to revisit here entanglement dynamics of a canonical bosonic model in many-body physics, i.e., a coupled harmonic oscillator chain. We find that when the system is driven out of equilibrium, the long-time entanglement dynamics exhibits strictly the same statistical behaviors as those of free-fermion models. Specifically, irrespective of entanglement probes and microscopic parameters, the statistical distribution of entanglement fluctuations is flanked by asymmetric tails: sub-Gaussian for upward fluctuations and sub-Gamma for downward; moreover, the variance exhibits a crossover from the scaling ∼1/L to ∼LA3/L2 as the subsystem size LA increases (L the total system size). This insensitivity to the particle statistics, dubbed boson-fermion universality, is contrary to the common wisdom that statistical phenomena of a many-body nature depend strongly on particle statistics. Together with our previous work, the present study indicates rich fluctuation phenomena in long-time entanglement dynamics that await in-depth exploration.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. P. W. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: a new kind of insulator? Mater. Res. Bull. 8, 153 (1973).
  2. H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: identification of topological order in non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008).
  3. P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2015).
  4. A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. (NY) 303, 2 (2003).
  5. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010).
  6. R. Islam et al., Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system, Nature (London) 528, 77 (2015).
  7. K. J. Satzinger et al., Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor, Science 374, 1237 (2021).
  8. G. Semeghini et al., Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  9. M. K. Joshi et al., Exploring large-scale entanglement in quantum simulation, Nature (London) 624, 539 (2023).
  10. A. H. Karamlou et al., Probing entanglement in a 2D hard-core Bose-Hubbard lattice, Nature (London) 629, 561 (2024).
  11. A. M. Kaufman et al., Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system, Science 353, 794 (2016).
  12. H. Bernien et al., Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  13. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018).
  14. D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
  15. S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winters, Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics, Nat. Phys. 2, 754 (2006).
  16. L. Vidmar, L. Hackl, E. Bianchi, and M. Rigol, Entanglement entropy of eigenstates of quadratic fermionic Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 020601 (2017).
  17. Y. O. Nakagawa, M. Watanabe, H. Fujita, and S. Sugiura, Universality in volume-law entanglement of scrambled pure quantum states, Nat. Commun. 9, 1635 (2018).
  18. X.-H. Yu, Z. Gong, and J. I. Cirac, Free-fermion page curve: Canonical typicality and dynamical emergence, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013044 (2023).
  19. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vidmar, Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states, PRX Quantum 3, 030201 (2022).
  20. F. H. L. Essler and M. Fagotti, Quench dynamics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064002.
  21. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P04010.
  22. C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 056001 (2016).
  23. L. D'Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  24. F. Borgonovi, F. Izrailev, L. Santos, and V. Zelevinsky, Quantum chaos and thermalization in isolated systems of interacting particles, Phys. Rep. 626, 1 (2016).
  25. D. Faiez, D. Šafránek, J. M. Deutsch, and A. Aguirre, Typical and extreme entropies of long-lived isolated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 101, 052101 (2020).
  26. J. von Neumann, Beweis des ergodensatzes und desh-theorems in der neuen mechanik, Z. Phys. 57, 30 (1929).
  27. J. von Neumann, Proof of the ergodic theorem and the H-theorem in quantum mechanics, Eur. Phys. J. H 35, 201 (2010).
  28. S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì, Long-time behavior of macroscopic quantum systems, Eur. Phys. J. H 35, 173 (2010).
  29. R. Modak, V. Alba, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement revivals as a probe of scrambling in finite quantum systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2020) 083110.
  30. M. B. Plenio, J. Hartley, and J. Eisert, Dynamics and manipulation of entanglement in coupled harmonic systems with many degrees of freedom, New J. Phys. 6, 36 (2004).
  31. L.-K. Lim, C. Lou, and C. Tian, Mesoscopic fluctuations in entanglement dynamics, Nat. Commun. 15, 1775 (2024).
  32. S. Boucheron, G. Lugosi, and P. Massart, Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2013).
  33. S. Ping, Introduction to Wave Scattering, Localization and Mesoscopic Phenomena, 2nd ed. (Springer, Germany, 2006).
  34. E. Akkermans and G. Montambaux, Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007).
  35. C. L. Kane, Telegraph noise and fractional statistics in the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 226802 (2003).
  36. E. Grosfeld, S. H. Simon, and A. Stern, Switching noise as a probe of statistics in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 226803 (2006).
  37. B. Rosenow and S. H. Simon, Telegraph noise and the Fabry-Perot quantum Hall interferometer, Phys. Rev. B 85, 201302 (2012).
  38. I. Peschel and M.-C. Chung, Density matrices for a chain of oscillators, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 8419 (1999).
  39. K. Audenaert, J. Eisert, M. B. Plenio, and R. F. Werner, Entanglement properties of the harmonic chain, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042327 (2002).
  40. A. Botero and B. Reznik, Spatial structures and localization of vacuum entanglement in the linear harmonic chain, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052329 (2004).
  41. M. B. Plenio, J. Eisert, J. Dreißig, and M. Cramer, Entropy, entanglement, and area: Analytical results for harmonic lattice systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 060503 (2005).
  42. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  43. M. G. Nezhadhaghighi and M. A. Rajabpour, Entanglement dynamics in short- and long-range harmonic oscillators, Phys. Rev. B 90, 205438 (2014).
  44. A. Coser, E. Tonni, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement negativity after a global quantum quench, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P12017.
  45. J. S. Cotler, M. P. Hertzberg, M. Mezei, and M. T. Mueller, Entanglement growth after a global quench in free scalar field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 166.
  46. L. Hackl, E. Bianchi, R. Modak, and M. Rigol, Entanglement production in bosonic systems: Linear and logarithmic growth, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032321 (2018).
  47. V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Entanglement dynamics after quantum quenches in generic integrable systems, SciPost Phys. 4, 017 (2018).
  48. G. Adesso and F. Illuminati, Entanglement in continuous-variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 7821 (2007).
  49. J. Williamson, On the algebraic problem concerning the normal forms of linear dynamical systems, Am. J. Math. 58, 141 (1936).
  50. I. Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, L205 (2003).
  51. G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003).
  52. I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Reduced density matrices and entanglement entropy in free lattice models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 504003 (2009).
  53. T. Shi, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, Variational study of fermionic and bosonic systems with non-Gaussian states: Theory and applications, Ann. Phys. 390, 245 (2018).
  54. T. Shi, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, Variational approach for many-body systems at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180602 (2020).
  55. N. J. Higham, Functions of Matrices (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008).
  56. J. Schachenmayer, B. P. Lanyon, C. F. Roos, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth in quench dynamics with variable range interactions, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031015 (2013).
  57. A. M. Samoilenko, Quasiperiodic oscillations, Scholarpedia 2, 1783 (2007).
  58. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1989).
  59. M. Kac, Statistical Independence in Probability, Analysis and Number Theory (Mathematical Association of America, Rahway, NJ, 1959).
  60. M. Ledoux, The Concentration of Measure Phenomenon (AMS, Providence, 2001).
  61. T. Tao, Topics in Random Matrix Theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island, 2012), Vol. 132.
  62. V. D. Milman and G. Schechtman, Asymptotic Theory of Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982).
  63. P. Fang, L. Zhao, and C. Tian, Concentration-of-measure theory for structures and fluctuations of waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 140603 (2018).
  64. M. Isoard, N. Milazzo, N. Pavloff, and O. Giraud, Bipartite and tripartite entanglement in a Bose-Einstein acoustic black hole, Phys. Rev. A 104, 063302 (2021).
  65. J. Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nat. Phys. 12, 959 (2016).
  66. Y. Shi et al., Quantum simulation of Hawking radiation and curved spacetime with a superconducting on-chip black hole, Nat. Commun. 14, 3263 (2023).
  67. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Quantum quenches in extended systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P06008.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation